Deraco M, Raspagliesi F, Kusamura S. Management of peritoneal surface component of ovarian cancer.
Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2003;
12:561-83. [PMID:
14567018 DOI:
10.1016/s1055-3207(03)00027-9]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Primary surgery followed by systemic platinum-based chemotherapy is the cornerstone of management for ovarian cancer. However, the majority of patients have an advanced disease (stage III/IV) at the time of diagnosis rendering the optimal primary cytoreduction feasible in only a small percentage of cases. A large tumor bulk limits the success of subsequent antiblastic therapy. There are two alternatives to overcome this unfavorable situation: (1) employment of ultra-radical interventions such as peritonectomy procedures, to increase the optimal cytoreduction rate; or (2) neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Whether such strategies would have an influence on the final outcome of patients is an issue to be defined in further prospective randomized studies. For second-line therapies no consensus regarding treatment has emerged. When previous effective drug combinations fail, there is virtually no chance of inducing a significant response with second-line treatment. The combination of secondary CRS and intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion constitutes a feasible and potential option for this subset of patients based on phase II studies. A randomized trial will be conducted to test the effectiveness of this strategy in patients with cisplatin-resistant disease. The indication for second-line treatment is macroscopic residual or relapse within 6 months after the completion of first line chemotherapy.
Collapse