Dysphagia after antireflux surgery

GERD surgery in non-neurologic patients: Modified Laparoscopic Hill-Snow Repair is a valid alternative to Nissen fundoplication. Results of a 20 years of follow-up

Nowadays laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication represents the gold standard in surgical treatment of complicated Gastro-Esophageal-Reflux Disease (GERD), above all in cerebral palsy patients. In non-neurological patients without gastrostomy Nissen fundoplication can create some problems (gas bloat syndrome, dysphagia). Laparoscopic Hill-Snow repair is an established surgical alternative, but it is reported only in adult population. We describe our modification of Hill-Snow technique and our experience in a large series of non-neurological children in order to report its effectiveness and applicability in pediatric patients affected by complicated GERD. Between 2000 and 2022, 319 children underwent surgical correction of gastro-esophageal reflux at our Department. All were affected by complicated gastro-esophageal reflux unresponsive to PPI (Proton Pump Inhibitors). 251 underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication; 68 non-neurological patients underwent laparoscopic Hill-Snow repair. Of these 68 children 48 were males (71%) and 20 females (29%); median age was 5years (3 months-11 years). Weight range was 4-37kg. 52 patients (76.5%) presented the following symptoms: retrosternal pain, dysphagia, regurgitation, coughing, failure to thrive, persisting reflux esophagitis. 16 (23.5%) had chronic respiratory problems (aspiration, apneic-spells, dysphagia, coughing, choking, gagging). For 8 (11.8%) symptoms were expression of chronic recurrent gastric volvulus. All underwent modified-laparoscopic-Hill-Snow repair. Contrast study showed sliding hiatal hernia in 55 patients (81%), while endoscopy demonstrated 16 cases of histologically severe esophagitis (23.5%) and 52 of mild esophagitis (76.5%). No intraoperative/postoperative complications were recorded. 60patients had a complete follow-up (range 1-20 years). 60/68 patients were evaluated with barium-swallow-study at 6-12 months; 40/68 patients with upper-gastrointestinal-endoscopy at 12months. No relapse was reported. 50 patients (73.7%) were symptom-free. 18 (26.3%) referred occasional epigastric pain, associated with vomit in 2 cases. 64 (94.1%) referred ability to vomit; 4 temporary difficulty to swallow (average 30 days). All patients reported being able to burp. 3(4.5%) presented episodes of gas-air-bloat during the first 2 months with spontaneous resolution. No case of dumping syndrome was recorded. This technique's modification yields excellent results in term of relapse and side effects at long-term follow-up. We reported the first and largest pediatric series in non-neurological children with encouraging results.

Analysis of Rates, Causes, and Risk Factors for 90-Day Readmission After Surgery for Large Hiatal Hernia: A Two-Center Study

Background: Hospital readmissions have become a more examined indicator of surgical care delivery and quality. There is scarcity of data in the literature on the rate, risk factors, and most common reasons of readmission following major hiatal hernia surgery. The primary endpoint was 90-day readmission after surgery for large hiatal hernia. Secondary endpoint was to examine which characteristics related with a higher risk of readmission. Methods: A retrospective review of two distinct institutional databases was performed for patients who had surgery for a large hiatal hernia between January 2012 and December 2019. Demographic, perioperative, and outpatient data were collected from the medical record. Results: A total of 71 patients met the inclusion criteria, most of them suffering from a type III hernia (66.2%). Mean operative time was 146 (±56.5) minutes and median length of stay (LOS) was 6 days (interquartile range = 3). The overall morbidity was 21.1% and the in-hospital mortality was 1.4%. The 30- and 90-day readmission rates were 7% and 8.5%, respectively. The mean time to readmission was 14.3 (±15.6) days. The reasons for 90-day hospital readmission were dysphagia (50%), pneumonia (16.7%), congestive heart failure (16.7%), and bowel obstruction (16.7%). Grade of esophagitis ≥2, presence of Barrett's esophagus, and LOS longer than 8 days were significant risk factors for unplanned readmission within 90 days. Conclusion: We observed that about 6 out of 71 patients who had surgery readmitted within 90 days (8.5%). Readmissions were most often linked to esophagitis ≥2, presence of Barrett's esophagus, and LOS longer than 8 days. These findings point to the necessity for focused treatments before, during, and after hospitalization to decrease morbidity and extra costs in this high-risk population.

Postoperative Dysphagia Following Esophagogastric Fundoplication: Does the Timing to First Dilation Matter?

BACKGROUND

Postoperative dysphagia after anti-reflux surgery typically resolves in a few weeks. However, even after the initial swelling has resolved at 6 weeks, dysphagia can persist in 30% of patients necessitating esophageal dilation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of esophageal dilation on postoperative dysphagia, the recurrence of reflux symptoms, and the efficacy of pneumatic dilations on postoperative dysphagia.

METHODS

A prospectively collected database was reviewed for patients who underwent partial/complete fundoplication with/without paraesophageal hernia repair between 2006 and 2014. Patient age, sex, BMI, DeMeester score, procedure type, procedure duration, length of stay, postoperative dysphagia, time to first pneumatic dilation, number of dilations, and the need for reoperations were collected.

RESULTS

The study included 902 consecutive patients, 71.3% females, with a mean age of 57.8 ± 14.7 years. Postoperative dysphagia was noted in 26.3% of patients, of whom 89% had complete fundoplication (p < 0.01). Endoscopic dilation was performed in 93 patients (10.3%) with 59 (63.4%) demonstrating persistent dysphagia. Recurrent reflux symptoms occurred in 35 (37.6%) patients who underwent endoscopic dilation. Patients who underwent a dilation for symptoms of dysphagia were less likely to require a revisional surgery later than patients who had dysphagia but did not undergo a dilation before revisional surgery (17.2% vs 41.7%, respectively, p < 0.001) in the 4-year follow-up period. The duration of initial dilation from surgery was inversely related to the need for revisional surgery (p = 0.047), while more than one dilation was not associated with additive benefit.

CONCLUSION

One attempt at endoscopic dilation of the esophagogastric fundoplication may provide relief in patients with postoperative dysphagia and can be used as a predictive factor for the need of revision. However, there is an increased risk for recurrent reflux symptoms and revisional surgery may ultimately be indicated for control of symptoms.

More beads, more peristaltic reserve, better outcomes: factors predicting postoperative dysphagia after magnetic sphincter augmentation

INTRODUCTION

Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) offers a minimally invasive anti-reflux alternative to fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. The most common side effect of MSA is dysphagia, which may require dilation or even device removal. The incidence of dysphagia may be reduced by MSA sizing and preoperative motility studies. Multiple rapid swallows (MRS) is a provocative maneuver during high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) that assesses peristaltic reserve. We evaluated factors predicting development of dysphagia following MSA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified patients undergoing MSA. Preoperative work-up included barium swallow, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and esophageal manometry. Peristaltic augmentation was defined as a ratio > 1 of the distal contractile integral (DCI) following MRS and the mean DCI of the 10 baseline wet swallows during manometry. Demographics, MSA implant size, and postoperative symptom data were gathered on all patients.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients underwent MSA. Mean age was 51.7 years, average BMI was 25.8 kg/m². 15 (22.1%) of patients had severe dysphagia requiring endoscopic dilation. Peristaltic augmentation with MRS was significantly higher in patients without dysphagia (46.1% vs 6.3% p = 0.026). 33.3% of patients requiring dilatation exhibited complete absence of smooth muscle contraction following MRS (DCI = 0). The ratio of the DCI of MRS/wet swallows predicting dysphagia following MSA was 0.56. Patients with a small (12-14 beads) versus a larger MSA implant (15-17 beads) had a significantly higher rate of postoperative dysphagia (58.5% vs 30.0% p = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

Adequate peristaltic reserve and larger device size correlate with decreased incidence of dysphagia following MSA implantation without compromising the anti-reflux barrier. Routine assessment of peristaltic reserve during preoperative HRM should be considered prior to MSA placement.

