Follow-up of more than 10 years after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis in young patients

Retention Time of Endoscopic Nasobiliary Drainage and Symptomatic Choledocholithiasis Recurrence After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Single-center, Retrospective Study in Fuyang, China

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) is usually retained for several days after choledocholithiasis is removed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). ENBD placement provides reliable biliary drainage and perfusion, prevents pancreatitis, and allows for cholangiography. However, it has not been established whether retention time of ENBD is associated with symptomatic choledocholithiasis recurrence after ERCP. For this reason, we estimated the effect of ENBD retention time on symptomatic choledocholithiasis recurrence after ERCP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 1016 patients in whom choledocholithiasis had been diagnosed and ERCP had been performed to remove choledocholithiasis were retrospectively reviewed. Their ENBD retention time was 4.01±1.53 days. They were divided into group 1 (n=570) and group 2 (n=446) according to the mean value. Cumulative recurrence rates of symptomatic choledocholithiasis after ERCP were compared between the 2 groups. To identify independent factors associated with symptomatic choledocholithiasis recurrence, various likely predictors associated with the intergroup differences were also recorded.

RESULTS

There were 570 patients with ENBD retention time ≤4.01 days (group 1) and 446 patients with ENBD retention time >4.01 days (group 2). No statistically significant differences between the 2 groups were evident in terms of demographic factors and laboratory results, except for amylase (AMY) and opening diet time after ERCP. The median (interquartile range) follow-up was 23.7 (14.6, 32.13) months (range: 4.3 to 70 mo) in group 1 and 23.7 (14.6, 31.2) months (range: 4.2 to 69.4 mo) in group 2 (P=0.762). The cumulative recurrence rates of symptomatic choledocholithiasis were 3.1% (2.5% vs. 3.8%) at month 20, 6.7% (5.1% vs. 8.7%) at month 40, and 8.2% (6.7% vs. 10.1%) at month 60 for groups 1 and 2, respectively (P=0.048). By multivariate analysis, being in group 1 reduced symptomatic choledocholithiasis recurrence, with a hazard ratio of 0.641 (95% confidence interval: 0.416-0.987,P=0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary study showed that symptomatic choledocholithiasis recurrence may be associated with ENBD retention time after ERCP, particularly for duration of ENBD more than 4.01 days.

Increased Risk of Pyogenic Liver Abscess after Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Treatment of Choledocholithiasis

Background and Aim

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) abolished the barrier between the hepatobiliary system and duodenum and might be at risk of pyogenic liver abscess (PLA). We aimed to identify the association factors of PLA in patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures for treatment of choledocholithiasis.

Methods

This study was based on the Chung Gung Research Database (CGRD) between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2018. Those who had an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision (ICD9 and ICD10) codes of choledocholithiasis and received ERCP were enrolled. After strict exclusions, 11,697 patients were further divided into the endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) group (n=7,111) and other ERCP group (n=4,586) for analysis.

Results

Patients receiving ES had significantly higher rates of PLA than those of the other ERCP group (5-year cumulative incidence 2.4% versus 1.7%; 10-year cumulative incidence 3.9% versus 3.2%, log-rank p=0.0177). Aging, male gender, surgery for hepato-pancreato-biliary system and hepatobiliary malignancy were significant association factors of PLA. On multivariate analysis, the ES increased the risk of PLA (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]=1.49; 95% CI=1.12-1.98; p=0.0058) but decreased the risks for acute pancreatitis (aHR=0.72; 95% CI=0.60-0.85; p=0.0002) and cholangitis (aHR= 0.91; 95% CI=0.84-0.99; p=0.0259). There was no significant difference about recurrent choledocholithiasis between groups.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated a significant risk of PLA after patients receiving ES compared with the other ERCP group. We should also carefully monitor the association factors of PLA after ERCP treatment of choledocholithiasis including aging, male gender, surgery for the hepato-pancreato-biliary system and hepatobiliary malignancy.

Clinical efficacy, timing, and outcomes of ERCP for management of bile duct leaks: a nationwide cohort study

Background and study aims  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) can safely and effectively manage postsurgical or traumatic bile duct leaks (BDLs). Standardized guidelines are lacking regarding effective management of BDLs. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy, clinical outcomes, and complications of different ERCP techniques and intervention timing using a nationwide database. Patients and methods  We performed a retrospective analysis of the IBM Explorys database (1999-2019), a pooled, national, de-identified clinical database of over 64 million unique patients across the United States. ERCP timing after BDL was classified as emergent (< 1 day), urgent (1-3 days) or expectant (> 3 days). ERCP technique was classified into sphincterotomy, stent or combination therapy. ERCP complications were defined as pancreatitis, duodenal perforation, duodenal hemorrhage, and ascending cholangitis within 7 days of the procedure. Results  Expectant ERCP had a decreased risk of adverse events (AEs) compared to emergent and urgent ERCP ( P  = 0.004). Rehospitalization rates also were lower in expectant ERCP ( P  < 0.001). Patients with COPD were more likely to have an AE if the ERCP was performed emergently compared to expectantly ( P  = 0.002). Combination therapy had a lower rate of ERCP failure compared to placement of a biliary stent ( P  = 0.02). There was no statistically significant difference in rates of ERCP failure between biliary stent and sphincterotomy ( P  = 0.06) or sphincterotomy and combination therapy ( P  = 0.74). Conclusion  Our study suggests that ERCP does not need to be performed emergently or urgently for management of BDLs. Combination therapy is superior to stenting or sphincterotomy; however, future prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound-Guided Contrast Injection via the Endoscopic Nasobiliary Drainage Duct in Diagnosing Residual Common Bile Duct Stones

Objectives

To investigate the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound- (CEUS-) guided contrast injection via an endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) tube on the evaluation for residual stones in common bile duct (CBD).

Methods

116 patients with CBD stones were treated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and duodenoscopic sphincterotomy incision surgery and ENBD. The US group consisted of 54 patients who underwent US-guided saline injection via the ENBD tube to evaluate for residual CBD stones. The CEUS group consisted of 62 patients who underwent CEUS-guided contrast injection via the ENBD tube to evaluate for residual CBD stones. The length and width of CBD and the detection rate of residual stones before and after NS injection were compared.

Results

In both the US group and the CEUS group, the rate of complete demonstration and the average length and width of CBD before and after injection of NS were all increased significantly. In the US group, 6 patients had verified residual stones, 1 of which was detected by conventional US (detection rate, 1/6), 5 of which were detected by saline injection ultrasound (detection rate, 5/6), and 4 of which were detected by ENBD cholangiography (detection rate, 4/6). There was 1 false positive result on saline injection US and 2 false positives on ENBD cholangiography. In the CEUS group, 6 patients had verified residual stones, none of which were detected by conventional US (detection rate, 0/6), all of which were detected by saline injection CEUS (detection rate, 6/6), and 4 of which were detected by ENBD cholangiography (detection rate, 4/6). There was 1 false positive result on ENBD cholangiography.

Conclusions

CEUS-guided contrast injection via an ENBD tube helps to provide clear observation of residual stones in the CBD after ERCP with EST and provides comprehensive information for follow-up.

Evaluation of Safety and Outcomes of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in 1337 Patients at a Single Center

Objective:

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the gold standard treatment for pancreaticobiliary diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and review the outcomes of our experience of ERCP over the past 4 years.

Method:

The clinical records of patients aged 18-104 years who underwent ERCP at our gastroenterology clinic between 2014 and 2018 were included in the study. Data were acquired from the hospital archive system.

Results:

A total of 1337 patients with a mean age of 60.58±17.96 years. including 775 female, and 562 male cases were included in the study. The patients were in the age groups of 18-30 (n=39), 30-65 (n=694), 65-75 (n=274), 75-85 (n=258), and > 85 (n=72) years. Among them, 28.27% were rated as ASA III-IV on the American Society of Anesthesiologists scale. Although biliary cannulation with standard sphincterotomy was successful in 1303 (97.45%), patients it could not be performed in 34 (2.55%). patients Precut papillotomy was performed in 27 (79.41%) of 34 patients. Furthermore, no complication was observed in 1207 patients (90.27%), whereas 96 patients (7.18%) had minor and major procedure-related and anesthesia-related complications. The 30-day mortality rate was 1.64% (n=22).

Conclusion:

We concluded that ERCP, which is currently performed entirely for therapeutic purposes, is safe and lifesaving, with high clinical success rates.

