Mobilizing peripheral blood stem cells with high-dose G-CSF alone is as effective as with Dexa-BEAM plus G-CSF in lymphoma patients

Preemptive and Upfront Plerixafor: Safe and Effective Strategy for Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell transplant and at High Risk for Mobilization Failure

Introduction: Approximately 10%–30% of patients are unable to collect the minimum number of stem cells to support high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (hematopoietic stem cell transplantation). Plerixafor alone or in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been shown to significantly increase the CD34 cell collection, especially in patients who failed their initial harvest strategy. This is a retrospective study of 17 preselected patients (relapsed lymphoma and myeloma), who were considered to have high risk of mobilization failure and who had undergone upfront and preemptive plerixafor mobilization. Patients and Methods: The mobilization protocol consisted of G-CSF (10–15 μg/kg) subcutaneously daily for 4 days before the initiation of plerixafor on evening of day 4. The patients then underwent apheresis on day 5. Results: Among 17 patients who underwent apheresis, 16 (93%) yielded the minimum required cell collection of ≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in a single apheresis session (2 days). Out of these 16 patients, 8 (53%) patients achieved the minimum target dose in a single day. Eight (50%) of all patients achieved the optimum target cell collection in a single apheresis session. Out of these eight patients, five (62%) patients collected optimum yield in a single day. Conclusion: Plerixafor is safe and effective if used upfront and preemptively for patients in whom mobilization of stem cells is considered to be a problem.

Hematopoietic stem cell mobilization with G-CSF

Cytokine mobilized peripheral blood stem cells are the preferred source of stem cells in autologous stem cell transplantation and have virtually replaced bone marrow as the stem cell source. In recent years, a dramatic increase has been reported in the use of peripheral blood stem cells for allogeneic transplantation as well. The reason for this rise is that peripheral blood stem cell transplants when compared to bone marrow transplants are associated with a more rapid recovery of granulocytes and platelets after transplantation and a lower regimen-related and transplant-related mortality. Peripheral blood stem cells can be easily harvested on an outpatient basis without the need for general anesthesia. In most cases peripheral blood stem cells are collected after G-CSF administration. In this chapter we describe peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in autologous transplant patients and in allogeneic donors using G-CSF.

Phase III prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor compared with placebo plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for autologous stem-cell mobilization and transplantation for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

PURPOSE

This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of plerixafor (AMD3100), a CXCR4 antagonist, in mobilizing hematopoietic stem cells for autologous stem-cell transplantation in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a phase III, multicenter, randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma requiring an autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in first or second complete or partial remission were eligible. Patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; 10 microg/kg) subcutaneously daily for up to 8 days. Beginning on evening of day 4 and continuing daily for up to 4 days, patients received either plerixafor (240 microg/kg) or placebo subcutaneously. Starting on day 5, patients began daily apheresis for up to 4 days or until > or = 5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg were collected. The primary end point was the percentage of patients who collected > or = 5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg in 4 or fewer apheresis days.

RESULTS

This report presents all data for all patients (n = 298) through 12 months follow-up. Eighty-nine (59%) of 150 patients in the plerixafor group and 29 (20%) of 148 patients in the placebo group met the primary end point (P < .001). One hundred thirty-five patients (90%) in plerixafor group and 82 patients (55%) in placebo group underwent transplantation after initial mobilization. Median time to engraftment was similar in both groups. The most common plerixafor-associated adverse events were GI disorders and injection site reactions.

CONCLUSION

Plerixafor and G-CSF were well tolerated and resulted in a significantly higher proportion of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma achieving the optimal CD34+ cell target for transplantation in fewer apheresis days, compared with G-CSF alone.

