Comparison of breast cancer patients who underwent partial mastectomy (PM) with mini latissimus dorsi flap (MLDF) and subcutaneous mastectomy with implant (M + I) regarding quality of life (QOL), cosmetic outcome and survival rates

PURPOSE

The latissimus dorsi muscle has long been used in breast cancer (BC) patients for reconstruction. This study aimed to compare early stage BC patients who had partial mastectomy (PM) with mini latissimus dorsi flap (MLDF) and subcutaneous mastectomy with implant (MI) with respect to quality of life (QoL), cosmetic outcome (CO), and survival rates.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The data of patients who underwent PM + MLDF (Group 1) and M + I (Group 2) between January 2010 and January 2018 were evaluated. Both groups were compared in terms of demographics, clinical and pathological characteristics, surgical morbidity, survival, quality of life, and cosmetic results. The EORTC-QLQ C30 and EORTC-QLO BR23 questionnaires and the Japanese Breast Cancer Society (JBCS) Cosmetic Evaluation Scale were used to assess the quality of life and the cosmetic outcome, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 317 patients were included in the study, 242 (76.3%) of them in group 1 and 75 (23.6%) of them in group 2. Median follow-up time was 56 (14-116) months. There were no differences identified between the groups in terms of tumor histology, hormonal receptors and HER-2 positivity, surgical morbidity, and 5-year overall and disease-free survival. Group 2 patients were significantly younger than group 1 (p = 0.003). The multifocality/multicentricity rate was higher in group 2 (p ≤ 0.001), whereas tumor size (p = 0.009), body mass index (BMI, p = 0.006), histological grade (p ≤ 0.001), lymph node positivity (p = 0.002), axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) rate (p = 0.005), and presence of lympho-vascular invasion (LVI, p = 0.013) were significantly higher in group 1. When the quality of life was assessed by using the EORTC QLQ C30 and BR23 questionnaires, it was seen that the body image perception (p < 0.001) and nausea/vomiting score (p = 0.024) were significantly better in PM + MLDF group whereas physical function score was significantly better in M + I group (p = 0.012). When both groups were examined in terms of cosmesis with JBCS Cosmetic Evaluation Scale, good cosmetic evaluation score was significantly higher in patients in MLDF group (p = 0.01).

DISCUSSION

The results of this study indicate that in comparison to M + I procedure, the PM + MLDF procedure provides significantly superior results in terms of body image and cosmetic result with similar morbidity and oncologic outcomes. In selected patients with small breasts and a high tumor/breast ratio, PM + MLDF may be an alternative to subcutaneous mastectomy and implant.

QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF BREAST RECONSTRUCTION IN A SPECIALIST BREAST UNIT

BACKGROUND

Breast reconstruction is an integral part of the surgical management of women with breast cancer. It is often performed by plastic surgeons but, in some centres, it is performed by breast surgeons trained in breast reconstruction and oncoplastic surgery. We evaluated the objective and subjective outcomes of reconstruction for breast cancer at the Royal Adelaide Hospital Breast Unit (Adelaide, Australia) between 1990 and June 2002.

METHODS

A chart analysis was conducted of all patients who underwent breast cancer reconstruction at the Royal Adelaide Hospital Breast Unit with analysis of type of reconstruction and complications. Patients were interviewed and self-assessment quality of life questionnaires (FACT-B, body image), and overall satisfaction with reconstruction using an analogue scale were performed. Three observers carried out photographic analysis of the reconstructions. A comparison was then made between the different forms of reconstruction used.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety-two patients underwent a total of 219 breast reconstructions during this period. The reconstructions included 18 latissimus dorsi mini flaps, 83 tissue expander/implants, 43 latissimus dorsi flaps and 75 TRAM flaps. There were no perioperative deaths. Significant systemic complications occurred in four patients (2%). Significant implant related complications occurred in four patients (3.2% of patients with implants). Total flap loss occurred in four patients (2.9% of flaps). One hundred and twenty-three patients were able to be contacted and completed the questionnaires. Overall 77% of patients were highly satisfied with breast reconstruction and 82% scored a satisfactory result on photographic analysis. All four forms of reconstruction rated highly with respect to quality of life, body image, patient satisfaction and photographic assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast reconstruction undertaken by breast surgeons trained in breast reconstruction and oncoplastic techniques has been performed with an acceptable rate of complications and a high level of patient satisfaction. Satisfaction with breast reconstruction was similar across the four methods of reconstruction used.

Breast volume replacement using the latissimus dorsi miniflap

BACKGROUND

Mastectomy is often recommended to women with early breast cancer who have large tumours or where the breast volume requiring resection to achieve adequate tumour clearance is too great to allow for a satisfactory cosmetic result after breast conservation surgery. The use of a latissimus dorsi muscular flap (latissimus dorsi miniflap (LDMF)) to replace the volume loss after major breast sector resection is an option where the tumour to breast volume ratio is large. The present study describes the technique and evaluates the experience of the LDMF at Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.

METHODS

Between August 1997 and April 2002, 18 women aged 37-64 years underwent wide local excision for primary breast cancer with LDMF reconstruction. Tumour characteristics, breast specimen weight and postoperative sequelae were assessed. Quality of life measurements and objective assessments of aesthetic outcome were evaluated.

RESULTS

Tumour diameter ranged from 13 to 80 mm (median 30 mm). Nine patients had multifocal or extensive intraductal component positive tumours. The weight of the resected specimens ranged from 75 to 395 g (median 130 g). There were no major postoperative complications, with a range of inpatient stay of 3-10 days. Seromas were aspirated in 14 patients but did not delay adjuvant treatment. Quality of Life results showed high patient satisfaction in all but one patient. A satisfactory cosmetic result was achieved in all but one patient who subsequently required mastectomy.

CONCLUSION

The LDMF procedure allows breast conservation to be achieved in women with large tumour to breast volume ratios, with satisfactory resection margins and good cosmetic and functional results. In the present experience standard oncological adjuvant treatment is not compromised.