False negative factor V Leiden assay following allogeneic stem cell transplant

Diagnostic Testing Approaches for Activated Protein C Resistance and Factor V Leiden: A Comparison of Institutional and National Provider Practices

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the economic impact of testing for activated protein C resistance (APC-R) due to factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation with APC-R with reflexive FVL genotyping (algorithmic approach) or genotyping alone.

METHODS

OptumLabs Data Warehouse (OLDW) data were used to assess testing approaches. Insurance claims for APC-R and FVL in 2013 were compared with the Mayo Clinic database. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services diagnostic fee schedules were used to assign costs.

RESULTS

Of 19.3 million OLDW-covered individuals, 74,242 (0.385%) received 75,608 tests: APC-R, 2,265 (2.9%); FVL genotyping, 70,619 (90.1%); and both APC-R and FVL, 2,724 (7.0%). In total, 1,317 tests were performed at Mayo Clinic: APC-R with reflex FVL (1,256; 95.4%) and FVL alone (61; 4.6%). Costs per evaluated individual and per total population (person/year) in OLDW and algorithmic approach were $83.77 vs $36.38 and $0.32 vs $0.14, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The cost-optimized algorithmic approach reduces health care costs.

An improved algorithm for activated protein C resistance and factor V Leiden screening

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance of a Russell viper venom-based activated protein C resistance (APCR) screening test relative to DNA analysis for the factor V Leiden mutation.

METHODS

We evaluated the concordance between Pefakit APCR screening results and DNA analysis for 435 patients homozygous (n = 11), heterozygous (n = 310), or wild-type (n =114) for the G1691A allele.

RESULTS

Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, we found that a cutoff of 1.89 for the APCR ratio yields a sensitivity and specificity of 99.1%. In patients with discrepant genotype-phenotype correlation, their APCR may provide a more clinically relevant result.

CONCLUSIONS

We compared several strategies for employing reflex testing and found that performing initial APCR screening followed by confirmatory molecular analysis on a subset of cases in the borderline regions between the diagnostic groups can reduce unnecessary testing by approximately 80% without compromising diagnostic accuracy.

Predictive genetic testing of a bone marrow recipient-ethical issues involving unexpected results, gender issues, test accuracy, and implications for the donor

We present a case where an apparently straightforward Lynch syndrome predictive genetic test of DNA from a blood sample from a woman yielded an unexpected result of X/Y chromosome imbalance. Furthermore, it demonstrates the complexities of genetic testing in people who have had bone marrow transplants. This highlights the potential for multiple ethical and counselling challenges, including the inadvertent testing of the donor. Good communication between clinics and laboratories is essential to overcome such challenges and to minimise the provision of false results.

False-negative factor V Leiden genetic testing in a patient with recurrent deep venous thrombosis

False-negative genetic testing of the factor V Leiden (fVL) mutation is unusual. We report a case of a young woman with a history of deep venous thrombosis tested for the fVL at four separate laboratories on four separate dates. Two laboratories reported the patient to be heterozygous for the fVL, while the other two reported no evidence of a mutation. Testing methods of the various laboratories were reviewed, and additional testing was performed on stored and newly drawn DNA samples, including sequencing of the fVL gene segment. The preponderance of evidence indicates the patient to be heterozygous for the fVL mutation. Dissection of data suggests that either sample misidentification or faulty allele specific amplification methods could have led to false-negative results in two laboratories. In one of the two laboratories, misinterpretation of results and clerical error could not be excluded. There is a need for standardization of optimized fVL genetic testing methods. Further education of ordering physicians on the limitations of genetic testing is necessary.

Hypercoagulable states in renal transplant candidates: impact of anticoagulation upon incidence of renal allograft thrombosis

INTRODUCTION

Although multiple studies of demographic variables have been associated with allograft thrombosis, these results are not routinely reproducible. Are ESRD patients with hypercoagulable states (HCS) (antithrombin III deficiency, protein S or C deficiency, activated protein C resistance, and anticardiolipin antibodies) at predictably greater risk for allograft thrombosis?

