The effect of bosentan on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin in healthy male subjects

Quantitatively Predicting Effects of Exercise on Pharmacokinetics of Drugs Using a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model

Exercise significantly alters human physiological functions, such as increasing cardiac output and muscle blood flow and decreasing glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and liver blood flow, thereby altering the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of drugs. In this study, we aimed to establish a database of human physiological parameters during exercise and to construct equations for the relationship between changes in each physiological parameter and exercise intensity, including cardiac output, organ blood flow (e.g., muscle blood flow and kidney blood flow), oxygen uptake, plasma pH and GFR, etc. The polynomial equation P = ΣaiHRi was used for illustrating the relationship between the physiological parameters (P) and heart rate (HR), which served as an index of exercise intensity. The pharmacokinetics of midazolam, quinidine, digoxin, and lidocaine during exercise were predicted by a whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (WB-PBPK) model and the developed database of physiological parameters following administration to 100 virtual subjects. The WB-PBPK model simulation results showed that most of the observed plasma drug concentrations fell within the 5th-95th percentiles of the simulations, and the estimated peak concentrations (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC) of drugs were also within 0.5-2.0 folds of observations. Sensitivity analysis showed that exercise intensity, exercise duration, medication time, and alterations in physiological parameters significantly affected drug pharmacokinetics and the net effect depending on drug characteristics and exercise conditions. In conclusion, the pharmacokinetics of drugs during exercise could be quantitatively predicted using the developed WB-PBPK model and database of physiological parameters. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study simulated real-time changes of human physiological parameters during exercise in the WB-PBPK model and comprehensively investigated pharmacokinetic changes during exercise following oral and intravenous administration. Furthermore, the factors affecting pharmacokinetics during exercise were also revealed.

Strategy for the Prediction of Steady-State Exposure of Digoxin to Determine Drug-Drug Interaction Potential of Digoxin With Other Drugs in Digitalization Therapy

Digoxin, a narrow therapeutic index drug, is widely used in congestive heart failure. However, the digitalization therapy involves dose titration and can exhibit drug-drug interaction. Ctrough versus area under the plasma concentration versus time curve in a dosing interval of 24 hours (AUC0-24h) and Cmax versus AUC0-24h for digoxin were established by linear regression. The predictions of digoxin AUC0-24h values were performed using published Ctrough or Cmax with appropriate regression lines. The fold difference, defined as the quotient of the observed/predicted AUC0-24h values, was evaluated. The mean square error and root mean square error, correlation coefficient (r), and goodness of the fold prediction were used to evaluate the models. Both Ctrough versus AUC0-24h (r = 0.9215) and Cmax versus AUC0-24h models for digoxin (r = 0.7781) showed strong correlations. Approximately 93.8% of the predicted digoxin AUC0-24h values were within 0.76-fold to 1.25-fold difference for Ctrough model. In sharp contrast, the Cmax model showed larger variability with only 51.6% of AUC0-24h predictions within 0.76-1.25-fold difference. The r value for observed versus predicted AUC0-24h for Ctrough (r = 0.9551; n = 177; P < 0.001) was superior to the Cmax (r = 0.6134; n = 275; P < 0.001) model. The mean square error and root mean square error (%) for the Ctrough model were 11.95% and 16.2% as compared to 67.17% and 42.3% obtained for the Cmax model. Simple linear regression models for Ctrough/Cmax versus AUC0-24h were derived for digoxin. On the basis of statistical evaluation, Ctrough was superior to Cmax model for the prediction of digoxin AUC0-24h and can be potentially used in a prospective setting for predicting drug-drug interaction or lack of it.

Clarithromycin substantially increases steady-state bosentan exposure in healthy volunteers

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1 inhibitor clarithromycin on the pharmacokinetics of bosentan. We also aimed to evaluate the impact of CYP2C9 and SLCO1B1 (encoding for OATP1B1) genotypes and their combination.

METHODS

We assessed the effect of the OATP and CYP3A inhibitor clarithromycin on bosentan pharmacokinetics at steady state and concurrently quantified changes of CYP3A activity using midazolam as a probe drug. Sixteen healthy volunteers received therapeutic doses of bosentan (125 mg twice daily) for 14 days and clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily) concomitantly for the last 4 days, and bosentan pharmacokinetics was assessed on days 1, 10 and 14.

