Salbutamol pretreatment does not change eosinophil percentage and eosinophilic cationic protein concentration in hypertonic saline-induced sputum in asthmatic subjects

Comorbidities are associated with different features of severe asthma

Background

According to ATS/ERS document on severe asthma (SA), the management of these patients requires the identification and proper treatment of comorbidities, which can influence the control of asthma.

Methods

The aim of this study was to assess the independent effect of different comorbidities on clinical, functional and biologic features of SA. Seventy-two patients with SA according to GINA guidelines were examined. We collected demographic data, smoking habit, asthma history, and assessment of comorbidities. Pulmonary function, inflammatory biomarkers, upper airway disease evaluation, asthma control and quality of life were carefully assessed.

Results

The mean age of patients was 59.1 years (65.3% female, 5.6% current smokers). Comorbidities with higher prevalence were: chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps (CRSwNP or CRSsNP), obesity and gastro-esophageal reflux (GERD), with some overlapping among them. In an univariate analysis comparing patients with single comorbidities with the other ones, asthmatics with CRSwNP had lower lung function and higher sputum eosinophilia; obese asthmatics had worse asthma control and quality of life, and tended to have lower sputum eosinophils; asthmatics with GERD showed worse quality of life. In multivariate analysis, obesity was the only independent factor associated with poor asthma control (OR 4.9), while CRSwNP was the only independent factor associated with airway eosinophilia (OR 16.2). Lower lung function was associated with the male gender and longer duration of asthma (OR 3.9 and 5.1, respectively) and showed a trend for the association with nasal polyps (OR 2.9, p = 0.06).

Conclusion

Our study suggests that coexisting comorbidities are associated with different features of SA.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12948-018-0103-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Effects of treatment changes on asthma phenotype prevalence and airway neutrophil function

Background

Asthma inflammatory phenotypes are often defined by relative cell counts of airway eosinophils/neutrophils. However, the importance of neutrophilia remains unclear, as does the effect of ICS treatment on asthma phenotypes and airway neutrophil function. The purpose of this study was to assess asthma phenotype prevalence/characteristics in a community setting, and, in a nested preliminary study, determine how treatment changes affect phenotype stability and inflammation, with particular focus on airway neutrophils.

Methods

Fifty adult asthmatics and 39 non-asthmatics were assessed using questionnaires, skin prick tests, spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) measurement, and sputum induction. Twenty-one asthmatics underwent further assessment following treatment optimisation (n = 11) or sub-optimisation (n = 10).

Results

Forty percent (20/50) had eosinophilic asthma (EA) and 8% had neutrophilic asthma. EA was associated with increased FENO, bronchodilator reversibility (BDR) and reduced lung function (p < 0.05). Following optimisation/sub-optimisation, the EA/NEA (non-eosinophilic asthma) phenotype changed in 11/21 (52%) asthmatics. In particular, fewer subjects had EA post treatment optimisation, but this was not statistically significant. However, a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in FENO, ACQ7 score, and BDR was observed after treatment optimisation, as well as an increase in FEV₁-% predicted (p < 0.05). It was also associated with reduced eosinophils (p < 0.05) and enhanced neutrophil phagocytosis (p < 0.05) in EA only, and enhanced neutrophil oxidative burst in both EA and NEA (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

In this community based population, non-eosinophilic asthma was common, less severe than EA, and at baseline most asthmatics showed no evidence of inflammation. In the nested change in treatment study, treatment optimisation was associated with reduced sputum eosinophils, improved symptoms and lung function, and enhanced neutrophil function, but a significant reduction in EA could not be demonstrated.

Trial registration

The nested change in treatment component of this study is registered at the Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (www.ANZCTR.org.au) ACTRN12617001356358. Registration date 27/09/2017. Retrospectively registered.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12890-017-0511-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Are sputum eosinophil cationic protein and eosinophils differently associated with clinical and functional findings of asthma?

BACKGROUND

Sputum eosinophil counts and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels are usually increased in asthmatic patients. The correlation between sputum eosinophils or ECP and clinical findings of asthma has been previously investigated but many of these studies have been performed on small samples of asthmatic patients, considering only few clinical indices and often including patients on oral or inhaled corticosteroids, which might be confounding when interpreting the relationship between disease activity and airway inflammation.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether sputum eosinophils and ECP were differently related to functional and clinical parameters of asthma in a large number of steroid-naïve asthmatic patients, taking into account several potential determinants of activity and chronicity of asthma.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-nine patients with mild-moderate asthma were studied. Sputum was induced by hypertonic saline inhalation and processed using the whole sample method.

RESULTS

Sputum eosinophils and ECP significantly correlated with each other (r = 0.41, P < 0.001). When patients were grouped on the basis of high/low sputum eosinophils and high/low sputum ECP levels, significant differences were observed among groups, with patients with high sputum eosinophils and ECP showing the greatest asthma severity. In the overall sample, disease duration inversely correlated with sputum eosinophils, whereas FEV1 and peak expiratory flow (PEF) inversely correlated with sputum ECP. Rescue β2 -agonist use and total symptom score positively correlated with both eosinophil counts and sputum ECP. Stepwise regression analysis showed that symptom score and disease duration accounted for 17.6% of sputum eosinophil variance, whereas symptom score and FEV1 accounted for 14.7% of sputum ECP variance.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Both sputum eosinophils and ECP are weakly related to clinical markers of asthma severity. However, ECP was more closely related to lung function parameters than eosinophil counts.

