All that wheezes is not asthma. Paradoxical vocal cord movement presenting as severe acute asthma requiring ventilatory support

Spirometry and provocation tests for vocal fold dysfunction diagnosis: a retrospective case series

AIMS Vocal cord dysfunction (VCD) is characterised by paradoxical inspiratory laryngeal motion and is often misdiagnosed as asthma. Definitive diagnosis of VCD is difficult, because laryngoscopy is positive only during symptomatic episodes or upon provocation with exercise or inhaled irritants. The aims of the study were to better characterise the symptomatology of patients with VCD and to evaluate the potential usefulness of less-invasive diagnostic tools, namely provocation tests and spirometry. METHODS Retrospective case series of 84 patients with a typical clinical history of VCD, in whom at least one of the three following diagnostic tests were performed: laryngoscopy, provocation testing, or spirometry. RESULTS The mean age of the patients was 51 years and 74% were women. The principal comorbidities were rhinosinusitis (60%), gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (56%) and atopy (54%). Diagnosis of VCD was confirmed in 73/84 cases (87%), by laryngoscopy (8%), spirometry (84%) and/or provocation tests (68%). CONCLUSIONS VCD remains an underdiagnosed condition. A negative finding on laryngoscopy can lead to false negative diagnosis if it is done when the patient is asymptomatic. Here we show that a clinical suspicion of VCD, evoked by medical history, can be confirmed in many cases by less invasive diagnostic tools such as spirometry and provocation tests. Future well-conducted prospective case-control studies are needed to draw firmer conclusions and to improve the diagnostic accuracy of this condition.

The Ability of Patient-Symptom Questionnaires to Differentiate PVFMD From Asthma

OBJECTIVES

Goals of the current study were to (1) conduct initial validation of a new Paradoxical Vocal Fold Movement Disorder Screening Questionnaire (PVFMD-SQ); (2) determine if symptom-based questionnaires can discriminate between patients with confirmed PVFMD and those with diagnosed uncontrolled asthma without clinical suspicion for PVFMD; and (3) determine if a new questionnaire with diagnostic specificity could be created from a combination of significant items on previously validated questionnaires.

METHODS

This is a prospective, case-controlled study of patients with PVFMD only and asthma only, who completed five questionnaires: Dyspnea Index, Reflux Symptom Index, Voice Handicap Index-10, Sino-Nasal Questionnaire, and PVFMD-SQ. Factor analysis was completed on the new PVFMD-SQ, and the discrimination ability of selected factors was assessed by receiver operating characteristics curve. The factor with the greatest discriminatory ability was selected to create one diagnostic questionnaire, and scores for each participant were calculated to estimate how well the factor correlated with a PVFMD or asthma diagnosis. Mean scores on all questionnaires were compared to test their discriminatory ability.

RESULTS

Patients with PVFMD showed greater voice handicap and reflux symptoms than patients with asthma. A 15-item one-factor questionnaire was developed from the original PVFMD-SQ, with a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 73% for diagnosing asthma versus PVFMD. The combined questionnaires resulted in four factors, none of which showed discriminatory ability between PVFMD and asthma.

CONCLUSION

This study represents the first time that a patient symptom-based screening tool has shown diagnostic sensitivity to differentiate PVFMD from asthma in a cohort of symptomatic patients.

Botulinum toxin injection in laryngeal dyspnea

Data, regarding the use of botulinum toxin (BT-A) in laryngeal dyspnea, are scarce, coming from some cases reports in the literature, including Vocal fold paralysis, laryngeal dystonia, vocal cord dysfunction also called paradoxical motion of the vocal fold (PMVF), and post-neuroleptic laryngeal dyskinesia. There is no consensus regarding the muscles and the doses to inject. The aim of this study is to present a retrospective review of patients treated in our ENT Department by BT-A injection in this indication. This study is a retrospective study describing patients who underwent an injection of botulinum toxin for laryngeal dyspnea in the ENT Department from 2005 to 2015 years. The inclusion criteria were a dyspnea associated with a laryngeal dysfunction, confirmed by flexible fiberoptic nasopharyngolaryngoscopy. Information concerning the causes of the dyspnea, the botulinum toxin BT-A injections procedure, post-injection follow-up, and respiratory outcome were collected for all patients included. In the group of 13 patients included, the main cause identified as principal factor linked with the short breath was: a bilateral VF paralysis (Patel et al., Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130:686-689, 7), laryngeal dystonia (Balkissoon and Kenn, Semin Respir Crit Care Med 33:595-605, 2), Anxiety syndrome associated with unilateral vocal fold paralysis or asthma (Marcinow et al., Laryngoscope 124:1425-1430, 3), and an isolated asthma (Zwirner et al., Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 254:242-245, 1). Nine out of the thirteen patients were improved by the injections. A BT-A-induced stable benefit for four patients led them to stop the injections in the follow-up. Good outcome was observed in five other patients (main cause: bilateral VP paralysis), allowing a progressive lengthening of the delay between BT-A injections. Four patients did not report a positive risk/benefit ratio after BT-A injections; two of them (with bilateral VF paralysis), because of respiratory side effects and lack of benefit without the side effects for the two others. This failure of effect was not related with BT-A doses injected. This study provides support for using BT-A injections as a symptomatic treatment of periodic laryngeal dyspnea, regardless of the etiologic context. From our data, we suggest that a small starting dose (of around 4 U BT-A Botox^®) could be enough for a first injection to obtain a good benefit. The target muscle should be determined by the EMG analysis.

