Anti-inflammatory mechanisms of leukotriene modulators

Allergen immunotherapy for allergic asthma: The future seems bright

Allergen specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only causal therapeutic option for allergic airway diseases including asthma and allergic rhinitis. AIT has been shown to restore the allergen immune tolerance, can modify both the early and late-onset allergen-specific airway hyperreactivity, helps to achieve disease control/remission and prevents new sensitisations. Recent real life data on long-term effectiveness of house dust mite (HDM) AIT in a large group of patients with HDM-driven asthma further underscored its unique therapeutic potential as well as confirmed previous data with pollen AIT. More widespread use of this causal treatment in select patient populations should further move this promising therapeutic field. In this mini-review, we discuss updates on new insights based on real world patient data.

G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Asthma Therapy: Pharmacology and Drug Action

Asthma is a heterogeneous inflammatory disease of the airways that is associated with airway hyperresponsiveness and airflow limitation. Although asthma was once simply categorized as atopic or nonatopic, emerging analyses over the last few decades have revealed a variety of asthma endotypes that are attributed to numerous pathophysiological mechanisms. The classification of asthma by endotype is primarily routed in different profiles of airway inflammation that contribute to bronchoconstriction. Many asthma therapeutics target G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which either enhance bronchodilation or prevent bronchoconstriction. Short-acting and long-acting β 2-agonists are widely used bronchodilators that signal through the activation of the β 2-adrenergic receptor. Short-acting and long-acting antagonists of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors are used to reduce bronchoconstriction by blocking the action of acetylcholine. Leukotriene antagonists that block the signaling of cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1 are used as an add-on therapy to reduce bronchoconstriction and inflammation induced by cysteinyl leukotrienes. A number of GPCR-targeting asthma drug candidates are also in different stages of development. Among them, antagonists of prostaglandin D2 receptor 2 have advanced into phase III clinical trials. Others, including antagonists of the adenosine A2B receptor and the histamine H4 receptor, are in early stages of clinical investigation. In the past decade, significant research advancements in pharmacology, cell biology, structural biology, and molecular physiology have greatly deepened our understanding of the therapeutic roles of GPCRs in asthma and drug action on these GPCRs. This review summarizes our current understanding of GPCR signaling and pharmacology in the context of asthma treatment. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Although current treatment methods for asthma are effective for a majority of asthma patients, there are still a large number of patients with poorly controlled asthma who may experience asthma exacerbations. This review summarizes current asthma treatment methods and our understanding of signaling and pharmacology of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in asthma therapy, and discusses controversies regarding the use of GPCR drugs and new opportunities in developing GPCR-targeting therapeutics for the treatment of asthma.

Comparing biologicals and small molecule drug therapies for chronic respiratory diseases: An EAACI Taskforce on Immunopharmacology position paper

Chronic airway diseases such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), together with their comorbidities, bear a significant burden on public health. Increased appreciation of molecular networks underlying inflammatory airway disease needs to be translated into new therapies for distinct phenotypes not controlled by current treatment regimens. On the other hand, development of new safe and effective therapies for such respiratory diseases is an arduous and expensive process. Antibody-based (biological) therapies are successful in treating certain respiratory conditions not controlled by standard therapies such as severe allergic and refractory eosinophilic severe asthma, while in other inflammatory respiratory diseases, such as COPD, biologicals are having a more limited impact. Small molecule drug (SMD)-based therapies represent an active field in pharmaceutical research and development. SMDs expand biologicals' therapeutic targets by reaching the intracellular compartment by delivery as either an oral or topically based formulation, offering both convenience and lower costs. Aim of this review was to compare and contrast the distinct pharmacological properties and clinical applications of SMDs- and antibody-based treatment strategies, their limitations and challenges, in order to highlight how they should be integrated for their optimal utilization and to fill the critical gaps in current treatment for these chronic inflammatory respiratory diseases.