Laparoscopic Transcystic Common Bile Duct Exploration in the Emergency Is as Effective and Safe as in Elective Setting

BACKGROUND

Emergent laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE) has been reported to be on the increase in some institutions, reflecting the growing confidence with the technique. However, no study has focused on the outcomes of LTCBDE in the non-elective setting. The aim of this study is to investigate whether LTCBDE can be performed effectively and safely in the emergency.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 500 consecutive patients with choledocholithiasis subjected for LTCBDE at the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires from January 2009 to January 2018. Procedures were classified according to the setting as emergent or elective. Demographic data and perioperative parameters were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Throughout the period comprised, 500 patients were admitted for choledocholithiasis and gallstones. A single-step treatment combining LTCBDE and laparoscopic cholecystectomy was attempted: 211 (42.2%) were performed electively and the 289 (57.8%) as an emergency. There was no significant difference in the success rate of LTCBDE (93.9% versus 93.8%, p = 0.975) for the two groups. The operative time was slightly longer in the emergency group (122 ± 63 versus 106 ± 53 min, p = 0.002). Postoperative recovery was slower in the emergency group, as reflected by a higher rate of prolonged postoperative stay (21.1% vs 5.7%, p < .001). The rates of postoperative complications were similar between groups (2.8% vs 5.9%, p = 0.109).

CONCLUSION

Emergent LTCBDE can be performed with equivalent efficacy and morbidity when compared to an elective procedure. Patients undergoing emergent procedures have longer procedures and hospital stays.

Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound after removal of common bile duct stone

Objective: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a standard procedure for choledocholithiasis. Nonetheless, the recurrence rate remains quite high. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and related factors of remnant biliary stone or sludge using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) after the removal of common bile duct (CBD) stone and to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes. Methods: A prospective study enrolling a consecutive series of patients who underwent ERCP for CBD stone removal was performed between June 2014 and November 2015. Following confirmation of complete CBD stone removal by the operator, EUS was performed to determine whether biliary stone or sludge remained. Patients underwent cholecystectomy if a gallstone was identified and were subsequently followed up at a regular interval of 3-6 months. We investigated whether symptomatic recurrence would occur. Results: A total of 130 patients were enrolled. The presence of remnant biliary stone or sludge after ERCP was confirmed in 36.9% (48/130) of patients. Acute angulation of the distal CBD was the sole factor associated with remnant biliary stone or sludge (p < .01). During the follow-up period, the overall recurrence rate was 17.7% (23/130). Recurrent symptomatic choledocholithiasis was predicted by remnant biliary sludge and large CBD diameter in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Acute angulation of the distal CBD was associated with remnant biliary stone or sludge after ERCP. Remnant biliary sludge on EUS and large CBD diameter were strong predictors of symptomatic recurrence. EUS evaluation following CBD stone removal could be an effective strategy in the treatment of choledocholithiasis.

Endoscopic management of postcholecystectomy biliary leak: When and how? A nationwide study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

ERCP is considered the first-line therapy for biliary duct leaks (BDLs). However, the optimal ERCP timing and endotherapy methods remain controversial. Our aim was to evaluate these factors as predictors of poor clinical outcomes after BDLs.

METHODS

Adults who underwent ERCP for BDLs after cholecystectomy were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2000 to 2014. ERCP was classified as emergent, urgent, and expectant if it was done within 1 day, after 2 to 3 days, or >3 days after BDLs, respectively. Endotherapy was classified into sphincterotomy, stent, or combination. Post-ERCP adverse events (AEs) were defined as requiring pressor infusion, endotracheal intubation, invasive monitoring, or hemodialysis. Early endotherapy failure was defined as the need for salvage surgical or radiology-percutaneous biliary intervention after ERCP.

RESULTS

A total of 1028 patients with a median age of 56 years were included. ERCP was done emergently (19%), urgently (30%), and expectantly (51%). Endotherapy procedures were sphincterotomy (24%), biliary stent (24%), and combination (52%). Post-ERCP AEs were 11%, 10%, and 9% for emergent, urgent, and expectant ERCP, respectively (P = .577). In-hospital mortality showed a U-shape trend of 5%, 0%, and 2% for emergent, urgent, and expectant ERCP, respectively (P < .001). Combination and stent monotherapy had lower failure rates of 3% and 4%, respectively as compared with sphincterotomy monotherapy with failure rate of 11% (P < .001). When multivariate analysis was used, both combination (odds ratio, .2; 95% confidence interval, .1-.5) and stent monotherapy (odds ratio, .4; 95% confidence interval, .2-.9) were less likely to fail as compared with sphincterotomy monotherapy. There were no statistically significant differences between combination therapy and stent monotherapy in the univariate and the multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Although limited by retrospective design and the possibility of selection bias, this analysis suggests that the timing of ERCP is not a significant predictor of post-ERCP AEs after BDLs. Furthermore, combination or stent monotherapy had lower failure rates as compared with sphincterotomy monotherapy.

Outcomes of endoscopic sphincterotomy vs open choledochotomy for common bile duct stones

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) for the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS) is used increasingly widely because it is a minimally invasive procedure. However, some clinical practitioners argued that EST may be complicated by post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) and accompanied by a higher recurrence of CBDS than open choledochotomy (OCT). Whether any differences in outcomes exist between these two approaches for treating CBDS has not been thoroughly elucidated to date.

AIM

To compare the outcomes of EST vs OCT for the management of CBDS and to clarify the risk factors associated with stone recurrence.

METHODS

Patients who underwent EST or OCT for CBDS between January 2010 and December 2012 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Follow-up data were obtained through telephone or by searching the medical records. Statistical analysis was carried out for 302 patients who had a follow-up period of at least 5 years or had a recurrence. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to adjust for clinical differences. A logistic regression model was used to identify potential risk factors for recurrence, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated for qualifying independent risk factors.

RESULTS

In total, 302 patients undergoing successful EST (n = 168) or OCT (n = 134) were enrolled in the study and were followed for a median of 6.3 years. After propensity score matching, 176 patients remained, and all covariates were balanced. EST was associated with significantly shorter time to relieving biliary obstruction, anesthetic duration, procedure time, and hospital stay than OCT (P < 0.001). The number of complete stone clearance sessions increased significantly in the EST group (P = 0.009). The overall incidence of complications and mortality did not differ significantly between the two groups. Recurrent CBDS occurred in 18.8% (33/176) of the patients overall, but no difference was found between the EST (20.5%, 18/88) and OCT (17.0%, 15/88) groups. Factors associated with CBDS recurrence included common bile duct (CBD) diameter > 15 mm (OR = 2.72; 95%CI: 1.26-5.87; P = 0.011), multiple CBDS (OR = 5.09; 95%CI: 2.58-10.07; P < 0.001), and distal CBD angle ≤ 145° (OR = 2.92; 95%CI: 1.54-5.55; P = 0.001). The prediction model incorporating these factors demonstrated an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.81 (95%CI: 0.76-0.87).

CONCLUSION

EST is superior to OCT with regard to time to biliary obstruction relief, anesthetic duration, procedure time, and hospital stay and is not associated with an increased recurrence rate or mortality compared with OCT in the management of CBDS.

Risk of pyogenic liver abscess and endoscopic sphincterotomy: a population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the risk of pyogenic liver abscess (PLA) in patients receiving endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES).

SETTING

A population-based cohort study using data from Taiwans' National Health Insurance Research Database was conducted. Patients aged 20 or older who had undergone an ES were considered as the ES cohort. The dates for the first hospitalisation of the patients receiving ES were defined as the index dates.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients in the ES and non-ES cohorts were selected by 1:1 matching ratio based on a propensity score. A total of 8174 sex-matched, age-matched and index year-matched (1:1) pairs of patients receiving ES and 8174 patients without ES served as controls. Cox proportional hazards regression was employed to calculate the HRs and 95% CIs for the association between PLA and ES.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of PLA was significantly higher in the ES cohort than in the non-ES cohort (4.20 vs 0.94, respectively, per 1000 person-year) with the adjusted HR (aHR) 4.50 (95% CI 3.38 to 6.58) A stratified analysis during the follow-up years revealed that when the ES cohort was compared with the non-ES cohort, they displayed a higher risk of PLA during the first follow-up year (aHR 4.35, 95% CI 2.26 to 8.39) which continued significantly over the next 4-5 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving ES are associated with having a higher risk of PLA.

Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines for endoscopic sphincterotomy

The Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society (JGES) has recently compiled guidelines for endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) using evidence-based methods. Content regarding actual clinical practice, including detailed endoscopic procedures, instruments, device types and usage, has already been published by the JGES postgraduate education committee in May 2015 and, thus, in these guidelines we avoided duplicating such content as much as possible. The guidelines do not address pancreatic sphincterotomy, endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD), and endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD). The guidelines for EPLBD are planned to be developed separately. The evidence level in this field is often low and, in many instances, strong recommendation has to be determined on the basis of expert consensus. At this point in time, the guidelines are divided into six items including indications, techniques, specific cases, adverse events, outcomes, and postoperative follow up.

Symptomatic Gallstones in the Young: Changing Trends of the Gallstone Disease-Related Hospitalization in the State of New York: 1996 - 2010

Background

The aim of the study was to evaluate if the gallstone-related hospitalizations in the young (< 20 years of age) have increased over time in both the Bronx County and New York State as a whole.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 15 years (1996 - 2010) of Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) data of New York State Department of Health. Patients with ICD-9 code diagnosis of 574 (cholelithiasis) among the first three discharge diagnoses were reviewed.

Results

Total number of all cause admissions to hospitals had increased from 2.44 million to 2.77 million (1996 - 2010). However, gallstone-related hospitalizations had decreased from 1.7% to 1.2%. It was noted that there was a 30% increment in the proportion of those below 20 years of age with gallstone disease requiring hospitalization over the same period. This young patient population contributed only 2.04% to all gallstone-related hospitalizations in 1996, whereas it had increased to 2.96% in 2010. This trend was more pronounced in women, Hispanics and in those who were residing in the Bronx County as compared to all other New York counties combined.

Conclusion

The gallstone-related hospitalizations in the young (< 20 years of age) have increased over time in both the Bronx County and New York State as a whole. This could be due to increasing prevalence of risk factors such as obesity, physical inactivity, diabetes and early pregnancy.

Cholecystectomy After Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Common Bile Duct Stones: Is Surgery Necessary?

It has been more than 30 years since the introduction of endoscopic sphincterotomy for the management of choledocholithiasis. Once introduced, this endoscopic intervention subsequently enabled clinicians to witness the natural history of leaving the gallbladder in situ once the common duct calculi were removed. Because many people were free of symptoms once the common bile duct was cleared of stones, patients and physicians alike soon questioned whether it was necessary to remove the gallbladder at all. Despite more than two decades of clinical research and numerous published reports, the answer to this question remains elusive. Similarly, the management algorithm for choledocholithiasis in patients with an intact gallbladder remains controversial. We review the available key data regarding this question. Importantly, there are only three prospective, randomized trials that have examined the need for cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy, with case studies constituting most of the published reports. Consequently, the literature on this topic remains inconclusive, weakened by its retrospective approach, considerable variability between the patients studied, inconsistent inclusion and exclusion criteria, and frequently poor patient follow-up. Nonetheless, the preponderance of data favor removing the gallbladder after endoscopically clearing the common bile duct of gallstones because an estimated 25% of patients will experience recurrent symptoms within a 2-year follow up period. Recognizing the existence of various mitigating clinical factors, we advocate adopting a selective wait-and-see approach for high-risk patients, especially those with a life expectancy of less than 2 years or severely debilitating comorbidities.

Results of Medium Seventeen Years' Follow-Up after Laparoscopic Choledochotomy for Ductal Stones

Introduction. In a previously published article the authors reported the long-term follow-up results in 138 consecutive patients with gallstones and common bile duct (CBD) stones who underwent laparoscopic transverse choledochotomy (TC) with T-tube biliary drainage and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Aim of this study is to evaluate the results at up to 23 years of follow-up in the same series. Methods. One hundred twenty-one patients are the object of the present study. Patients were evaluated by clinical visit, blood assay, and abdominal ultrasound. Symptomatic patients underwent cholangio-MRI, followed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as required. Results. Out of 121 patients, 61 elderly patients died from unrelated causes. Fourteen patients were lost to follow-up. In the 46 remaining patients, ductal stone recurrence occurred in one case (2,1%) successfully managed by ERCP with endoscopic sphincterotomy. At a mean follow-up of 17.1 years no other patients showed signs of bile stasis and no patient showed any imaging evidence of CBD stricture at the site of choledochotomy. Conclusions. Laparoscopic transverse choledochotomy with routine T-tube biliary drainage during LC has proven to be safe and effective at up to 23 years of follow-up, with no evidence of CBD stricture when the procedure is performed with a correct technique.

Short-term and long-term outcomes after endoscopic sphincterotomy versus endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stones

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) with endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD), and to find out risk factors for long-term complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2008 to June 2011, patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stone removal were included, and they were divided into EST and EPBD groups. Clinical information was retrospectively viewed, and the patients were contacted through telephone or by searching for the medical records to get long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 863 patients were included, with 636 patients in the EST group and 227 patients in the EPBD group. There was no difference in the rate of complete stone removal and early complications, except for pancreatitis. In all, 493 patients in the EST group and 170 patients in the EST group were followed up for 36.7-77.6 months. More patients in the EST group developed cholangitis, stone recurrence, and cholecystitis in the long term. Multivariate analysis showed that EPBD was a protective factor for cholangitis, stone recurrence, and cholecystitis. Gall stones were risk factors for cholangitis and cholecystitis. Mechanical lithotripsy may also be a risk factor for stone recurrence.

CONCLUSION

EST shows better results in early outcomes, but during long-term follow-up patients following EST experienced more number of late complications. Gall stones and mechanical lithotripsy may be risk factors for long-term complications.

Late Complications following Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Choledocholithiasis: A Swedish Population-Based Study

In order to assess the risk of long-term complications following endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) for common bile duct stones (CBDS), we conducted a cohort study. The study included 1,113 patients who underwent ES for CBDS in six different hospitals in central Sweden between 1977 and 1990. Through the use of the Swedish population registry, each patient was assigned five population-based controls matched for sex and age. Linkage to the Inpatient Registry yielded information on morbidity and mortality for the patients as well as for the controls. After one year of washout, there were 964 patients available for follow-up. The mean age was 70.6 years, 57% were women, and the mean length of follow-up was 8.9 years. The patients' overall morbidity was significantly higher and we observed a tendency towards increased mortality as well. Recurrent CBDS was diagnosed in 4.1% of the patients. Acute cholangitis with a hazard ratio (HR) of 36 (95%CI 11–119.4) was associated with recurrent CBDS in 39% of the patients. HR for acute pancreatitis was 6.2 (95%CI 3.4–11.3) and only one patient had CBDS at the same time. In conclusion, we consider acute pancreatitis and cholangitis both as probable long-term complications after ES.

Comparative quality of life study between endoscopic sphincterotomy and surgical choledochotomy

AIM: To determine quality of life improvement in choledocholithiasis patients who underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) versus open choledochotomy (OCT).

METHODS: Eligible choledocholithiasis patients (n = 216) hospitalized in the Changhai Hospital between May 2010 and January 2011 were enrolled into a prospective study using cluster sampling. Patients underwent EST (n = 135) or OCT (n = 81) depending on the patient’s wishes. Patients were followed-up with a field survey and by correspondence. Patients were also given the self-administered Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) to measure patient quality of life before surgery, and at two and six weeks after the procedures.

RESULTS: With respect to baseline patient characteristics, the EST and OCT groups were comparable. After the procedure, gallstones were completely eliminated in all patients. Among 216 eligible patients, 191 patients (88.4%) completed all three surveys, including 118 patients who underwent EST (118/135; 87.4%) and 73 patients who underwent OCT (73/81; 90.1%). EST was associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay than OCT (8.8 ± 6.5 vs 13.9 ± 6.7 d; P < 0.001). The GIQLI score was similar between the EST and OCT groups before cholelithotomy (103.0 ± 15.4 vs 99.7 ± 10.2), but increased significantly in the EST group at two weeks (113.4 ± 12.0 vs 107.2 ± 11.2; P < 0.001) and six weeks (120.7 ± 10.6 vs 116.9 ± 7.5; P < 0.05) after the procedures.

CONCLUSION: EST, compared with OCT, is associated with better postoperative quality of life in patients treated for choledocholithiasis.

