Combination treatment with methotrexate and cyclosporin for severe recalcitrant psoriasis

Combination of methotrexate with oral disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review

Background: Oral conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), especially methotrexate, are the cornerstone of treating psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The use of csDMARDs with biologics has increased their efficacy in psoriasis. However, the combination of two oral DMARDs in patients with PsA has not been adequately reviewed. In this study, we explore the combinational use of methotrexate with DMARDs in PsA patients. Materials & methods: A review was conducted using Medline (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library, covering articles up to February 2023. Results & conclusion: Nine studies comprising 1993 participants were included. The evidence supporting combination therapy remains limited. Combinational therapy could be considered in patients with inadequate response to monotherapy or no access to biologics.

Combination Therapy for Psoriasis with Methotrexate and Other Oral Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Although the introduction of biologics and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (tsDMARDs) has reshaped the treatment paradigm for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) such as psoriasis, oral conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) remain the cornerstone in their treatment. Combinational use of DMARDs is common in rheumatological practice, but for the treatment of many skin diseases, dermatologists typically use a single oral DMARD, with methotrexate (MTX) being the most commonly prescribed csDMARD for psoriasis.

METHODS

To better understand the potential benefits of MTX combination therapy in psoriasis, a literature review was conducted using Medline (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, covering articles published from inception until October 2022. Randomized controlled trials, cohort, open-label, and observational studies, and case reports with efficacy and safety results for combination therapy with MTX, csDMARDs, and tsDMARDs or comparisons between MTX monotherapy and combination therapy with other oral DMARDs in psoriasis were included. Studies involving MTX monotherapy alone or sequential treatment with MTX and other oral DMARDs were excluded, as were non-English articles. The results are presented as a systematic review, and the risk of bias was assessed by the corresponding author using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 6.3, and confirmed by an independent assessor.

RESULTS

Eleven studies comprising 494 participants were included in the review. Overall, combination treatment with MTX and other oral DMARDs exhibited good efficacy and tolerability in psoriasis. However, the included studies were primarily small scale or retrospective, and larger prospective randomized trials are needed to provide stronger evidence.

CONCLUSION

This literature review suggests that combination therapy with MTX and csDMARDs may serve as an efficacious treatment for psoriasis patients with an inadequate response to oral DMARD monotherapy.

Safety and efficacy of methotrexate (0.3 mg/kg/week) versus a combination of methotrexate (0.15 mg/kg/week) with cyclosporine (2.5 mg/kg/day) in chronic plaque psoriasis: A randomised non-blinded controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory, relapsing and remitting disease with no cure till date. There is a paucity of trials using a combination of methotrexate (MTX) and cyclosporine (CsA) in chronic plaque psoriasis, due to fear of added toxicity, although they are time tested treatment options for monotherapy.

AIMS

The study aimed to compare the efficacy and adverse effect profile of the standard recommended dose of MTX (i.e. 0.3mg/kg/week) versus a combination of reduced doses of MTX and CsA (i.e. MTX 0.15 mg/kg/week with CsA 2.5mg/kg/day) in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis.

METHODS

Study design was a non-blinded randomised controlled trial. Patients of chronic plaque psoriasis with PASI more than 10 were randomised in 1: 1 allocation to receive either 0.3 mg/kg/week of intramuscular MTX injection or a combination of 0.15 mg/kg/week of intramuscular MTX injection and 2.5 mg/kg/day of CsA rounded off to the nearest 25 mg. Patients were followed up at every 2 weeks for 12 weeks. The doses were kept fixed throughout the study period.

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients received MTX monotherapy, whereas 67 patients received the combination. At baseline, both groups were comparable in their BSA (P = 0.105, Student t-test) and PASI (P = 0.277, Student t-test), which reduced significantly at 12 weeks in both groups (P < 0.001, paired t-test). The achievement of PASI-75 (P = 0.005), PASI-90 (P < 0.001) and PASI-100 (P = 0.001) was more in the combination group (Chi square test). Intention to treat analysis using Chi square test also showed better outcomes for PASI-75 (P = 0.027), PASI-90 (P < 0.001) and PASI-100 (P = 0.001) in the combination group. Combination group also had earlier onset of action (P = 0.001, Chi square test). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of laboratory and clinical adverse events.

LIMITATIONS

Non-blinded, no comparison with CsA monotherapy arm, no follow up beyond 12 weeks.

CONCLUSION

The combination of reduced doses of MTX and CsA is more efficacious with earlier onset of action and similar adverse effects as with MTX monotherapy.

Safety considerations with combination therapies for psoriasis

Introduction: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that waxes and wanes, and long-term remission can be difficult to achieve regardless of disease severity. Currently, numerous treatment options are available for psoriasis including steroid and non-steroid topical agents, phototherapy, oral systemic agents, and biologics, with many more therapeutic agents under development.Areas covered: This article will review various combination therapy strategies such as rotational therapy and sequential therapy and describe a variety of safe and effective combination therapies for the treatment of psoriasis. Two or more agents with different mechanisms of action and safety profiles can be used to achieve and/or maintain adequate disease control while minimizing the toxicity of treatments. Combination therapy can also be used when a single agent is not enough for treating recalcitrant disease. Choosing a combination regimen that maximizes safety and efficacy while considering patient usability and compliance can be a challenge.Expert opinion: Given the various treatment options currently available for psoriasis and more agents under development, combination therapy will continue to be a valuable treatment strategy for any patient with psoriasis. It is crucial for clinicians to carefully consider the fine balance between safety and efficacy when combining various therapeutic agents.