RESULTS

Clarithromycin significantly increased bosentan area under the plasma concentration-time curve of the dosing interval 3.7-fold and peak concentration 3.8-fold in all participants irrespective of the genotype. Clarithromycin also reduced CYP3A activity (midazolam clearance) in all participants; however, these changes were not correlated to the changes of bosentan clearance.

CONCLUSIONS

Clarithromycin substantially increases the exposure to bosentan, suggesting that dose reductions may be necessary.

Phase I and II metabolism and MRP2-mediated export of bosentan in a MDCKII-OATP1B1-CYP3A4-UGT1A1-MRP2 quadruple-transfected cell line

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Hepatic uptake (e.g. by OATP1B1), phase I and II metabolism (e.g. by CYP3A4, UGT1A1) and subsequent biliary excretion (e.g. by MRP2) are key determinants for the pharmacokinetics of numerous drugs. However, stably transfected cell models for the simultaneous investigation of transport and phase I and II metabolism of drugs are lacking.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

A newly established quadruple-transfected MDCKII-OATP1B1-CYP3A4-UGT1A1-MRP2 cell line was used to investigate metabolism and transcellular transport of the endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan.

KEY RESULTS

Intracellular accumulation of bosentan equivalents (i.e. parent compound and metabolites) was significantly lower in all cell lines expressing MRP2 compared to cell lines lacking this transporter (P < 0.001). Accordingly, considerably higher amounts of bosentan equivalents were detectable in the apical compartments of cell lines with MRP2 expression (P < 0.001). HPLC and LC-MS measurements revealed that mainly unchanged bosentan accumulated in intracellular and apical compartments. Furthermore, the phase I metabolites Ro 48-5033 and Ro 47-8634 were detected intracellularly in cell lines expressing CYP3A4. Additionally, a direct glucuronide of bosentan could be identified intracellularly in cell lines expressing UGT1A1 and in the apical compartments of cell lines expressing UGT1A1 and MRP2.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

These in vitro data indicate that bosentan is a substrate of UGT1A1. Moreover, the efflux transporter MRP2 mediates export of bosentan and most likely also of bosentan glucuronide in the cell system. Taken together, cell lines simultaneously expressing transport proteins and metabolizing enzymes represent additional useful tools for the investigation of the interplay of transport and metabolism of drugs.

Darexaban (YM150), an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin

To investigate the impact of the direct Factor Xa inhibitor darexaban administered in a modified-release formulation (darexaban-MR) on the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of digoxin. In this Phase I, randomized, double-blind, two-period crossover study (8 days for each treatment, 10 days washout), 24 healthy subjects received darexaban-MR 120 mg once/day (qd) + digoxin 0.25 mg qd in one treatment period, and placebo + digoxin 0.25 mg qd in the other treatment period. Blood for PK assessment of digoxin and darexaban was obtained in serial profile on day 8, as well as pre-dose on day 6-7; urinary PK samples were obtained up to 24 h after the last dose on day 8. A lack of interaction was determined if 90 % confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMR) of digoxin C max,ss and AUC0-24h,ss with and without darexaban-MR co-administration were within 0.80-1.25 limits. Pharmacodynamic activity was assessed by international normalized ratio and activated partial thromboplastin time. Twenty-three subjects completed the study. The GMR (90 % CI) for C max,ss and AUC0-24h,ss of digoxin plus darexaban versus digoxin plus placebo was 1.03 (90 % CI: 0.94-1.12) and 1.11 (90 % CI: 1.05-1.17), respectively. The 90 % CI for the GMRs fell within the limits of 0.80-1.25, indicating a lack of drug-drug interaction. Co-administration of digoxin with darexaban-MR was well tolerated, with no unexpected treatment-emergent adverse events or safety concerns. Co-administration of darexaban-MR did not impact the steady-state PK profile of digoxin.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions of endothelin receptor antagonists in pulmonary arterial hypertension