Recurrent cholangitis after endoscopic lithotripsy of common bile duct stones with gallstones in situ: predictive factors with and without subsequent cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Common bile duct stones are a frequent complication of gallstones. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy are often performed to evaluate the etiology of obstructive jaundice and for concomitant therapeutic removal of common bile duct stones. We aimed to evaluate the recurrence rate of cholangitis or cholecystitis after endoscopic lithotripsy with gallstones in situ and to identify associated predictive factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 183 patients who had received endoscopic lithotripsy between July 2007 and June 2010. We divided patients into two groups: One group who had received subsequent cholecystectomy (n=66) and one observational group (n=117). Patients with previous cholecystectomy or without gallstones were excluded. All included patients were followed up at our outpatient department. Our end point was the presence of symptoms of recurrent cholangitis or cholecystitis.

RESULTS

Subjects included 86 males and 97 females with a mean age of 62.5±16.3 years (range, 43-81 years). Cholangitis or cholecystitis recurred in 6 patients in the cholecystectomy group and 30 patients in the observational group. Findings revealed a lower recurrence rate and longer recurrence-free period in patients who received subsequent cholecystectomy. The recurrence rate of the observational group was significantly higher than that of the cholecystectomy group (25.6% versus 9.1%, P=.007). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that common bile duct dilatation was an independent predictive factor for recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Cholecystectomy is recommended after endoscopic lithotripsy. Common bile duct dilatation is associated with the rate of recurrent cholangitis or cholecystitis.

Changes of the sphincter of Oddi motility in dog after cholecystectomy

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of cholecystectomy on the motility of the sphincter of Oddi (SO).

METHODS

Pressures of common bile duct (CBD), SO motility and its response to bolus injections of cholecystokinin (CCK, 20 ng/kg and 100 ng/kg) were detected respectively by manometry in eight Beagle dogs before and after cholecystectomy.

RESULTS

After cholecystectomy the CBD pressure increased 2.18 ± 1.86 mmHg, while the cyclical motion pattern of SO still existed but with a shortened cycle duration. The basal pressure (BP), phasic contraction amplitude (PCA), phasic contraction frequency (PCF) and its mode of propagation did not change significantly. Under the stimulation of CCK after cholecystectomy, although the motion patterns of SO were similar to those before cholecystectomy, the greatest inhibitory efficacy of BP and PCA all decreased with the prolonged excitement duration and the increased percentage of retrograde contraction.

CONCLUSIONS

Shortly after a cholecystectomy in Beagle dogs, the CBD pressure increased, SO motilities did not change significantly during the interdigestive phase except with a shortened cycle duration. Its relaxation responded to CCK was weakened with a confused contraction pattern.

Nationwide study of the treatment of common bile duct stones in Sweden between 1965 and 2009

BACKGROUND

Treatment of common bile duct stones has changed. Open surgery has gradually been replaced by endoscopic and laparoscopic procedures. The aims of this study were to see how common bile duct stones have been treated in Sweden, to establish whether there were differences in morbidity and mortality between these approaches, and to identify factors influencing mortality.

METHODS

All persons undergoing inpatient common bile duct exploration or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during 1965-2009 in the Swedish Hospital Discharge Registry, but without a diagnosis of malignancy in the Swedish Cancer Registry, were included. The outcome death was identified by cross-linkage to the Causes of Death Registry. Registry data on possible risk factors for mortality were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 126 885 procedures were performed in 110 119 patients. Open surgery was initially the only available method, but during the 1990s ERCP became predominant. Later, laparoscopic bile duct clearance became an established but uncommon method. A 90-day mortality rate of 0·2 per cent after open surgery, 0·8 per cent after ERCP, 0 per cent after laparoscopic exploration and 0·7 per cent after combined procedures was recorded. After adjustment for confounding, there was no difference in mortality between open surgery and ERCP. Biliary reintervention within 90 days was identified as a risk factor for death, whereas a concomitant diagnosis of pancreatitis reduced the risk.

CONCLUSION

The laparoscopic technique had the lowest mortality and morbidity rates. After adjustment for confounding factors, there was no difference in mortality after open surgery and ERCP. The favourable outcome for laparoscopy may have been due to selection bias, owing to treatment of younger, healthier subjects with less severe disease.

The efficacy of early scheduled follow-up endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography after common bile duct stone removal

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To investigate the efficacy of early scheduled follow-up endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) after common bile duct (CBD) stone removal.

METHODS

Patients who underwent endoscopic CBD stone removal and who had at least one risk factor for stone recurrence were enrolled. Six months after complete clearance of the CBD, patients underwent follow-up ERCP at an ambulatory care center, irrespective of symptoms.

RESULTS

The incidence of symptoms and cholangitis at follow-up ERCP was significantly lower in Group A (ERCP at 6 months after stone removal) than that in Group B (ERCP at >6 months) (14.3% vs 71.4%, p=0.00; 9.5% vs 33.3%, p=0.02, respectively). However, the recurrence rates of CBD stones were not different between Groups A and B (33.3% vs 47.6%). When comparing the subgroups, Group AR (stone recurrence in Group A) displayed significantly fewer symptoms and lesser cholangitis and spent fewer days in the hospital than did Group BR (stone recurrence in Group B) (21.4% vs 70%, p=0.02; 14.3% vs 60%, p=0.02; 2.43±1.87 vs 6.10±3.35, p=0.00, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that, irrespective of symptoms, early scheduled follow-up ERCP for patients who are at a high risk of recurrence is effective and safe.

Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stone removal in patients 60 years old or younger

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes in relatively young patients (≤ 60 years old) who underwent endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) for bile duct stone removal.

METHODS

Immediate and long-term outcomes were evaluated in 311 patients who were 60 years old or younger at the time of EPBD. The stone recurrence rate was compared among four groups stratified according to gallbladder (GB) status before and after EPBD (cholecystectomy after EPBD, GB left in situ with stones, GB left in situ without stones, and cholecystectomy before EPBD).

RESULTS

Bile duct stones were completely removed via EPBD alone in 304 patients (97.7%). Post-EPBD pancreatitis occurred in 24 patients (7.7%), and was mild in 18 patients, moderate in 5 patients, and severe in 1 patient. The rate of pancreatitis was significantly higher in these patients than in patients aged more than 60 years who underwent EPBD during the same study period (4.7%). Long-term outcomes were evaluated in 217 patients who were followed for at least 1 year after complete stone removal via EPBD. During a mean follow-up period of 5.6 years (range, 1.0-13.4 years), stone recurrence was observed in 13 patients (6.0%). The cumulative stone recurrence rates at 5 and 10 years after EPBD were 5.9 and 7.1%, respectively. Patients in the cholecystectomy after EPBD group had the lowest risk of stone recurrence among the four groups (2.0%).

CONCLUSION

EPBD removes bile duct stones in the majority of younger patients without increasing the risk of severe pancreatitis. Post-EPBD pancreatitis is more likely to occur in younger patients as compared to older patients. The long-term outcomes of EPBD appear favorable, especially in patients who have undergone cholecystectomy after EPBD.

The ballooning time in endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for the treatment of bile duct stones

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) is a safe and effective method for the treatment of choledocholithiasis, but previous studies have rarely reported the appropriate ballooning time (BT). We prospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of EPBD according to BT in patients undergoing bile duct stone removal.

METHODS

Seventy consecutive patients with bile duct stones were randomly assigned to receive EPBD with either conventional (n = 35, 60 seconds) or short (n = 35, 20 seconds) BT.

RESULTS

EPBD alone achieved complete bile duct clearance in 67 patients (long BT, n = 33, 94.3%; short BT, n = 34, 97.1%; p = 0.808). We also found no significant difference in the rate of complete duct clearance, including procedures that used mechanical lithotripsy, between the long and short BT groups (97.1% vs. 100%; p = 0.811). Mild pancreatitis was noted in four (11.4%) patients in the long BT group and two (5.7%) patients in the short BT group, but this incidence was not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed that EPBD using both 20-sec and 60-sec BTs is safe and effective for the treatment of bile duct stones. Short and long BTs produced comparable outcomes.

Long-term biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy restenosis: incidence, endoscopic management, and complications of retreatment

BACKGROUND

Ampullary restenosis is a late complication of biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy. Long-term data are limited regarding both the rate of restenosis and complications resulting from repeat therapy.

AIMS

To determine the incidence of post sphincterotomy restenosis and the effectiveness of endoscopic therapy in the management of this entity.