Cyclosporine regimens in plaque psoriasis: an overview with special emphasis on dose, duration, and old and new treatment approaches

Cyclosporine A (CsA) is one of the most effective systemic drugs available for the treatment of psoriasis, as evidenced by the results of several randomized studies and by a prolonged experience in dermatological setting. In clinical practice, CsA is usually used for the induction of psoriasis remission at a daily dose included in the range of 2.5–5 mg/kg and with intermittent short-term regimens, lasting on average 3–6 months. The magnitude and rapidity of response are dose dependent, as well as the risk of development of adverse events. Therefore, the dose should be tailored to patient's needs and general characteristics and adjusted during the treatment course according to both the efficacy and tolerability. Some studies support the feasibility of pulse administration of CsA for a few days per week for both the induction and the maintenance of response in psoriasis patients. This paper will review the data on CsA regimens for plaque-type psoriasis and will focus the attention on dose, treatment duration, novel schedules, and role in combination therapies, including the association with biologicals.

A retrospective analysis of combination methotrexate-cyclosporine therapy in moderate-severe psoriasis

BACKGROUND

Methotrexate-cyclosprine combination therapy has traditionally been discouraged in the treatment of moderate-severe psoriasis. However, recent reports indicate that the two may be used in combination in psoriasis.

AIM

The retrospective study was undertaken to study the adverse effects and efficacy of the combination in Indian patients of psoriasis.

METHODS

The records of all patients who received combination therapy between 2005 and 2010 were extracted. Demographic details, disease profile, presence of coexistent arthropathy, prior therapy, duration of combination therapy, body surface area involvement, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), and adverse effects were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients received combination therapy during the study period. Fourteen patients received short-term combination therapy and four patients received long-term combination therapy. Twelve patients in the first group and all patients of the second group achieved the primary end point of PASI by 50% from baseline (PASI 50). Nine patients in the first group and all patients in the second group suffered from significant adverse effects; they were however reversible.

CONCLUSION

Methotrexate-cyclosporine combination therapy can be used with adequate monitoring in the treatment of moderate-severe psoriasis. Adverse effects seen are usually reversible with reduction in dose and cessation of therapy. Adverse effects related to cyclosporine are a common problem.

Current and emerging systemic treatment strategies for psoriasis

Psoriasis is a common chronic inflammatory disease of the skin that has a significant impact on quality of life. A small number of systemic therapies are well established in psoriasis management. These have immunosuppressive and/or anti-proliferative effects on the skin and immune system. As understanding of the pathogenesis of psoriasis has advanced over the last 2 decades, there has been clearer appreciation of the genetic, cellular and immunological components of disease expression, which has provided new insight into potential therapeutic targets, including the development of biological therapies. Biologics offer a unique opportunity to block or inhibit specific key components of psoriasis pathogenesis. The introduction of tumour necrosis factor (TNF).α and interleukin (IL)-12/-23 inhibitors has resulted in remarkable clinical responses in patients with severe psoriasis and has led to the development of a range of other cytokine modulators currently undergoing investigation. More recently, research in keratinocyte biology and immune cell function, particularly intracellular signalling, has afforded additional opportunities to develop a range of small-molecule oral preparations that may prove effective in disease control. This paper reviews current and emerging systemic treatments in the management of psoriasis.

A Delphi Consensus Approach to Challenging Case Scenarios in Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: Part 2

INTRODUCTION

Clinicians may be confronted with difficult-to-treat psoriasis cases for which there are scant data to rely upon for guidance. To assist in managing such patients, who are typically excluded from clinical trials, a consensus panel of 14 experts in the field of psoriasis was formed to conduct a Delphi method exercise.

METHODS

The exercise consisted of both survey questionnaires and a live meeting to review and discuss current data (as of 2009, when the exercise was conducted) and arrive at a consensus for optimal treatment options. Seventy difficult treatment scenarios were identified, and the top 24 were selected for discussion at the live meeting.

RESULTS

Five of the 24 discussed case scenarios are presented in this article: (1) moderate-to-severe psoriasis that has failed to respond to all currently approved therapies for psoriasis; (2) palmoplantar psoriasis that is unresponsive to topical therapy and phototherapy; (3) erythrodermic psoriasis; (4) pustular psoriasis; and (5) the preferred therapeutic choice to combine with low-dose methotrexate. A previous article (part 1) presented six other scenarios.

CONCLUSION

The Delphi exercise resulted in guidelines for practicing physicians to utilize when confronted with patients with challenging cases of psoriasis.