Vocal cord dysfunction in bronchial asthma. A review article

INTRODUCTION

Vocal cord dysfunction (VCD) is a condition in which the larynx exhibits paradoxical vocal cord adduction during inspiration, resulting in extra-thoracic variable airway obstruction. It has been described as a mimic of asthma, and hence, many patients with VCD are diagnosed as difficult-to-treat asthma and suffer significant morbidity as such.

METHODS

In completing this review we searched the literature using the database from MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cochrane library using the medical terms "vocal cord/vocal cord dysfunction and asthma".

RESULTS

During the last few decades, many publications have described many conditions that may cause or coexist with VCD. In addition, the association between asthma and VCD was recognized. In this narrative review we provide an overview of the current knowledge about VCD and, in particular its relationship to asthma. We also provide a pragmatic diagnostic algorithm and treatment options based on our collaborative multi-disciplinary management of patients attending a difficult to control asthma clinic.

CONCLUSION

Most VCD patients present with inadequately controlled asthma rather than the typical symptoms described in association with VCD. Careful diagnostic strategy as outlined in this review may be helpful in confirming the diagnosis.

Vocal cord dysfunction, paradoxic vocal fold motion, or laryngomalacia? Our understanding requires an interdisciplinary approach

This article presents disorders of periodic occurrence of laryngeal obstruction (POLO) resulting in noisy breathing and dyspnea and a variety of secondary symptoms. Included in this classification are glottic disorders, such as paradoxic vocal fold movement and vocal cord dysfunction. The supraglottic disorder, termed, intermittent arytenoid region prolapse or laryngomalacia, is also reviewed. Three categories of POLO are defined as irritant, exertional, and psychological.

Irritant vocal cord dysfunction and occupational bronchial asthma: differential diagnosis in a health care worker

OBJECTIVES

Vocal cord dysfunction (VCD) is an uncommon respiratory disease characterized by the paradoxical adduction of vocal cords during inspiration, that may mimic bronchial asthma. The pathogenesis of VCD has not been clearly defined but it is possible to recognize non-psychologic and psychologic causes. The majority of patients are female but, interestingly, a high incidence of VCD has been documented in health care workers. A misdiagnosis with asthma leads to hospitalisation, unnecessary use of systemic steroids with related adverse effects, and sometimes tracheostomy and intubation. In a subset of VCD patients, the disease can be attributed to occupational or environmental exposure to inhaled irritants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We report the case of a 45-year-old woman, working as a nurse, who complained of wheezing, cough, dyspnoea related to inhalation of irritating agents (isopropylic alcohol, formaldehyde, peracetic acid). She underwent chest radiography, pulmonary function assessment both in the presence and in the absence of symptoms, bronchial provocation with methacholine and bronchodilation test with salbutamol to recognize asthma's features, allergy evaluation by skin prick tests and patch tests and video-laryngoscopy.

RESULTS

VCD diagnosis was made on the basis of video-laryngoscopy, that visualized the paradoxical motion of the vocal cords during symptoms, in the absence of other pathologic processes.

CONCLUSIONS

This case fulfils the proposed criteria for the diagnosis of irritant VCD (IVCD). This is the first report of VCD onset following exposure to several irritants: formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, sopropylic alcohol, peracetic acid-hydrogen peroxide mixture. These substances are used as cleaning and antiseptic agents in healthcare settings and some ones can also be found in many indoor environments. A correct diagnosis is important both to give the appropriate treatment and for medical legal implications.