Comparison of Laparoscopic 270° Posterior Partial Fundoplication vs Total Fundoplication for the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Restoration of the esophagogastric junction competence is critical for effective long-term treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surgical repair results in such restoration, but mechanical adverse effects seem unavoidable. Minimizing these adverse effects without jeopardizing reflux control is warranted.

Objective

To determine whether partial fundoplication (PF) or total fundoplication (TF) is superior in laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this double-blind, randomized clinical trial of 1171 patients scheduled for laparoscopic antireflux surgery at a single university-affiliated center between November 19, 2001, and January 24, 2006, 456 patients were randomized and followed up for 5 years. Data were collected from November 2001 to April 2012, and data were analyzed from April 2012 to September 2018.

Interventions

A 270° posterior PF or a 360° Nissen TF.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Esophageal acid exposure at 3 years after surgery.

Result

Of the 456 randomized patients, 268 (58.8%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 49.0 (11.7) years. A total of 229 patients were randomized to PF, and 227 patients were randomized to TF. At 3 years postoperatively, the median (interquartile range) esophageal acid exposure was reduced from 14.6% (9.8-21.9) to 1.8% (0.7-4.4) after PF and from 16.0% (10.4-22.7) to 2.5% (0.8-6.8) after TF (P = .31). Likewise, reflux symptoms were equally and effectively controlled. Early postoperative dysphagia (6 weeks) was common in both groups but then decreased toward normality. A small but statistically significant difference in favor of PF was noted in the mean (SD) scoring of dysphagia for liquids at 6 weeks (PF, 1.6 [0.9]; TF, 1.9 [1.3]; P = .01) and for solid food at 12 months (PF, 1.3 [1.0]; TF, 1.9 [1.4]; P < .001) and 24 months (PF, 1.3 [0.9]; TF, 1.7 [1.2]; P = .001). Quality of life was reduced before surgery but increased to normal values after surgery and remained so over 5-year follow-up, with no difference between the groups.

Conclusions and Relevance

The results from this randomized clinical trial suggest that although PF and TF could be recommended for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, PF might be superior by inducing less dysphagia.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03659487.

Asymmetrical elevation of esophagogastric junction pressure suggests hiatal repair contributes to antireflux surgery dysphagia

The radial distribution of esophago-gastric junction (EGJ) pressures with regard to troublesome dysphagia (TDysph) after antireflux surgery is poorly understood. Before and after antireflux surgery, end-expiratory and peak-inspiratory EGJ pressures were measured at eight angles of 45° radial separation in patients with reflux disease. All 34 patients underwent posterior crural repair, then either 90° anterior (N = 13) or 360° fundoplication (N = 21). Dysphagia was assessed prospectively using a validated questionnaire (score range 0-45) and TDysph defined as a dysphagia score that was ≥5 above pre-op baseline. Compared with before surgery, for 90° fundoplication, end-expiratory EGJ pressures were highest in the left-anterolateral sectors, the position of the partial fundoplication. In other sectors, pressures were uniformly elevated. Compared with 90° fundoplication, radial pressures after 360° fundoplication were higher circumferentially (P = 0.004), with a posterior peak. Nine patients developed TDysph after surgery with a greater increase in end-expiratory and peak-inspiratory EGJ pressures (P = 0.03 and 0.03, respectively) and significantly higher inspiratory pressure at the point of maximal radial pressure asymmetry (P = 0.048), compared with 25 patients without TDysph. Circumferential elevation of end-expiratory EGJ pressure after 90° and 360° fundoplication suggests hiatal repair elevates EGJ pressure by extrinsic compression. The highly localized focal point of elevated EGJ pressure upon inspiration in patients with TDysph after surgery is indicative of a restrictive diaphragmatic hiatus in the presence of a fundoplication.

British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for oesophageal manometry and oesophageal reflux monitoring

These guidelines on oesophageal manometry and gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring supersede those produced in 2006. Since 2006 there have been significant technological advances, in particular, the development of high resolution manometry (HRM) and oesophageal impedance monitoring. The guidelines were developed by a guideline development group of patients and representatives of all the relevant professional groups using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool. A systematic literature search was performed and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) tool was used to evaluate the quality of evidence and decide on the strength of the recommendations made. Key strong recommendations are made regarding the benefit of: (i) HRM over standard manometry in the investigation of dysphagia and, in particular, in characterising achalasia, (ii) adjunctive testing with larger volumes of water or solids during HRM, (iii) oesophageal manometry prior to antireflux surgery, (iv) pH/impedance monitoring in patients with reflux symptoms not responding to high dose proton pump inhibitors and (v) pH monitoring in all patients with reflux symptoms responsive to proton pump inhibitors in whom surgery is planned, but combined pH/impedance monitoring in those not responsive to proton pump inhibitors in whom surgery is planned. This work has been endorsed by the Clinical Services and Standards Committee of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) under the auspices of the oesophageal section of the BSG.

Endoscopic augmentation of gastroesophageal junction using a full-thickness endoscopic suturing device

Background and study aims  This preliminary study was conducted to determine the feasibility and safety of endoscopic augmentation of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) using the Apollo OverStitch endoscopic suturing system in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms. Patients and methods  Endoscopic augmentation of GEJ was performed on 10 consecutive patients and the data were analyzed retrospectively. Using a double-channel gastroscope affixed to the endoscopic suturing platform, interrupted sutures were placed on the gastric side of the GEJ in 2 layers in order to create a narrowed and elongated GEJ. Results  Technical success was achieved in all patients, including those with a history of previous antireflux procedures (n = 7) and those with a hiatal hernia (n = 6). The median follow-up duration was 5 mo (range: 2 - 12). The median pre-procedure GERD-Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaire improved from 20 (range: 11 - 45) to a post-procedure score of 6 (range: 3 - 25) ( P  = 0.001). The median duration of GERD symptom improvement after the procedure was 1 mo (range: 0.5 - 4). Adverse events were limited to 1 patient who developed nausea and vomiting, which was self-limited. Conclusions  The use of a novel endoscopic suturing technique for the treatment of GERD is feasible and safe. The procedure resulted in short-term GERD symptom improvement. Further prospective studies using refined techniques are currently underway to improve durability and to prove efficacy.

The effect of pneumatic dilation in management of postfundoplication dysphagia

BACKGROUND

Fundoplication surgery is a commonly performed procedure for gastro-esophageal reflux disease or hiatal hernia repair. Up to 10% of patients develop persistent postoperative dysphagia after surgery. Data on the effectiveness of pneumatic dilation for treatment are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes and identify clinical factors associated with successful response to pneumatic dilation among patients with persistent postfundoplication dysphagia (PPFD).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients who had undergone pneumatic dilation for PPFD between 1999 and 2016. Patients with dysphagia or achalasia prior to fundoplication were excluded. Demographic information, surgical history, severity of dysphagia, and clinical outcomes were collected. Data pertaining to esophagram, manometry, endoscopy, and pneumatic dilation were also collected.