S3 - Guidelines on the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris (English version). Update

Psoriasis vulgaris is a common and often chronic inflammatory skin disease. The incidence of psoriasis in Western industrialized countries ranges from 1.5% to 2%. Patients afflicted with severe psoriasis vulgaris may experience a significant reduction in quality of life. Despite the large variety of treatment options available, surveys have shown that patients still do not received optimal treatments. To optimize the treatment of psoriasis in Germany, the Deutsche Dermatologi sche Gesellschaft (DDG) and the Berufsverband Deutscher Dermatologen (BVDD) have initiated a project to develop evidence-based guidelines for the management of psoriasis. They were first published in 2006 and updated in 2011. The Guidelines focus on induction therapy in cases of mild, moderate and severe plaque-type psoriasis in adults including systemic therapy, UV therapy and topical therapies. The therapeutic recommendations were developed based on the results of a systematic literature search and were finalized during a consensus meeting using structured consensus methods (nominal group process).

Effective and sustainable biologic treatment of psoriasis: what can we learn from new clinical data?

The introduction of the biologic agents, adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab and ustekinumab, has provided more options for the short- and long-term treatment of patients with psoriasis. Physicians are now able to achieve and maintain effective disease control in more patients using biologic therapies. Newly published clinical data support the introduction of novel optimization strategies to further improve outcomes in patients with psoriasis. Recent randomized controlled clinical trials have provided data on the efficacy of conventional therapies, including systemic agents, and biologics at specific time points. Switching from methotrexate to a tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α antagonist after 16 weeks can improve response rates, as demonstrated in a study of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, while the benefit of long-term methotrexate use remains unclear. In a separate study, psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) ≥ 75 response rates were maintained over time (>3 years for adalimumab), suggesting that long-term biologic therapy is an effective and sustainable treatment option for psoriasis. For each individual patient, the benefit of a particular treatment needs to be balanced with the risks. The lack of head-to-head trials of antipsoriatic therapies, particularly biologic therapies, does not help with making individualized treatment decisions. However, a benefit-risk assessment of TNF-α antagonists calculated from an integrated analysis of published literature in moderate-to-severe psoriasis can be used to aid clinical practice. The number needed to treat, number needed to harm and number of patient years of observation to detect an adverse event have been determined for adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab. The benefit-risk profiles generated demonstrated that, during the initial year of treatment, likelihood of success with TNF-α antagonists was several orders of magnitude greater than the likelihood of serious toxicity.

Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: section 6. Guidelines of care for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: case-based presentations and evidence-based conclusions

Psoriasis is a common, chronic, inflammatory, multisystem disease with predominantly skin and joint manifestations affecting approximately 2% of the population. In the first 5 parts of the American Academy of Dermatology Psoriasis Guidelines of Care, we have presented evidence supporting the use of topical treatments, phototherapy, traditional systemic agents, and biological therapies for patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. In this sixth and final section of the Psoriasis Guidelines of Care, we will present cases to illustrate how to practically use these guidelines in specific clinical scenarios. We will describe the approach to treating patients with psoriasis across the entire spectrum of this fascinating disease from mild to moderate to severe, with and without psoriatic arthritis, based on the 5 prior published guidelines. Although specific therapeutic recommendations are given for each of the cases presented, it is important that treatment be tailored to meet individual patients' needs. In addition, we will update the prior 5 guidelines and address gaps in research and care that currently exist, while making suggestions for further studies that could be performed to help address these limitations in our knowledge base.

[Guidelines on the use of methotrexate in psoriasis]

Psoriasis, a chronic multifactorial inflammatory disease that develops in genetically predisposed individuals, affects approximately 1.5% of the Spanish population. This disease has a negative impact on patients' quality of life, and long-term therapy is often required to control the symptoms. In addition to the classical systemic treatments (methotrexate, acitretin, cyclosporine, and ultraviolet light), the group of drugs known as biologics (etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab) provides the dermatologist with an expanded therapeutic armamentarium, thereby improving the likelihood of controlling psoriasis in patients with severe and/or extensive disease. Methotrexate, a classic antipsoriatic drug, is still very useful either as single-drug therapy or in combination with other systemic drugs, particularly as a rescue therapy or combined with biologics. This article aims to establish the role of methotrexate in the treatment of psoriasis. We considered it of interest to develop guidelines for using methotrexate in the management of psoriasis with a view to ensuring the safe and proper use of this drug in the management of psoriasis. This document was developed by consensus among members of the Psoriasis Group of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

The use of cyclosporine in dermatology: part I

Cyclosporine is a calcineurin inhibitor that acts selectively on T cells. It has been used in dermatology since 1997 for its US Food and Drug Administration indication of psoriasis and off-label for various other inflammatory skin conditions, including atopic dermatitis, blistering disorders, and connective tissue diseases. In the last decade, many dermatologists have hesitated to use this important drug in their clinical practices because of its toxicity profile. The purpose of this article is to review the mechanism of action of cyclosporine and its current uses and dosing schedules. It is our goal to create a framework in which dermatologists feel comfortable and safe incorporating cyclosporine into their prescribing regimens.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completing this learning activity, participants should be able to describe the mechanism of action of cyclosporine, recognize the potential role of cyclosporine in dermatology and the evidence to support this role, and incorporate cyclosporine into his or her prescribing regimens.