Paradoxical vocal fold motion dysfunction in asthma patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Paradoxical vocal fold motion dysfunction (PVFMD) is a disorder of the larynx characterized by adduction of the vocal cords during the respiratory cycle leading to symptoms of extrathoracic airway obstruction. PVFMD mimics asthma and patients with PVFMD (PVFMD+) are often diagnosed incorrectly as refractory asthma and receive unnecessary treatment. This study determined the prevalence of PVFMD in asthma patients and described the relationship between asthma and PVFMD.

METHODS

A descriptive study of 94 asthmatic patients and 40 control subjects, all of whom were examined via laryngoscopy and had pulmonary function tests were performed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of PVFMD was 19% (n = 18) in the asthmatic group and 5% (n = 2) in the control group (P < 0.001). No relationship was found between presence of PVFMD, asthma attacks and asthma severity (P > 0.05). Laryngopharyngeal reflux and allergy were significantly more prevalent in the PVFMD+ group than in the group without PVFMD (PVFMD-) (P < 0.05). The most common symptoms in the PVFMD+ patients were difficulty in breathing (88%), inspiratory stridor (66%) and a choking sensation (50%) and the most common symptoms in PVFMD- asthmatic patients were cough (63%), dyspnoea (55%) and wheezing (51%).

CONCLUSIONS

Asthma seems to facilitate the formation of the paradoxical dysfunction in the larynx as the prevalence of PVFMD in asthma patients is significantly higher than in patients with out asthma.

The successful treatment of vocal cord dysfunction with low-dose amitriptyline - including literature review

Vocal cord dysfunction is an asthma mimic. Diagnosis of this condition requires a high index of suspicion if unnecessary treatments are to be avoided. We describe the findings from our case series of 62 patients (age range 18 to 90 years) in whom the diagnosis was confirmed. Our findings show low-dose amitriptyline to be very effective in 90% of cases, with rapid benefit for those patients whose symptoms had been present for less than 12 months. This treatment, in conjunction with psycho-therapeutic and behavioral therapies may reduce unnecessary hospital admissions. Future studies may show whether this treatment regimen may reduce demands on the speech and language therapists.

[Expiratory vocal cord dysfunction? Case report and review of the literature]

Wood and Milgrom defined vocal cord dysfunction (VCD) as paradoxical adduction of the vocal folds during inspiration or during inspiration and expiration. We describe the case of a patient with attacks of dyspnea with an isolated expiratory paradoxical adduction of the vocal folds. A review of the literature reveals many factors associated with VCD. Because of the similar risk factors and order of events concerning VCD, we believe that even expiratory laryngeal dysfunctions could be denoted as subtypes of VCD.

Laryngeal dyskinesia: an under-recognized condition

OBJECTIVE

To perform a review of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnosis and management of laryngeal dyskinesia.

METHODS

A search of the Medline database from 1966 to 2003 was performed. A manual search was performed of the references of each article.

RESULTS

Laryngeal dyskinesia is a respiratory condition characterized by abnormal vocal cord adduction and airflow limitation at the level of the larynx in the absence of evidence of local organic disease. It typically presents to the ED as wheeze, stridor or apparent upper airway obstruction. It occurs across a wide age range, is more common in females, and is typically associated with a range of underlying psychopathologies. Diagnosis is often delayed and unnecessary emergency treatment such as intubation and tracheostomy is not uncommon. Patients are commonly on high-dose steroids and are frequent users of the health-care system, often over prolonged periods. There are multiple diagnostic features on history and examination, and flexible nasendoscopy of the vocal cords in the ED can be used to confirm the diagnosis. Treatment options in the ED include sedation and use of continuous positive airway pressure. Long-term treatment involves a multidisciplinary approach involving respiratory physicians/ear, nose and throat surgeons, speech therapy and psychiatry.

CONCLUSION

Laryngeal dyskinesia remains an under-appreciated cause of respiratory presentations to the ED. Emergency physicians are ideally placed to make the diagnosis and initiate appropriate referral for specific therapies that have a high level of success.

Paradoxical vocal cord motion--a dangerous imitator of airway emergencies

We report a case of stridor in a 32 year old woman. Initial laryngoscopy demonstrated adduction of the vocal cords on inspiration, which reverted to abduction on induction of general anaesthesia. The airway was structurally normal. The most likely diagnosis was paradoxical vocal cord motion, a condition in which psychological stress can precipitate respiratory symptoms and signs due to involuntary adduction of the vocal cords during inspiration. Its importance to the anaesthetist lies in its ability to masquerade as a serious airway or respiratory condition.

Vocal cord dysfunction: an uncommon cause of stridor

We present a case of vocal cord dysfunction syndrome (VCDS) presenting as acute angioedema of the upper airway. The presentation of this syndrome and its differentiation from other upper airway conditions that require far different and more urgent treatment is discussed.