METHODS

A retrospective review of medical charts and the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) database to identify patients with ERCP and biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy during the period 1998-2002 at the University of Iowa Hospitals was conducted. All subjects were contacted by phone and asked about the recurrence of their pancreatobiliary symptoms after the first ERCP and whether they sought any medical treatment for these symptoms. The primary outcome was restenosis of the sphincterotomy site and the secondary outcome was complications of endoscopic treatment of sphincterotomy restenosis.

RESULTS

A total of 202 patients underwent ERCP and biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy on an intact major papilla. Of these, n = 80 patients (54.7 +/- 19 years of age, 76% female) consented and enrolled in the study. Among these, n = 13 (16%) developed ampullary restenosis in 1-62 (median 16) months after the index ERCP. These 13 patients underwent a total of 24 ERCPs (range 1-4 for each patient) for repeat biliary sphincterotomy and biliary stenting, if needed. Repeat biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy was successful in 12/13 (92%) patients. Complications of repeat biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy were seen in three patients: mild pancreatitis (n = 1), severe bleeding (n = 1), and severe duodenal perforation (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term restenosis is an important sequella of biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy. Repeat biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy is an effective treatment modality, but complications are not negligible.

Evaluation of residual bile duct stones by peroral cholangioscopy in comparison with balloon-cholangiography

We evaluated the usefulness of peroral cholangioscopy (POCS) for residual bile duct stones in patients with complete bile duct clearance confirmed by balloon-occluded cholangiography. A total of 108 patients with common bile duct stones who underwent POCS after extraction of stones via endoscopic sphincterotomy, resulting in complete bile duct extraction confirmed by balloon-occluded cholangiography, were retrospectively evaluated. For the treatment of difficult stones, stones were fragmented by mechanical lithotripsy (ML) or electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL). In 26 patients (24%), residual stones were detected with POCS in the lower bile duct. In patients with residual stones, large bile duct stones, juxtapapillary diverticulum, and use of ML or EHL were significantly related to residual stones (P < 0.05). Although a prospective study is necessary to clarify whether this procedure is appropriate in aspects of cost and benefits, POCS appears to be a useful diagnostic tool for confirming complete extraction of bile duct stones. POCS may be useful, particularly when lithotripsy using ML or EHL is performed and a large pneumobilia exists in the bile duct.

Single-step treatment of gall bladder and bile duct stones: a combined endoscopic-laparoscopic technique

INTRODUCTION

The advent of endoscopic techniques changed surgery in many regards. In the management of cholelithiasis; laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is today the treatment of choice. This has created a dilemma in the management of choledocholithiasis. Today a number of options exist, including endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) before LC in patients with suspected common bile duct (CBD) stones, laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) by the transcystic approach or laparoscopic choledocotomy, open CBD exploration and postoperative ERCP. A major concern regarding both pre- and postoperative extraction of CBD stones (CBDS) by the ERCP is the risk of development of pancreatitis, also more than 10% of the preoperative ERCP is normal. More recently the alternative technique of combined LC with intraoperative ERCP and ES is emerging in an attempt to manage cholecysto-choledocholithiasis in a single-step procedure.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this work was to assess the treatment of common bile duct stones (CBDS) in a one-stage operation by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (LC+IO-ERCP) and endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was carried out on 45 patients with gall bladder stones and with suspected or confirmed CBDS at the Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit in the Main Alexandria University Hospital. They were treated by a single-step procedure combining LC and IO-ERCP. Laparoscopic intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) was carried out to confirm the presence of CBDS. A soft-tipped guide-wire was passed through the cystic duct and papilla into the duodenum. A papillotome was inserted endoscopically over the guide-wire. Endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed and the stones were extracted with a retrieval balloon or with a Dormia basket. The surgical operating time, surgical success rate, postoperative complications, retained CBDS, and postoperative length of hospital stay were assessed.

RESULTS

There were 30 females and 15 males. Their mean age was 45.07+11.3 years (ranging from 27 to 65 years). Twenty-seven patients had confirmed CBDS by preoperative ultrasound (US) and/or MRCP. Eighteen patients were suspected for CBDS on clinical, laboratory and/or US basis. Conversion to open cholecystectomy occurred in one case due to severe adhesions at the Calot's triangle. IOC revealed the presence of CBDS in 36 patients. IO-ERCP with ES was performed successfully in 33 patients and stones were extracted endoscopically. Passage of the guide-wire through the papilla failed in three patients. Cholecystectomy was completed laparoscopically in 44 patients. The mean operative time was 119+14.4 min (ranging from 100 to 150 min). Minor postoperative complications occurred in 15 patients. No postoperative complications related to the procedure, i.e., pancreatitis, bleeding, perforation, were encountered. Patients regained their bowel motion on the next day and were discharged after a mean hospital stay of 2.55+0.89 days. None of the patients presented on the postoperative follow-up with symptoms, signs, laboratory or radiological evidence of retained CBDS. The mean duration of the postoperative follow-up was 9+4.07 months (ranging from 3 to 14 months).

CONCLUSION

The current study suggests that LC+IO-ERCP for the management of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis is a safe and aneffective technique with a low rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis. It offers another alternative for surgeons especially those who do not practice LCBDE to treat patients in a single setting. However, additional studies with larger patient populations are needed keeping in mind that the limiting characteristic is the proximity and availability of the endoscopic settings.

Stone clearance and risk factors for failure in laparoscopic transcystic exploration of the common bile duct

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become a gold standard globally. At the time of surgery, 5 to 10% of patients have coexisting stones in the common bile duct (CBD). There are several alternatives in treating these patients. We have chosen to try to extract the CBD stones at the primary operation by laparoscopic transcystic CBD exploration.

METHODS

During the years 1994-2002 laparoscopic attempt of exploration of the CBD was made in 207 patients. Data was prospectively collected in a database, and was analyzed using unconditional logistic regression for risk factor analysis.

RESULTS

In 155 of the 207 patients an attempt of transcystic CBD exploration was made and it was successful in 132 cases (85%). The median operating time was 184 minutes (range 89-384 minutes) and the median postoperative hospital stay was one day (range 1-31 days). The odds ratio for failure in stone clearance among patients with a bile duct diameter greater than 6 mm was 6.90 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87-54.61) compared to patients with a bile duct diameter of 6 mm or less. There was a significant threefold increase in risk among patients with stones of greater than 5 mm diameter compared to patients with stones 5 mm or less.

CONCLUSIONS

The laparoscopic transcystic exploration of the CBD had a high frequency of stone clearance and low morbidity in the present study. Moreover, large stones are a risk factor for failure in stone clearance.

Impact of food on hepatic clearance of patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy

BACKGROUND

The recurrence rate of common bile duct stones (CBDS) is around 3-21% after treatment by endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). Fatty meal has been shown to improve hepatic clearance in both patients with intact gallbladder and post-cholecystectomy after ES. This study tested the effects of different kinds of food on hepatic clearance by using quantitative cholescintigraphy (QC) in patients after ES.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients after ES with abnormal QC were enrolled in our study. Complete ablation of sphincter function was confirmed by sphincter of Oddi manometry. Fasting QC was done in every patient shortly after normalization of liver function, and then followed with low-fat and fatty-meal QC. Each of the 47 subjects was observed for the effect on hepatic clearance at 3 different levels of treatments (diets and fasting). Additionally, possible factors responsible for recurrent CBDS were investigated by means of logistic regression.

RESULTS

Both fatty and low-fat meals could significantly improve hepatic clearance compared with fasting in most patients after ES. But the response to food types was individualized. All patients tolerated the meals well. There was no significant relationship between the recurrence of CBDS and sex, age, intact gallbladder and presence of juxtapapillary diverticulum, CBD size, and improvement in hepatic clearance (> or = 5%) by food.

CONCLUSION

Both fatty and low-fat meals improved hepatic clearance in most of the patients with CBDS after ES, but the response to meals was individualized. Therefore, there is no need to restrict the amount of fat intake for patients who have undergone ES.

Effect of medical or surgical admission on outcome of patients with gallstone pancreatitis and common bile duct stones

INTRODUCTION

Management of uncomplicated common bile duct stone (CBDS) and gallstone pancreatitis (GP) presumably varies based on whether a patient is admitted to medicine or surgery. This study evaluates the impact of admitting team on outcome and cost.