The relevance of leukotrienes for bone resorption induced by mechanical loading

5-Lipoxygenase (5-LO) metabolites are important pro-inflammatory lipid mediators. However, much still remains to be understood about the role of such mediators in bone remodeling. This study aimed to investigate the effect of 5-LO metabolites, LTB4 and CysLTs, in a model of mechanical loading-induced bone remodeling. Strain-induced tooth movement and consequently alveolar bone resorption/apposition was achieved by using a coil spring placed on molar and attached to incisors of C57BL6 (wild-type-WT), 5-LO deficient mice (5-LO(-/-)) and mice treated with 5-LO inhibitor (zileuton-ZN) or with antagonist of CysLTs receptor (montelukast-MT). The amount of bone resorption and the number of osteoclasts were determined morphometrically. The expression of inflammatory and bone remodeling markers in periodontium was analyzed by qPCR. Osteoclast differentiation and TNF-α production were evaluated in vitro using RAW 264.7 cells treated with LTB4 or LTD4. Bone resorption, TRAP(+) cells and expression of Tnfa, Il10 and Runx2 were significantly diminished in 5-LO(-/-), ZN- and MT-treated mice. The expression of Rank was also reduced in 5-LO(-/-) and MT-treated mice. Accordingly, LTB4 and LTD4 in association with RANKL promoted osteoclast differentiation and increased TNF-α release in vitro. These data demonstrate that the absence of 5-LO metabolites, LTB4 and CysLTs reduces osteoclast recruitment and differentiation, consequently diminishing bone resorption induced by mechanical loading. Thus, 5-LO might be a potential target for controlling bone resorption in physiological and pathological conditions.

Which biomarkers are effective for identifying Th2-driven inflammation in asthma?

Recognition of asthma as a heterogeneous disease revealed different potential molecular targets and urged the development of targeted, customized treatment modalities. Evidence was provided for different inflammatory subsets of asthma and more recently, further refined to T helper (Th)2-high and Th2-low subphenotypes with different responsiveness to standard and targeted pharmacotherapy. Given these differences in immunology and pathophysiology, proof of concept studies of novel treatment modalities for asthma should be performed in adequate, well-defined phenotypes. In this review, we describe both existing and novel biomarkers of Th2-inflammation in asthma that can be applied to classify asthma subphenotypes in clinical studies and for treatment monitoring.

Leukotriene receptor antagonists pranlukast and montelukast for treating asthma

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of bronchial asthma, which is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the airway, is increasing worldwide. Although inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) play a central role in the treatment of asthma, they cannot achieve good control for all asthmatics, and medications such as leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) with bronchodilatory and anti-inflammatory effects often serve as alternatives or add-on drugs.

AREAS COVERED

Clinical trials as well as basic studies of montelukast and pranlukast in animal models are ongoing. This review report clarifies the current status of these two LTRAs in the treatment of asthma and their future direction.

EXPERT OPINION

LTRAs could replace ICS as first-line medications for asthmatics who are refractory to ICS or cannot use inhalant devices. Further, LTRAs are recommended for asthmatics under specific circumstances that are closely associated with cysteinyl leukotrienes (cysLTs). Considering the low incidence of both severe adverse effects and the induction of tachyphylaxis, oral LTRAs should be more carefully considered for treating asthma in the clinical environment. Several issues such as predicted responses, effects of peripheral airway and airway remodeling and alternative administration routes remain to be clarified before LTRAs could serve a more effective role in the treatment of asthma.

Antileukotriene reverts the early effects of inflammatory response of distal parenchyma in experimental chronic allergic inflammation

Aims. Compare the effects of montelukast or dexamethasone in distal lung parenchyma and airway walls of guinea pigs (GP) with chronic allergic inflammation. Methods. GP have inhaled ovalbumin (OVA group-2x/week/4weeks). After the 4th inhalation, GP were treated with montelukast or dexamethasone. After 72 hours of the 7th inhalation, GP were anesthetised, and lungs were removed and submitted to histopathological evaluation. Results. Montelukast and dexamethasone treatments reduced the number of eosinophils in airway wall and distal lung parenchyma compared to OVA group (P < 0.05). On distal parenchyma, both treatments were effective in reducing RANTES, NF-κB, and fibronectin positive cells compared to OVA group (P < 0.001). Montelukast was more effective in reducing eotaxin positive cells on distal parenchyma compared to dexamethasone treatment (P < 0.001), while there was a more expressive reduction of IGF-I positive cells in OVA-D group (P < 0.001). On airway walls, montelukast and dexamethasone were effective in reducing IGF-I, RANTES, and fibronectin positive cells compared to OVA group (P < 0.05). Dexamethasone was more effective in reducing the number of eotaxin and NF-κB positive cells than Montelukast (P < 0.05). Conclusions. In this animal model, both treatments were effective in modulating allergic inflammation and remodeling distal lung parenchyma and airway wall, contributing to a better control of the inflammatory response.

