Platelet transfusions from D+ donors to D- patients: a 10-year follow-up study of 1014 patients

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend that platelets (PLTs) from D- donors should be given to D- patients. However, such evidence comes from studies with a limited number of included patients that reported an incidence of anti-D alloimmunization to be up to 19%. We thus decided to extend these findings by examining anti-D alloimmunization at our institution, where PLT transfusions from D+ donors are transfused to D- patients because of logistic constraints.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

From April 1999 to December 2009, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical and transfusion records of all D- patients who received PLT transfusions from D+ donors at our hospital. PLT concentrates (PCs) were obtained from apheresis and from whole blood donations. RhIG was not administered after the transfusion of PCs from D+ donors. The antibody screen test to detect anti-D was performed by low-ionic-strength solution indirect antiglobulin test using the gel test.

RESULTS

Our series comprises 1014 D- patients who received 5128 PLT transfusions from D+ donors (89% were pooled PCs). We had 315 (31.1%) patients who had a blood sample to analyze the presence of anti-D 4 or more weeks after the first D+ PLT transfusion with a median follow-up of 29 weeks (range, 4-718 weeks). Anti-D developed in 12 (3.8%) of these 315 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of anti-D alloimmunization of D- patients after receiving pooled PCs from D+ donors is low. The transfusion of D-incompatible pooled PCs without immunoprophylaxis to D- men or D- women without childbearing potential seems a reasonable and safe alternative.

Detection of anti-D in D- recipients transfused with D+ red blood cells

BACKGROUND

The D antigen is highly immunogenic, requiring only a small quantity of transfused red blood cells (RBCs) to cause alloimmunization in D- immunocompetent recipients. The relatively low sensitization rate in oncology patients transfused with D+ platelets is well documented. A study of the alloimmunization rate of primarily nononcology D- recipients transfused with D+ RBCs was undertaken.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Transfusion service records were examined to identify D- recipients who were not alloimmunized to the D antigen and who had a follow-up antibody screen performed at least 10 days after the initial D+ RBC transfusion(s). The age and sex of the recipients, date and number of D+ RBC transfusion(s) and their leukoreduction status, all subsequent serologic investigations, and the hospital ward where the units were issued were recorded.

RESULTS

There were 98 study-eligible recipients identified who received a total of 445 D+ RBC units. The mean follow-up length was 182 days. Most recipients (87%) had antibody screens performed more than 21 days after the initial D+ RBC transfusion. In total, 24 recipients made 44 new alloantibodies: 22 anti-D (22%), 11 anti-E, 5 anti-C, 2 anti-K, and 1 each of anti-Kp(a), anti-Jk(a), anti-Bg, and anti-Fy(b). The rate of anti-D alloimmunization among recipients of entirely leukoreduced D+ units was 13 percent (1/8). Reexposure to D+ RBCs after the initial bleeding episode did not increase the rate of alloimmunization.

CONCLUSIONS

The 22 percent rate of anti-D alloimmunization in patients requiring urgent RBC transfusion was intermediate between the rates previously reported for D- oncology patients transfused with D+ RBCs and that in immunocompetent volunteer recipients.

Transfusions de concentrés plaquettaires Rhésus incompatible au CHU de Rouen : pratiques et conséquences

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines for distribution and use of blood products have been established for both blood transfusion institution and hospitals, in particular for the use of Rh (D)-incompatible platelet concentrates. The aim of this study was to evaluate: 1) the rate of attribution for the Rh (D)-incompatible platelets concentrates, 2) the immunisation prophylaxis practices, 3) the immunological consequences using short and medium term follow-up of transfused patients.

METHODS

Patients with Rh (D)-incompatible platelets concentrate administered during the year 2003 at Rouen University Hospital were retrospectively selected. Patients on transfusion were described. The relationship of various factors with the injection as well as the appearance of allo-immunization was statistically tested.

RESULTS

During a year, 280 Rh (D)-incompatible platelets concentrates were administered to 67 patients. Immunisation prophylaxis by injection of Ig anti-D was not systematically performed. Four immunizations in the Rhesus group system were identified: 2 against D antigen (Ag), 1 against E Ag and 1 against C Ag. Immunisations against D Ag occurred for two younger women considered as immunodeficient. Immunization prophylaxis was more frequent in poly-transfused patients. However no difference was observed for the other factors.

CONCLUSION

Compatibility concerning Rhesus (D) is not always possible. The immunization against red cells persists, in particular against the antigens of the Rhesus group system and moreover for the immunodeficient patients. Recommendations for immunization prophylaxis by injection of specific anti-D immune-globulin (Ig) could be reconsidered.

Transient anti rhesus alloantibody produced by graft after non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplant

BACKGROUND

We report the case of a patient who received an allogeneic transplant with peripheral blood compatible ABO, Rhesus mismatched progenitor cells and who developed an asymptomatic transient anti Rhesus alloimmunisation.

CASE REPORT

A 56-year-old man with renal cell carcinoma received a non-myeloablative allogeneic PBPC ABO compatible graft from his HLA-identical brother. Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine alone. On day + 59, prior to any transfusion, a positive direct antiglobulin test (IgG++, C3d-) was detected. The indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) was considered doubtful, and IAT identification revealed the presence of an active anti Rhesus antibody (anti D specificity) in the patient's serum. This immunisation had no clinical consequence, with no acute hemolytic episode. Further monitoring showed negative antibody screening tests on day + 78.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge this is the first reported case of transient anti Rh (D) allo-immunisation after non-myeloablative allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplant. The period of occurrence and the specificity of this antibody strongly suggest a donor cell origin.

Absence of anti-D alloimmunization in hematologic patients after D-incompatible platelet transfusions

BACKGROUND

Rh antigens are not present on the platelet surface. However, platelet concentrates may contain enough RBCs to elicit an anti-D response. Thus, D status must be considered in platelet transfusion. In immunosuppressed patients, frequencies of D alloimmunization of up to 19 percent have been previously reported.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Here a prospective study is reported in which 22 D- patients with hematologic disease received D+ platelet transfusions. Platelet concentrates were prepared from whole-blood donations according to the buffy coat method and were pooled before administration. The antibody screen test to detect anti-D was performed by LISS- IAT using the gel test.

RESULTS

Our series comprises 22 immunosuppressed D+ patients with a median age of 56 years (range, 23-79). The patients received 121 D-incompatible pooled platelet transfusions. The mean +/- SD of RBC content was 4.17 +/- 1.74 mL. None of the 22 patients developed detectable anti-D after a median follow-up of 8 weeks (range, 1-37).

CONCLUSION

The risk of D alloimmunization is low in patients with hematologic disease after D-incompatible platelet transfusions using platelet concentrates prepared by the buffy coat method.