Resistance of Candida species to antifungal agents used in the treatment of onychomycosis: a review of current problems

Epidemiology and changes in patient-related factors from 1997 to 2009 in clinical yeast isolates related to dermatology, gynaecology, and paediatrics

From 1997 to 2009, 1,862 dermatology, gynaecology, and paediatrics (DGP) associated clinical yeast isolates were analysed for species occurrence, specimen origin and type, (multi-) resistance pattern, and testing period. The top seven of the isolated DGP-associated species remained the same as compared to total medical wards, with Candida albicans (45%) as most frequent pathogen. However, the DGP wards and DGP ICUs showed species-specific profiles; that is, the species distribution is clinic-specific similar and however differs in their percentage from ward to ward. By applying the "one fungus one name" principle, respectively, the appropriate current taxonomic species denominations, it has been shown that no trend to emerging species from 1998 to 2008 could be detected. In particular the frequently isolated non-Candida albicans species isolated in the DGP departments have already been detected in or before 1997. As yeasts are part of the cutaneous microbiota and play an important role as opportunistic pathogens for superficial infections, proper identification of the isolates according to the new nomenclature deems to be essential for specific and calculated antifungal therapy for yeast-like DGP-related infectious agents.

Terbinafine Versus Itraconazole and Fluconazole in the Treatment of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis

Vulvovaginal candidiasis is one of the most frequent infections of the female genital tract with a high incidence. Although numerous antimycotical agents are available for treatment of yeast vaginitis, there are few comparative data on the in vivo and in vitro activity of these drugs. The aim of this open, randomized, and comparative study was to determine in vivo and in vitro effectiveness of the 3 systemic antifungal agents: terbinafine and 2 azoles (itraconazole and fluconazole) in the treatment of patients with Vulvovaginal candidiasis. A total of 44 patients who had signs and symptoms of Vulvovaginal candidiasis were recruited for the study. Patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups: terbinafine 500 mg/d orally was used for 7 days, itraconazole 200 mg/d orally was used for 7 days, and fluconazole 150 mg orally was used as a single dose. Both clinical and mycologic examinations were performed for posttreatment assessment at week 4. This study revealed a clinical cure rate 33.3% for terbinafine, 60% for itraconazole, and 66.6% for fluconazole (P>0.05). Mycologic cure rates were 33.3%, 10%, and 66.6% respectively (P<0.05). Overall cure rates were 33.3%, 10%, and 53.3% (P>0.05). Terbinafine could be an alternative treatment option in Vulvovaginal candidiasis because there were no significant differences in the clinical and overall cure rates among 3 antifungal agents. However, terbinafine could not be suggested as a first-line treatment in Vulvovaginal candidiasis. Systemic use of terbinafine in larger numbers of cases may give more information about the effectiveness of this drug in the treatment of patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis.

Cutaneous infections dermatophytosis, onychomycosis, and tinea versicolor

Cutaneous fungal infections cause significant morbidity for healthy and ill patients. The incidence of some dermatomycoses is increasing, despite availability of newer and better topical and systemic treatments. Fungal remnants last months to years under the ideal conditions, allowing continued spread of infection. Mycoses treated in one area may recur because of organism travel from concomitant areas of infection. Failure of patients and physicians to recognize a fungal etiology early may lead to more extensive, severe, or difficult-to-treat infections. Finally, a patient's concurrent illnesses may play a part in susceptibility and ability to manage fungal infections. For these reasons, scientists have studied and developed newer antifungal agents with better efficacy and greater convenience in dosing. These drugs, however, still have side effects and medication interactions that may limit their use in some patients. Better efforts to educate patients and physicians alike may aid in faster recognition and treatment of dermatophytoses. More research is needed to continue to develop drugs suitable for use in a broader range of patients and diagnostic tests that may be quicker or more specific than conventional ones.