Dexa-BEAM as salvage therapy in patients with primary refractory aggressive Non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Although aggressive NHL in relapse after remission can still be cured by second-line treatment followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation, the long-term prognosis of patients who fail to obtain remission after first-line therapy remains extremely poor. We retrospectively evaluated a series of 29 consecutive patients with primary refractory high-grade NHL who were treated with Dexa-BEAM (DB) as uniform salvage therapy at a single institution. Twenty-nine patients with aggressive NHL primary refractory to CHOP or CHOP-like induction therapy with a median age of 47 (range, 22 - 64) years received 1 - 2 cycles of DB and were candidates for subsequent autologous stem cell (PBSC) mobilization and transplantation (PBSCT). Follow-up of all patients was updated in March 2004. Eight of 29 patients (28%) responded to one cycle of DB (1 complete/7 partial remissions); 2 of whom are alive after PBSCT (1 autologous/1 matched unrelated donor), 1 patient died after autologous PBSCT. Reasons for failure to proceed to high-dose therapy in spite of response to DB were recurrent progressive disease (n = 2), septicemia (n = 1), and allogeneic transplant-related mortality after mobilization failure to DB (n = 2). Twenty-one patients failed to respond to DB and died of progressive disease. Overall survival was 7% after 41 months. We conclude that Dexa-BEAM salvage therapy is not effective in patients with truly primary refractory high-grade NHL. The efficiency of rituximab combined with Dexa-BEAM or novel chemotherapeutic strategies needs to be established.

Finding the needle in the hay stack: hematopoietic stem cells in Fanconi anemia

Fanconi anemia is a rare bone marrow failure and cancer predisposition syndrome. Childhood onset of aplastic anemia is one of the hallmarks of this condition. Supportive therapy in the form of blood products, androgens, and hematopoietic growth factors may boost blood counts temporarily. However, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) currently remains the only curative treatment option for the hematologic manifestations of Fanconi anemia (FA). Here we review current clinical and pre-clinical strategies for treating hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) failure, including the experience with mobilizing and collecting CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells as target cells for somatic gene therapy, the current state of FA gene therapy trials, and future prospects for cell and gene therapy.

An analysis of the optimal timing of peripheral blood stem cell harvesting following priming with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF

Increasing demand on the apheresis service makes efficient harvesting of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) essential. A total of 168 adult patients with haematological malignancy were primed using low-moderate dose cyclophosphamide (1.5-3 g/m(2)) with G-CSF 5-10 microg/kg per day. Harvesting was booked and peripheral blood (PB) counts first checked between 6 and 10 days post-priming. One hundred and thirty (77%) patients harvested successfully (total harvest yield > or =2 x 10(6) CD34(+)/kg) and the median PBSC collection per procedure was 2.18 x 10(6)/kg (range 0.1-14.5). Only more lines of prior chemotherapy predicted failure to harvest in multivariate analysis (P=0.003). The PB CD34(+) cell count correlated significantly with harvest yield (r=0.8448, P<0.0001). A PB CD34(+) count > or =10/microl predicted a collection of > or =2 x 10(6)/kg (positive-predictive value of 61%, negative-predictive-value 100%). Patients first attending day 9 required significantly fewer visits to achieve a successful harvest than those first attending days 6-8 without increasing the risk of failure. No significant difference in failure rates, number of days attending and total harvest yield was found between days 9 and 10 attendees. Collection from day 9 may however enable higher target yields to be achieved. PB CD34(+) count monitoring should commence and harvesting booked from day 9 to optimize both the harvest and the efficiency of the PBSC harvesting service.

Ifosfamide, epirubicin, and etoposide (IEV) mobilize peripheral blood stem cells more efficiently than cyclophosphamide/etoposide

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support is an effective treatment in advanced multiple myeloma. In this study, we compare chemotherapy with ifosfamide, epirubicin, and etoposide (IEV) or cyclophosphamide and etoposide (CE) in 47 patients with multiple myeloma with regard to stem cell mobilization, toxicity, and tumor response. The proportion of patients reaching the threshold of >6 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg body weight was significantly higher in the IEV group (97% vs 71%), and more CD34+ cells (10 x 10(6) vs 3.5 x 10(6) cells/kg; p = 0.002) could be collected by the first leukapheresis associated with less leukaphereses needed. Non-hematopoietic side effects were mild with nausea being more frequent after IEV treatment (30% vs 7%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia (thrombocytopenia) occurred in 89 and 100% (55 and 44%) of the patients. There was one treatment-related death due to septic shock in the IEV group. Grade 3/4 anemia was more frequent in the IEV group (19% vs 0%). Forty-two percent (IEV) and 50% (CE) received inpatient treatment for neutropenic fever. In 20 and 7% of the patients, a partial response was observed after IEV and CE. However, the overall response rate (complete response and partial tumor response) after mobilization and tandem high-dose chemotherapy was 75% after IEV and 78% after CE and, thus, independent of the mobilization. In summary, both treatment protocols can readily be used for the mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells with comparable major toxicities and similar tumor response rates. However, the efficiency of the stem cell mobilization was significantly higher after IEV treatment.