The authors review the basic pharmacology and potential for adverse drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of bosentan and ambrisentan, the 2 endothelin receptor antagonists currently approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) treatment. Bosentan, an endothelin (ET) receptor-type ET(A) and ET(B) antagonist, is metabolized to active metabolites by and an inducer of cytochrome P450 (CYP)2C9 and CYP3A. Ambrisentan, a selective ET(A) receptor antagonist, is metabolized primarily by uridine 5'diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) 1A9S, 2B7S, and 1A3S and, to a lesser extent, by CYP3A and CYP2C19. Drug interactions observed with bosentan DDI studies have demonstrated a potential for significant clinical implications during PAH management: bosentan is contraindicated with cyclosporine A and glyburide, and additional monitoring/dose adjustments are required when coadministered with hormonal contraceptives, simvastatin, lopinavir/ritonavir, and rifampicin. As bosentan carries a boxed warning regarding risks of liver injury and showed dose-dependant increases in serum aminotransferase abnormalities, drug interactions that increase bosentan exposure are of particular clinical concern. Ambrisentan DDI studies performed to date have shown only one clinically relevant DDI, an interaction with cyclosporine A that requires ambrisentan dose reduction. As the treatment of PAH moves toward multimodal combination therapy, scrutiny should be placed on ensuring that drug combinations achieve maximal clinical benefit while minimizing side effects.

Endothelin receptor antagonists -- their role in pulmonary medicine

INTRODUCTION

Understanding of the function of endothelin-1 in the pathophysiology of endothelial disease, in particular pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), has paved the way for the development of endothelin-receptor antagonists (ERAs) and explains the leading role they now play in the treatment armamentarium for this disease.

BACKGROUND

Three active ERA drugs (bosentan, sitaxentan, ambrisentan) are currently approved for the treatment of PAH in France. Several randomised clinical trials have demonstrated their efficacy and safety in PAH.

PERSPECTIVES AND CONCLUSION

Besides its vasoconstrictor effect, endothelin-1 (ET-1) plays a pivotal role in cell proliferation and apoptosis. ERAs are innovative drugs potentially useful in some pulmonary disorders such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis or systemic sclerosis, even though the preliminary results published remain insufficient or controversial.

CONCLUSION

ERAs play a major role in the management of pulmonary vascular disease. Other drugs, still under study, could prove useful in the treatment of infiltrating pneumonias.

Differential modulation of the expression of important drug metabolising enzymes and transporters by endothelin-1 receptor antagonists ambrisentan and bosentan in vitro

The safety and effectiveness of drugs used to treat chronic diseases critically depend on their propensity to interact with co-administered drugs. Induction of enzymes and drug transporters involved in the clearance and distribution of drugs may critically reduce exposure with their substrates and thus lead to nonresponse. We therefore investigated the impact of the endothelin-1 receptor antagonists bosentan and ambrisentan on the expression of relevant human efflux and uptake transporters and on phase 1 and phase 2 enzymes. LS180 adenocarcinoma cells were treated for four days with bosentan or ambrisentan (1-50 μM), the positive control rifampicin, or medium only (negative control). For evaluation of bosentan also HuH-7 human hepatoma cells were used and treated similarly. Gene expression was quantified at the mRNA level by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and for some genes also at the protein level by western blot analysis. Comparable to rifampicin, bosentan was a moderate to strong inductor for all cytochrome P450 isozymes and ATP-binding cassette transporters tested, and it also induced organic anion transporting polypeptides. 50 μM bosentan up-regulated e.g. CYP3A4 8.5-fold, ABCB1 5.1-fold, and ABCB11 1.9-fold at the mRNA level in LS180 cells. In HuH-7 cells induction was much less pronounced (e.g. CYP3A4 1.9-fold for bosentan). In contrast, ambrisentan only weakly induced some of the genes investigated in LS180 cells. These findings corroborate the in vivo finding that bosentan is much more prone to drug interactions than ambrisentan.

