Safety and Efficacy of Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors in the Treatment of Facial and Genital Psoriasis: A Systematic Review

Facial and genital psoriasis impairs quality of life and is challenging to treat because of increased percutaneous penetration and, consequently, increased risk of adverse effects. Topical calcineurin inhibitors are recognized as a valid off-label treatment for these sensitive skin areas, but data on safety and efficacy are limited. This systematic review of the literature included 24 of 3,322 studies (5 randomized controlled trials, 9 open-label studies, 2 case series and 8 case reports). All studies demonstrated positive efficacy; 11 studies found statistically significant reductions in psoriasis severity. Local stinging, burning and itching were the most common short-term adverse effects and were reported in 18 studies. Topical calcineurin inhibitors appear to have an important role in the treatment of facial and genital psoriasis. The drugs are effective and generally well-tolerated with few adverse effects.

Treatments for inverse psoriasis: a systematic review

Background: Inverse psoriasis often requires a targeted treatment strategy due to the inherent sensitivity, thinness, and occlusion of flexural areas. However, most treatment recommendations are based on anecdotal evidence.Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in October 2018 in Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library with keywords 'inverse psoriasis,' 'genital psoriasis,' and 'treatment.' All prospective studies assessing efficacy of treatments for inverse psoriasis that had a sample size of at least 10 patients were included in our analysis.Results: The initial search yielded 340 results, and 14 studies were included in the final analysis. These studies comprised over 1000 patients with mild to severe psoriasis involving axillary, inframammary, facial, and/or anogenital regions. The included studies demonstrated efficacy of topical immunomodulators (N = 7), vitamin D analogs (N = 4), topical corticosteroids (N = 3), antiseptics (N = 2), and biologics (N = 1) in improving genital and flexural psoriasis symptoms.Conclusions: There is a paucity of high-quality studies on which to base treatment recommendations, especially with regard to the role of systemic and biologic therapies. Few studies, many of which are of low evidence quality, suggest that topical immunomodulators, vitamin D analogs, and mid-to-high-potency topical corticosteroids may be effective treatments, but more randomized controlled trials are needed.

Psoriasis of the face and flexures

Facial and flexural psoriasis may impair the quality of life of psoriatic patients considerably. For the adequate management of psoriasis it is important to pay attention to lesions at these sensitive sites, which require an approach different to that for lesions on other sites in several respects. An extensive literature search was carried out to collect evidence-based data on facial and flexural psoriasis with respect to epidemiology, clinical aspects, pathogenetic factors and various treatments. Subsequently, a panel of experts, the Copenhagen Psoriasis Working Group (CPWG), discussed these aspects and several recommendations were formulated reconciling the evidence-based data. Facial psoriasis occurs in 17-46% of psoriatics and flexural psoriasis is experienced by 6.8-36% of patients with psoriasis. Therefore, psoriasis at these sites cannot be regarded as a rare manifestation. Facial psoriasis is a prognostic marker indicating a poor prognosis of psoriasis. Facial and flexural psoriasis cannot be regarded as distinct disease entities but rather as site variations. The clinical features of facial psoriasis suggest that there are three subtypes: hairline psoriasis, sebo-psoriasis and true facial psoriasis. Otitis externa and ocular manifestations should not be neglected. Evidence that microbiological factors may be relevant to facial and flexural psoriasis is virtually absent. For facial psoriasis the response to UV radiation is variable. At least 5% of psoriatics have photosensitive psoriasis. In these patients photosensitive diseases such as lupus erythematodes and polymorphic light eruption have to be excluded. Based on the literature assessment and working group discussions the CPWG concluded the following. (1) Low-potency topical corticosteroids, vitamin D3 analogues and calcineurin inhibitors are first choice treatments in facial and flexural psoriasis. Evidence for the efficacy of the first two modalities is at level 3 while it is at level 1 for the third one. An individualized approach is indicated; for example, in case of corticosteroid side effects in the past the other two modalities should be selected and in unstable psoriasis prone to irritation, monotherapy with vitamin D3 analogues should be avoided. (2) Antimicrobial treatments are not indicated for facial and flexural psoriasis. (3) Dithranol and tar treatment are not indicated as first-line treatment but only if the first-line options fail. (4) In case topical therapies are not effective, phototherapy and systemic treatments are indicated. (5) For future drug development the combination of vitamin D3 analogues with low strength corticosteroids is recommended.