Sepsis, low platelet nadir at mobilization and previous IFN use predict stem cell mobilization failure in patients with multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

Successful stem cell mobilization is a prerequisite for autologous blood cell transplantation. We analyzed factors that may predict the success of stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).

METHODS

We analyzed 124 consecutive patients and compared those who failed to mobilize a sufficient amount of CD34(+) cells (peak blood CD34(+) cell count <20x10(6)/L) (n=20) with those with successful mobilization (n=104). The peak blood CD34(+) cell count after mobilization was used as the marker of mobilization success against which the various predictive factors were tested.

RESULTS

In univariate analysis the best predictive factors for mobilization failure were the number of different chemotherapy regimens (P<0.001), number of chemotherapy cycles (P<0.001), time from diagnosis to mobilization (P<0.001) and previous use of IFN (P<0.001). The distributions of treatment responses at mobilization were similar in the groups with successful and unsuccessful mobilization, and were CR or VGPR in 10% of all patients, PR in 54% and stable or progressive disease in 36%. Regarding the mobilization-related factors, lower leukocyte nadir (P<0.001), longer duration of leukocyte counts <1x10(9)/L (P<0.001), lower platelet nadir (P=0.001), longer duration of platelet counts <20x10(9)/L (P<0.001) and the occurrence of sepsis after the mobilization therapy (P=0.001) were significantly associated with mobilization failure. In multivariate analysis, the amount of earlier chemotherapy cycles (P=0.002), low platelet nadir (P=0.020), occurrence of sepsis at mobilization (P=0.040) and previous use of IFN (P=0.052) remained as significant predictive factors for mobilization failure.

DISCUSSION

Predicting the success of stem cell mobilization beforehand may have important practical consequences. By identifying those patients who will fail to mobilize stem cells, unnecessary mobilization and collection attempts can be avoided.

Cytoreduction of lymphoid malignancies and mobilization of blood hematopoietic progenitor cells with high doses of cyclophosphamide and etoposide plus filgrastim

We evaluated the efficiency of high doses of cyclophosphamide (6 g/m2) and etoposide (2 g/m2) plus filgrastim (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; G-CSF) to mobilize autologous hematopoietic progenitor cells in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and Waldenström macroglobulinemia. We also evaluated the safety of this regimen and the engraftment kinetics after myeloablative chemotherapy. Seventy-nine patients with high-risk or relapsed/primary refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma, multiple myeloma, or Waldenström macroglobulinemia were treated. The mobilizing regimen was as follows: cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 twice daily for 10 doses, etoposide 200 mg/m2 twice daily for 10 doses (continuous; n=57) or 2 g/m2 over 10 hours on day 5 of etoposide (bolus; n=22), and G-CSF 5 microg/kg/d beginning day 14. Fifty-nine percent of patients achieved the primary end point (a CD34 cell dose of 5 million per kilogram with a single leukapheresis). More bolus etoposide patients achieved the primary end point (86%) compared with continuous etoposide patients (47%; P<.0001). The CD34 cell dose collected was greater in bolus etoposide patients (44 million per kilogram) than in continuous etoposide patients (10.9 million per kilogram; P<.0001). Patients took 3 weeks to recover >500/microL neutrophils and >20000/microL platelets after cyclophosphamide and etoposide. The overall response rate was 69% for non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients and 71% for multiple myeloma/Waldenström macroglobulinemia patients. The treatment-related mortality was 2.5%. Sixteen percent of surviving patients experienced grade>or=3 nonhematologic toxicity. Patients receiving bolus etoposide had significantly less grade>or=2 oral mucositis, less use of total parenteral nutrition, and less need for red blood cell and platelet transfusions. Sixty-four patients (81%) underwent autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation, with prompt engraftment. Four patients (5%) did not undergo autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation because of toxicity from high-dose cyclophosphamide and etoposide. We conclude that high doses of cyclophosphamide and etoposide combined with G-CSF are an efficient and safe mobilizing regimen for the collection of hematopoietic progenitor cells during aggressive cytoreduction of tumor burden in patients with lymphoid malignancies.