Evaluation of in vivo P-glycoprotein phenotyping probes: a need for validation

Drug transporters are involved in clinically relevant drug-drug interactions. P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is an efflux transporter that displays genetic polymorphism. Phenotyping permits evaluation of real-time, in vivo P-gp activity and P-gp-mediated drug-drug interactions. Digoxin, fexofenadine, talinolol and quinidine are commonly used probe drugs for P-gp phenotyping. Although current regulatory guidance documents highlight methodologies for evaluating transporter-based drug-drug interactions, whether current probe drugs are suitable for phenotyping has not been established, and validation criteria are lacking. This review proposes validation criteria and evaluates P-gp probes to determine probe suitability. Based on these criteria, digoxin, fexofenadine, talinolol and quinidine have limitations to their use and are not recommended for P-gp phenotyping.

Bosentan: a review of its use in the management of mildly symptomatic pulmonary arterial hypertension

Bosentan (Tracleer) is an orally administered dual endothelin-1 (ET-1) receptor antagonist approved for use in patients with WHO class II (mildly symptomatic) pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Oral bosentan therapy was beneficial and generally well tolerated in patients with mildly symptomatic PAH. In a well designed, placebo-controlled trial in adolescents and adults with mildly symptomatic PAH, pulmonary vascular resistance was significantly reduced with bosentan relative to placebo, but the 6-minute walk distance did not increase significantly. Similarly, pediatric patients (most of whom had mildly symptomatic PAH) in a small uncontrolled trial experienced some improvement in hemodynamic variables with bosentan, but did not experience a significant increase in exercise capacity. Adverse events associated with bosentan were consistent with those seen in other indications, with major concerns being the potential for teratogenicity and hepatotoxicity, for which regular liver function monitoring is recommended. Overall, considering the progressive nature of PAH, bosentan extends the treatment options available to patients with mildly symptomatic PAH.

Bosentan: a review of its use in the management of digital ulcers associated with systemic sclerosis

Bosentan (Tracleer) is an orally administered dual endothelin-1 (ET-1) receptor antagonist approved in the EU for reducing the number of new digital ulcers in patients with systemic sclerosis and ongoing digital ulcer disease. Oral bosentan therapy was beneficial and generally well tolerated in patients with digital ulcers associated with systemic sclerosis. In well designed, placebo-controlled trials, bosentan treatment significantly reduced the number of new ulcers, but had no effect on ulcer healing, in patients with digital ulcers. Adverse events associated with bosentan were consistent with those seen during treatment for other indications, with major concerns being the potential for teratogenicity and hepatotoxicity, for which regular liver function monitoring is recommended. Overall, considering the large unmet need for therapeutic options in patients with digital ulcers, bosentan extends the treatment options available to patients with systemic sclerosis-associated digital ulcers.

Bosentan is a substrate of human OATP1B1 and OATP1B3: inhibition of hepatic uptake as the common mechanism of its interactions with cyclosporin A, rifampicin, and sildenafil

The elimination process of the endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan (Tracleer) in humans is entirely dependent on metabolism mediated by two cytochrome P450 (P450) enzymes, i.e., CYP3A4 and CYP2C9. Most interactions with concomitantly administered drugs can be rationalized in terms of inhibition of these P450 enzymes. The increased bosentan concentrations observed in the presence of cyclosporin A, rifampicin, or sildenafil, however, are incompatible with this paradigm and prompted the search for alternative mechanisms governing these interactions. In the present article, we identify bosentan and its active plasma metabolite, Ro 48-5033 (4-(2-hydroxy-1,1-dimethyl-ethyl)-N-[6-(2-hydroxy-ethoxy)-5-(2-methoxy-phenoxy)-[2,2']bipyrimidinyl-4-yl]-benzenesulfonamide), as substrates of the human organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATP) OATP1B1 and OATP1B3. Bosentan uptake into Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing these OATP transporters was efficiently inhibited by cyclosporin A and rifampicin with IC(50) values significantly below their effective plasma concentrations in humans. The phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor sildenafil was also shown to interfere with OATP-mediated transport, however, at concentrations above those achieved in therapeutic use. Therefore, inhibition of bosentan hepatic uptake may represent an alternative/complementary mechanism to rationalize some of the pharmacokinetic interactions seen in therapeutic use. A similar picture has been drawn for drugs like pitavastatin and fexofenadine, drugs that are mainly excreted in unchanged form. Bosentan elimination, in contrast, is entirely dependent on metabolism. Therefore, the described interactions with rifampicin, cyclosporin A, and, to a lesser extent, sildenafil represent evidence that inhibition of hepatic uptake may become the rate-limiting step in the overall elimination process even for drugs whose elimination is entirely dependent on metabolism.

