Frequency of restenosis after carotid endarterectomy

Introduction: Carotid artery restenosis is a significant long-term complication of carotid endarterectomy. Carotid artery restenosis is the result of neointimal hyperplasia in the early postoperative period or recurrent atherosclerotic lesions in the following period. Numerous studies have incriminated several risk factors as predisposing conditions for restenosis. The definite role of each predisposing factor, however, is still widely debated. Aim: Investigation of frequency and risk factors for restenosis after carotid endarterectomy. Material and methods: Data of 295 patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy was reviewed between 2008 and 2010. Postoperative duplex studies were performed on control examinations in the following period between 2011 and 2019. Retrospective analysis was performed to assess the effect of demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients on the development of restenosis after carotid endarterectomy. Results: Restenosis occurred in 76 (26%) patients after carotid endarterectomy, with the highest incidence during the third (33%) and fourth (25%) year of follow-up. Patients with diabetes (p = 0.048) and peripheral arterial occlusive disease (p = 0.041) had significant statistical correlation with the occurrence of restenosis, as well as parameters of lipid status - cholesterol values (p = 0.025), serum low-density lipoprotein (p = 0.036) and non highdensity lipoprotein (p = 0.041). Conclusion: The results of our study confirm the significant role of atherosclerotic risk factors in the development of carotid artery restenosis in the later postoperative period. More frequent monitoring and control of systemic risk factors in these patients is necessary in order to prevent the development of carotid artery restenosis.

A Single-center Retrospective Study with 5- and 10-year Follow-up of Carotid Endarterectomy with Patch Graft

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is widely used for cervical artery stenosis. In Japan, primary closure after endarterectomy has been a standard technique. Recently, the patch closure has been shown to be superior to the primary suture for the prevention of restenosis and ipsilateral stroke. This study evaluated the 5- and 10-year outcomes following CEA with patch graft closure in our institution. Between January 2000 and March 2013, 134 patients, who underwent CEA with patch graft closure were investigated in the current retrospective study. Among these patients, 102 CEAs in 97 patients were followed up for 5 years and 66 CEAs in 61 patients were for 10 years after the procedure. Restenosis was defined as >50% recurrent luminal narrowing at the endarterectomy site. In 5 years, symptomatic restenosis exhibited minor stroke in one patient at 58 months after CEA (restenosis rate 1.0%). The ipsilateral minor stroke occurred in three patients including the above case (2.9%). In 10 years, asymptomatic restenosis occurred in three patients in addition to the above symptomatic case (restenosis rate 6.1%), and the ipsilateral minor stroke occurred in four patients (6.1%). Carotid endarterectomy with patch graft exerted a high protective effect from restenosis up to 5 and 10 years in our institution. The number of carotid artery stenting is increasing all over the world but we speculated that the established surgical procedure of patched CEA prevented restenosis and ipsilateral stroke.

Biomechanical Aspects of Closing Approaches in Postcarotid Endarterectomy

The carotid bifurcation tends to develop atherosclerotic stenoses which might interfere with cerebral blood supply. In cases of arterial blockage, the common clinical solution is to remove the plaque via carotid endarterectomy (CEA) surgery. Artery closure after surgery using primary closures along the cutting edge might lead to artery narrowing and restrict blood flow. An alternative approach is patch angioplasty which takes longer time and leads to more during-surgery complications. The present study uses numerical methods with fluid-structure interaction (FSI) to explore and compare the two solutions in terms of hemodynamics and stress and strain fields developed in the artery wall.

Angioplasty and stenting for high-grade internal carotid artery stenosis: safety study in 39 selected patients

BACKGROUND

Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is sometimes used as an alternative to surgery, despite the lack of evidence for its safety and efficacy.

METHOD

Over a 33-month period, 39 consecutive patients with a stenosis >/=70% underwent CAS (4 in a randomized trial and 35 because of contra-indications for surgery).

RESULTS

In 5 patients (13%; 95% CI: 3-23), a major complication occurred (3 disabling ischaemic strokes, 1 myocardial infarction, 1 acute interstitial nephropathy). In 7 patients (18%; 95% CI: 6-30), a minor complication occurred (5 transient ischaemic attacks, 1 transient confusional state, 1 non-disabling ischaemic stroke).

CONCLUSION

CAS cannot be considered as a routine procedure and should be restricted to high-risk patients unfit for surgery.