Are Mast Cells MASTers in Cancer?

Prolonged low-grade inflammation or smoldering inflammation is a hallmark of cancer. Mast cells form a heterogeneous population of immune cells with differences in their ultra-structure, morphology, mediator content, and surface receptors. Mast cells are widely distributed throughout all tissues and are stromal components of the inflammatory microenvironment that modulates tumor initiation and development. Although canonically associated with allergic disorders, mast cells are a major source of pro-tumorigenic (e.g., angiogenic and lymphangiogenic factors) and antitumorigenic molecules (e.g., TNF-α and IL-9), depending on the milieu. In certain neoplasias (e.g., gastric, thyroid and Hodgkin's lymphoma) mast cells play a pro-tumorigenic role, in others (e.g., breast cancer) a protective role, whereas in yet others they are apparently innocent bystanders. These seemingly conflicting results suggest that the role of mast cells and their mediators could be cancer specific. The microlocalization (e.g., peritumoral vs intratumoral) of mast cells is another important aspect in the initiation/progression of solid and hematologic tumors. Increasing evidence in certain experimental models indicates that targeting mast cells and/or their mediators represent a potential therapeutic target in cancer. Thus, mast cells deserve focused consideration also as therapeutic targets in different types of tumors. There are many unanswered questions that should be addressed before we understand whether mast cells are an ally, adversary, or innocent bystanders in human cancers.

Increase in CD30 ligand/CD153 and TNF-alpha expressing mast cells in basal cell carcinoma

Mast cells are a significant source of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily members, such as TNF-alpha, CD30 ligand/CD153 (CD30L) and CD40L/CD154. Furthermore, the expression of some of these proteins in mast cells has been associated with tumorigenesis, and mast cells have been found to be increased in number in the basal cell carcinoma (BCC) lesion. In this study, we have examined the expression of TNF-alpha, CD30L and CD40L immunoreactivity in mast cells in the healthy-looking skin and lesional skin of ten patients with superficial spreading BCC. Also, the counterparts of these molecules, TNF receptor (TNFR) I and II as well as CD30 and CD40, were analysed immunohistochemically. We found that numbers of mast cells and Kit-positive cells were significantly increased in the dermal BCC lesion. The percentage of CD30L-positive mast cells and the number of CD30-positive cells were significantly increased in the upper dermis of the BCC lesion as well. In addition, the numbers of TNF-alpha-positive mast cells and cells with TNFRI and TNFRII were markedly increased in the upper lesional dermis. In contrast, no mast cells positive for CD40L could be detected, even though the lesional dermis contained increased numbers of CD40 positive cells. The BCC epithelium was positive for TNFRI, TNFRII and CD40, but not for CD30, though the larger basal buds appeared to be less intensely stained for TNFRI and CD40. In conclusion, mast cells positive for CD30L and TNF-alpha, but not CD40L, are increased in number in the lesional dermis in BCC. These data suggest plausible pathways whereby mast cells can be activated and to interact with other cells and thereby contribute to the tumorigenesis in BCC.

Stromal mast cells in invasive breast cancer are a marker of favourable prognosis: a study of 4,444 cases

PURPOSE

We have previously demonstrated in a pilot study of 348 invasive breast cancers that mast cell (MC) infiltrates within primary breast cancers are associated with a good prognosis. Our aim was to verify this finding in a larger cohort of invasive breast cancer patients and examine the relationship between the presence of MCs and other clinical and pathological features.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Clinically annotated tissue microarrays (TMAs) containing 4,444 cases were constructed and stained with c-Kit (CD-117) using standard immunoperoxidase techniques to identify and quantify MCs. For statistical analysis, we applied a split-sample validation technique. Breast cancer specific survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier [KM] method and log rank test was used to compare survival curves.

RESULTS

Survival analysis by KM method showed that the presence of stromal MCs was a favourable prognostic factor in the training set (P = 0.001), and the validation set group (P = 0.006). X-tile plot generated to define the optimal number of MCs showed that the presence of any number of stromal MCs predicted good prognosis. Multivariate analysis showed that the MC effect in the training set (Hazard ratio [HR] = 0.804, 95% Confidence interval [CI], 0.653-0.991, P = 0.041) and validation set analysis (HR = 0.846, 95% CI, 0.683-1.049, P = 0.128) was independent of age, tumor grade, tumor size, lymph node, ER and Her2 status.

CONCLUSIONS

This study concludes that stromal MC infiltration in invasive breast cancer is an independent good prognostic marker and reiterates the critical role of local inflammatory responses in breast cancer progression.