Ifosfamide, Idarubicin, and Etoposide in Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Disease or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Salvage Regimen with High Response Rates before Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

To achieve long-term disease-free survival, high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the current standard approach in patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin disease (HD) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Because chemosensitivity is a significant factor in determining transplantation eligibility, it is critical to select a salvage chemotherapy regimen that has the potential to induce a high response rate with low nonhematologic toxicity. In this phase II study, 49 patients with relapsed or refractory HD (n = 22) and NHL (n = 27) with a median age of 42 years were treated with an IIVP salvage regimen consisting of ifosfamide, idarubicin, and etoposide. Twenty-seven percent of the patients had primary refractory disease, whereas 22% and 51% had early and late relapses, respectively. As analyzed by intention to treat, 16 patients (33%) achieved complete remission and 21 patients (43%) achieved a partial response, leading to an overall response rate of 76% (63% in NHL and 91% in HD). In the univariate analysis, diagnosis (HD versus NHL), remission duration before the initiation of IIVP, disease bulk, increased lactate dehydrogenase, and the presence of "B" symptoms were significant factors affecting the response achieved by the IIVP regimen. Of 37 responders, 31 (84%) underwent high-dose therapy and transplantation. The probability of 4-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) in this group of patients who underwent ASCT was 67.7% and 49.1%, respectively. When compared with the patients who achieved a partial response, patients who achieved complete remission with the IIVP regimen had a significantly higher probability of 4-year EFS (67.3% versus 30%; P = .016) and 4-year OS (92.3% versus 39.2%; P = .003). In patients with HD, 4-year EFS and 4-year OS were 54.9% and 70.6%, respectively, without a significant difference with respect to the survival rates obtained in patients with NHL (43.6% and 63.6%, respectively). Common side effects observed during 102 cycles of therapy were grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (62%) and thrombocytopenia (58%). The IIVP regimen is a highly effective salvage regimen for patients with relapsed or refractory HD or NHL who are candidates for ASCT. Furthermore, the degree of response to IIVP predicts the posttransplantation outcome. However, close follow-up is necessary because of a high incidence of grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity.

G-CSF alone vs cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF in PBPC mobilization of patients with lymphoma: results depend on degree of previous pretreatment

We performed a randomized study to compare 'G-CSF alone' (administered at dose of 10 mcg/kg/day) and 'cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF' (cyclophosphamide at dose of 4 g/m(2) and G-CSF at dose of 10 microg/kg/day), as PBPC mobilization schedules in 52 patients with NHL or HD. Randomization was stratified according to the amount of previous chemotherapy (< or =2 and >2 lines of previous chemotherapy). Mean CD34+ cell peak in P.B., mean 'Total CD34+ cells' harvested and percentage of patients successfully mobilized, in the group mobilized with 'G-CSF alone' vs the group mobilized with 'cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF', were: 35.3 x 10(6) vs 45.8 x 10(6)/l (P=0.3), 5.4 x 10(6) vs 6.8 x 10(6)/kg (P>0.9) and 50 vs 61% (P=0.4). No differences were observed in the stratum of less pretreated patients. However, in the stratum of patients who had previously received more than two lines of chemotherapy, CD34+cell peak (P=0.05) and percentage of successful mobilization (P=0.01) were higher when 'cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF' was used. Using logistic regression, both age and mobilization with 'G-CSF alone' were significantly associated with a low CD34+ cell peak in P.B. However, in the stratum of less pretreated patients, only age was significantly associated with this risk.