RESULTS

We identified 38 patients (82% female, 95% Caucasian, and median age 59 years) with PPFD who completed pneumatic dilation. The median postfundoplication dysphagia score was 2. Eleven patients had abnormal peristalsis on manometry. Seventeen patients reported response (seven complete) with an average decrease of 1 in their dysphagia score. Fifteen patients underwent reoperation due to PPFD. Hiatal hernia repair was the only factor that predicts a higher response rate to pneumatic dilation. Only one patient in our study developed complication (pneumoperitoneum) from pneumatic dilation.

CONCLUSION & INFERENCES

We found that pneumatic dilation to be a safe treatment option for PPFD with moderate efficacy. Patients who developed PPFD after a hiatal hernia repair may gain the greatest benefit after pneumatic dilation. We were not able to identify additional clinical, radiological, endoscopic, or manometric parameters that were predictive of response.

Post-Nissen Dysphagia and Bloating Syndrome: Outcomes After Conversion to Toupet Fundoplication

INTRODUCTION

Protracted dysphagia and bloating are potential troublesome side effects following Nissen fundoplication. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of conversion from Nissen to Toupet on dysphagia and bloating.

METHODS

The study used a retrospective chart review of all patients who had undergone conversion from Nissen to Toupet between 2001 and 2014. Endpoints were to determine the effect of conversion on dysphagia, bloating, and reflux control.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients underwent conversion at a median of 3.7 years (1.4-10.5) after initial fundoplication. Indications were dysphagia in 19 (76%) and bloating syndrome in 6 (24%) patients. The median operative time was 104 min (86-146). There were no serious complications or mortality. Median follow-up was 27 months (0.8-130). Dysphagia was relieved in 16 (84%) and bloating in all 6 patients. Two patients developed reflux requiring a redo-Nissen. Two patients had persistent dysphagia and required endoscopic dilation. The GERD-HRQL post-conversion showed a median score of 5 (3-13).

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion relieved dysphagia in 84% and bloating in 100%. Significant recurrence of GERD was rare. Given the absence of serious complications, conversion should be considered in patients with severe bloating or dysphagia.

Laparoscopic anterior versus posterior fundoplication for gastro-esophageal reflux disease: a meta-analysis and systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Although laparoscopic posterior fundoplication (LPF) i.e., Nissen or Toupet have the proven efficacy for controlling gastro-esophageal reflux surgically, there remain problems with postoperative dysphagia and gas bloat syndrome. To decrease some of these postoperative complications, laparoscopic anterior fundoplication (LAF) was introduced. The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate the merits and drawbacks of LPF versus LAF for the treatment of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD).

DATA SOURCES, STUDY SELECTION, AND REVIEW METHODS

A search of Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index, Current Contents, PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database identified all RCTs comparing different types of LPF and LAF published in the English Language between 1990 and 2013. The meta-analysis was prepared in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Data was extracted and analyzed on ten variables which include dysphagia score, heartburn rate, redo operative rate, operative time, overall complications, rate of conversion to open, Visick grading of satisfaction, overall satisfaction, length of hospital stay, and postoperative 24-h pH scores.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Nine trials totaling 840 patients (anterior = 425, posterior = 415) were analyzed. There was a significant reduction in the odds ratio for dysphagia in the LAF group compared to the LPF group. Conversely, significant reduction in the odds ratio for heartburn was observed for LPF compared to LAF. Comparable effects were noted for both groups for other variables which include redo surgery, operating time, overall complications, conversion rate, Visick's grading, patients' satisfaction, length of hospital stay, and postoperative 24-h pH scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this meta-analysis, LPF compared to LAF is associated with significant reduction in heartburn at the expense of higher dysphagia rate on a short- and medium-term basis. We therefore conclude that LPF is a better alternative to LAF for controlling GERD symptoms.

Randomized controlled trial of transoral incisionless fundoplication vs. proton pump inhibitors for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVES

Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) was developed in an attempt to create a minimally invasive endoscopic procedure that mimics antireflux surgery. The objective of this trial was to evaluate effectiveness of TIF compared with proton pump inhibition in a population consisting of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients controlled with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) who opted for an endoscopic intervention over lifelong drug dependence.

METHODS

Patients with chronic GERD were randomized (2:1) for TIF or continuation of PPI therapy. American Society of Anesthesiologists >2, body mass index >35 kg/m(2), hiatal hernia >2 cm, and esophageal motility disorders were exclusion criteria. Primary outcome measure was GERD-related quality of life. Secondary outcome measures were esophageal acid exposure, number of reflux episodes, PPI usage, appearance of the gastroesophageal valve, and healing of reflux esophagitis. Crossover for the PPI group was allowed after 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients (TIF n=40, PPI n=20, mean body mass index 26 kg/m(2), 37 male) were included. At 6 months, GERD symptoms were more improved in the TIF group compared with the PPI group (P<0.001), with a similar improvement of distal esophageal acid exposure (P=0.228) compared with baseline. The pH normalization for TIF group and PPI group was 50% and 63%, respectively. All patients allocated for PPI treatment opted for crossover. At 12 months, quality of life remained improved after TIF compared with baseline (P<0.05), but no improvement in esophageal acid exposure compared with baseline was found (P=0.171) and normalization of pH was accomplished in only 29% in conjunction with deteriorated valve appearances at endoscopy and resumption of PPIs in 61%.

CONCLUSION

Although TIF resulted in an improved GERD-related quality of life and produced a short-term improvement of the antireflux barrier in a selected group of GERD patients, no long-term objective reflux control was achieved.

Combined impedance-manometry for the evaluation of esophageal disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Combined impedance-manometry was introduced just over 20 years ago for the assessment of esophageal motor function. Since then, technical developments have led to the introduction of high-resolution impedance-manometry (HRIM). However, analysis of the impedance and manometry recordings has remained separate and relatively unchanged since the introduction of HRIM, and it is unclear whether the addition of impedance has had a significant impact on the management of esophageal motor disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

The major technical advance over the past 12 months or so has been the development of automated impedance-manometry (AIM) analysis, in which the impedance and manometric data are analyzed together to assess the interactions between pressure and flow. This analysis has revealed subtle abnormalities in esophageal function in patients with nonobstructive dysphagia who have normal manometry and conventional impedance analyses. AIM analysis has also revealed preoperative characteristics in patients that may predict the occurrence of postfundoplication dysphagia.

SUMMARY

Through ongoing technical development, impedance-manometry is becoming increasingly useful clinically to assess esophageal motility disorders as well as to provide further insights into esophageal physiology.

New insights in gastroesophageal reflux, esophageal function and gastric emptying in relation to dysphagia before and after anti-reflux surgery in children

In children with gastroesophageal reflux (GER) disease refractory to pharmacological therapies, anti-reflux surgery (fundoplication) may be a treatment of last resort. The applicability of fundoplication has been hampered by the inability to predict which patient may benefit from surgery and which patient is likely to develop post-operative dysphagia. pH impedance measurement and conventional manometry are unable to predict dysphagia, while the role of gastric emptying remains poorly understood. Recent data suggest that the selection of patients who will benefit from surgery might be enhanced by automated impedance manometry pressure-flow analysis (AIM) analysis, which relates bolus movement and pressure generation within the esophageal lumen.

Susceptibility to dysphagia after fundoplication revealed by novel automated impedance manometry analysis

BACKGROUND

Conventional measures of esophageal pressures or bolus transport fail to identify patients at risk of dysphagia after laparoscopic fundoplication.

METHODS

Liquid and viscous swallows were evaluated with impedance/manometry in 19 patients with reflux disease before and after surgery. A new method of automated impedance manometry (AIM) analysis correlated esophageal pressure with impedance data and automatically calculated a range of pressure and bolus movement variables. An iterative analysis determined whether any variables were altered in relation to dysphagia. Standard measures of esophago-gastric junction pressure, bolus presence time, and total bolus transit time were also evaluated.