Are oral contraceptive use and pregnancy complications risk factors for atopic disorders among offspring?

In utero programming of atopic manifestations has been suggested. We investigated the association between oral contraceptive (OC) use before, and complications during pregnancy (CDP) and asthma, along with other atopic manifestations. The study is based on neonates from Kingston and St Andrew, a geographic subcohort from the Jamaican Perinatal Morbidity, Mortality Survey conducted in 1986-1987. Information on OC use and CDP was extracted from maternal interviews and medical records. In a follow up in 1997-1998, via interviews with mothers, trained nurses collected information on asthma/wheezing, coughing, eczema, and hay fever. Data, specific to this paper, from birth and 11-12 yr of age was available for a total of 1040 of the 1720 members of the geographic subcohort. Using logistic regression, controlling for confounders, we estimated adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). For asthma or wheezing, and coughing, aOR for OC use were 1.81 (95% CI: 1.25-2.61), and 2.72 (95% CI: 1.41-5.24), respectively. CDP was only shown to be a significant risk factor for hay fever. Additionally, a higher number of older siblings were protective for hay fever. The results suggest that asthma in childhood may be programmed in utero.

Severe obstructive airway disorders and diseases: vocal fold dysfunction

Vocal Fold Dysfunction is a syndrome characterized by abnormal adduction of the focal folds during inspiration and is the cause of a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations ranging from mild inspiratory stridor to an inability to move any air. Patients present with varying degrees of intermittent respiratory difficulty, the most severe caused by intense laryngospasm. Distinguishing Vocal Fold Dysfunction from Refractory Asthma is important to avoid unnecessary pharmacotherapy and intubation. The diagnosis of Vocal Fold Dysfunction can only be made with certainty by flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy while the patient is symptomatic. Pulmonary function studies and a lack of response to bronchodilators may provide clues to the diagnosis. Most patients with the condition can be managed by speech therapy and the use of breathing strategies that eliminate the abnormal vocal fold movement. Chronic laryngeal irritation may be a trigger for Vocal Fold Dysfunction and conditions such as laryngopharyngeal reflux disease should be aggressively managed in this patient population.

Concurrent laryngeal abnormalities in patients with paradoxical vocal fold dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to investigate the presence of laryngeal abnormalities is patients with paradoxical vocal fold dysfunction (PVFD).

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

A retrospective chart review was performed of patients referred for evaluation of paradoxical vocal fold dysfunction between July 2002 and December 2002. The patients completed questionnaires at the time of the office visit. Data collected from the medical record included age, gender, duration of symptoms before evaluation, asthma, gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, and laryngoscopic findings. Exercise stress test was performed when suitable. The diagnosis of PVFD was made based on patient history and laryngoscopy.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were identified. There was a 27:3 (90%) female predominance, and mean age of presentation at was 28 years (range, 12 to 67 years). The median time from the onset of respiratory symptoms to diagnosis was 4.5 years (range, 0.5 to 30 years). Of the 30 patients, 17 (56%) had asthma, 16 had laryngeal findings suggestive of gastroesophageal reflex disease, 4 (12%) had laryngoscopic findings of chronic laryngitis, and 10 (33%) had additional findings, including laryngomalacia, vocal fold motion impairment, sulcus vocalis, nodules, and subglottic stenosis, mostly in the exercise-induced group.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant laryngeal abnormalities are present in a many patients with PVFD, particularly in those with exercise-induced symptoms. Laryngoscopy is important in the management of these patients.

Acute asphyxia caused by Gerhardt's syndrome associated with asthma

Vocal cord dysfunction (VCD) has been frequently discussed as confounding the diagnosis of asthma, and it is recommended to examine vocal cord function in cases of difficult asthma. However, there is also strong evidence that asthma may be associated with VCD, sometimes masquerading as exercise-induced asthma. Gerhardt's syndrome frequently induces severe acute respiratory distress requiring ventilatory support, and this condition might be mistaken for a severe acute asthma attack. Here, a case of bilateral paralysis of the vocal cords, which was associated with asthma, is described.

Multidimensional voice program analysis (MDVP) and the diagnosis of pediatric vocal cord dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Vocal cord dysfunction (VCD) can present with signs and symptoms that mimic asthma. This may lead to unnecessary pharmacologic treatment or more invasive measures including intubation. Presently, the diagnosis of VCD can only be confirmed when a patient is symptomatic, via pulmonary function testing (PFT) or visualization of adduction of the vocal cords during inspiration by direct laryngoscopy.