Noninvasive methods for assessment of airway inflammation in occupational settings

The present document is a consensus statement reached by a panel of experts on noninvasive methods for assessment of airway inflammation in the investigation of occupational respiratory diseases, such as occupational rhinitis, occupational asthma, and nonasthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis. Both the upper and the lower airway inflammation have been reviewed and appraised reinforcing the concept of 'united airway disease' in the occupational settings. The most widely used noninvasive methods to assess bronchial inflammation are covered: induced sputum, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) concentration, and exhaled breath condensate. Nasal inflammation may be assessed by noninvasive approaches such as nasal cytology and nasal lavage, which provide information on different aspects of inflammatory processes (cellular vs mediators). Key messages and suggestions on the use of noninvasive methods for assessment of airway inflammation in the investigation and diagnosis of occupational airway diseases are issued.

The validity of induced sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage in childhood asthma

There are a number of useful direct airway sampling procedures to help diagnose and monitor asthma in patients. However, non-invasive techniques are the ideal, especially in children, given the necessity of safe and repeatable measurements to monitor treatment efficacy and disease progression. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) may be too invasive for clinical use in children, while questions still surround the utility of induced sputum (IS). More novel techniques, such as fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FE(NO)) and exhaled breath condensate (EBC), are still unproven. Eosinophilic airway inflammation is a major feature of childhood asthma, and it has been revealed as a major treatment target with inhaled corticosteroids. Moreover, treatment protocols governed by sputum eosinophil counts may be more efficacious - by reducing the frequency and severity of exacerbations - than treatment based on clinical symptoms and other traditional objective measures of lung function. The selection of an appropriate airway inflammation monitoring technique must take everything into consideration, including safety, reproducibility, repeatability, sensitivity to treatment, and the overall clinical/research goals.

Changes in sputum composition during 15 min of sputum induction in healthy subjects and patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

INTRODUCTION

The use of sputum induction by inhalation of hypertonic saline to study the cellular and biochemical composition of the airways allows noninvasive sampling of the airways content and identification of markers of airways inflammation.

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to identify possible changes in the cellular composition of induced sputum between samples obtained sequentially (three periods of 5 min each) during one sputum induction. Moreover, difference between these samples and the mixed one (mixture of samples obtained after 5, 10 and 15 min of induction) was investigated.

METHODS

Forty-six subjects (10 healthy volunteers, 12 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and 24 patients with asthma) (mean age 53.0+/-14.0 yr, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) 71.8+/-19.0% pred) produced sputum after three consecutive 5 min periods of hypertonic (4.5%) saline inhalation. Stained cytospins from the three periods separately and from the mixed sample were produced and analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean percentage of neutrophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes and epithelial cells did not change significantly in samples obtained consecutively after 5, 10 and 15 min of the induction procedure. There was no significant difference in the cellular composition of samples obtained after 5, 10 and 15 min of induction and the cellular composition of the mixed sample (P=0.06).

CONCLUSION

The separate analysis of induced sputum from three consecutive sampling and the mixed sample did not demonstrate significant changes in their cellular composition. Fifteen minutes induction procedure with the fixed concentration of hypertonic saline and processing of the mixed sample can be recommended for clinical settings and clinical trials.

Comparison of sputum induction using inhaled methacholine or hypertonic saline

OBJECTIVES

Hypertonic saline is recommended for the induction of sputum to assess airway inflammation. Methacholine is most commonly used to assess airway responsiveness. The aim of this study was to compare sputum induction by methacholine and hypertonic saline challenges, and the subsequent inflammatory cell differential counts.

METHODOLOGY

Subjects (n = 56) underwent inhaled hypertonic saline (4.5% for < or = 15 min without bronchodilator pretreatment) and methacholine (maximum cumulative dose 4 micromol) challenges 1 week apart, in random order. Sputum was processed, and on cytospins stained with May-Grunwald-Giemsa, a total of 400 inflammatory plus squamous cells were counted to obtain a differential cell count.

RESULTS

A satisfactory sputum sample was obtained from 29 subjects following hypertonic saline and also from 10 subjects following methacholine. For these 10 subjects, the mean percent macrophages, neutrophils, eosinophils, and lymphocytes were similar after methacholine (64%, 26%, 7% and 1%) or hypertonic saline (67%, 26%, 6% and 1%). The results were similar for squamous cells (42% and 45%) and when asthmatics and nonasthmatics were compared separately.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhaled methacholine has a much lower yield of sputum induction compared with hypertonic saline. However, the differential sputum cell count is similar following both challenge agents.