METHODS

Three hundred seventy patients admitted to the Massachusetts General Hospital for CBDS or GP were retrospectively analyzed for demographics, insurance status, procedures, complications, length of stay, readmission, and cost. A multivariable analysis was conducted for outcome and cost measures.

RESULTS

Patients admitted to a surgical service were younger than those admitted to a medical service. Gender, race, tobacco use, and the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic renal insufficiency were not significantly different between groups. Patients admitted to a medical service had a higher incidence of coronary artery disease and diabetes. Despite lower readmission rates for surgical patients, there was no difference in total hospital days between groups. Though total cost of an initial surgical admission was greater than a medical admission, total cost attributable to the index admission diminished over time and ultimately was not significant in follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite variations in uncomplicated management of CBDS and GP, there is no difference, in long-term follow-up, in the total number of hospital days or cost for the management of CBDS or GP based on admitting team practices.

[Occurrence and risk factor for development of pancreatitis and asymptomatic hyperamylasemia following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography--our experiences]

INTRODUCTION

Chronic pancreatitis is defined as chronic inflammatory lesion of pancreatic parenchyma leading to destruction and fibrosis of exocrine pancreas. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the most sensitive and specific method for detection of morphological alterations in chronic pancreatitis. ERCP is inevitably associated to post-ERCP acute pancreatitis, as well as hyperamilasemia.

STUDY AIM

This study aims to determine frequency of post-ERPC pancreatitis and asymptomatic hyperamilasemia.

STUDY METHODS

We have studied 160 patients who underwent ERCP in Institute of Digestive Diseases, Clinical Centre of Serbia in Belgrade. Data regarding cholecystectomy, papillotomy, peripapillary diverticulosis, Oddi's sphincter hypertension, choledoch canulation and diameter, Wirsung duct canulation, minor duodenal papilla patency, anomalies of BP junction, as well as chronic pancreatitis has been analysed and correlated with eventual development of post-ERCP pancreatitis and asymptomatic hyperamilasemia.

RESULTS

Asymptomatic hyperamilasemia was determined in 51 subjects (31.9%), while pancreatitis has been developed in 5 patients (3.1%) subsequent to ERCP. It has been proofed that Wirsung duct canulation plays significant role in development of post-ERCP complications.

CONCLUSION

Although numerous factors may potentially contribute to development of post-ERCP pancreatitis, none of them, with the exception of Wirsung duct canulation, has been determined to play significant role in development of these complications.

Choledochoduodenostomy: reappraisal in the laparoscopic era

BACKGROUND

With the advent of interventional endoscopic procedures and with growing experience of laparoscopic surgery, the indications for open biliary procedures have become limited. This prospective study reviews the indications of open choledochoduodenostomy for benign biliary diseases and presents the short-term and long-term outcomes of this procedure in the present minimally invasive surgical era.

METHODS

Side-to-side choledochoduodenostomy was carried out for various benign obstructive pathologies of the biliary tract. The various parameters recorded were the demographic data, indications for surgery, early and late complications and the long-term outcome of the procedure.

RESULTS

Results of choledochoduodenostomy on 54 consecutive patients over a 9-year period are presented. The mean age was 49.7 years with a male to female ratio of 1:2.6. Thirty (55.5%) patients presented with obstructive jaundice and 42.6% had cholangitis. Overall hospital morbidity was 13% with zero mortality. After a mean follow up of 7.8 years, 96.3% patients had 'good' or 'fair' and 3.7% experienced 'poor' results. No recurrent disease or biliary malignancy was observed.

CONCLUSION

Open biliary drainage procedures may still be indicated in select patients where the facility or expertise for minimally invasive biliary procedures is not available. Choledochoduodenostomy remains an effective biliary drainage procedure with acceptable morbidity and mortality, especially in the high-risk and elderly population. The procedure should be regarded as an essential in the general surgical knowledge and training.

Fortuitous discovery of common bile duct stones: results of a conservative strategy

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of fortuitously discovered stones in the common bile duct is about 5%. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of spontaneous clearance of asymptomatic stones in the common bile duct discovered fortuitously during cholecystectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Intraoperative cholangiography was performed in all patients undergoing cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallbladder stones. If a filling defect of the common bile duct was discovered, a transcystic drain was inserted. Surgical or endoscopic extraction was not proposed initially. A control cholangiogram was performed on the second postoperative day then during the sixth postoperative week. If a stone persisted at the sixth week, endoscopic extraction was undertaken.

RESULTS

Cholecystectomy was performed in 124 patients with symptomatic gallstones and no signs predictive of stones in the common bile duct. A stone was found fortuitously in the common bile duct in 12 patients. The control cholangiogram was normal in two of these patients on day two (16.7%) and in six others (50%) at the six-week control. All 12 patients remained free of symptoms suggesting the presence of a stone in the common duct. Presence of the drain had no impact on quality-of-life. Endoscopic extraction was finally performed for four patients (33.3%) to remove a stone from the common bile duct.

CONCLUSION

Early surgical or endoscopic extraction of stones in the common bile duct should not be undertaken systematically in asymptomatic patients. Spontaneous asymptomatic clearance of the common bile duct is observed in about half of patients.

[Therapeutic splitting as standard treatment for cholelithiasis]

At the moment, therapeutic splitting is still regarded by the vast majority of surgeons as the gold standard for stones in the common bile duct. Endoscopic clearance of the duct certainly is much less invasive than open exploration. However, this does not apply when compared with laparoscopic stone removal. Both are equivalent in respect to stone clearance rates, but the laparoscopic techniques protect patients from the long-term sequelae of endoscopic papillotomy. This can be important particularly for younger patients. Laparoscopic bile duct exploration is cost-effective and safe. Special experience in laparoscopic surgical techniques, however, is mandatory. Thus, surgeons should intensify their training in laparoscopic bile duct exploration in order to increase the acceptance of these techniques.

Iatrogenic ampullary stenosis: history, endoscopic management, and outcome in a series of 49 patients

BACKGROUND

Iatrogenic ampullary stenosis is a late complication of endoscopic interventions that affects the sphincter of Oddi.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the history, endoscopic treatment, and outcome of iatrogenic ampullary stenosis.

DESIGN

Patients' charts, endoscopic reports, and x-ray films were reviewed and scored. Long-term follow-up data were obtained by means of contact with attending specialists, general physicians, and patients. Ampullary stenoses were distinguished by 2 types: type I, limited to the intraduodenal portion of the sphincter complex; type II, all other types, including extension of the stenosis into the common bile duct (CBD).

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

All patients treated for iatrogenic ampullary stenosis at our institution during the last 15 years were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Success of endoscopic treatment.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients were included (mean age 54 years; 36 women; type I, n = 18, type II, n = 31). Treatment consisted of extending the sphincterotomy in type I stenoses and included stent treatment and/or balloon dilation in type II. During endoscopic treatment of ampullary stenosis, complications occurred in 8 of 49 patients. There were no procedure-related deaths. Median (range) follow-up after treatment was 2124 (240-4544) days. From an intention-to-treat perspective, endoscopic therapy of ampullary stenosis showed a long-term success rate of 83% in type I and 65% in type II CBD stenosis. In patients identified as treated successfully by endoscopy, blood samples obtained prospectively after a median (range) follow-up of 1971 (99-3320) days did not show signs of clinically relevant cholestasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic therapy is successful in the majority of patients and should be regarded as first-line treatment for iatrogenic ampullary stenosis.

Endoscopic balloon sphincter dilation (sphincteroplasty) versus sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic balloon dilation was introduced as an alternative to endoscopic sphincterotomy to preserve the sphincter of Oddi and avoid undesirable effects due to an incompetent sphincter. Endoscopic balloon dilation has been largely abandoned by USA endoscopists due to increased risks of pancreatitis noted in one multicentre trial, but is still practiced in parts of Asia and Europe.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of endoscopic balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy in the management of common bile duct stones.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE until January 2004. We hand searched Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (1983-2002), read through bibliographies of all included randomised clinical trials, and contacted all primary authors regarding missed randomised trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing endoscopic balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy in removal of common bile duct stones irrespective of publication status, language, or blinding.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data collection was done by two independent authors for decisions on study inclusion, data abstraction, and quality assessment. When there was a non-resolvable discrepancy, the third author made the final decision. Analysis was run with RevMan Analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen randomised trials met our inclusion criteria (1768 participants). Less than half of the trials reported adequate methods of randomisation and only two trials used blinded outcome assessment. Endoscopic balloon dilation is statistically less successful for stone removal (relative risk (RR) 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 0.97), requires higher rates of mechanical lithotripsy (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.66), and carries a higher risk of pancreatitis (RR 1.96, 95% CI 1.34 to 2.89). Conversely, endoscopic balloon dilation has statistically significant lower rates of bleeding. When a fixed-effect model is applied endoscopic balloon dilation leads to significantly less short-term infection and long-term infection. There was no statistically significant difference with regards to mortality, perforation, or total short-term complications.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic balloon dilation is slightly less successful than endoscopic sphincterotomy in stone extraction and more risky regarding pancreatitis. However, endoscopic balloon dilation seems to have a clinical role in patients who have coagulopathy, who are at risk for infection, and possibly in those who are older.