Clinical pharmacology of bosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist

Bosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, is indicated for the treatment of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Following oral administration, bosentan attains peak plasma concentrations after approximately 3 hours. The absolute bioavailability is about 50%. Food does not exert a clinically relevant effect on absorption at the recommended dose of 125 mg. Bosentan is approximately 98% bound to albumin and, during multiple-dose administration, has a volume of distribution of 30 L and a clearance of 17 L/h. The terminal half-life after oral administration is 5.4 hours and is unchanged at steady state. Steady-state concentrations are achieved within 3-5 days after multiple-dose administration, when plasma concentrations are decreased by about 50% because of a 2-fold increase in clearance, probably due to induction of metabolising enzymes. Bosentan is mainly eliminated from the body by hepatic metabolism and subsequent biliary excretion of the metabolites. Three metabolites have been identified, formed by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 and 3A4. The metabolite Ro 48-5033 may contribute 20% to the total response following administration of bosentan. The pharmacokinetics of bosentan are dose-proportional up to 600 mg (single dose) and 500 mg/day (multiple doses). The pharmacokinetics of bosentan in paediatric PAH patients are comparable to those in healthy subjects, whereas adult PAH patients show a 2-fold increased exposure. Severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance 15-30 mL/min) and mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class A) do not have a clinically relevant influence on the pharmacokinetics of bosentan. No dosage adjustment in adults is required based on sex, age, ethnic origin and bodyweight. Bosentan should generally be avoided in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment and/or elevated liver aminotransferases. Ketoconazole approximately doubles the exposure to bosentan because of inhibition of CYP3A4. Bosentan decreases exposure to ciclosporin, glibenclamide, simvastatin (and beta-hydroxyacid simvastatin) and (R)- and (S)-warfarin by up to 50% because of induction of CYP3A4 and/or CYP2C9. Coadministration of ciclosporin and bosentan markedly increases initial bosentan trough concentrations. Concomitant treatment with glibenclamide and bosentan leads to an increase in the incidence of aminotransferase elevations. Therefore, combined use with ciclosporin and glibenclamide is contraindicated and not recommended, respectively. The possibility of reduced efficacy of CYP2C9 and 3A4 substrates should be considered when coadministered with bosentan. No clinically relevant interaction was detected with the P-glycoprotein substrate digoxin. In healthy subjects, bosentan doses >300 mg increase plasma levels of endothelin-1. The drug moderately reduces blood pressure, and its main adverse effects are headache, flushing, increased liver aminotransferases, leg oedema and anaemia. In a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic study in PAH patients, the haemodynamic effects lagged the plasma concentrations of bosentan.

Investigation of the mutual pharmacokinetic interactions between bosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, and simvastatin

BACKGROUND

In vitro, bosentan has been shown to be a mild inducer of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 and 3A4.

PURPOSE

To investigate in vivo the mutual pharmacokinetic interactions between bosentan and simvastatin, a CYP3A4 substrate.

METHODS

Nine healthy male subjects were treated in a three-period randomised crossover study with: (A) bosentan 125 mg twice daily for 5.5 days; (B) simvastatin 40 mg once daily for 6 days; and (C) bosentan 125 mg twice daily and simvastatin 40 mg once daily for 5.5 and 6 days, respectively. Plasma concentration-time profiles of bosentan and its metabolites (treatments A and C) and simvastatin and beta-hydroxyacid simvastatin (treatments B and C) were determined on day 6.