Emerging drugs for asthma

INTRODUCTION

Current drug treatments for asthma relieve bronchospasm and airway inflammation but do not offer a cure, and symptoms return when treatment is stopped. Asthma management guidelines emphasize the importance of effective asthma treatment to achieve and maintain asthma control. However, despite widely available and effective treatments, achieving asthma control is still an unmet need for many patients.

AREAS COVERED

Remarkable efforts have been made to identify the characteristic features of difficult-to-control (usually severe) asthma that are different from those described for mild-to-moderate asthma, setting the stage for the development of new and even individualized therapies. The most fascinating options of the new asthma treatments are biologic therapies, in particular monoclonal antibodies. In addition, some novel once-daily combinations of long-acting β(2)-agonist and inhaled corticosteroids are under development.

EXPERT OPINION

Asthma is a complex syndrome made up of a number of disease variants or asthma phenotypes, with different underlying pathophysiology. As different drugs target different pathways, it is necessary to determine the individual profile of pathophysiological abnormalities for each patient. Several cytokines have been implicated in the inflammatory cascades leading to the different asthma phenotypes, and the most relevant ones are discussed. The challenge in treating asthma resides precisely in its heterogeneity.

Biomarkers in asthma and allergic rhinitis

A biological marker (biomarker) is a physical sign or laboratory measurement that can serve as an indicator of biological or pathophysiological processes or as a response to a therapeutic intervention. An applicable biomarker possesses the characteristics of clinical relevance (sensitivity and specificity for the disease) and is responsive to treatment effects, in combination with simplicity, reliability and repeatability of the sampling technique. Presently, there are several biomarkers for asthma and allergic rhinitis that can be obtained by non-invasive or semi-invasive airway sampling methods meeting at least some of these criteria. In clinical practice, such biomarkers can provide complementary information to conventional disease markers, including clinical signs, spirometry and PC(20)methacholine or histamine. Consequently, biomarkers can aid to establish the diagnosis, in staging and monitoring of the disease activity/progression or in predicting or monitoring of a treatment response. Especially in (young) children, reliable, non-invasive biomarkers would be valuable. Apart from diagnostic purposes, biomarkers can also be used as (surrogate) markers to predict a (novel) drug's efficacy in target populations. Therefore, biomarkers are increasingly applied in early drug development. When implementing biomarkers in clinical practice or trials of asthma and allergic rhinitis, it is important to consider the heterogeneous nature of the inflammatory response which should direct the selection of adequate biomarkers. Some biomarker sampling techniques await further development and/or validation, and should therefore be applied as a "back up" of established biomarkers or methods. In addition, some biomarkers or sampling techniques are less suitable for (very young) children. Hence, on a case by case basis, a decision needs to be made what biomarker is adequate for the target population or purpose pursued. Future development of more sophisticated sampling methods and quantification techniques, such as--omics and biomedical imaging, will enable detection of adequate biomarkers for both clinical and research applications.

Montelukast in the treatment of asthma and beyond

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting over 300 million people worldwide. The common association with allergic rhinitis and the presence of proinflammatory cells and mediators in the circulation of patients qualify asthma as a systemic disease. This characteristic and the fact that the gold-standard therapy for persistent asthma, inhaled corticosteroids, cannot suppress all components of airway inflammation and fail to adequately penetrate into the small airways, warrant the quest for effective systemic anti-asthma therapies. This review describes the most important controlled studies of montelukast, a once-daily leukotriene receptor antagonist, in asthma and allergic rhinitis in both adults and children. Montelukast is a systemically active drug with a targeted, dual mechanism of action, acting both as a bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory. In patients of all ages, montelukast has shown a favorable safety profile and was well-tolerated. Both as monotherapy or in combination with inhaled corticosteroids, montelukast produced clinically relevant improvements in asthma-related parameters, including symptoms, lung function parameters, quality of life and the number of asthma exacerbations. Furthermore, bronchoprotective effects have been reported both against specific and nonspecific bronchoactive stimuli. Similarly, in patients with allergic rhinitis, montelukast produced substantial improvements in symptoms and quality of life. Long-term studies aimed to determine its effects on airway remodeling are still lacking.