Economical and clinical outcomes of alternative treatment strategies in the management of common bile duct stones in the elderly: wait and see or surgery?

BACKGROUND

Common bile duct stones (CBDS) are especially prevalent in the elderly population. Although the standard of care for stone removal is endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with sphincterotomy (ERC-S), the clinician's decision to refer a patient for cholecystectomy after ERC-S depends on several factors including potential for future biliary symptoms and complications, morbidity and mortality related to cholecystectomy, and costs associated with referral for cholecystectomy versus conservative approach. Using decision analysis, we explored the economic implications of cholecystectomy versus expectant management following ERC-S in elderly patients with CBDS.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

A decision tree was constructed with DATA 3.5 (Williamstown, MA) to estimate the costs and outcomes associated with two treatment strategies following ERC-S for CBDS in patients age 60 yr and older: (1) elective cholecystectomy, and (2) expectant management. Probabilities for potential complications and outcomes were derived from the medical literature and cost reflected Medicare reimbursement rates at our institution. The time horizon of the analysis was 2 yr.

RESULTS

Elective cholecystectomy was associated with total costs of 5,259 dollars with 94.3% of the cohort alive (1.886 life-years) at 2 yr, whereas expectant management was associated with total costs of 1,173 dollars with 94.7% of the cohort alive (1.894 life-years). The results were sensitive to the probability of recurrent biliary symptoms in patients treated conservatively. Compared to elective cholecystectomy, expectant management became less effective and more expensive at a yearly probability of recurrent symptoms greater than 40% and 90%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients aged 60 and older, expectant management after ERC-S for CBDS is a reasonable approach, but the economic attractiveness of this strategy is highly dependent on the probability of recurrent symptoms.

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography accurately detects common bile duct stones in resolving gallstone pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

There is controversy about the optimal method to detect common bile duct (CBD) stones in patients with mild resolving gallstone pancreatitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in detecting choledocholithiasis in this group of patients.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective randomized trial was conducted. Patients randomized to group 1 (n = 34) underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and intraoperative cholangiography (IOC). Those randomized to group 2 (n = 29) had preoperative MRCP, of these, patients with negative MRCP underwent LC and IOC, patients with positive MRCP had preoperative ERCP followed by LC.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were randomized (34 to group 1 and 29 to group 2). CBD stones were found in 5 patients in group 1. CBD exploration was performed in 2 patients, preoperative ERCP in 1, and postoperative ERCP in the other 2. MRCP showed CBD stones in 4 patients in group 2. There were two false-positive MRCPs. Four patients with a negative MRCP did not have IOC or ERCP, the remaining 21 patients with a negative MRCP had a negative IOC. The MRCP sensitivity was 100% (95% CI, 16-100%), specificity 91% (95% CI, 72-99%), positive predictive value 50% (95% CI, 7-93%), negative predictive value 100% (95% CI, 84-100%), and accuracy 92% (95% CI, 74-99%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with resolving gallstone pancreatitis and a negative MRCP do not need preoperative ERCP or IOC. Only patients with a positive MRCP will require preoperative ERCP.

Long-term effects of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation on gallbladder motility

We prospectively studied long-term (5 years) effects of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) on gallbladder motility. Thirteen patients with intact gallbladders (six with and seven without gallbladder stones) who had undergone EPBD for choledocholithiasis were enrolled in this study. Gallbladder volumes, while fasting and after dried egg yolk ingestion, were determined by ultrasonography, before and at 7 days, 1 month, and 1, 2, and 5 years after EPBD. Before EPBD, the gallbladder had a larger fasting volume and lower yolk-stimulated maximum contraction than in normal controls. Seven days after EPBD, fasting volume was decreased and maximum contraction was increased, regardless of whether the patient had gallbladder stones, showing significant differences from the pre-EPBD values. At 1 month to 5 years after EPBD, these changes were far less evident and gallbladder function did not differ significantly from baseline. EPBD does not adversely affect gallbladder motility in the long-term (5 years).

Predictive factors for acute pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation

BACKGROUND

Although endoscopic papillary balloon dilation may result in acute pancreatitis or hyperamylasemia, the risk factors for these complications have not been well documented. Risk factors predictive of acute pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation were retrospectively analyzed.

METHODS

In 118 patients who underwent endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for choledocholithiasis, postendoscopic papillary balloon dilation acute pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia (at least 3-fold elevation) were investigated. A multivariate analysis was conducted for 20 potential risk factors related to clinical and procedure characteristics.

RESULTS

Bile duct clearance was achieved in 113 patients. Early complications in the form of mild pancreatitis occurred in 7 patients (6%). Multivariate analysis identified history of acute pancreatitis as the only risk factor for postendoscopic papillary balloon dilation pancreatitis. Postendoscopic papillary balloon dilation hyperamylasemia occurred in 30 patients (25%). Multivariate analysis identified 4 independent risk factors for hyperamylasemia: an age of 60 years or less, previous pancreatitis, bile duct diameter 9 mm or less, and difficult bile duct cannulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation is associated with a relatively low occurrence (6%) of pancreatitis but a high frequency (25%) of hyperamylasemia. The latter may represent pancreatic irritation or latent pancreatic injury. Particular care is necessary when endoscopic papillary balloon dilation is performed in younger patients, those with a history of pancreatitis, patients with a nondilated bile duct, and when cannulation is difficult.

Endoscopic sphincterotomy in the management of bile duct stones in children

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) is a widely accepted method of extracting bile duct stones (BDS) in young as well as in elderly patients. The present study was undertaken to assess the safety and efficacy of ES for the treatment of BDS in children, seven of whom were critically sick because of suppurative cholangitis or pancreatitis.

METHOD

Over a period of 33 months, ES was performed in 16 consecutive children aged 7-16 yr with BDS. Nine patients had gallbladder in situ, and seven had previously undergone cholecystectomy. The coexisting abnormalities were gallstones and hepatic duct stones in one patient each and dead fragmented roundworms in 11 patients. Seven (five with an intact gallbladder and two cholecystectomized) patients presented with severe complications of BDS such as severe cholangitis in six and acute severe pancreatitis in one.

RESULTS

ES was technically successful in all patients, and complete stone extraction was achieved in 15 (93.8%) patients. Complications were minor bleeding in one (6.3%) patient without mortality. One patient with coexisting gallstones underwent cholecystectomy at a later date. During a mean follow-up period of 4-32 months, one patient developed recurrent biliary symptoms because of biliary ascariasis.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude ES is a safe and an effective method of treating BDS in children with previous cholecystectomy, and in those presenting with severe complications of BDS, such as pyogenic cholangitis or acute pancreatitis regardless of the presence of gallbladder.

Comparison of endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct is becoming more popular, although endoscopic sphincterotomy remains the usual treatment for bile duct stones. However, loss of the biliary sphincter causes permanent duodenobiliary reflux, and recurrent stone disease and biliary neoplasia may be a consequence.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to compare laparoscopic exploration with endoscopic sphincterotomy. A text word search of the Medline, Pubmed and Cochrane databases, and a manual search of the citations from these references, was used.