OBJECTIVE

Multidimensional Voice Program (MDVP) analysis. a computer program which analyzes various aspects of voice, can detect abnormal voice patterns of patients with upper airway pathology. We determined whether MDVP analysis was useful in the diagnosis of VCD.

METHODS

We conducted chart reviews of patients referred to our department from 1995 to 1998 with the presumed diagnosis of VCD who had undergone MDVP analysis. The diagnosis of VCD was based on the presenting history, PFT results, laryngoscopy results, as well as voice evaluation conducted by a speech-language pathologist. We analyzed six consecutive patients referred for this investigation. We delineated common trends in the variables measured on MDVP analysis in VCD patients. and compared these with controls and other vocal cord pathology.

RESULTS

Five cases of possible VCD had abnormalities in the MDVP variable of soft phonation index (SPI). All five also had abnormalities in the variation in fundamental frequency (vFo). In one case, MDVP analysis was conducted pre- and posttreatment for VCD, and SPI and vFo both normalized. In a sixth case of possible VCD. the diagnosis was not confirmed as the patient had normal PFTs and laryngoscopy. MDVP analysis was normal in this individual. The pattern of abnormal SPI and vFo was not seen in a group of normal controls or in patients with vocal cord nodules.

CONCLUSIONS

MDVP analysis may be a useful tool when diagnosingVCD, as well as in evaluating response to treatment.

[Episodic laryngeal dysfunction]

Episodic laryngeal dysfunction (ELD), also known as paradoxical vocal cord dysfunction or laryngeal dyskinesia, is characterized by abnormal closure of the vocal cords during inspiration (and sometimes at the very start of expiration). It can manifest in different ways depending on the patient's age. In the newborn, it is usually associated with stridor restricted to the inspiratory breath following crying, and the natural history is always one of rapid resolution. Occasionally, a more severe form presents with intense dyspnea and marked inspiratory stridor in a baby that usually has extensive gastroesophageal reflux which has not been treated adequately enough to improve the dyspnea or the associated vasovagal attacks. A tracheotomy may be necessary. It is rare for this disease to present between the ages of 2 and 8 years. Thereafter, it may present as a form of pseudo asthma resistant to bronchodilators and anti-inflammatory drugs. The dyspnea can be very severe and lead the family to seek hospital admission, at least during the initial episodes. There is a female preponderance. The key to making the diagnosis is the complete reversibility of the patient's symptoms when they are distracted. Exertion asthma can be mimicked by forms of ELD that occur only by effort (apart from the profile of the lung function tests). There may be significant gastroesophageal reflux. Medical intervention (hospitalization and tracheotomy) must be avoided, treatment being essentially behavioral. Finally, some cases of paradoxical adduction of the vocal cords have been described with the use of neuroleptics, brain stem compression, cortical lesions and, much more rarely, motoneuron disease. This diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion, particularly in patients with asthma whose presentation or clinical course with treatment is atypical.

Atypical expiratory flow volume curve in an asthmatic patient with vocal cord dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Vocal cord dysfunction can coexist with or masquerade as asthma. Vocal cord dysfunction, when coexistent with asthma, contributes substantially to the refractory nature of the respiratory problem.

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of an asthmatic patient with vocal cord dysfunction and a previously unreported unique expiratory flow volume curve.

RESULTS

A 16-year-old female, known to have asthma, developed increased frequency of her asthma exacerbations. Spirometry, during symptoms, showed an extrathoracic airway obstruction with a reproducible unique abrupt drop and rise in the expiratory flow volume loop. Laryngoscopy showed adduction of the vocal cords during inspiration and expiration.

CONCLUSIONS

We report a unique expiratory flow volume curve in an asthmatic with vocal cord dysfunction that resolved with panting maneuvers. Speech and psychological counseling helped prevent future attacks.

Wheezing and vocal cord dysfunction mimicking asthma

Vocal cord dysfunction (VCD) is a respiratory disorder characterized by paradoxical closure of the vocal cords during the respiratory cycle leading to obstructive airway symptoms. The presenting symptoms vary from stridor to wheezing. VCD may coexist with asthma or masquerade as asthma. Misdiagnosis of VCD as asthma leads to inappropriate use of systemic steroids with its adverse effects, frequent emergency department visits, hospitalization, and, rarely, intubation and tracheostomy. Attenuation of the inspiratory flow volume loop on spirometry is suggestive of VCD. Laryngoscopic demonstration of the paradoxical vocal cord movements during an acute attack is the gold standard for the diagnosis of VCD. Patient education, speech therapy, and psychologic counseling are the therapeutic tools for treatment.