Evaluation of the angiotensin challenge methodology for assessing the pharmacodynamic profile of antihypertensive drugs acting on the renin-angiotensin system

Attenuation of the blood pressure response to exogenous angiotensin I after oral administration of benazepril to healthy adult horses

BACKGROUND

Benazepril has been shown to inhibit circulating angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) activity in horses but the optimal dosage is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the lowest tested dose of benazepril that results in ≥75% attenuation in the response of arterial blood pressure (BP) to exogenous angiotensin I (ANG-I) administration.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective experimental study.

METHODS

A total of 5 healthy horses were instrumented for the direct measurement of BP. Each horse received 4 intragastric doses of benazepril (0.5, 1, 2 and 4 mg/kg bwt) with a washout period of 7 days between doses. Prior to and 2, 12 and 24 h after benazepril administration, each horse received intravenous (i.v.) boluses of ANG-I at 20, 60 and 200 ng/kg. Attenuation of the systolic arterial pressure (SBP) response to ANG-I and serum ACE activity were quantified and expressed as percentage of inhibition.

RESULTS

There was a significant effect of benazepril dose (P = 0.004) and time (P = 0.004) on the percentage of inhibition of the systolic pressor response to ANG-I. Regardless of benazepril dose, the percentage of inhibition was significantly greater 2 h after administration of benazepril compared with 12 and 24 h. At an ANG-I dose of 20 ng/kg, the percentage of inhibition after administration of benazepril at 1 mg/kg bwt (46.6 ± 18.9%) was significantly greater than that achieved after 0.5 mg/kg bwt (19 ± 14%) but not significantly different from that achieved at higher doses of benazepril. Benazepril doses ≥1 mg/kg bwt resulted in serum ACE inhibition of at least 90%.

MAIN LIMITATIONS

Small sample size and resulting low statistical power.

CONCLUSIONS

Attenuation of the rise in SBP in response to ANG-I after administration of benazepril is modest in horses despite adequate serum ACE inhibition. A dose of 1 mg/kg bwt would be recommended for future investigations of benazepril for the management of cardiovascular diseases in horses.

Attenuation of the pressor response to exogenous angiotensin by angiotensin receptor blockers and benazepril hydrochloride in clinically normal cats

OBJECTIVE

To compare the attenuation of the angiotensin I-induced blood pressure response by once-daily oral administration of various doses of angiotensin receptor blockers (irbesartan, telmisartan, and losartan), benazepril hydrochloride, or lactose monohydrate (placebo) for 8 days in clinically normal cats.

ANIMALS

6 healthy cats (approx 17 months old) with surgically implanted arterial telemetric blood pressure-measuring catheters.

PROCEDURES

Cats were administered orally the placebo or each of the drug treatments (benazepril [2.5 mg/cat], irbesartan [6 and 10 mg/kg], telmisartan [0.5, 1, and 3 mg/kg], and losartan [2.5 mg/kg]) once daily for 8 days in a crossover study. Approximately 90 minutes after capsule administration on day 8, each cat was anesthetized and arterial blood pressure measurements were recorded before and after IV administration of each of 4 boluses of angiotensin I (20, 100, 500, and 1,000 ng/kg). This protocol was repeated 24 hours after benazepril treatment and telmisartan (3 mg/kg) treatment. Differences in the angiotensin I-induced change in systolic arterial blood pressure (ΔSBP) among treatments were determined.

RESULTS

At 90 minutes after capsule administration, only losartan did not significantly reduce ΔSBP in response to the 3 higher angiotensin doses, compared with placebo. Among drug treatments, telmisartan (3 mg/kg dosage) attenuated ΔSBP to a significantly greater degree than benazepril and all other treatments. At 24 hours, telmisartan was more effective than benazepril (mean ± SEM ΔSBP, 15.7 ± 1.9 mm Hg vs 55.9 ± 12.42 mm Hg, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Results indicated that telmisartan administration may have advantages over benazepril administration for cats with renal or cardiovascular disease.

Evaluation of a rapid pressor response test in healthy cats

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate angiotensin I and angiotensin II rapid pressor response tests in healthy cats.

ANIMALS

6 purpose-bred sexually intact male cats.

PROCEDURES

Telemetric blood pressure (BP) implants were placed in all cats. After 2 weeks, cats were anesthetized for challenge with exogenous angiotensin I or angiotensin II. Continuous direct arterial BP was recorded during and immediately after IV administration of boluses of angiotensin I or angiotensin II at increasing doses. Blood pressure responses were evaluated for change in systolic BP (SBP), change in diastolic BP (DBP), and rate of increase of SBP by 4 observers.