RESULTS

Endoscopic sphincterotomy is associated with a median (range) mortality rate of 1 (0-6) per cent, compared with 1 (0-5) per cent for laparoscopic bile duct exploration. The median (range) rate of pancreatitis following endoscopic sphincterotomy is 3 (1-19) per cent; this is a rare complication after laparoscopic duct exploration. The combined morbidity rate for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopic sphincterotomy is 13 (3-16) per cent, which is greater than 8 (2-17) per cent for laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Randomized trials are few and contain relatively small numbers of patients. They show little overall difference in rates of duct clearance, but a higher mortality rate and number of hospital admissions are noted for endoscopic sphincterotomy compared with laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Endoscopic sphincterotomy is associated with recurrent stone formation (up to 16 per cent) with associated cholangitis. It is also associated with bacterobilia and chronic mucosal inflammation. The late development of bile duct cancer has been reported in up to 2 per cent of patients.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct may be a better way of removing stones than endoscopic sphincterotomy plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. :

Risk factors predictive of late complications after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones: long-term (more than 10 years) follow-up study

OBJECTIVE

Widespread use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has extended the indications for endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) to young patients with choledocholithiasis; however, long-term results of ES and risk factors for late complications are largely unknown.

METHODS

Between 1977 and 1990, 145 patients aged 60 yr or younger underwent ES for choledocholithiasis. Long-term outcomes of ES were investigated in the year 2000, and prognostic factors for late complications were multivariately analyzed.

RESULTS

Long-term information was available in 135 cases (93.1%), with a median overall follow-up duration of 14.5 yr (range, 6.5-22.3 yr). There were neither biliary malignancies nor deaths attributable to biliary disease. Sixteen patients (11.9%) developed late complications, including choledochal complications (stone recurrence and/or cholangitis; 14 patients) and acute cholecystitis (two of 32 patients with the gallbladder in situ). Multivariate analysis identified two independent risk factors for choledochal complications: bile duct diameter > or = 15 mm and brown pigment stones at the initial ES. Choledochal complications were endoscopically manageable. All recurrent stones were brown pigment stones.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 12% of patients develop late complications after ES, but retreatment with ERCP is effective. ES is a reasonable alternative even in young patients with choledocholithiasis. Careful follow-up is necessary, however, particularly for patients with a dilated bile duct or brown pigment stones.

Do patients with recurrent choledocholithiasis after endoscopic sphincterotomy benefit from regular follow-up?

BACKGROUND

As many as 24% of patients who undergo endoscopic sphincterotomy for the removal of bile duct stones have recurrent biliary complications develop for which there is no effective method of prevention. The aim of this study was to determine whether patients who undergo routine clinical follow-up after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones have a different outcome than those who do not.

METHODS

All patients who had endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones were scheduled for follow-up visits, liver function tests, and transabdominal US every 3 to 6 months. ERCP was performed whenever symptoms recurred, or abnormal liver function or US was noted. The patients themselves decided whether to adhere to the follow-up schedule; this was not a randomized trial.

RESULTS

Seven hundred sixty-seven patients underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones from October 1990 to July 1999. Seventy-seven (10%) were found to have recurrent bile duct stones. Three patients who had undergone Billroth II gastrectomy were excluded. Among the remaining 74 patients (52 men, 22 women; mean age 65 years), 42 (57%) had a juxtapapillary diverticulum and 21 (28%) an intact gallbladder. The mean time to recurrence of bile duct stones was 19.7 months (range 5-72 months). Sixty-four patients (87%) had recurrent bile duct stones within 3 years. Fifty-one (69%) were followed regularly (Group A) and 23 (31%) were not (Group B). At the time of stone recurrence, 20 patients in Group A (39%) and 1 in Group B (4%) were asymptomatic (p = 0.002). Liver function tests were normal in 17 patients (13 Group A, 4 Group B). Endoscopic treatment for recurrent bile duct stones was successful in 46 patients (90%) in Group A and 16 (70%) in Group B (p = 0.04); surgical treatment was successful in all 5 patients in Group A and 4 of the 7 patients in Group B. Two patients in Group B were treated by nasobiliary drainage and biliary endoprosthesis insertion caused by extremely large stones and poor condition; both died (acute pancreatitis and sepsis).

CONCLUSION

Regular follow-up after endoscopic sphincterotomy detects recurrent bile duct stones early and thus avoids complications of bile duct stones.

Does a fatty meal improve hepatic clearance in patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy?

BACKGROUND

Delayed biliary emptying is a cause of recurrent bile duct stones in patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) for choledocholithiasis. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of fatty meal on hepatic clearance in patients after ES.

METHODS

Sixty patients who had received ES and complete clearance of bile duct stones were enrolled. Delayed hepatic clearance (45 min clearance of radioisotope [E45'] < 57%) from quantitative cholescintigraphy (QC) and absence of sphincteric function confirmed by sphincter of Oddi manometry were found in each patient after normalization of liver function. Patients then received another QC 30 min after a fatty meal (two fried eggs and 250 mL full milk, fat 28 g) within 2 months.

RESULTS

Improvement of hepatic clearance in QC after fatty meal was found in 20 of 24 (83%) cholecystectomized patients and 27 of 36 (75%) patients with intact gallbladder. The E45' after fatty meal was significantly higher than that without fatty meal (56 +/- 12%vs 40 +/- 9% in cholecystectomized patients, P < 0.001; 52 +/- 16%vs 35 +/- 11% in patients with intact gallbladder, P < 0.001). All patients tolerated the fatty meal well during fatty meal QC.

CONCLUSIONS

Fatty meal can improve hepatic clearance in both patients with intact gallbladder and after cholecystectomy, so routine restriction of fat after ES may be inappropriate. However, further studies are needed to evaluate the role of diet in the prevention of recurrent biliary complications.

Is cholecystectomy necessary after ERCP for bile duct stones in patients with gallbladder in situ?

BACKGROUND

The requirement for subsequent cholecystectomy in patients with gallbladder in situ after endoscopic removal of stones from the common bile duct (CBD) is controversial. The aims of this study were to assess the requirement for subsequent cholecystectomy for gallbladder-related symptoms, and to identify the patients who develop symptoms after the endoscopic removal of CBD stones.

METHODS

Of 241 patients with gallbladder in situ following endoscopic removal of stones from the CBD, 146 patients (78 men and 68 women; mean age 69 +/- 13 years, range 20-93) with a follow-up time of more than three months without elective cholecystectomy were enrolled in the study. Fifty-nine patients had gallbladder stones (single stones in 27 and multiple stones in 32) and 87 patients had gallbladder in situ without stones. The time from entry to the occurrences of death or cholecystectomy was evaluated retrospectively. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors associated with these events.

RESULTS

The mean duration of follow-up was 24.1 +/- 18.0 months (range 3-70 months). During follow-up, seven patients (4.8%) underwent cholecystectomy, on average 18.4 months after CBD stone removal, as the result of acute cholecystitis in four cases, biliary pain in two cases and acute pancreatitis in one case. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in four patients and open cholecystectomy in three patients. Post-operative morbidity occurred in two patients, with improvement after conservative management. Nine patients (6.2%) died as the result of unrelated biliary disease. Age, sex, presence of gallbladder stones, multiplicity of gallbladder stones and underlying disease did not correlate with subsequent cholecystectomy by Cox regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

Elective cholecystectomy is not warranted in patients with bile duct stones when the common duct can be cleared of stones by endoscopic sphincterotomy. We could not find any clinical predictors of further symptoms or complications arising from the retained gallbladder.

Medium-term effects of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation on gallbladder motility

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) for removal of bile duct stones tends to preserve papillary function. However, EPBD may exert beneficial or deleterious effects on gallbladder motility. This was a prospective, medium-term investigation (2 years) of the effects of EPBD on gallbladder motility.

METHODS

Twelve patients with intact gallbladders (6 with and 6 without gallbladder stones) who underwent EPBD for choledocholithiasis were enrolled in this study. Gallbladder motility was examined before EPBD and at 7 days, 1 month, 1 year, and 2 years after EPBD. Gallbladder volumes, measured after fasting and after ingestion of dried egg yolk, were determined by US.

RESULTS

All patients were asymptomatic during the 2-year follow-up period. Before EPBD, particularly in patients with cholelithiasis, the gallbladder had a larger fasting volume and lower yolk-stimulated maximum contraction compared with normal control subjects. Seven days after EPBD, fasting volume was decreased and maximum contraction was increased, both significantly compared with pre-EPBD values and regardless of the presence or absence of gallbladder stones. At 1 month, 1 year, and 2 years after EPBD, these changes were far less evident and gallbladder function did not differ significantly from baseline.

CONCLUSION

EPBD does not adversely affect gallbladder motility in the medium-term (2 years). In terms of gallbladder motility, EPBD does not appear to increase the future risk of acute cholecystitis or gallbladder stone formation.