Complementary therapy in asthma: inhaled corticosteroids and what?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

For optimal asthma control, complementary strategies are advocated to cover several aspects of the disease. This mini-review highlights different complementary strategies with special focus on the combined use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and long-acting beta2 agonists and as an alternative, the combination of ICSs and antileukotrienes.

RECENT FINDINGS

New data show that combinations of ICSs/long-acting beta2 agonists or ICSs with antileukotrienes improve disease stability with concomitant control of the underlying airway inflammation. Moreover, there is some evidence that combination therapy may prevent some aspects of airway remodelling. The use of a fixed combination of both a reliever and a controller medication may have certain advantages compared with a fixed dose regime with as-needed separate reliever therapy. Alternatively, in some asthma phenotypes, such as combined allergic rhinitis and asthma syndrome, the combination of ICSs with antileukotrienes offers a complementary anti-inflammatory treatment in combination with controller effects on both airway compartments.

SUMMARY

This review compares different strategies of complementary therapy in asthma with special focus on how to achieve the best clinical control also aimed at controlling the underlying airway inflammation. We have chosen to focus on two major topics: the use of ICSs and long-acting beta2 agonists in two different strategies, that is, a symptom-driven versus a fixed symptom-preventive approach; and the use of ICSs with a long-acting beta2 agonist versus ICSs and a leukotriene receptor antagonist. What regime should be chosen is highly dependent on the individual phenotype and defined treatment goal.

Summing up 100 years of asthma

In this review, we aim to lead the readers through the historical highlights of pathophysiological concepts and treatment of asthma. Understanding the nature and links of asthma has modeled our diagnostic, pathophysiological and therapeutic thinking and acting. The recognition of its heterogeneous nature in combination with several refined and sophisticated technologies will mark a new era of phenotype-specific approach and treatment of asthma.

A critical appraisal of methods used in early clinical development of novel drugs for the treatment of asthma

Asthma is a heterogeneous disorder characterized by chronic airway inflammation, hyperresponsiveness and remodeling. Being the hallmark of asthma, airway inflammation has become the most important target for therapeutic agents. Consequently, during the past decade various semi-and non-invasive methods have been explored to sample the airway inflammation in asthma. In this review, we provide a practical overview of the current status of various sampling techniques including sputum induction, exhaled breath analysis, and bronchoprovocation tests (BPTs). We focus on their applicability for monitoring in clinical practice and in intervention trials in asthma.

Phenylsulphonyl urenyl chalcone derivatives as dual inhibitors of cyclo-oxygenase-2 and 5-lipoxygenase

Two series of phenylsulphonyl urenyl chalcone derivatives (UCH) with various patterns of substitution were tested for their effects on nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) overproduction in RAW 264.7 macrophages. None of the tested compounds reduced NO production more than 50% at 10 microM but most of them inhibited the generation of PGE2 with IC50 values under the micromolar range. Me-UCH 1, Me-UCH 5, Me-UCH 9, Cl-UCH 1, and Cl-UCH 9 were selected to evaluate their influence on human leukocyte functions and eicosanoids generation. These derivatives selectively inhibited cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) activity in human monocytes being Me-UCH 5 the most potent (IC50 0.06 microM). Selected compounds also reduced leukotriene B4 synthesis in human neutrophils by a direct inhibition of 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO) activity, with IC50 values from 0.5 to 0.8 microM. In addition, lysosomal enzyme secretion, such as elastase or myeloperoxidase as well as superoxide generation in human neutrophils were also reduced in a similar range. Our findings indicate that UCH derivatives exert a dual inhibitory effect on COX-2/5-LO activity. The profile and potency of these compounds may have relevance for the modulation of the inflammatory and nociceptive responses with reduction of undesirable side-effects associated with NSAIDs.

Treating asthma: is there a place for leukotriene receptor antagonists?