Factors influencing the collection of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia and non-myeloid malignancies

Factors influencing the collection of autologous peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) were studied in 182 mobilization procedures performed on 145 consecutive patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML; n=67) and with various non-myeloid malignancies (NMM; n=78). PBSC were collected following mobilization with chemotherapy, treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or chemotherapy plus G-CSF. Fewer colony-forming unit granulocyte-macrophages (CFU-GMs) were collected from patients with AML than from patients with NMM (P<0.0001), although there were no differences in the numbers of CD34+ cells collected between both groups. Multiple regression analysis showed that chemotherapy alone was predictive of a low CD34+ yield in patients with NMM (regression coefficient (RC)=-2.1; P=0.003). In addition, the interactions "diagnosis mutliple myeloma (MM)xmobilization with chemotherapy" (RC=2.9; P=0.004) and "diagnosis MMxmobilization with chemotherapy plus G-CSF" (RC=2.1; P=0.04) also remained in the model, both showing a favorable influence. In AML, mobilization with chemotherapy plus G-CSF was associated with higher CD34+ yields (P=0.003). In this subgroup of patients, multiple regression analysis identified the number of cycles of previous chemotherapy (< or =2 cycles; RC=1.3; P=0.03) and peripheral blood counts (WBC > or =1.5 x 10(9)/l and monocytes >20%; RC=0.8; P=0.02) as the factors most predictive of CD34+ cell yield. These findings emphasize the need to optimize harvesting technique to enhance safety and minimize morbidity and costs of this valuable procedure.

Topotecan-filgrastim combination is an effective regimen for mobilizing peripheral blood stem cells

We compared the efficacy, toxicity, and cost of topotecan-filgrastim and filgrastim alone for mobilizing peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) in 24 consecutive pediatric patients with newly diagnosed medulloblastoma. PBSCs were mobilized with an upfront window of topotecan-filgrastim for 11 high-risk patients (residual tumor > or =1.5 cm2 after resection; metastases limited to neuraxis) and with filgrastim alone for 13 average-risk patients. All patients subsequently underwent craniospinal irradiation and four courses of high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue. Target yields of CD34+ cells (> or =8 x 10(6)/kg) were obtained with only one apheresis procedure for each of the 11 patients treated with topotecan-filgrastim, but with a mean of 2.3 apheresis procedures for only six (46%) of the 13 patients treated with filgrastim alone (P = 0.0059). The median peak and median total yield of CD34+ cells were six-fold higher for the topotecan-filgrastim group (328/microl and 21.5 x 10(6)/kg, respectively) than for the filgrastim group (54/microl and 3.7 x 10(6)/kg, respectively). Mean times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were similar. Myelosuppression was the only grade 4 toxicity associated with topotecan-filgrastim mobilization and lasted a median of 5 days. Compared with filgrastim mobilization, topotecan-filgrastim mobilization resulted in a mean cost saving of $3966 per patient. Topotecan-filgrastim is an efficacious, minimally toxic, and cost-saving combination for PBSC mobilization.

Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has been extensively exploited as a therapeutic and research modality and has revolutionized current patient care. At present, more and more medical centers use peripheral blood progenitor cells for transplantation by mobilizing hematopoietic stem cells from bone marrow to peripheral blood because of potential advantages of peripheral blood stem cell transplantation over bone-marrow transplantation. Different effective mobilization regimens have been developed recently with chemotherapeutic agents, hematopoietic growth factors or their combination. This article reviews current developments related to hematopoietic stem cell mobilization including the biology of hematopoietic stem cells, strategies for mobilization, management for mobilization failure, mechanisms of mobilization, and side effects during mobilization. Finally, the Initiation-Amplification-Emigration-Adaptation Model is proposed to help aid understanding of the mechanisms of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and to stimulate development of novel and optimal mobilization strategies for patient care.