Cyclosporin combined with methotrexate in two patients with recalcitrant subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus

The treatment of subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus is a therapeutic challenge. Frequently, patients are resistant to or intolerant towards single selected immunosuppressants. In combination, lower doses of methotrexate and cyclosporin A might be used to minimize toxicity. This is the first report of a successful combination of these drugs in two patients suffering from subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus refractory to standard treatment.

Cyclosporine and psoriasis: 2008 National Psoriasis Foundation Consensus Conference

BACKGROUND

Cyclosporine is a valuable option for the treatment of psoriasis. This report summarizes studies regarding the use of cyclosporine since the last guidelines were published in 1998.

OBJECTIVE

A task force of the National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board was convened to evaluate treatment options. Our aim was to achieve a consensus on new updated guidelines for the use of cyclosporine in the treatment of psoriasis.

METHODS

Reports in the literature were reviewed regarding cyclosporine therapy.

LIMITATIONS

There are few evidence-based studies on the treatment of psoriasis with cyclosporine.

RESULTS

A consensus was achieved on the use of cyclosporine in psoriasis including specific recommendations on dosing, monitoring, and use of cyclosporine in special situations. The consensus received approval from members of the National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board.

CONCLUSIONS

Cyclosporine is a safe and effective drug for the treatment of psoriasis. It has a particularly useful role in managing psoriatic crises, treating psoriasis unresponsive to other modalities, bridging to other therapies, and treating psoriasis within a rotational scheme of other medications. Appropriate patient selection and monitoring will significantly decrease the risks of side effects.

The use of ciclosporin in psoriasis

Ciclosporin is a cyclic undecapeptide discovered in the 1970s to possess a potent inhibitory action on T lymphocytes. The subsequent discovery, in 1979, that it was remarkably effective in treatment of psoriasis transformed thinking about the nature of the disease, which subsequently became generally recognized as autoimmune in nature. Ciclosporin remains one of the most effective and rapidly acting treatments currently available for psoriasis. Virtually all the diverse manifestations of this disease can respond. The main side effects are nephrotoxicity and hypertension. There is considerable variation between individuals in susceptibility to these so careful monitoring is required. Ciclosporin should be used in single or intermittent short courses for all except the most severe cases as this is safer than continuous treatment. The rate of improvement depends very much on the dose, which ranges from 2 to 5.0 mg/kg/day. Ciclosporin can be combined with any topical treatment and a useful dose-sparing effect can be achieved in this way if patients are compliant. In severe cases ciclosporin is often used in combination with other systemic antipsoriatic drugs in order to spare the dose of each agent and reduce toxicity. Concurrent or intercurrent use of ultraviolet therapy is discouraged due to the increased risk of non-melanoma skin cancer. This article reviews the mode of action, pharmacokinetics, indications, contraindications, side effects, dosage regimens, pretreatment screening and monitoring, drug interactions, and use of treatment combinations with ciclosporin in the management of psoriasis.

Methotrexate and psoriasis: 2009 National Psoriasis Foundation Consensus Conference

BACKGROUND

Methotrexate remains a valuable option for the treatment of psoriasis. This report will summarize studies regarding the use of methotrexate since the last guidelines were published in 1998.

OBJECTIVE

A task force of the National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board was convened to evaluate treatment options. Our aim was to achieve a consensus on new updated guidelines for the use of methotrexate in the treatment of psoriasis.

METHODS

Reports in the literature were reviewed regarding methotrexate therapy.

RESULTS

A consensus was achieved on use of methotrexate in psoriasis including specific recommendations on dosing and monitoring. The consensus received unanimous approval from members of the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation.

LIMITATIONS

There are few evidence-based studies on the treatment of psoriasis with methotrexate. Many of the reviewed reports are for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

CONCLUSIONS

Methotrexate is a safe and effective drug for the treatment of psoriasis. Appropriate patient selection and monitoring will significantly decrease the risks of side effects. In patients without risk factors for hepatic fibrosis, liver biopsies may not be indicated or the frequency of liver biopsies may be markedly reduced.

Psoriatic arthritis

Although there is still some controversy about the existence of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) as a specific form of inflammatory arthritis associated with psoriasis, epidemiological and clinical studies support the unique features of PsA. Because of lack of diagnostic or classification criteria, the disease has been thought of as uncommon. New classification criteria should facilitate case definition of PsA. Over the past several decades, it has become clear that the disease leads to serious disability and even increased mortality. Traditional medications have not been effective in preventing the progression of joint damage. New medications, including biologics, have emerged with potential to controlling the inflammation and arresting the progression of joint damage.

Systemic therapies for psoriasis: methotrexate, retinoids, and cyclosporine

Despite the current use and ongoing development of the biological therapies 'traditional' systemic agents will continue to form a key part of the therapeutic armamentarium for patients with severe psoriasis. Long-term maintenance therapy with retinoids and methotrexate is cost-effective and, for many patients with psoriasis, life changing. Regular monitoring is required for both treatments, particularly methotrexate to prevent significant bone marrow suppression and hepatotoxicity. Ideally, cyclosporine should be used for short courses of 3 to 4 months duration, within which it provides excellent disease control. Close assessment of renal function and blood pressure is essential.