Asthma is a chronic disorder, characterized by airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), airway inflammation and airway remodelling. Evidence has been provided for a relationship between pathophysiology, airway inflammation and remodelling. Moreover, these asthma features have been shown to respond to anti-inflammatory therapy. According to current guidelines, monitoring of asthma is predominantly based on symptoms and lung function data. However, these parameters appeared as poor indices for asthma control. Alternatively, asthma control relates well to exacerbations and (anamnestic) surrogate biomarkers of airway inflammation. Hence, appropriate treatment of asthma should primarily target the airway inflammation. According to current guidelines for asthma management, anti-inflammatory therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) is the cornerstone in the treatment of persistent asthma. To further optimize asthma control, add-on therapy with long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA) or leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) should be combined with low to high doses of ICS. While the first combination focuses on optimal control of symptoms and lung function, the second provides a more complete suppression of the airway inflammation. In this paper we discuss treatment of asthma according to current guidelines versus new insights, addressing practical issues.

Second-generation antihistamines in asthma therapy: is there a protective effect?

Second-generation histamine H(1) receptor antagonists are recognized as being highly effective treatments for allergic-based disease and are among the most frequently prescribed drugs in the world. The newer antihistamines represent a heterogeneous group of compounds with markedly different chemical structures, a spectrum of antihistaminic properties, adverse effects, half-life, tissue distribution, metabolism and varying degrees of anti-inflammatory effects. Histamine is an important mast cell- and basophil-derived mediator that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of asthma, resulting in smooth muscle contraction, mucus hypersecretion, and increased vascular permeability leading to mucosal edema. Antihistamines should never be used as monotherapy for asthma but there is evidence that these drugs give a measure of protection in histamine-induced bronchoconstriction. Furthermore, several studies have demonstrated that the use of second-generation antihistamines, as adjunct therapy, may benefit those patients whose allergic asthma co-exists with allergic rhinitis. Indeed, many patients present with both allergic rhinitis and asthma. The link between the upper and lower respiratory airways is now well established and there is increasing evidence that allergic rhinitis is a risk factor for the development of asthma. More recently, a number of novel antihistamines have been developed which are either metabolites of active drugs or enantiomers and there is emerging evidence that at least one of these drugs, desloratadine, may give significant symptomatic benefit in some types of asthma. It is of interest to note that cetirizine provides a primary pharmacological intervention strategy to prevent the development of asthma in specifically-sensitized high risk groups of infants. Moreover, the documented anti-inflammatory activities of antihistamines may provide a novel mechanism of action for the therapeutic control of virus-induced asthma exacerbations by inhibiting the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) by airway epithelial cells. Finally, several well-conducted studies suggest that combination therapy with antihistamines and antileukotrienes may be as effective as corticosteroid use in patients with allergic asthma and seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Current and emerging nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory therapies targeting specific mechanisms in asthma and allergy

Today inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are regarded as the first-line controller anti-inflammatory treatment in the management of asthma. However, there is an increasing awareness of the risk of long-term adverse effects of ICS and that asthma is not only an organ-specific disease but also a systemic and small airway disease. This thinking has called for systemic treatment alternatives to treat asthma targeting more disease-specific mechanisms without influencing normal physiologic functions. Blocking of disease-specific mediators is a mechanism utilized by anti-leukotrienes and anti-immunoglobulin E treatment, each proven to be effective in both asthma and allergic rhinitis.Different cytokine-modifying strategies have been tested in clinical trials with variable results, some disappointing and some encouraging. Anti-interleukin (IL)-5 monoclonal antibody treatment effectively reduces the number of eosinophils locally in the airways and in peripheral blood in asthmatic patients. Unfortunately, this marked effect on eosinophils was not associated with an improvement in bronchial hyperresponsiveness and/or symptoms. Clinical trials with a recombinant soluble IL-4 receptor have been somewhat more successful at improving asthma control and allowing reduction of ICS therapy in asthma. Treatment with recombinant IL-12 had an effect on bronchial hyperresponsiveness and eosinophilic response, but was associated with unacceptable adverse effects. Other interesting cytokine-modulating treatments include those targeting IL-9, IL-10, IL-12 and IL-13.Immune-modulating treatment with bacterial antigens represents another strategy, originating from the hypothesis that some bacterial infections guide the immune system towards a T helper (Th) type 1 immune response. Mycobacterium vaccae, Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) and immunostimulatory DNA sequences have all been tested in clinical trials, with encouraging results. Future asthma and allergy treatment will probably include not only one but also two or more disease-modifying agents administered to the same patient.