Treatment of inverse psoriasis with the 308 nm excimer laser

BACKGROUND

The treatment of inverse psoriasis can be both challenging and frustrating. Conventional topical and systemic treatments can be limited in terms of efficacy, acceptability and safety. The 308 nm excimer laser has been shown to be effective in the treatment of psoriatic plaques.

METHODS

A patient with chronic inverse psoriasis was treated with 308 nm excimer laser using a 3.5 cm spot, a dosage of 2 minimal erythema doses and a pulse width of 30 ns.

RESULTS

Complete clearance of the psoriatic lesions was obtained after 3 weeks of treatment. Remission duration was at least 6 months.

CONCLUSION

The 308 nm excimer laser is safe and effective for the treatment of inverse psoriasis. Treatments are well tolerated with minimal side effects.

Calcipotriol cream with or without concurrent topical corticosteroid in psoriasis: tolerability and efficacy

The objectives of the study were to determine whether concurrent treatment with calcipotriol (50 microg/g) and either clobetasone 17-butyrate cream (0.5 mg/g) (moderate potency) or betamethasone 17-valerate cream (1 mg/g) (potent) or placebo (vehicle of calcipotriol) was more effective and/or caused less skin irritation than calcipotriol cream (50 microg/g) used twice daily. It was a multicentre, double-blind, parallel group study. Patients applied calcipotriol cream in the morning and either vehicle (n = 174), calcipotriol (n = 174), clobetasone (n = 175) or betamethasone creams (n = 176) in the evening for up to 8 weeks. Adverse events led to withdrawal in 20 patients (2.9%). The mean percentage change in PASI (psoriasis area and severity index) was -40.6 in the calcipotriol/vehicle group, -48.3 in the calcipotriol/calcipotriol group, -53.7 in the calcipotriol/clobetasone 17-butyrate group and -57.5 in the calcipotriol/betamethasone 17-valerate group. A statistically significant difference was seen between the four treatment groups (P = 0.006) with calcipotriol/vehicle being less effective than the other treatments. A statistically significant difference in favour of calcipotriol/betamethasone 17-valerate was seen between the calcipotriol/calcipotriol group and the calcipotriol/betamethasone 17-valerate group. The majority of adverse events were skin irritations, which were reported for 31.2% of patients treated with calcipotriol/vehicle, 34.3% of patients treated with calcipotriol twice daily and 23.8% vs. 17.1% of patients treated with calcipotriol/clobetasone 17-butyrate and calcipotriol/betamethasone 17-valerate, respectively. Skin irritation was seen statistically significantly less frequently in patients treated with calcipotriol/ clobetasone 17-butyrate or calcipotriol/betamethasone 17-valerate (P = 0.001), whereas no difference was seen between the other groups. In conclusion, calcipotriol applied twice daily was as effective as calcipotriol/clobetasone 17-butyrate, but slightly less effective than calcipotriol/betamethasone 17-valerate. The incidence of skin irritation was less for patients using concurrent corticosteroids, whereas treatment with calcipotriol/vehicle did not reduce the incidence of skin irritation when compared with calcipotriol twice daily.

Narrow-band (TL-01) ultraviolet B phototherapy for chronic plaque psoriasis: three times or five times weekly treatment?

Three and five times weekly narrow-band TL-01 (311-313 nm) ultraviolet (UV) B phototherapy regimens for chronic plaque psoriasis were compared in a randomized, observer-blinded, half-body, within-patient paired study. Twenty-one patients [13 men, eight women, age range 21-68 years, skin phototypes I (two patients), II (14) and III (five)] entered the study. Sixteen reached clearance or minimal residual activity (MRA) on both sides. Of the other five, three withdrew because they did not reach clearance or MRA on the 5x weekly side by a maximum of 30 treatments, one when he was satisfied with moderate improvement and one because of repeated failure to attend. Those who completed treatment reached clearance or MRA after a median of 35 days with 5x weekly treatment compared with 40 days with 3x weekly treatment (P = 0.007), but required a median of 23.5 compared with 17 UVB exposures (P = 0.001) and 94 minimal erythema dose multiples (MEDs) compared with 64 MEDs (P = 0.01). Fifteen (of 16) developed at least one episode of well-demarcated erythema during 5x weekly treatment compared with just three of 16 treated 3x weekly (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between regimens in duration of remission. For this skin phototype I-III population, the more rapid clearance of psoriasis with 5x weekly phototherapy is not, for the majority of patients, sufficient to justify the extra exposures and higher UVB dose. We no longer use 5x weekly phototherapy for psoriasis.