A comparison of vitamin A and leucovorin for the prevention of methotrexate-induced micronuclei production in rat bone marrow

INTRODUCTION

Methotrexate, a folate antagonist, is a mainstay treatment for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. It is also widely used in a low dose formulation to treat patients with rheumatoid arthritis. In rats, methotrexate is known to induce micronuclei formation, leading to genetic damage, while vitamin A is known to protect against such methotrexate-induced genetic damage. Leucovorin (folinic acid) is generally administered with methotrexate to decrease methotrexate-induced toxicity.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine whether vitamin A and leucovorin differed in their capacity to prevent formation of methotrexate-induced micronuclei in rat bone marrow erythrocytes. The present study also aimed to evaluate the effect of combined treatment with vitamin A and leucovorin on the formation of methotrexate-induced micronuclei.

METHODS

Male and female Wistar rats (n=8) were injected with 20 mg/kg methotrexate (single i.p. dose). The control group received an equal volume of distilled water. The third and fourth groups of rats received vitamin A (5000 IU daily dose for 4 successive days) and leucovorin (0.5 mg/kg i.p. dose for 4 successive days), respectively. The fifth and sixth groups of rats received a combination of vitamin A and a single dose of methotrexate and a combination of leucovorin and methotrexate, respectively. The last group of rats received a combination of leucovorin, vitamin A and single dose of methotrexate. Samples were collected at 24 hours after the last dose of the treatment into 5% bovine albumin. Smears were obtained and stained with May-Grunwald and Giemsa. One thousand polychromatic erythrocytes were counted per animal for the presence of micronuclei and the percentage of polychromatic erythrocyte was determined.

RESULTS

Comparison of methotrexate-treated rats with the control group showed a significant increase in the percentage of cells with micronuclei and a significant decrease polychromatic erythrocyte percentage. Combined methotrexate and vitamin A therapy and combined methotrexate and leucovorin therapy led to significant decreases in the micronuclei percentage and an increase in polychromatic erythrocyte percentage when compared to rats treated with methotrexate alone. Leucovorin was found to be more effective than vitamin A against the formation of methotrexate-induced micronuclei.

CONCLUSIONS

Both vitamin A and leucovorin provided significant protection against genetic damage induced by methotrexate.

Evidence-based (S3) guidelines for the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris

Psoriasis vulgaris is a common and often chronic inflammatory skin disease. The incidence of psoriasis in Western industrialized countries ranges from 1 to 2%. Patients afflicted with severe psoriasis vulgaris may experience a significant reduction in quality of life. Despite the large variety of treatment options available, patient surveys have revealed lack of satisfaction with the efficacy of available treatments and a high rate of non-compliance. To optimize the treatment of psoriasis in Germany, the Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG) and the Berufsverband Deutscher Dermatologen (BVDD) initiated a project to develop evidence-based guidelines for the management of psoriasis. These resulting Guidelines focus on induction therapy in cases of mild, moderate, and severe plaquetype psoriasis in adults. The Guidelines include evidence-based evaluation of the efficacy of all currently available therapeutic options in Germany. In addition, they offer detailed information on how best to administer the various treatments and give information on contraindications, adverse drug reactions, and drug interactions as well as estimates of practicability and cost. The Guidelines were developed following the recommendations of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft wissenschaftlicher medizinischer Fachgesellschaften (AWMF). The therapeutic recommendations were developed by an expert group and finalized during interdisciplinary consensus conferences.

Current and future management of psoriasis

Management of psoriasis begins with identification of the extent of cutaneous disease. However, a holistic, contractual approach to treatment is encouraged, with particular reference to psychosocial disability and quality-of-life issues. The presence of psoriasis on palms, soles, body folds, genitals, face, or nails, and concomitant joint disease, are also important when considering treatment options. An evidence-based approach is essential in delineating differences between the many available treatments. However, archaic approaches, especially combinational ones, are routinely used by some clinicians, with inadequate prospective or comparative evidence. Treatments currently available are: topical agents used predominantly for mild disease and for recalcitrant lesions in more severe disease; phototherapy for moderate disease; and systemic agents including photochemotherapy, oral agents, and newer injectable biological agents, which have revolutionised the management of severe psoriasis. Other innovative treatments are undergoing clinical studies, with the aim of maintaining safe, long-term control of the condition.

Methotrexate and ciclosporin combination for the treatment of severe psoriasis

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is a chronic skin disease that often requires long-term therapy to control the symptoms. Combination therapies for severe psoriasis have advantages for disease control and are thought to reduce long-term side-effects.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and side-effects of methotrexate plus ciclosporin used in combination for the treatment of severe psoriasis.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 20 patients were treated with the combination of methotrexate and ciclosporin. Methotrexate was given intramuscularly as a single weekly dose of 10 mg and ciclosporin at a dose of 3.5 mg/kg/day in two equally divided doses. Clinical response was assessed according to clinical outcome and the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index which were evaluated at the beginning of therapy (PASI1), after cessation of one agent (PASI2), and at the end of therapy (PASI3).