KEY RESULTS

At 5 months postop, 15 patients reported some dysphagia, including 7 with new-onset dysphagia. For viscous boluses, three AIM-derived pressure-flow variables recorded preoperatively varied significantly in relation to postoperative dysphagia. These were: time from nadir esophageal impedance to peak esophageal pressure (TNadImp-PeakP), median intra-bolus pressure (IBP, mmHg), and the rate of bolus pressure rise (IBP slope, mmHgs(-1) ). These variables were combined to form a dysphagia risk index (DRI=IBP×IBP_slope/TNadImp-PeakP). DRI values derived from preoperative measurements were significantly elevated in those with postoperative dysphagia (DRI=58, IQR=21-408 vs no dysphagia DRI=9, IQR=2-19, P<0.02). A DRI >14 was optimally predictive of dysphagia (sensitivity 75% and specificity 93%).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Before surgery, a greater and faster compression of a swallowed viscous bolus with less bolus flow time relates to postoperative dysphagia. Thus, susceptibility to postfundoplication dysphagia is related to a pre-existing sub-clinical variation of esophageal function.

Dysphagia postfundoplication: more commonly hiatal outflow resistance than poor esophageal body motility

BACKGROUND

Historically, risk assessment for postfundoplication dysphagia has been focused on esophageal body motility, which has proven to be an unreliable prediction tool. Our aim was to determine factors responsible for persistent postoperative dysphagia.

METHODS

Fourteen postfundoplication patients with primary dysphagia were selected for focused study. Twenty-five asymptomatic post-Nissen patients and 17 unoperated subjects served as controls. Pre- and postoperative clinical and high-resolution manometry parameters were compared.

RESULTS

Thirteen of the 14 symptomatic patients (92.9%) had normal postoperative esophageal body function, determined manometrically. In contrast, 13 of 14 (92.9%) had evidence of esophageal outflow obstruction, 9 of 14 (64.3%) manometrically, and 4 of 14 (28.6%) on endoscopy/esophagram. Median gastroesophageal junction integrated relaxation pressure was significantly greater (16.2 mm Hg) in symptomatic than in asymptomatic post-Nissen patients (11.1 mm Hg, P = .05) or unoperated subjects (10.6 mm Hg, P = .02). Sixty-four percent (9/14) of symptomatic patients had an increased mean relaxation pressure. Dysphagia was present in 9 of 14 (64.3%) preoperatively, and elevated postoperative relaxation pressure was independently associated with dysphagia.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that postoperative alterations in hiatal functional anatomy are the primary factors responsible for post-Nissen dysphagia. Impaired relaxation of the neo-high pressure zone, recognizable as an abnormal relaxation pressure, best discriminates patients with dysphagia from those without symptoms postfundoplication.

Prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with anterior versus posterior hiatal repair: late outcomes

BACKGROUND

The technique used for hiatal closure in laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication might have an impact on the risk of postfundoplication dysphagia and hiatal herniation. In 1997, we commenced a randomized trial to evaluate the impact of anterior versus posterior hiatal repair techniques on these outcomes. In the present study, we evaluated the 10-year outcomes from this trial.

METHODS

A total of 102 patients were randomized to undergo laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with either anterior (47 patients) or posterior (55 patients) repair of the diaphragmatic hiatus. Outcomes were assessed using standardized clinical assessment scores that evaluated reflux symptoms, dysphagia, and satisfaction with the outcome following surgery.

RESULTS

Clinical outcomes 10 years after surgery were available for 93% of patients, and outcome scores were obtained for 43 patients in each group. Patients undergoing anterior hiatal repair were less likely to report dysphagia for lumpy solid foods (14.0% vs. 39.5%, p = 0.01), although there were no significant differences in dysphagia outcomes for six other dysphagia assessment scores. There were no differences between the two groups for reflux symptoms, medication use, and overall satisfaction with the outcome of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

At the 10-year follow-up, the outcomes for the two groups were similar. Anterior hiatal repair is an acceptable technique for hiatal closure during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Postoperative dysphagia is not predictive of long-term failure after laparoscopic antireflux surgery

INTRODUCTION

Dysphagia is a common postoperative symptom after laparoscopic antireflux surgery, usually attributed to postoperative edema or a "too tight" fundoplication. Although it is usually self-limited, it occasionally requires endoscopic dilation and rarely revisionary surgery. It has not been previously described whether postoperative dysphagia is associated with poorer long-term reflux control after fundoplication.

METHODS

We hypothesized that the presence of dysphagia in the early postoperative period is associated with long-term failure of the antireflux procedure and recurrence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms. A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing antireflux surgery was performed. The study population included patients, who underwent primary laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication between the years 1991 and 2010. The presence of dysphagia on their first postoperative visit (<30 days) was used to classify them in the early-dysphagia (ED) and the no-early-dysphagia (NED) groups. The recurrence of heartburn or regurgitation, as well as the pH studies on long-term follow-up (more than 6 months) were compared between the two groups. A grading system (range 0-4) was used to measure the severity of foregut symptoms.

RESULTS

1223 patients underwent primary laparoscopic Nissen fundoplications during the study period and met the inclusion criteria. Both short and long-term follow-up was available in 821 patients, who were analyzed. 423 patients were included in the ED group, whereas 398 in the NED group. The mean regurgitation score of the ED group on the long-term follow-up was 0.25 compared to 0.20 for the NED group (P = 0.21). The heartburn score was 0.38 for the ED group compared to 0.33 for the NED group (P = 0.38). Long-term dysphagia was higher in the ED group. These findings were confirmed when ED patients were subclassified based on the degree of early post-operative dysphagia. Of the 821 patients, 599 underwent routine postoperative pH testing. The mean DeMeester score in the ED group (n = 308) was 11.7 compared to 13.2 for the NED group (n = 291; P = 0.54). The percentage of patients with abnormal pH testing was similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Early postoperative dysphagia is not associated with worse long-term GERD symptom control after primary laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

Meta-analysis of two randomized controlled trials to identify long-term symptoms after division of the short gastric vessels during Nissen fundoplication

BACKGROUND

Randomized trials suggest that division of the short gastric vessels during Nissen fundoplication is unnecessary. Some trials report an increased risk of gas bloat symptoms following division of the short gastric vessels. In this study long-term follow-up data from the two largest randomized clinical trials of division versus no division of the short gastric vessels during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication were combined to determine whether there were differences in late outcome.

METHODS

Patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease who underwent primary laparoscopic antireflux surgery and were included in two previously reported randomized trials were studied. Of 99 patients enrolled in the Swedish study and 102 in the Australian study, the short gastric vessels were divided in 104 and left intact in 97. Data sets were combined and late clinical outcomes analysed.

RESULTS

At 10-12 years' follow-up (mean 11.5 years) clinical data were obtained from 170 patients (86 with vessels divided, 84 undivided). Statistical analysis of the combined data set showed no significant differences in symptoms of heartburn or dysphagia, ability to belch or vomit, and use of antisecretory medications. Division of the short gastric vessels was associated with a higher rate of bloating symptoms (72 versus 48 per cent; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Division of the short gastric vessels is followed by a slightly poorer clinical outcome at late follow-up after Nissen fundoplication. Surgeons should avoid dividing these vessels when undertaking a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

The laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication--a better operation?