METHODS

Between 1996 and 1999, all renal transplant candidates were screened for hypercoagulability risk factors [HRF] (multiple arteriovenous access thromboses, prior deep vein thrombosis, prior allograft thrombosis, collagen vascular disease, multiple miscarriages, diabetes, autoimmune disease, and Fabry's disease). HRF(+) candidates were then tested for HCS status. We administered preemptive posttransplant i.v. Heparin in HCS(+) patients and observed the impact of this intervention upon the incidence of allograft thrombosis. We compared demographic data and incidence of allograft thrombosis in an historic control (346 patients transplanted between June 31, 1992, and March 5, 1996) not tested for HCS and a study cohort (502 patients transplanted between March 6, 1996, and June 31, 1999) prospectively screened for HRF. HRF(+) patients who were HCS(+) in the study cohort received i.v. heparin immediately after transplant and p.o. warfarin as outpatients.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics previously implicated in allograft thrombosis were equivalently distributed in both cohorts with the exceptions that more living-donor transplants (33.1% vs. 15.3%) were performed in study cohort, CIT>24 hr occurred in more control patients (37.3% vs. 22.1%) and more study patients (16.7% vs. 0%) received tacrolimus. Hypercoagulable states were found upon reevaluating five of seven controls (71.4%), who lost prior allografts to thrombosis. Hypercoagulable states were prospectively detected in 10 study patients with hypercoagulability risk factors. Most (9 of 10) study patients receiving anticoagulation have achieved long-term allograft function. Study group allograft thrombosis incidence was reduced (1.59% vs. 4.05%). Hypercoagulable states were demonstrated in most episodes of allograft thrombosis. Control patients who lost prior allografts to thrombosis were anticoagulated after retransplantation and 100% achieved long-term allograft function.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term allograft function has been achieved in 90% of study patients when prophylactically anticoagulating study patients with hypercoagulable states. A 2.6-fold reduction in the expected incidence of allograft thrombosis was observed in anticoagulated patients with hypercoagulable states.

Allograft loss in renal transplant recipients with Fabry's disease and activated protein C resistance

INTRODUCTION

Fabry's disease is associated with an increased incidence of thrombotic events and rejection. Spontaneous thrombosis of a functioning cadaveric renal allograft in a recipient with Fabry's disease prompted prospective evaluation of all transplant candidates with Fabry's disease for hypercoagulability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Transplant candidates with Fabry's disease were tested for hypercoagulability, analyzed for HLA-type and ABO group, and comorbid conditions suggestive of hypercoagulability.

RESULTS

A unique association of Fabry's disease with activated protein C Resistance was documented in a cohort of Caucasian male renal transplant recipients with Fabry's disease. Four of five patients were blood group A and had no significant comorbid conditions suggestive of hypercoagulability. The resistance to activation of protein C (APCR)(+) patients shared HLA loci-B8 and Dr3, although the APCR(-) patients shared HLA loci-B27 and -B38.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the observed increase in the incidence of APCR in our Fabry's cohort, we suggest screening all patients with Fabry's disease for APCR. Because factor V and factor Va receptors are found on vascular endothelium and peripheral blood monocytes, APCR in the presence of Fabry's disease may be a nonimmunological stimulus for rejection. Analysis of HLA typing in patients with Fabry's disease may further elucidate HLA-based association of Fabry's disease and resistance to activated protein C with the risk of thrombosis and rejection.

Factor V Leiden and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: chimerism as a confounding factor in genetic test interpretation

Factor V Leiden is one of the most common genetic conditions predisposing to venous thrombosis. Diagnosis is currently made by plasma activity assay for activated protein C (APC) resistance or polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based DNA assay. The occurrence of factor V Leiden is reported in a patient affected by acute myeloid leukaemia submitted to allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from an HLA identical sister. The donor was not affected by the factor V mutation. The patient did not develop thrombosis during induction and consolidation chemotherapy and the post-transplantation course was not complicated by thrombosis or veno-occlusive disease. At engraftment, PCR analysis showed the disappearance of factor V Leiden. Genetic tests on DNA after allogeneic marrow transplantation should be carefully interpreted as a result of donor chimerism.