RESULTS

All the patients had previously received one or more systemic treatment. There were 10 women and 10 men (mean age 44 years). The median (minimum to maximum) duration of methotrexate and ciclosporin treatments were 12.5 (4-55) and 14.0 (4-80) weeks, respectively. Median duration of combination therapy was 9.5 weeks (range 4-50). The median of previously used and end-of-study cumulative doses of methotrexate were 181.8 mg (range 0-785) and 330.8 mg (range 50-845), respectively. The median PASI scores were decreased by 77.4% (range 51.2-90.2) and 75.9% (range 10.1-100) at PASI2 and PASI3, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients with severe psoriasis had clinically significant improvement after the initiation of combination therapy. Healing rate was decreased upon cessation of one of the medications. Short-term side-effects were minor, transient and manageable. Long-term follow-up of patients treated with this combination is needed.

Optimal management of severe plaque form of psoriasis

Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory, hyperproliferative skin disease that affects 1-2% of the general population in the UK and US. Plaque psoriasis is the most common form, accounting for approximately 90% of cases. The disease is usually chronic and persistent, although up to 50% of patients may enter spontaneous remission for varying periods of time. There is no cure for psoriasis; therefore, the aim of treatment is to minimize the extent and severity of the disease to the point at which it no longer substantially disrupts the patient's quality of life. First-line therapy of psoriasis usually consists of topical agents, such as emollients, tar, dithranol, and vitamin D3 analogs. In cases of severe, extensive psoriasis, where topical therapy is either impractical or not sufficiently effective, systemic treatment may be warranted at the outset. In these circumstances, the therapeutic options include: (i) intensive inpatient or day center topical therapy; (ii) phototherapy; and/or (iii) systemic agents. There are now a number of systemic agents available for the treatment of severe psoriasis, but all have potential adverse effects. We review the current treatment options, which include the use of phototherapy and systemic agents, and provide recommendations on their use in clinical practice. Importantly, treatment should be tailored to each individual patient depending on concurrent medical problems (which might preclude certain agents), patient choice and acceptance of the risk of adverse effects.

Current and investigational treatment of psoriatic arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is now recognised as a progressively destructive inflammatory arthritis that can lead to joint deformity and functional disability. Early diagnosis and treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are necessary to control disease, particularly in patients with clinical factors and human leukocyte antigen markers predictive of progressive disease. However, there are few randomised controlled trials of the traditional DMARDs in PsA and none have demonstrated efficacy on axial manifestations or delay in radiological progression. The demonstration of raised levels of TNF-alpha in psoriatic skin and synovial tissue has provided a rationale for the application of biological agents in PsA. Furthermore, the recognition of the role of T-cell activation in both psoriasis and PsA has led to the therapeutic targeting of T lymphocytes, the results of which at this early stage are encouraging. This article reviews the studies of the most widely used traditional DMARDs in PsA followed by studies with leflunomide and the biological response modifiers, including TNF-alpha antagonists and T-cell-targeted therapies.

Psoriatic arthritis

Although there is still some controversy about the existence of psoriatic arthritis as a specific form of inflammatory arthritis associated with psoriasis, epidemiological, and clinical studies support the unique features of psoriatic arthritis. Because of lack of diagnostic or classification criteria, the disease has been thought of as uncommon. Over the past several decades, it has become clear that the disease leads to serious disability and even increased mortality. Traditional medications have not been effective in preventing the progression of joint damage. New medications, including biologics, have emerged with the potential to control the inflammation and arrest the progression of joint damage.

A randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, multicentre trial of combination therapy with methotrexate plus ciclosporin in patients with active psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding ciclosporin A (CSA) to the treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) demonstrating an incomplete response to methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy.

METHODS

In a 12 month, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial at five centres in three countries, 72 patients with active PsA with an incomplete response to MTX were randomised to receive either CSA (n = 38) or placebo (n = 34). Patients underwent full clinical and radiological assessment and, in addition, high resolution ultrasound (HRUS) was performed at one centre. An intention to treat (last observation carried forward) analysis was employed.

RESULTS

Some significant improvements were noted at 12 months in both groups. However, in the active but not the placebo arm there were significant improvements in swollen joint count, mean (SD), from 11.7 (9.7) to 6.7 (6.5) (p<0.001) and C reactive protein, from 17.4 (14.5) to 12.7 (14.3) mg/l (p<0.05) as compared with baseline. The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score improved in the active group (2 (2.3) to 0.8 (1.3)) as compared with placebo (2.2 (2.7) to 1.9 (2.8)), p<0.001, and synovitis detected by HRUS (33 patients, 285 joints) was reduced by 33% in the active group compared with 6% in the placebo group (p<0.05). No improvement in Health Assessment Questionnaire or pain scores was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Synovitis detected by HRUS was significantly reduced. Combining CSA and MTX treatment in patients with active PsA, and a partial response to MTX, significantly improves the signs of inflammation but not pain or quality of life.