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication has become the method of choice in antireflux surgery replacing its open counterpart before the long-term results of controlled clinical trials were available. METHODS AND AIM: Review of the literature to highlight the long-term results of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

RESULTS

Long-term symptom relief regarding significant reflux symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation can be achieved by laparoscopic fundoplication in 84% to 97% and patients' overall satisfaction with the result of their laparoscopic fundoplication surgery is high, ranging from 86% to 96%. The long-term results of randomised trials have shown no statistically significant differences in subjective symptomatic outcome between laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication. Complaints regarding the scar, incisional hernias and higher incidence of defective wraps were associated with the open approach.

CONCLUSION

At long-term follow-up the laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication has a similar long-term subjective symptomatic outcome as the open procedure but laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is associated with a significantly lower incidence of incisional hernias and defective fundic wraps at endoscopy, defining laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication as the procedure of choice in surgical management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Preoperative lower esophageal sphincter manometry data neither impact manifestations of GERD nor outcome after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication

BACKGROUND

Experience with laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and manometrically intact lower esophageal sphincter (LES) is limited. The disease pattern may be different and LARS may fail to control reflux or result in higher rates of dysphagia. This is the first study investigating the impact of preoperative LES manometry data not only on manifestations of GERD and subjective outcome alone but also on objective outcomes 1 year after LARS.

METHODS

Three hundred fifty-one GERD patients underwent LARS and had subjective symptom and quality of life assessment, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, barium swallow esophagogram, 24-h esophageal pH monitoring, and manometry pre- and 1 year postoperatively. Patients were divided into those with a preoperatively intact versus defective LES based on intraabdominal length and resting pressure. Baseline and 1-year postoperative follow-up data were compared.

RESULTS

Preoperative manifestations of GERD were similar in each group. Postoperatively, all symptoms except flatulence, quality of life scores, and objective manifestations improved significantly in each group.

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative manometric character of the LES neither impacts the manifestations of GERD nor subjective and objective outcomes after LARS. Patients with GERD and manometrically intact LES have no higher risk for postoperative dysphagia.

Antireflux transoral incisionless fundoplication using EsophyX: 12-month results of a prospective multicenter study

Background

A novel transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) procedure using the EsophyX system with SerosaFuse fasteners was designed to reconstruct a full-thickness valve at the gastroesophageal junction through tailored delivery of multiple fasteners during a single-device insertion. The safety and efficacy of TIF for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were evaluated in a prospective multicenter trial.

Methods

Patients (n = 86) with chronic GERD treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were enrolled. Exclusion criteria included an irreducible hiatal hernia > 2 cm.

Results

The TIF procedure (n = 84) reduced all hiatal hernias (n = 49) and constructed valves measuring 4 cm (2–6 cm) and 230° (160°–300°). Serious adverse events consisted of two esophageal perforations upon device insertion and one case of postoperative intraluminal bleeding. Other adverse events were mild and transient. At 12 months, aggregate (n = 79) and stratified Hill grade I tight (n = 21) results showed 73% and 86% of patients with ≥50% improvement in GERD health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores, 85% discontinuation of daily PPI use, and 81% complete cessation of PPIs; 37% and 48% normalization of esophageal acid exposure; 60% and 89% hiatal hernia reduction; and 62% and 80% esophagitis reduction, respectively. More than 50% of patients with Hill grade I tight valves had a normalized cardia circumference. Resting pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) was improved significantly (p < 0.001), by 53%. EsophyX-TIF cured GERD in 56% of patients based on their symptom reduction and PPI discontinuation.

Conclusion

The 12-month results showed that EsophyX-TIF was safe and effective in improving quality of life and for reducing symptoms, PPI use, hiatal hernia, and esophagitis, as well as increasing the LES resting pressure and normalizing esophageal pH and cardia circumference in chronic GERD patients.

On-table endoscopy following laparoscopic fundoplication

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic fundoplication represents the gold standard in the surgical management of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). The achievement of long-lasting symptomatic and physiological control of reflux is the goal of therapy, as well as the minimization of troubling sequelae, in particular, dysphagia. On-table endoscopy after fundoplication was introduced in this Unit as a quality initiative in an attempt to minimize dysphagia and technical errors, and the aim of this study is to report the experience to date, and compare outcomes with the previous 100 cases performed by an experienced team.

METHODS

Eighty patients who underwent laparoscopic Rosetti-Nissen fundoplication and on-table endoscopy (group 2) were compared with 100 consecutive prior cases (group 1). Patients were prospectively evaluated and had pre- and postoperative symptom scoring and analysis of complications (all patients), and manometry and 24-h pH testing in 120 patients (60 in each group).

RESULTS

Both groups were similar with respect to demographics, esophagitis, pH score, and dysmotility. No bougie was used in either group. On-table endoscopy resulted in technical modifications in 4 (5%) patients. Early grade 2 or 3 dysphagia was evident in 4 (5%) patients in group 2, compared with 15 (15%) in group 1 (p < 0.001). Late dysphagia was evident in one patient (1.5%) in group 2 compared with 7 (7%) in group 1 (p < 0.05). Dilatation was performed in four patients (5%) in group 2, compared with 11 (11%) in group 1 (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that on-table endoscopy may be a useful quality assurance adjunct in laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery, in particular, reducing the incidence of dysphagia and reinterventions.

Esophageal ileus following laparoscopic fundoplication

Early postoperative dysphagia occurs in most patients following laparoscopic fundoplication. Whether dysphagia is associated with a change in esophageal motor function and/or a change in gastroesophageal junction characteristics is unknown. Esophageal motility in the early postoperative period has not been evaluated previously. Esophageal motility was studied on the first postoperative day in 10 patients who underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and 10 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (control group), using standard perfusion manometry. Primary peristalsis on water swallows following fundoplication elicted a median response of 5% successful peristalsis compared with median response of 100% successful peristalsis following cholecystectomy (P = 0.05). The fundoplication was associated with failure of primary esophageal peristalsis in 7/10 patients, compared to 2/10 patients who underwent cholecystectomy (P = 0.068 Fisher's exact test). Three months after fundoplication, in nine patients studied, primary peristalsis was similar to peristalsis observed preoperatively in seven patients and two patients still had an aperistaltic esophagus. In this study, esophageal manometry 1 day after surgery demonstrated grossly disturbed esophageal motility in most patents following laparoscopic fundoplication, compared to normal motility following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Peristalsis improved at 3 months or more following surgery. This suggests that an 'esophageal ileus' occurs during the early period after laparoscopic fundoplication.

Dysphagia after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the frequency and severity of dysphagia during the first 8 weeks after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. So far, there have been no studies reporting data on day-to-day occurrence of dysphagia after laparoscopic fundoplication in a consecutive series of patients. This may explain why the frequency of dysphagia varies greatly in the literature (4-100%).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty consecutive patients, undergoing elective laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, completed a standard dysphagia registration diary each day during the first 8 weeks after surgery. Patients who preoperatively had suffered from dysphagia were excluded. Thus, none of the patients had dysphagia in the 2-month period before surgery. Ten patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy served as controls. Data were quantified, and a score value of 4 or more was considered bothersome.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients (93%) experienced some degree of dysphagia during the observation period. Sixteen patients (44%) had at least one day with annoying dysphagia. The dysphagia started 1-2 days after surgery, was most prominent during the first few weeks, and subsided in nearly all cases after 5-6 weeks. Two patients with persistent dysphagia were treated once with balloon dilatation. None of the patients in the control group had dysphagia.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly all patients experience some degree of dysphagia after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, and in nearly half of the patients it is considered annoying. However, even severe dysphagia usually disappears within 5-6 weeks. These results suggest a conservative attitude for the first 1-2 months after surgery. The data may also serve as a background for preoperative information to the patients.