RESULTS

Following IV angiotensin I and angiotensin II administration, transient, dose-dependent increases in BP (mean ± SEM change in SBP, 25.7 ± 5.2 and 45.0 ± 9.1; change in DBP, 23.4 ± 4.7 mm Hg and 36.4 ± 7.8 mm Hg; for 100 ng of angiotensin I/kg and angiotensin II/kg, respectively) and rate of increase of SBP were detected. At angiotensin I and II doses < 2.0 ng/kg, minimal responses were detected, with greater responses at doses ranging from 20 to 1,000 ng/kg. A significant effect of observer was not found. No adverse effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The rapid pressor response test elicited dose-dependent, transient increases in SBP and DBP. The test has potential as a means of objectively evaluating the efficacy of various modifiers of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in cats. Ranges of response values are provided for reference in future studies.

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor 1166A/C polymorphism in association with blood pressure response to exogenous angiotensin II

BACKGROUND

The angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) 1166A/C polymorphism is reported to be implicated in cardiovascular diseases. The association between the 1166A/C polymorphism and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) changes in response to exogenous angiotensin II and valsartan was evaluated by pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling.

METHODS

Thirteen normotensive, healthy adults (six with the 1166A/A polymorphism and seven with 1166A/C) were enrolled in this clinical study. Angiotensin II was infused continuously over a 2-min period at four different rates (from 5 ng/kg/min and increased by 5 ng/kg/min) at 0 (before valsartan dosing), 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h after a single oral dose of valsartan (40 mg). BP was measured serially before and at the end of each rate of angiotensin II infusion. Plasma concentration-time profiles of valsartan were established over a 24-h period. We analyzed data using NONMEM and studied the relationship between the AT1R 1166A/C genotypes and BP responses.

RESULTS

Plasma valsartan concentrations and DBP data best fitted into a two-compartment linear model and E(max) model (E(max) with baseline for angiotensin II and inhibitory E(max) for valsartan), respectively. The ED50 for angiotensin II in the subjects with 1166A/C [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.30 approximately 14.02 ng/kg/min] was significantly lower than in those with 1166A/A (95% CI: 14.23 approximately 28.77 ng/kg/min), while the E(max) for angiotensin II and EC50 for valsartan was similar in both genotype groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that exogenous human angiotensin II increases the BP more potently in subjects with 1166A/C than in those with 1166A/A.

Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of angiotensin receptor blockade in healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVE

To compare the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of angiotensin II receptor antagonists as a therapeutic class.

DESIGN

Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling study.

METHODS

The data of 14 phase I studies with 10 different drugs were analysed. A common population pharmacokinetic model (two compartments, mixed zero- and first-order absorption, two metabolite compartments) was applied to the 2685 drug and 900 metabolite concentration measurements. A standard nonlinear mixed effect modelling approach was used to estimate the drug-specific parameters and their variabilities. Similarly, a pharmacodynamic model was applied to the 7360 effect measurements, i.e. the decrease of peak blood pressure response to intravenous angiotensin challenge recorded by finger photoplethysmography. The concentration of drug and metabolite in an effect compartment was assumed to translate into receptor blockade [maximum effect (Emax) model with first-order link].

RESULTS

A general pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model for angiotensin antagonism in healthy individuals was successfully built up for the 10 drugs studied. Representatives of this class share different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles. Their effects on blood pressure are dose-dependent, but the time course of the effect varies between the drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

The characterisation of PK-PD relationships for these drugs gives the opportunity to optimise therapeutic regimens and to suggest dosage adjustments in specific conditions. Such a model can be used to further refine the use of this class of drugs.

Evaluation of noninvasive blood pressure recording by photoplethysmography in clinical studies using angiotensin challenges

AIMS

Continuous noninvasive blood pressure measurement by photoplethysmography has been regularly used in the experimental paradigm of angiotensin challenges, applied to the phase I clinical testing of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor antagonists. This work aims to evaluate the performance of this measurement method, in terms of reliability, reproducibility and dependence on technical settings.

METHODS

Data have been gathered from 13 clinical studies on antihypertensive drugs, using the Finapres device for measuring the response to exogenous angiotensin challenges. The agreement between simultaneous recordings at different fingers and the influence of the reading method are assessed. A literature review addresses the question of the concordance between results obtained noninvasively and through arterial cannulation.

RESULTS

The relative precision of blood pressure monitoring by photoplethysmography allows reproducible determination of angiotensin-induced blood pressure peaks (agreement limits for systolic and diastolic peaks: 12 and 6 mmHg respectively). The reading method influences the results to a similar extent. As compared with blood pressure measured intra-arterially, the difference is usually within limits of clinical acceptability.

CONCLUSIONS

In the context of phase I studies using the angiotensin challenges methodology, the reliability and reproducibility of noninvasive blood pressure measurement appear satisfactory, despite the technical limitations of this method. The impact of selected changes in the settings and reading methods is limited.