Biologics in combination with nonbiologics: efficacy and safety

The mechanisms of action of biologic therapies differ from the currently used systemic therapies by attacking specific steps in the pathogenesis pathway of psoriasis. Preliminary data show that combination therapy using biologics may allow for improved therapeutic efficacy with fewer side effects, including decreased risk of hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity commonly associated with the most widely used systemic agents, methotrexate, and cyclosporine. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the increased immunosuppression, increased risk of infection, potential for development of certain types of malignancy, as well as the significant increased cost of therapy. Both potential benefits and toxicities of combination therapy will be reviewed here. Long-term clinical studies are warranted to more accurately quantify the risks and benefits associated with combination therapy. The role of combination therapy will continue to be refined over the next few years to maximize its potential in the treatment of resistant psoriasis.

The use of ciclosporin in psoriasis: a clinical review

Psoriasis is a chronic condition that shows variability in phenotype and severity. The disease can seriously compromise patients' quality of life, regardless of disease extent. Systemic treatment is indicated when lesional burden is extensive and/or frequently relapsing, and when quality of life is severely altered. Furthermore, surveys have indicated that patients are dissatisfied with their current topical or phototherapy. The efficacy of ciclosporin in the treatment of psoriasis is well established. However, widespread use of this drug has been limited by concerns over adverse effects, such as renal impairment, hypertension and the potential risk of malignancy. Data from many clinical trials designed to examine the efficacy and safety of long-term continuous and intermittent short-course (< 12 weeks) therapy are now available. Information from these studies has aided dermatologists in developing treatment guidelines. Intermittent short-course therapy is well tolerated, safe, and highly effective in sustaining disease control and promoting quality of life. Long-term continuous ciclosporin therapy may be useful in some patients with refractory psoriasis. If treatment guidelines are followed, the risk of nephrotoxicity and hypertension is low. Ciclosporin therapy is associated with an increased risk of non-melanoma skin cancer (mainly squamous cell carcinoma) when patients have been previously exposed to psoralen-ultraviolet A (PUVA). The incidence of non-skin malignancy shows no significant difference to that observed in the general population.

Methotrexate markedly reduces the expression of vascular E-selectin, cutaneous lymphocyte-associated antigen and the numbers of mononuclear leucocytes in psoriatic skin

A positive correlation between disease severity and the frequency of cutaneous lymphocyte-associated antigen (CLA)-positive T cells in the blood of untreated patients with psoriasis has been previously observed. A dose-dependent inverse relationship between disease severity and the frequency of circulating CLA(+) T cells in psoriasis patients on methotrexate (MTX) treatment is reported. Circulating T cells from a patient with psoriasis were monitored for CLA expression on a daily basis for 5 weeks. A decrease in the intensity and frequency of CLA(+) mononuclear leucocytes was consistently observed in the blood during the first 3-4 days after each MTX intake, but the CLA expression increased thereafter until the next weekly dose was taken. The MTX treatment of this patient was then discontinued for 16 days, and a marked subjective exacerbation was reported within 9 days, which was confirmed objectively (laser Doppler perfusion imaging) after 11 and 16 days. Biopsies taken 4 days after the last MTX intake showed only a few mononuclear leucocytes in lesional skin, but the exacerbation coincided with a marked increase in CLA expression by mononuclear blood leucocytes, followed by an increase in endothelial E-selectin and a striking influx of CLA(+) mononuclear cells into lesional skin. Conversely, a clinical improvement after the patient resumed the MTX treatment was associated with reduction in CLA expression by mononuclear cells in the blood, downregulation of endothelial E-selectin and an approximate threefold decrease in mononuclear leucocyte infiltration of lesional skin. No MTX-associated changes were detected in the expression of very late antigen-4, vascular cell-adhesion molecule-1 nor the late activation marker CD25. It is concluded that MTX decreases the expression of CLA and E-selectin and that this may be a major mechanism for the therapeutic effect of MTX on psoriatic skin lesions.

Ciclosporin in psoriasis clinical practice: an international consensus statement

The main recommendations for the use of ciclosporin in the management of psoriasis are: (i) intermittent short courses (average of 12 weeks duration) of ciclosporin are preferable; (ii) ciclosporin should be given in the dose range 2.5-5.0 mg kg(-1) day(-1) (doses greater than 5.0 mg kg(-1) day(-1) should only be given in exceptional circumstances); (iii) treatment regimens should be tailored to the needs of each patient; (iv) selection of patients should take into account psychosocial disability, as well as clinical extent of disease and failure of previous treatment; (v) each patient's renal function (as measured by serum creatinine) should be thoroughly assessed before and during treatment; (vi) each patient's blood pressure should be carefully monitored before and during treatment; (vii) adherence to treatment guidelines substantially reduces the risk of adverse events; (viii) long-term continuous ciclosporin therapy may be appropriate in a subgroup of patients; however, duration of treatment should be kept below 2 years whenever possible; and (ix) when long-term continuous ciclosporin therapy is necessary, annual evaluation of glomerular filtration rate may be useful to accurately monitor renal function.