RESULTS

Steady-state conditions for bosentan and its metabolites were attained on day 4 of treatment. The pharmacokinetic parameters of bosentan and its metabolites were not influenced by concomitant treatment with simvastatin: areas under the plasma concentration-time curve over one administration interval of 12 hours (AUC(tau)) [geometric mean and 95% CI] were 4586 (3719-5656) and 4928 (3945-6156) micro g * h/L. In contrast, bosentan significantly reduced exposure to simvastatin and beta-hydroxyacid simvastatin by 34 and 46%, respectively. AUC(tau) values for simvastatin were 30.5 (23.1-40.2) and 20.0 (15.9-25.1) micro g * h/L and for beta-hydroxyacid simvastatin 43.0 (32.1-57.8) and 23.4 (16.7-32.6) micro g * h/L in treatments B and C, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant treatment with bosentan reduces the exposure to simvastatin and beta-hydroxyacid simvastatin by approximately 40%, indicating that in vivo bosentan is also a mild inducer of CYP3A4.

Bosentan

Bosentan is the first endothelin (ET) receptor antagonist approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). In patients with World Health Organization Class III and IV PAH, bosentan has demonstrated improvement in dyspnea and exercise tolerance. ET also plays an important role in the pathophysiology of different vascular diseases. Therefore, bosentan also may have the potential to alter the outcome of many other diseases, such as heart failure, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, and renal disease, as well as cerebrovascular disorders. Because of the rarity and the poor prognosis of patients with PAH, as well as the requirement of close monitoring of bosentan (due to its potential of causing liver dysfunction and its teratogenic effects), bosentan is currently available only through a special access program and is distributed by certain selected pharmacies. Patients who are receiving bosentan should be taught to recognize early signs and symptoms of liver dysfunction and possible pregnancy. In addition, bosentan is not only a substrate but also an inducer of CYP3A4 and CYP2C9. Therefore, it is anticipated that numerous drug interactions may occur. Patients should be advised to consult their physicians or pharmacists should they need to consume other prescription or nonprescription medications.

Bosentan: a dual endothelin receptor antagonist

The peptide endothelin plays a significant role in a wide array of pathological conditions, including primary pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with collagen vascular disease. These are life-threatening conditions that can severely compromise the function of the lungs and heart. Inhibiting the actions of endothelin by blockade of its receptors provides a new and effective approach to therapy for patients with these conditions. Bosentan (Tracleer ) is the first orally-active dual endothelin receptor antagonist and has recently been approved in the US, Canada, Switzerland and the EU for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Bosentan significantly improves exercise capacity, symptoms and functional status in patients with this disease and also slows clinical deterioration, which may be indicative of a delay of disease progression. Results from large-scale studies of bosentan in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic heart failure have established its long-term safety and tolerability profiles. The introduction of the dual endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan has provided an essential treatment for pulmonary arterial hypertension and ongoing trials are evaluating its potential role in the management of other endothelin-mediated disease states.

Simultaneous determination of bosentan and its three major metabolites in various biological matrices and species using narrow bore liquid chromatography with ion spray tandem mass spectrometric detection

An analytical method was developed for the determination of bosentan and its three main metabolites in various matrices and species with focus on robustness. The drug assay involved protein precipitation, followed by liquid-liquid extraction and column switching in combination with narrow bore HPLC-MS-MS. Deuterated analogues of the analytes were used as internal standards. The sample preparation procedure was optimised with respect to minimise the suppression effects from different matrices. The drug and its metabolites could be analysed in plasma, serum, bile, and liver samples from man, dog, and rat with a run cycle time of 10 min. The method used always calibration samples made up in human plasma, whereas quality control samples were prepared in human plasma as well as in the identical matrix as the unknown samples. Calibration graphs for the drug and for the metabolites were linear in the range from 1 or 2 to 2000 or 10,000 ng/ml using a sample volume of 0.25 ml. Mean inter-assay precision and accuracy were 3.0% and 98.4%, respectively. Two additional methods were derived from the main method for the analysis of plasma samples only with focus on reduced manual effort and instrumental run cycle time. The modified methods showed a mean inter-assay precision and accuracy of 5.0% and 99.9% for the method using column-switching, and 3.5% and 98.8% for the method using off-line SPE, respectively. All methods proved to be robust, sensitive, and selective during the analysis of several thousand samples.