Treatment of asthmatic patients with a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor-1 antagonist montelukast (Singulair), decreases the eosinophil survival-enhancing activity produced by peripheral blood mononuclear leukocytes in vitro

BACKGROUND

Montelukast (Singulair, MSD) has been shown to have a beneficial effect on the clinical symptoms of asthma. We aimed to investigate the effect of montelukast treatment on the production of eosinophil survival-enhancing cytokines by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC).

METHODS

PBMNC obtained from 15 grass-allergic patients (7 treated with montelukast and 8 with a placebo) were cultured for 72 h. Eosinophils from allergic patients were cultured with MNC supernatants alone or with addition of neutralizing antibodies, and the proportion of living cells was assessed by flow cytometry. In another experiment PBMNC from 6 allergic patients were cultured in vitro in the presence of montelukast or vehicle. Following stimulation the production of GM-CSF in monocytes was assessed.

RESULTS

Eosinophil survival in the MNC supernatants from the placebo-treated patients was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than in supernatants from montelukast-treated patients. GM-CSF was the predominant cytokine responsible for the eosinophil survival-enhancing activity (ESEA). In vitro production of GM-CSF by allergen-stimulated monocytes was significantly suppressed by addition of montelukast.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of patients with montelukast decreased the production of MNC-derived cytokines, particularly GM-CSF. We suggest that cysteinyl leukotriene receptor-1 (CysLT-R1) antagonists may act, at least partially, by diminishing the production of GM-CSF from PBMNCs.

Protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction by montelukast in aspirin-sensitive and aspirin-tolerant patients with asthma

BACKGROUND

Montelukast, a cysteinyl-leukotriene receptor antagonist, was reported to have a protective effect against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). Aspirin-induced asthma (AIA) is characterized by overproduction of cysteinyl-leukotrienes.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare the response to exercise and the effect of montelukast on EIB in AIA as compared to aspirin-tolerant asthma (ATA).

METHODS

A placebo-controlled, double blind, cross-over randomized study was performed in 19 AIA and 21 ATA patients with stable asthma. A single dose of montelukast (10 mg) or placebo (PL), was given orally one hour prior to exercise challenge. FEV1 was measured before and 5, 10, 15 min after exercise and then at 15-minute intervals for 4 h. Urinary LTE4 excretion and blood eosinophil count were measured at baseline, 2 h and 4 h following exercise challenge.

RESULTS

Positive bronchial response to exercise was observed in 47.5% of all patients studied. Exercise led to almost identical maximal fall in FEV1 in AIA and ATA patients (23.5% +/- 6.8% vs. 21.8% +/- 12.0%, respectively; P = 0.7). Montelukast, as compared to PL, significantly attenuated EIB in 63.2% of 19 patients with positive exercise test preceded by PL. The mean of maximum fall in FEV1 from the pre-exercise value was 10.2% +/- 13.8 after montelukast as compared to 22.5% +/- 10.2 after placebo (P < 0.001). No significant differences between protective effect of montelukast was observed in AIA as compared to ATA patients (P = 0.63, anova). Urinary LTE4 excretion showed no change following exercise, irrespective of the result of the test in all subjects.

CONCLUSION

Patients with AIA and ATA react similarly to exercise challenge and obtain similar protection against EIB by montelukast.

Distal lung inflammation in asthma

OBJECTIVE

To review the role of distal lung inflammation in asthma.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION

Selected peer-reviewed research publications retrieved from MEDLINE search. Search was restricted to English-language publications only. Included articles were selected for their relevance to pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Bibliographies of selected papers served as an additional source of considered publications.

RESULTS

Inflammation in the small airways and alveolar tissue plays an important role in the clinical manifestations of asthma. Diagnostic modalities such as transbronchial biopsy and evolving radiologic techniques such as high-resolution computed tomography are improving our ability to evaluate this portion of the lung. New ultra-fine particle size metered-dose inhalers and oral agents such as cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonists offer new opportunities for treating small airways inflammation and need to be fully evaluated for their ability to target and treat distal lung inflammation.