Combination therapy to treat moderate to severe psoriasis

In patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, remission can be difficult to achieve and sustain. Both acutely acting and long-term maintenance agents are needed. Speed and efficiency of available monotherapies tend to be inversely proportional to safety. Combination, rotational, and sequential approaches are often more effective and safer than single-agent therapy. Combining agents with complementary adverse effect profiles is preferable. Apparent synergistic enhancement is seen with most paired combinations of the four major therapies: acitretin, phototherapy (ultraviolet B/psoralen plus ultraviolet A), cyclosporine, and methotrexate. Of those, only cyclosporine in combination with psoralen plus ultraviolet A is contraindicated because of increased cancer risk. Combinations of each of those major therapies with topical agents (retinoids, steroids, vitamin D derivatives, and others) have been used with varying efficacy and safety. The immunomodulators, hydroxyurea and thioguanine, have also shown some success in combination therapy. The new biologic agents with their novel modes of action and adverse effect profiles may prove to be important adjuncts in combination/rotational/sequential approaches. In some cases, monotherapy (with either systemic agents or phototherapy) adequately controls moderate to severe disease. A regimen using a single agent has the advantages of lower cost and greater adherence by the patient. For any number of reasons, however, including loss of efficacy, adverse effects, or cumulative or acute toxicity-and especially the inability to clear resistant lesions-a single modality will not be adequate. Using two or more therapies is thus the rule rather than the exception for most patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, but picking a combination that serves to balance safety and efficacy needs careful consideration, especially since no evidence-based treatment guidelines exist.

Prevalence of joint disease in patients with psoriasis: implications for therapy

Joint diseases are common among patients with psoriasis. Psoriatic arthritis, the most important of these, can be defined as a rheumatoid factor-negative inflammatory arthritis associated with psoriasis and has emerged as a specific disease independent from rheumatoid arthritis. Psoriatic arthritis is divided into several clinical subsets, which is helpful in differentiating it from other types of inflammatory arthritis. The prevalence of arthritis in patients with psoriasis may be far higher than the previously accepted average of 7%. In a recent study of 5,795 members of the Nordic Psoriasis Associations, the prevalence was found to be 30%. Arthritis has a significant impact on quality of life in patients with psoriasis. These factors should be recognised as they have implications for therapy, since a number of drugs can delay or stop joint damage when given in time. This also applies to the new biologic agents, although at present these therapies are generally restricted to patients non-responsive to other available drugs. Alone or in combination, the new drugs may achieve higher response rates and have better safety profiles than older therapies. However, long-term experience is still lacking and, unfortunately, the new drugs will be far from affordable by all for some time to come.

Strategy to manage the treatment of severe psoriasis: considerations of efficacy, safety and cost

Psoriasis is a common, unpredictable, chronic immune-mediated disease characterised by skin lesions and frequently associated with arthritis. Although rarely fatal, psoriasis has a tremendous impact on a patients' quality of life. Traditional therapies for severe psoriasis include phototherapy, methotrexate, oral retinoids and cyclosporin. New biological agents add to the treatment options for psoriasis; however, they raise the already considerable cost of managing the disease. In considering efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness, ultraviolet Type B (UVB) phototherapy appears to be the best first-line agent for the control of psoriasis. Methotrexate, psoralen plus UVA, alefacept, etanercept and infliximab are appropriate second-line agents, the choice of which requires considerable patient input and physician judgement. Developing rational, effective and acceptable strategies to manage psoriasis treatments would encourage cost-effective psoriasis management.

Current systemic therapies for psoriasis: where are we now?

Many systemic agents are used in the treatment of psoriasis. They provide good control of psoriasis in the majority of patients and have improved their life quality indices. Frequently, combination therapy is utilized to synergize the efficacy of these medications. Many dermatologists are hesitant in prescribing systemic agents because of their adverse effects. However, such potential toxicities arising from these medications can largely be avoided if proper patient selection and close monitoring are performed.

Combining the new biologic agents with our current psoriasis armamentarium

Combination therapy, rotational therapy, and sequential therapy have been used for psoriasis in attempts to achieve greater efficacy and greater safety. The purpose of this manuscript is to review potential advantages and disadvantages of new biologic agents as we look forward to their use in combination regimens with other systemic, topical, and light therapies. Data on the efficacy and toxicity of existing systemic therapies and new biologic agents is reviewed with an emphasis on potential additive or synergistic benefits or toxicities. The mechanism of action of biologic agents differs from systemic agents currently in use, suggesting that there may be additive effects in treating psoriasis. The absence of hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity are important advantages when considering combination therapy with biologic agents. The advantages of the use of biologic therapies in combination or rotation with other systemic agents will have to be demonstrated in clinical trials. Mechanisms of action of the biologic therapies suggest that there is potential for additive benefit when used in combination regimens.

Current concepts in psoriasis and its treatment

Many advances have been made in our understanding of the biology of psoriasis over the past 20 years. We are close to knowing the genetic determinants of psoriasis. There is now greater insight into the immunological mechanisms that produce the phenotype, and the possibility of intervening selectively to antagonise some of these mechanisms is becoming a reality. Nevertheless, psoriasis remains an enigmatic disease, and much of the suffering it produces is not adequately addressed. The sheer number of treatments that are used therapeutically suggests a lack of efficacy and/or toxicity of many of these approaches. In this review, we aim to briefly describe the biology of psoriasis, document the key features of treatments that are available or under development, and explain how these treatments can be used effectively to manage this chronic relapsing disease.