High-dose chemoradiotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with primary refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma: an intention-to-treat analysis

High-dose chemoradiotherapy (HDT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the treatment of choice for patients with relapsed aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). However, its role in the treatment of patients with primary refractory disease is not well defined. The outcomes of 85 patients with primary refractory aggressive NHL who underwent second-line chemotherapy with ICE with the intent of administering HDT/ASCT to those patients with chemosensitive disease were reviewed. Patients were retrospectively classified as induction partial responders (IPR) if they attained a partial response to doxorubicin-based front-line therapy or as induction failures (IF) if they had less than partial response. Forty-three patients (50.6%) had ICE-chemosensitive disease; there was no difference in the response rate between the IPR and the IF groups. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed that 25% of the patients were alive and 21.9% were event-free at a median follow-up of 35 months. Among 42 patients who underwent transplantation, the 3-year overall and event-free survival rates were 52.5% and 44.2%, respectively, similar to the outcomes for patients with chemosensitive relapsed disease. No differences were observed between the IPR and IF groups, and there were no transplantation-related deaths. More than one extranodal site of disease and a second-line age-adjusted International Prognostic Index of 3 or 4 before ICE chemotherapy were predictive of poor survival. These results suggest that patients with primary refractory aggressive NHL should receive second-line chemotherapy, with the intent of administering HDT/ASCT to those with chemosensitive disease. Newer therapies are needed to improve the outcomes of patients with poor-risk primary refractory disease.

Is there any difference in PBPC mobilization between cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF and G-CSF alone in patients with non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma?

We attempted to analyze whether the use of high-dose cyclophosphamide (CTX 7g/m2, group A) plus hematopoietic growth factor (G-CSF) or G-CSF alone (10 microg/Kg, group B) as a mobilizing regimen, could result in harvesting different numbers of CD34+ cells, committed progenitors and CD34+ cells subsets. The number of CD34+ cells considered as the target for each high-dose chemotherapy was > or = 2 x 10(6) /Kg/bw. Fifteen leukaphereses procedures were necessary in group A, while 16 procedures were performed in group B. We did not observe any difference between the two groups in terms of CD34+ cells/microl in the peripheral blood (117 vs 78; p = NS), whereas in the aphereses product we found a significant difference between the two groups of patients in terms of CD34+ cells (6.41 vs 2.89 x 10(6) /Kg/bw; p = .009), CFU-GM (82.5 vs 52.3 x 10(4) /Kg/bw; p = .04). Interestingly, we noted a different distribution of CD34+/33- cells between the 2 groups (mean value 39% vs 65%; p < .05), whereas we did not find any differences regarding CD34+/38-, CD34+/Thy1+, CD34+/HLADR-. The higher number of CFU-GM/Kg/bw collected in the former group did not translate into a superior plating efficiency (27.75 vs 30.29). Furthermore, we observed a strong correlation between CD34+ cells/microl in the peripheral blood and the total number of CD34+ cells in the leukaphereses product (r = 0.97), whereas this correlation was not found in group B (r = 0.15). In both groups of patients the number of CD34+ cells collected correlated well with CFU-GM (r = 0.93; r = 0.94), but definitely we did not observe any correlation between CD34+ cells/microl and CFU-GM in patients mobilized with G-CSF alone and this did not allow us to predict the harvest accurately. Finally, we evaluated the engraftment kinetics and we did not observe any statistically significant difference between the two groups of patients.

High-dose chemoradiotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with primary refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma: an intention-to-treat analysis

High-dose chemoradiotherapy (HDT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the treatment of choice for patients with relapsed aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). However, its role in the treatment of patients with primary refractory disease is not well defined. The outcomes of 85 patients with primary refractory aggressive NHL who underwent second-line chemotherapy with ICE with the intent of administering HDT/ASCT to those patients with chemosensitive disease were reviewed. Patients were retrospectively classified as induction partial responders (IPR) if they attained a partial response to doxorubicin-based front-line therapy or as induction failures (IF) if they had less than partial response. Forty-three patients (50.6%) had ICE-chemosensitive disease; there was no difference in the response rate between the IPR and the IF groups. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed that 25% of the patients were alive and 21.9% were event-free at a median follow-up of 35 months. Among 42 patients who underwent transplantation, the 3-year overall and event-free survival rates were 52.5% and 44.2%, respectively, similar to the outcomes for patients with chemosensitive relapsed disease. No differences were observed between the IPR and IF groups, and there were no transplantation-related deaths. More than one extranodal site of disease and a second-line age-adjusted International Prognostic Index of 3 or 4 before ICE chemotherapy were predictive of poor survival. These results suggest that patients with primary refractory aggressive NHL should receive second-line chemotherapy, with the intent of administering HDT/ASCT to those with chemosensitive disease. Newer therapies are needed to improve the outcomes of patients with poor-risk primary refractory disease.