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication decreases gastroesophageal junction distensibility in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) is the surgical treatment of choice for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Post-LNF complications, such as gas bloat syndrome, inability to belch and vomit, and dysphagia, remain too common and prevent LNF from being more highly recommended. It remains controversial as to whether preoperative assessment can predict the development of post-LNF complications. Some authors have shown a correlation between pre-LNF manometry characteristics and post-LNF dysphagia, and others have not. We hypothesize that many post-LNF complications are caused by a decrease in the distensibility of the GEJ and that standard manometry is at best an indirect measure of this. The aim of this study is to directly measure the effect of LNF on gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) distensibility (GEJD). The lower esophageal sphincter (LES) of 15 patients undergoing LNF was characterized using standard manometry. The GEJD before and after a standardized LNF was measured using a specialized catheter, containing an infinitely compliant bag, placed within the LES. GEJD was measured, as dV/dP over volumes 5 to 25 mL distended at a rate of 20 mL/min. Mean dP +/- standard error of the mean for each volume was calculated, and distensibility curves were generated and compared. Measurements were also taken after abolishing LES tone by mid-esophageal balloon distension. Patient symptoms were recorded before and after surgery. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance, paired t test, and the Tukey test. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication led to a statistically significant increase in Delta pressure over each volume tested and therefore a significant decrease in the distensibility of the GEJ. Abolition of LES tone had no statistical effect on GEJD after fundoplication. There were no complications, and none of the patients developed the symptom of dysphagia postoperatively. These are the first direct measurements to show that LNF significantly reduces the distensibility of the GEJ. We hypothesize that the magnitude of this reduction may be the vital variable in the development of post-LNF complications and specifically post-LNF dysphagia. The intraoperative measurement of LES distensibility may provide a means for avoiding this feared and other post-LNF complications in the future.

Dysphagia after laparoscopic antireflux surgery: a problem of hiatal closure more than a problem of the wrap

BACKGROUND

Postoperative dysphagia after laparoscopic antireflux surgery usually is transient and resolves within weeks after surgery. Persistent dysphagia develops in a small percentage of patients after surgery. There still is debate about whether postoperative dysphagia is caused by the type or placement of the fundic wrap or by mechanical obstruction of the hiatal crura. This study aimed to investigate patients who experienced recurrent or persistent dysphagia after laparoscopic antireflux surgery, and to identify the morphologic reason for this complication.

METHODS

A sample of 50 patients consecutively referred to the authors' unit with recurrent, persistent, or new-onset of dysphagia after laparoscopic antireflux surgery were prospectively reviewed to identify the morphologic cause of postoperative dysphagia. According to their radiologic findings, these patients were divided into three groups: patients with signs of obstruction at or above the gastroesophageal junction suspicious of crural stenosis (group A; n = 18), patients with signs of total or partial migration of the wrap intrathoracically (group B; n = 27), and patients in whom the hiatal closure was radiologically assessed to be correct with a supposed stenosis of the wrap (group C; n = 5). The exact diagnosis of a too tight (group A) or too loose (group B) hiatus in contrast to a too tight wrap (group C) was established during laparoscopic redo surgery (groups B and C) or by x-ray during pneumatic dilation (group A).

RESULTS

For all 18 group A patients, intraoperative x-ray during pneumatic dilation showed the typical signs of hiatal tightness. Of these, 15 were free of symptoms after dilation, and 3 had to undergo laparoscopic redo surgery because of persistent dysphagia. In all these patients, the hiatal closure was narrowing the esophagus. All the group B patients underwent laparoscopic redo surgery because of intrathoracic wrap migration. Intraoperatively, all the patients had an intact fundoplication, which slipped above the diaphragm. Definitely, only in 10% of all 50 patients (group C) presenting with the symptom of dysphagia, was the morphologic reason for the obstruction a problem of the fundic wrap.

CONCLUSIONS

In most patients, postoperative dysphagia is more a problem of hiatal closure than a problem of the fundic wrap.

Functional Problems Following Esophageal Surgery

Functional problems following esophageal surgery for GERD are not infrequent. The majority of patients improve with time. Careful patient selection and attention to surgical technique are key factors in preventing such functional disorders. When anatomic abnormalities related to the fundoplication are identified, reoperation may offer symptom relief. Before embarking on re-fundoplication, a thorough preoperative evaluation of the esophageal physiology is recommended.

Manometric characteristics of the gastroesophageal junction after anterior versus posterior partial fundoplication

How best to surgically treat GERD is an unresolved issue. To increase our insights into the fundoplication procedures, functional consequences for the gastroesophageal junction of an anterior or a posterior partial fundoplication were studied by manometry. Patients were randomly selected from a larger study in a randomised comparison between posterior and anterior partial fundoplications. The manometric studies were done 12 months after respective procedures in 24 patients. The motor characteristics of the esophagus and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function were determined by use of sleeve catheter manometry. The manometric characteristics of the esophageal body were similar in the study groups except for the ramp pressure. This was significantly higher in patients with posterior partial fundoplications. The posterior group had significantly longer total length (P < 0.02) as well as longer intra-abdominal portions (P = 0.07) of the LES while the basal tone, albeit numerically higher, did not reach statistical significance. Water-swallow induced LES relaxations reached lower nadir values in the anterior group (1.7 vs 2.7 mmHg). Gas distension triggered few transient LES relaxations in both study groups while common cavities were more frequently observed in those having an anterior partial wrap (P < 0.01). A posterior partial fundoplication is followed by manometric characteristics suggesting a well functioning antireflux barrier with some obstruction to bolus passage as well as restricted venting of air from the stomach. The manometric mechanisms behind the inferior reflux control achieved by a Watson type of anterior partial wrap has now been further elucidated.

Anatomical investigation of the esophageal and aortic hiatuses: physiologic, clinical and surgical considerations

Precise knowledge about the anatomical constitution of the diaphragmatic pillars is essential to understand the physiologic, clinical and surgical roles of the esophageal and aortic hiatuses. Because anatomical descriptions found in the literature are dubious, we have decided to investigate this subject. Anatomical dissections and histologic sections of the right and left diaphragmatic pillars (diaphragma crura) from 43 human bodies were analyzed, comprising both non-fixed and fixed specimens. We have described a classification of the diaphragmatic pillars and their muscular branches, forming two basic arrangements (patterns I and II) around the esophageal and aortic hiatuses. Such anatomical and functional relationships between the esophagus and its diaphragmatic hiatus help explain why, during normal inspiration, a hiatal enlargement is observed first but is followed, thereafter, during deep inspiration, by a hiatal narrowing exerted by the contraction of the diaphragmatic pillars. Our results also show that the aortic hiatus does not seem to constitute a rigid ventral tendinous arc around the aorta that could impose any considerable degree of vascular compression, as suggested by other investigators. The present study provides anatomical data useful for a better understanding of gastroesophageal reflux physiology, antireflux surgery and abdominal angina.

Gastroenterologists' views of symptoms following laparoscopic fundoplication: anecdotally based medicine?

BACKGROUND

Currently gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) can be managed either medically or surgically. The management decision is often based on the referring doctor's perception of the pros and cons of surgical management versus the medical alternative. A large group of gastroenterologists was surveyed to determine their understanding of the common outcomes of surgical management of GORD.

