Long-term survival following emergency abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Survival of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in the West of Ireland: Do Prognostic Indicators of Outcome Exist?

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) is a demanding vascular surgical problem and the cause of significant morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors that influence outcome. Over 6 years, 42 ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms were operated on with a mean diameter of 7.2 cm. RAAA was defined as free intraperitoneal rupture. Data were collected retrospectively from hospital medical records. The male:female ratio was 8:1 and the mean age was 74 years (range 55–89). Fifteen were in hypovolemic shock and 27 patients were clinically stable. The perioperative mortality rate for the 15 shocked patients was 60% (9 patients) and the 1-year cumulative survival rate was 33%. The perioperative mortality rate for the 27 clinically stable patients was 40% (11 patients) and the 1-year cumulative survival rate was 56%. Survival curves were constructed for these groups to compare male versus female, age =70 versus age <70, shocked versus stable, and preoperative hemoglobin (Hb) =10 vs >10. No patient with preoperative cardiac arrest survived more than 24 hours. With VassarStats, the confidence interval for age, gender, hemodynamic status, and preoperative Hb were calculated. The standard weighted mean analysis by ANOVA gave a p value of <0.001. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 47% (20 of 42) and the 1-year mortality rate was 52% (22 of 42). Male patients over 70 years with RAAA in hypovolemic shock with low Hb have a higher 30-day mortality rate and few survive more than 1 year. The study suggests that each of these 4 parameters separately was not a strong prognostic indicator. Collectively, however, they strongly influence the prognosis of patients with RAAA. These findings strengthen the case for selective treatment for RAAA.

Outcome after open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients>80 years old: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of open repair in the management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) in patients>80 years old is questioned by the perceived high operative risk of these patients. This issue has been investigated in the present meta-analysis of observational studies.

METHODS

Studies on open repair of RAAA in patients>80 years old were identified in July 2010. The immediate and intermediate results were expressed as pooled proportions with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Linear regression and meta-regression were performed to evaluate the impact of variables on the immediate postoperative mortality.

RESULTS

Pooled analysis of 29 studies showed that the risk of immediate postoperative mortality in patients>80 years old was significantly higher than in younger patients (risk ratio 1.440, 95%CI 1.365-1.519, I2 36.8%, P=0.002; risk difference 19.4%, 95% CI 16.4-22.4%, I2 38.8%, P=0.019). Pooled analysis of 36 studies showed an immediate postoperative mortality rate of 59.2% (95% CI 55.7-62.5, I2 35.62). Immediate postoperative mortality in patients<80 years old positively correlated with that of patients>80 years old (rho: 0.686, P<0.0001). Intermediate survival data of 111 operative survivors were available from six studies, and their pooled survival rates at 1-, 2-, and 3-year were 82.4, 75.6, and 68.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate and intermediate survival rates of patients>80 years old after open repair of RAAA are acceptable. These findings suggest a more confident approach toward emergency repair of RAAA in the very elderly.

Repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms by endovascular techniques

Emergency EVR for ruptured AAA is now technically feasible, and several reports with small numbers have appeared in the literature from major centers suggesting that the results may be the same as or better than seen with open repair. The immediate priority is avoidance of over-resuscitation together with the rapid transfer of the patient to CT and then to the operating theater. Because of the learning curve involved, these cases should be attempted only by major centers that have extensive elective endovascular experience. The requirement for 24-hour availability of surgeons and radiologists trained in endovascular techniques places an enormous strain on vascular and radiologic staff and is achievable only in major centers with large teams of doctors. These issues raise important questions about the delivery of vascular services and whether all cases of ruptured aortic aneurysm should be transferred to major vascular centers. The operating theater staff and other support persons need training in endovascular techniques and in rapid deployment of an aortic occlusion balloon. A wide selection of devices, guidewires, and catheters must be immediately available in the operating theater. The ideal way to establish the role of EVR for ruptured AAA would be a randomized trial, but there might be logistic difficulties in recruiting sufficient numbers in major vascular centers, particularly as screening for AAA becomes more common and reduces the number of cases. There also are ethical issues as to whether these patients can give informed consent for involvement in such a trial. The alternative is for major centers to continue to develop their endovascular programs, to do more cases, and to compare the results with historical controls undergoing open repair.

Ruptured aneurysm of the infrarenal abdominal aorta: impact of age and postoperative complications on mortality

Between 1985 and 2000, a total of 871 patients underwent surgical treatment for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), including 98 (11.2%) presenting with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAA). An optimized operative protocol was used to treat 77 RAAA starting in January 1989. The main features of the optimized protocol are routine use of intraoperative autotransfusion, revascularization by aortoaortic bypass, absence of systemic heparinization, and use of a collagen-impregnated prosthesis. Intraoperative mortality (IOM) was 3.8%. Postoperative mortality at 1 month (POM1) was 25.9% and postoperative mortality at 3 months (POM3) was 33.7%. Heart failure (p <0.001), hemodynamic shock (p <0.001), and hemorrhage (p = 0.04) were the only complications correlated with POM1. Pneumonia (p = 0.01) and sepsis (p = 0.01) were the only complications correlated with POM3. Isolated acute renal insufficiency was not a significant risk factor for postoperative mortality. Using a cutoff of 75 years, there was a significant age-related difference (p = 0.025) for POM1 but not for IOM and POM3. The findings of this study show that optimizing the operative protocol decreases mortality related to RAAA. The main predictor of POM1 was hemodynamic status while the main predictor of POM3 was infection. Isolated acute renal insufficiency was not a risk factor for mortality. Age should not be considered a contraindication for operative treatment.

Community mortality after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm is unrelated to the distance from the surgical centre

BACKGROUND

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) carries a high community mortality. Raigmore Hospital, Inverness serves Highland Region, an area the size of Wales with a population of 204,000. The aim of this retrospective review was to determine the community mortality and hospital mortality rates from RAAA in Highland Region and to assess whether distance travelled had any significant impact on survival.

METHODS

Data were retrieved from hospital records, the Registrar General for Scotland and the Information and Statistics Division of the National Health Service in Scotland about patients diagnosed with RAAA between 1992 and 1999.

RESULTS

Of 198 patients with RAAA, 131 (66 per cent) were transferred to Raigmore Hospital while the other 67 (34 per cent) died in a community hospital or at home. Of those reaching Raigmore 109 (83 per cent) had surgery, of whom 65 (60 per cent) survived. The overall community mortality rate was 67 per cent while the hospital mortality rate was 50 per cent. The hospital and community mortality rates for patients living within 50 miles of Raigmore Hospital were 60 and 67 per cent respectively, compared with 26 and 68 per cent for those living more than 50 miles away.

CONCLUSION

Distance from Raigmore Hospital had no significant impact on community mortality from RAAA.