Induced sputum in the investigation of airway inflammation of COPD

During the last decade, the method of sputum induction (SI) has offered the opportunity to study inflammation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This paper reviews methodological aspects of SI and summarizes its uses in the research of inflammation in COPD, including sputum cellularity and soluble markers. SI is a relatively safe, reliable, and reproducible technique, used to investigate different aspects of airway inflammation. Although various methods of induction and processing have been proved safe and highly reproducible, a generally accepted method is needed. Sputum analysis has given evidence for increased numbers of macrophages and neutrophils in COPD patients compared to normal subjects. In some studies, increased numbers of eosinophils have been also reported. Changes in various mediators have been found in sputum supernatant of COPD patients (IL-8, LTB-4 and TNF-a). The clinical usefulness of the method in the follow-up of the disease has not been explored extensively. A number of observations in patients with different clinical characteristics could be proven useful in identifying patterns of inflammation associated with different prognosis. Finally, SI could also guide treatment; such as, sputum eosinophilia in COPD could predict response to inhaled corticosteroids.

Quality evaluation of samples obtained by spontaneous or induced sputum: comparison between two methods of processing and relationship with clinical and functional findings

The aim of the study was to assess, on a large group of spontaneous or induced sputum samples, the difference in quality between slides processed by two different methods, and the relationship between quality assessment and some clinical and functional characteristics of the examined subjects. We examined 631 sputum samples obtained from 337 subjects with proven (n = 291) or suspected bronchial asthma. Of these, 467 samples were processed using the whole-sample method (Group I), while 164 samples were processed using the plug method (Group II). Salivary contamination, cell distribution on the slide, and cell borders were evaluated, and samples were classified as inadequate, adequate, or good. Inadequate samples were equally represented in both groups, while good samples were represented more in Group II. No significant difference in most clinical and functional findings was observed between the different quality categories of both groups. A higher proportion of inadequate samples was observed in Group I samples spontaneously collected. Mild intermittent asthmatics produced a better quality of slides in comparison with other groups of asthma severity. In conclusion, sputum quality partially depends on the different methods of sputum collection and/or processing, although the percentage of inadequate samples is similar for the two methods of processing. Sputum quality is only marginally affected by clinical and functional characteristics of asthma, or by asthma severity.

Airway response to inhaled hypertonic saline in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

The present study aimed at delineating the mechanisms underlying the adverse response to hypertonic saline inhalation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Twenty patients (age, 48-70 yr; FEV(1), 29-58 %pred) inhaled, on two different days in randomized order, 200 microg salbutamol from an MDI and 20 min later either 0.9% or 3% saline from an ultrasonic nebulizer for a maximum of four consecutive 5-min periods. Forced expiratory (FEV(1)) and inspiratory (FIV(1)) volumes, inspiratory capacity (IC), intrathoracic gas volume (ITGV), and specific airway resistance (SRaw) were measured. Significant changes occurred in FEV(1), FIV(1), IC, ITGV, and SRaw with both concentrations (p < 0.05, each) and effects were stronger with 3% as compared with 0.9% saline (p < 0.05, each). The increase in dyspnea was associated with the changes in FIV(1), FEV(1), IC, and ITGV, in contrast to its decrease during bronchodilation, where only FIV(1) was important. Sputum analysis showed elevated concentrations of histamine after 3% as compared with 0.9% saline. These data indicate that the adverse lung function response to hypertonic saline is common in patients with moderate to severe COPD, involves both bronchoconstriction and lung hyperinflation, and could be mediated, at least partially, through activation of mast cells.

The tolerability, safety, and success of sputum induction and combined hypertonic saline challenge in children

Induced sputum using hypertonic saline (HS) is a useful research tool to study airway inflammation (AI). HS provocation testing can also be used to measure airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR). A combined HS challenge and sputum induction procedure has been developed to permit assessment of AI and AHR in a single test. The aim of this study is to report the success and tolerability of sputum induction alone, and in combination with a HS bronchial provocation challenge. Sputum induction alone was performed with beta2-agonist pretreatment. In the combined challenge, no beta2-agonist pretreatment was used. A high-output ultrasonic nebulizer with valve box and tubing were used to deliver 4.5% saline in doubling time periods from 0.5 s to 4 min. Outcomes assessed were completion of the test protocol, adequacy of sputum samples, decrease in FEV1, and adverse effects during the procedure. Fifty-three children who underwent a sputum induction alone, and 182 children who underwent a combined sputum induction and bronchial provocation using HS. Sputum induction alone was well tolerated, with 98% of children completing the procedure and only 4% experiencing a significant (> 15%) fall in FEV1. An adequate sample of sputum was obtained in 92% of children. The combined challenge was completed by 90% of children. A distressing cough occurred in 13% of children and irritation of the mucosa in 1% of children. In the combined challenge an adequate sample of sputum was obtained in significantly fewer children than with sputum induction alone (70% versus 92%, p < 0.05). Sputum cellular changes reflected the shorter nebulization time with sputum induction alone. We conclude that induction of sputum using HS after pretreatment with bronchodilator is well tolerated with a high success rate in children. Combining the HS challenge with sputum induction provides additional information and is a useful means of comparing AHR and AI simultaneously, but at the expense of having a reduced success rate in obtaining an adequate sample of sputum, as well as increased side effects.