Detecting curable disease following hepatectomy for colorectal metastases

INTRODUCTION

Although resection may be curative for patients with hepatic colorectal metastases, recurrence occurs in the majority. Recurrence is occasionally amenable to repeated resection. The aim of the present study was to evaluate which modalities, at what intervals, detected potentially curable resection.

METHODS

The records of patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal metastases over 10 years in one centre were retrospectively reviewed to determine when and how recurrence was diagnosed. Specific attention was paid to the detection of potentially curable disease.

RESULTS

Of 41 recurrences, 22 occurred in the first year postoperatively, 21 of which were suitable for palliative treatment only. Ten of 19 recurrences occurring after 1 year underwent potentially curative intervention, 10 were diagnosed by computed tomography (CT). Carcinoembryonic antigen did not diagnose any curable recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

A follow-up protocol is proposed, based on annual CT.

[Anatomic segmental resection of the liver in surgical treatment of colorectal metastatic lesions]

The prime role of hepatic resection in the management of colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver is firmly established. At least a third of patients who undergo liver resection for colorectal metastases can expect to survive five years. Since 1999, 106 hepatic metastases were resected in 42 patients (synchr. 8, metachr. 34, pts.). We performed 12 monosegmentectomies (S2-S8), 4 bisegmentectomies (S4b, S5 and S5, S6), 6 sectorectomies (right posterior, left paramedian, left lateral), 3 polysegmentectomies (S4b, S5, S6), 8 bilateral sectionectomies (S2, S3 and S6, S7) and in 9 cases multiple segmentectomies. In 4 cases initially unresectable colorectal metastases were downstaged by transcatheter HAI regional chemotherapy (Implantoflx), and after that successfully resected. We favour vascular inflow occlusion through selective division of appropriate portal pedicle at the porta hepatis or by transparenchymal approach. Median blood loss was 330 +/- 160 ml. The complication rate amounted to 9.52% (bile fistula, abscess collection). No method related lethality occurred. During the follow-up period we registered tumor recurrence rate of 19.1% (8 pts.), of which two patients were subjected to liver re-resection. Overall 3-year survival rate (Kaplan-Meier) is 38.9%. Multivariate analysis shows a significant correlation between 3-year survival and solitary (p-0.031) and unilobar metastases (p-0.014).

Surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Liver metastases are a major cause of death in patients with colorectal carcinoma. The only curative option available at present is surgery. This review article discusses the current state of evidence for the effectiveness of liver resection for patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, Current Contents and Science Citation Index databases were used to search English language articles published on the subject of liver resection for colorectal metastases in the last 20 years.

RESULTS

Liver resection has a five year survival of 16-49% and 10 year survival of 17-33% with an operative mortality rate of 0-9%. Two factors appear to be clearly associated with poorer outcome - involved resection margins and the presence of extrahepatic disease (including hilar and coeliac axis lymph nodes) at the time of liver resection. None of the other factors related to the patients, their primary tumour or the metastases themselves have been conclusively shown to adversely effect long-term survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver resection is a feasible, safe and effective procedure which carries an acceptable morbidity and mortality and does have a major impact on the survival of these patients. The decision on resectability of colorectal metastases should be decided by the ability to leave at least 2-3 segments of liver free from metastases with uninvolved resection margins, together with the general fitness of the patient to undergo a major surgical procedure.

A study of factors influencing prognosis after resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal and gastric carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to determine the absolute contraindication for hepatic resection for colorectal metastases and investigate the value of hepatectomy for gastric metastases by comparing it with the results of colorectal metastases performed with the same criteria.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients undergoing hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal (n = 64) and gastric (n = 17) carcinomas. Common predictive factors for both metastases were analyzed by the stratified Cox proportional hazard model. In this model, the different baseline hazard was set for each disease, whereas the risk of each covariate was assumed to be equal in both gastric and colorectal metastases.

RESULTS

Overall 1-, 2-, and 5-yr survival rates after hepatectomy for colorectal and gastric metastases were 90%, 73%, 42%, and 47%, 22%, 0%, respectively. Factors controlling prognosis were as follows: age > or = 60, extrahepatic metastases, serosal invasion, grade of lymph node metastases, tumor cell differentiation of the primary lesion(s), carcinoembryonic antigen level, tumor-exposed surgical margin, and blood transfusion. In particular, presence of extrahepatic metastases showed the markedly high-risk ratio among these eight variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatectomy, if possible, is indicated in patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma if there are no extrahepatic metastases and if the primary disease is controlled. It is indicated only in carefully selected patients with metastases from gastric carcinoma.

Cryotherapy of the resection edge after liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases

BACKGROUND

An involved or inadequate (< 1 cm) resection margin is associated with a high rate of local tumour recurrence and reduced survival rates after liver resection for colorectal metastases. This paper assesses whether or not hepatic cryotherapy of the resection edge is suitable to improve local disease control.

METHODS

From April 1990 to May 1997, we performed cryotherapy of the resection edge in 44 patients after liver resection for colo rectal liver metastases with an involved or inadequate resection margin. The reasons for performing edge cryotherapy instead of extension of resection were: proximity of hepatic veins or portal sheath (n = 12); avoidance of extended left or right hemihepatectomy (n = 15); inadequate liver tissue reserve after resection (n = 16); and patient unfit to undergo further major resection (n = 1). Histological examination showed the resection margin to be involved in 24 patients and close (< 1 cm) in 20 patients.

RESULTS

Two patients died after surgery. Morbidity consisted of intra-abdominal collections (n = 6), postoperative bleeding (n = 1), wound infection (n = 1) and transient liver failure (n = 1). At a median follow-up of 19 months, 16 patients are alive and disease-free, 26 patients developed recurrence and 15 of them died. Nineteen patients developed recurrence which involved the liver but only five of these were at the resection edge. Median overall and liver disease-free survival was 33 and 23 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cryotherapy of the resection edge after resection of colorectal liver metastases with involved or inadequate resection margins considerably improves local disease control and may allow a greater proportion of patients with liver metastases to undergo potentially curative treatment.