METHODS

A 15-question survey was sent to all gastroenterologists in Australia who were members of the Gastroenterology Society of Australia. Questions centred on management decisions and postoperative symptoms in fundoplication patients. The findings were compared to current published outcome data.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-four gastroenterologists responded anonymously to the survey. More than 75% described fundoplication as a safe and established procedure, and 80% had referred patients who were well controlled on medication for surgical management. The gastroenterologists' perceptions of the problems of postoperative dysphagia and bloating differed from published outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastroenterologists are often the gatekeepers for the management of patients with GORD. The understanding that this group has about surgical outcomes is important so that patients can make well-informed management decisions. The present study found that gastroenterologists are likely to convey to their patients higher degrees of postoperative dysphagia and bloating following fundoplication than is actually reported. This may deter some patients who would benefit from fundoplication from consulting a surgeon.

Mechanical consequences of short gastric vessel division at the time of laparoscopic total fundoplication

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is currently the most commonly practiced antireflux operation. Some adverse consequences of the operation remain in the form of mechanical side effects, labeled postfundoplication complaints, of which dysphagia and gas bloat seem to predominate. Measures have been suggested to counteract some of these and one frequently advocated has been division of the short gastric vessels to create a short-floppy wrap. The advantages of this are still debated, particularly in the long-term perspective. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the mechanical consequences of dividing all short gastric vessels at the time of a laparoscopic total fundoplication. Ninety-nine patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were originally allocated on a random basis to have either all short gastric vessels divided or left intact at the time of a laparoscopic total fundoplication. A subsample of these patients, again selected at random, were recruited for a comprehensive manometric investigation 1 year after the operation. In this cohort, 12 patients had all short gastrics divided and in 12 patients, the wrap was done with intact vessels by use of the anterior portion of the fundus. Manometry was carried out by the use of a sleeve sensor to straddle the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), and gastric distension (750 ml air) was used to trigger transient LES relaxations (TLESR). The basal LES tone was similar in the two groups (14.2 +/- 2.4 and 18.8 +/- 4.3, mean +/- SE), respectively. Accordingly, all other relevant manometric variables were equal when the two groups were compared, except for the total number of TLESRs (triggered by gastric distension by air) that were significantly higher (p < 0.02) in patients having their short gastric vessels intact. Consequently, numerically more common cavities were recorded in the latter group. Very similar outcomes in terms of motor function of the LES and esophageal body were observed after a total fundoplication irrespective of whether a complete division of all gastric vessels had been carried out or not. However, after gastric distension with air, more TLESRs were recorded in the latter group suggesting a better maintained ability to vent air from the stomach.

Modelo experimental de fundoplicatura gastroesofágica em ratos: estudo manométrico e histológico do esôfago

OBJETIVO: O presente estudo objetiva avaliar alguns aspectos decorrentes da fundoplicatura em ratos, com técnica de Nissen, através da análise histológica do esôfago distal e estudo manométrico do esfíncter esofágico inferior (EEI), bem como da avaliação da variação do peso dos ratos submetidos ao procedimento, com diferentes dias de evolução. MÉTODOS: Utilizaram-se 70 ratos Wistar, machos, com idade entre 100 e 130 dias e peso entre 250 e 300 g, divididos em dois grupos. O grupo experimento foi composto por 60 ratos, subdivididos em 6 subgrupos de acordo com o tempo de aferição manométrica pós-operatória: 02, 07, 14, 21, 28 e 40 dias, e submetido a fundoplicatura com posterior análise manométrica do EEI e histológica do esôfago distal. O grupo controle foi composto pelos 10 animais restantes, submetido apenas a laparotomia com manipulação da região esôfago-gástrica, e realizaram-se as mesmas análises. RESULTADOS: Evidenciou-se na análise histológica, edema estatisticamente significativo (p=0,0000) nos subgrupos 02 e 07 dias, acompanhado de perda de peso. Observou-se significância estatística no estudo manométrico em todos os subgrupos comparados ao controle (p<0,0018). A correlação edema e peso foi linear significativa e inversamente proporcional (t=-2,577 < t c=2,132). Não se verificou correlação linear significativa entre manometria e peso. Estabeleceu-se correlação linear significativa e diretamente proporcional entre edema e manometria (t=+6,085 > t c=+2,132). CONCLUSÃO: Após fundoplicatura de Nissen em ratos, a pressão no EEI não retorna aos níveis do controle até o 40º pós-operatório. O edema correlacionado à perda de peso e ao aumento da pressão no EEI pode ser a principal variável relacionada à possível disfagia.

Evidence-based appraisal of antireflux fundoplication

OBJECTIVE

To highlight the current available evidence in antireflux surgery through a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Laparoscopic fundoplication is currently suggested as the gold standard for the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, but many controversies are still open concerning the influence of some technical details on its results.

METHODS

Papers related to RCTs identified via a systematic literature search were evaluated according to standard criteria. Data regarding the patient sample, study methods, and outcomes were abstracted and summarized across studies. Defined outcomes were examined for 41 papers published from 1974 to 2002 related to 25 RCTs. A meta-analysis was performed pooling the results as odds ratios (OR), rate differences (RD), and number needed to treat (NNT). Data given as mean and/or median values were pooled as a mean +/- SD (SD).

RESULTS

No perioperative deaths were found in any of the RCTs. Immediate results showed a significantly lower operative morbidity rate (10.3% versus 26.7%, OR 0.33, RD -12%, NNT 8), shorter postoperative stay (3.1 versus 5.2 days, P = 0.03), and shorter sick leave (20.1 versus 35.8 days, P = 0.03) for laparoscopic versus open fundoplication. No significant differences were found regarding the incidence of recurrence, dysphagia, bloating, and reoperation for failure at midterm follow-up. No significant differences in operative morbidity (13.1% versus 9.4%) and in operative time (90.2 versus 84.2 minutes) were found in partial versus total fundoplication. A significantly lower incidence of reoperation for failure (1.6% versus 9.6%, OR 0.21, RD -7%, NNT 14) was found after partial fundoplication, with no significant differences regarding the incidence of recurrence and/or dysphagia. Routine division of short gastric vessels during total fundoplication showed no significant advantages regarding the incidence of postoperative dysphagia and recurrence when compared with no division. The use of ultrasonic scalpel compared with clips or bipolar cautery for the division of short gastric vessels showed no significant effect on operative time, postoperative complications, and costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic antireflux surgery is at least as safe and as effective as its open counterpart, with reduced morbidity, shortened postoperative stay, and sick leave. Partial fundoplication significantly reduces the risk of reoperations for failure over total fundoplication. Routine versus no division of short gastric vessels showed no significant advantages. A word of caution is needed when implementing these results derived from RCTs performed in specialized centers into everyday clinical practice, where experience and skills may be suboptimal.

Dysphagia in children: a paediatric surgical perspective

Dysphagia in childhood encompasses all disorders of swallowing. The patient groups seen frequently in paediatric surgical practice are those with repaired oesophageal atresia, some patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and those with neurological impairment. Oesophageal atresia patients frequently experience dysphagia that is most troublesome in early childhood, fortunately for most the long-term outlook is good. Gastro-oesophageal reflux may give rise to dysphagia as a result of peptic structure, dysmotility associated with oesophagitis or as a complication of anti-reflux surgery. Children with neurological impairment and swallowing problems are very difficult for their carers to manage. Gastrostomy represents a pragmatic solution to their nutritional needs.

Efficacy of an anterior as compared with a posterior laparoscopic partial fundoplication: results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and mechanical consequences of 2 partial fundoplications performed laparoscopically under the framework of a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Although laparoscopic total fundoplication procedures have proven their effectiveness in the control of gastroesophageal reflux, problems remain with the functional consequences after a supra-competent gastric cardia high-pressure zone. Partial fundoplications have been found to be associated with fewer mechanical side effects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During a 2-year period, 95 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease were enrolled into a randomized, controlled single-institution clinical trial comparing a partial posterior (Toupét, n = 48) fundoplication and an anterior partial wrap (Watson, n = 47). All patients were assessed postoperatively at predefined time points, and the 12-month follow-up data are presented in terms of clinical results and 24-hour pH monitoring variables.