Comparison of progenitor cell collection on day 4 or day 5 after steady-state stimulation with G-CSF alone in breast cancer patients: influence on CD34+ cell yield, subpopulation, and breast cancer cell contamination

To determine the influence of apheresis timing on CD34+ cell yield, subpopulation, and breast cancer cell contamination, 48 women with breast cancer were stimulated from steady-state hematopoiesis in a prospective but nonrandomized study with 2 x 5 microg/kg G-CSF s.c. alone, and apheresis was started either on day 4 (n = 24) or day 5 (n = 24). Forty-eight women with breast cancer (stage II/III, n = 30; stage IV; n = 12; inflammatory, n = 6) and a median age of 44 years were well balanced between the two groups. In group I, aphersis was started on day 4 and additionally performed on day 5 after G-CSF stimulation, and in group II, apheresis was started on day 5. CD34+ cell count and CD34+ cell subpopulation were determined according to international criteria. Breast cancer cell contamination was detected by immunocytology. The median CD34+ cell harvest on day 4 was 3.3 x 10(6)/kg body weight (range 0.5-12.8) and 6 x 10(6)/kg BW (range 0.3-30) for patients starting on day 5 (p = 0.01). Those patients starting on day 4 achieved a median CD34+ cell count of 4 x 10(6)/kg (range 0.7-13) on day 5 (NS). Twenty-one percent of group I and 71% of group II achieved >5 x 10(6)/kg BW CD34+ cells in the first apheresis, whereas <2.5 x 10(6)/kg BW CD34+ cells in the first apheresis were observed in 38% of group I and 16% of group II. No differences were observed between the CD34+ cell subpopulations, CD34+/CD38+ (10.5% versus 10.5%) and CD34+/Thyl+ (1.5% versus 1.8%). The CD34+ cell harvest from consecutive collecting on days 4 and 5 was nearly identical to the harvest starting on day 5 (6.4 versus 6 x 10(6)/kg). Collecting CD34+ progenitor cells after stimulation with G-CSF alone on day 5 results in a significantly higher cell yield than starting collecting on day 4. No differences in respect to breast cancer cell contamination and CD34+ cell subpopulation were observed.

Ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide: a highly effective cytoreduction and peripheral-blood progenitor-cell mobilization regimen for transplant-eligible patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate a chemotherapy regimen that consisted of ifosfamide administered as an infusion with bolus carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE) supported by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for cytoreduction and stem-cell mobilization in transplant-eligible patients with primary refractory or relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred sixty-three transplant-eligible patients with relapsed or primary refractory NHL were treated from October 1993 to December 1997 with ICE chemotherapy at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Administration of three cycles of ICE chemotherapy was planned at 2-week intervals. Peripheral-blood progenitor cells were collected after cycle 3, and all patients who achieved a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) to ICE chemotherapy were eligible to proceed to transplantation. Event-free and overall survival, ICE-related toxicity, and the number of CD34(+) cells collected after treatment with ICE and G-CSF were evaluated.

RESULTS

All 163 patients were assessable for response, and there was no treatment-related mortality. A major response (CR/PR) was evident in 108 patients (66.3%); 89% of the responding patients underwent successful transplantation. Patient who underwent transplantation and achieved a CR to ICE had a superior overall survival to that of patients who achieved a PR (65% v 30%; P =.003). The median number of CD34(+) cells/kg collected was 8.4 x 10(6). The dose-limiting toxicity of ICE was hematologic, with 29.4% of patients developing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. There were minimal nonhematologic side effects.

CONCLUSION

ICE chemotherapy, with ifosfamide administered as a 24-hour infusion to decrease CNS side effects, and the substitution of carboplatin for cisplatin to minimize nephrotoxicity, is a very effective cytoreduction and mobilization regimen in patients with NHL. Furthermore, the quality of the clinical response to ICE predicts for posttransplant outcome.