RESULTS

Both patient groups were strictly comparable at the time of randomization. All operations were completed laparoscopically, and no serious complications were encountered. During the first postoperative year, a difference regarding the control of reflux symptoms was observed in favor of the posterior fundoplication. Esophageal acid exposure (% time pH <4) was substantially reduced by both operations but to a significantly lower level after a Toupét compared with the Watson partial fundoplication (1.0 +/- 0.3 vs. 5.6 +/- 1.1 mean +/- SEM; p < 0.001). Postfundoplication symptoms were infrequently recorded with no difference between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

When performing a laparoscopic partial fundoplication, the posterior modification (Toupét) offers advantages in terms of better reflux control compared with an anterior type (Watson).

Laparoscopic surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with impaired esophageal peristalsis: total or partial fundoplication?

BACKGROUND

It has been proposed that partial fundoplication is associated with less incidence of postoperative dysphagia and consequently is more suitable for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and impaired esophageal body motility. The aim of this study was to assess whether outcomes of Toupet fundoplication (TF) are better than those of Nissen-Rossetti fundoplication (NF) in patients with GERD and low-amplitude esophageal peristalsis.

STUDY DESIGN

Thirty-three consecutive patients with proved GERD and amplitude of peristalsis at 5 cm proximal to lower esophageal sphincter (LES) less than 30 mmHg were randomly allocated to undergo either TF (19 patients: 11 men, 8 women; mean age: 61.7 +/- 8.7 SD years) or NF (14 patients: 7 men, 7 women; mean age: 59.2 +/- 11.5 years), both by the laparoscopic approach. Pre- and postoperative assessment included clinical questionnaires, esophageal radiology, esophageal transit time study, endoscopy, stationary manometry, and 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH testing.

RESULTS

Duration of operation was significantly prolonged in the TF arm (TF: 90 +/- 12 minutes versus NF: 67 +/- 15 minutes; p < 0.001). At 3 months postoperatively, the incidences of dysphagia (grades I, II, III) and gas-bloat syndrome were higher after NF than after TF (NF: 57% versus TF: 16%; p < 0.01 and NF: 50% versus TF: 21%; p = 0.02, respectively), but decreased to the same level in both groups at the 1-year followup (NF: 14% versus TF: 16% and NF: 21% versus TF: 16%, respectively). At 3 months postoperatively, patients with NF presented with significantly increased LES pressure than those with TF (p = 0.02), although LES pressure significantly increased after surgery in both groups, as compared with preoperative values. Amplitude of esophageal peristalsis at 5 cm proximal to LES increased postoperatively to the same extent in both groups (TF, preoperatively: 21 +/- 6 mmHg versus postoperatively: 39 +/- 12 mmHg; p < 0.001, and NF, preoperatively: 20 +/- 8 mmHg versus postoperatively: 38 +/- 12 mmHg; p < 0.001). Reflux was abolished in all patients of both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both TF and NF efficiently control reflux in patients with GERD and low amplitude of esophageal peristalsis. Early in the postoperative period, TF is associated with fewer functional symptoms, although at 1 year after surgery those symptoms are reported at similar frequencies after either procedure.

Ineffective motility is not a marker for gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have suggested that ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) may be a marker for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), particularly supraesophageal reflux disease. We evaluated the relationship between esophageal acid exposure and esophageal body motility in patients undergoing both esophageal manometry and 24-h pH metry in the absence of antisecretory therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective database review of 84 patients (mean age 47 yr, 46% male) evaluated in our GI physiology laboratory. The indication for testing was recorded and characterized as esophageal or supraesophageal. Abnormal esophageal acid exposure was defined as a distal esophageal pH <4 for more than 4.2% of the total monitoring time (>6.3% upright, >1.2% supine) or a proximal esophageal acid exposure time of greater than 1.1% total (>1.3% upright, 0% supine). IEM was defined as more than two of 10 ineffective peristaltic waves.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients had esophageal-presenting symptoms, and 12 had supraesophageal symptoms. The prevalence of abnormal esophageal acid exposure was similar in patients with esophageal and supraesophageal symptoms (69% vs 92%, p = 0.17). Abnormal motility was identified in 26 patients (31%). IEM was the most common motility disturbance (77%, 20 patients). The frequency of motility disorders was similar in patients with and without abnormal esophageal acid exposure (30% vs 35%, p = 0.79), in patients with esophageal or supraesophageal symptoms (32% vs 25%, p = 0.75, for all patients; 30% vs 27%, p = 1.00, for patients with abnormal esophageal acid exposure), and among upright, supine, and combined refluxers (33%, 9%, and 35%, p = 0.26).

CONCLUSIONS

IEM does not stand alone as a significant marker for the presence of GERD in general or supraesophageal reflux disease in particular.

Complications of laparoscopic fundoplication in the elderly

Our objective was to assess the complications of laparoscopic fundoplication in 77 patients older than 70 years of age. The indications for surgery were (1) complications of reflux esophagitis (n = 17), (2) large hiatal hernia (n = 10), (3) asthma and bronchitis (n = 7), (4) the need for other surgery (n = 13), and (5) a patient's desire to discontinue medical treatment that was controlling reflux esophagitis (n = 30). Operative time varied from 34 to 250 minutes (mean [standard deviation], 116 +/- 20). Hospital stay varied from 12 hours to 19 days (mean, 1.2). No patient needed conversion to open operation. Intraoperative complications were observed in 4 patients (5.2%): left pneumothorax in 2, major operative bleeding in 1, and minor spleen lesion in 1. The most common postoperative complications were gas-bloating syndrome and dysphagia. Gastric ulcer was diagnosed in two. Other postoperative complications included acute delirium, acute urinary retention, and acute ischemia of the lower extremity. One patient died of congestive heart failure. It is concluded that laparoscopic fundoplication is an effective procedure for treating geriatric patients with reflux esophagitis and may be performed with low morbidity and mortality rates.

Esophageal pneumatic dilation for postfundoplication dysphagia: safety, efficacy, and predictors of outcome

OBJECTIVE

Persistent dysphagia occurs in 5-10% of patients after fundoplication. The cause is obscure in most cases, and the management has not been well established. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes and the predictors of success for esophageal pneumatic dilations in patients with dysphagia after fundoplication.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 14 patients who underwent pneumatic dilation for persistent postfundoplication dysphagia. All patients had esophageal manometry before dilations.

RESULTS

There were nine responders to pneumatic dilations (30-40-mm balloons). The nadir lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation pressure was the only significant predictor for successful dilation and was higher among the responders than nonresponders (median 10 mm Hg vs 5 mm Hg). All six of 14 patients with nadir LES pressure > or = 10 mm Hg had a good response. There was no significant difference in the LES basal pressure between the responders and nonresponders (median 20 mm Hg vs 12 mm Hg). The median distal peristaltic amplitude (74 mm Hg vs 69 mm Hg), percent of failed peristalsis (8% vs 45%), and ramp pressure (19 mm Hg vs 17 mm Hg) did not differ significantly between the responders and nonresponders. No perforations occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Pneumatic dilation is a reasonably safe and effective treatment for patients with postfundoplication dysphagia. Raised nadir LES relaxation pressure seems to be a useful predictor of successful outcome.