CONCLUSIONS

Distal lung inflammation is an important component of airway inflammation in asthma. New modalities for evaluating distal airway inflammation and for targeting the distal lung with inhaled and systemic drugs are rapidly expanding our knowledge of the clinical importance of distal lung inflammation and may ultimately be of critical importance in asthma therapy.

Antitussive effect of the leukotriene receptor antagonist zafirlukast in subjects with cough-variant asthma

Cough-variant asthma (CVA) occurs in a subgroup of asthmatics whose sole or predominant respiratory symptom is cough. Although bronchodilators are often sufficient to treat CVA, refractory cough may require therapy with inhaled or systemic corticosteroids. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, we examined the effect of a 14-day course of the leukotriene receptor antagonist zafirlukast on subjective cough score and cough-reflex sensitivity to inhaled capsaicin in eight subjects with CVA refractory to inhaled beta agonists, and in five subjects refractory to inhaled corticosteroids. Seven of eight subjects experienced significant subjective and objective improvement in cough after treatment with zafirlukast. Mean (+/- SEM) cough score improved from 7.75 +/- 0.56 to 3.25 +/- 0.84 (p = 0.0006). Cough sensitivity to capsaicin was suppressed by zafirlukast in all subjects. Patients with CVA may represent a distinct subgroup of asthmatics whose afferent cough receptors within the respiratory epithelium are hypersensitive relative to those of patients with the typical form of asthma. Zafirlukast appears to be particularly effective in treating CVA by inhibiting the sensitivity of these receptors. Leukotriene receptor antagonists may offer an alternative to corticosteroids for the treatment of CVA refractory to inhaled bronchodilators.

Cysteinyl leukotrienes induce human eosinophil locomotion and adhesion molecule expression via a CysLT1 receptor-mediated mechanism

BACKGROUND

The mechanisms involved in eosinophil recruitment by cysteinyl-leukotrienes (CysLTs) remain to be defined.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether CysLTs LTC4, LTD4 and LTE4 could directly stimulate in vitro adhesion molecule expression and cell locomotion of blood eosinophils from atopic asthmatic donors.

METHODS

Mab staining and FACS analysis were used to evaluate Mac-1 and LFA-1 expression on eosinophils before and after CysLTs stimulation. Eosinophil locomotion was tested using a 48-well Boyden microchamber.

RESULTS

CysLTs, at the concentrations of 1 and 10 nM, were able to significantly up-regulate Mac-1 expression (P < 0.05, each comparison) but not LFA-1 expression (P > 0.05, each comparison). A dose-dependent, eosinophil chemotaxis was also induced by LTC4, LTD4 and LTE4 (0.1-10 nM) (P < 0.01, each comparison). Montelukast (0.01 nM to 10 nM), a specific CysLT1 receptor antagonist, significantly down-regulated LTC4, LTD4 and LTE4-induced Mac-1 expression (P < 0.01, each comparison) and the CysLT-induced eosinophil migration (P < 0.01, each comparison). In contrast, montelukast did not affect Mac-1 expression or cell migration when eosinophils were stimulated by the 'non-specific activators', such as fMLP or C5a (P > 0.05, each comparison).

CONCLUSION

These data demonstrate that CysLTs are active in vitro in directly up-regulating human eosinophil functions involved in eosinophil recruitment. The down-regulation of Mac-1 expression and eosinophil chemotaxis by the potent and selective CysLT1 receptor antagonist montelukast indicated the specificity of the LTC4-, LTD4- and LTE4-induced response.

Levels of cysteinyl leukotriene receptor mRNA in human peripheral leucocytes: significantly higher expression of cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 2 mRNA in eosinophils

BACKGROUND

Cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLTs) have been implicated as important contributors in the pathophysiology of asthma and their biological effects are mediated by at least two distinct G-protein-coupled receptors. cDNA sequences of cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1 (CysLTR1) and cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 2 (CysLTR2) have recently been elucidated.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim is to explore gene expression and the comparative expression of CysLTR1 mRNA and CysLTR2 mRNA in human peripheral blood leucocytes.

METHODS

Gene expression of CysLTR1 and CysLTR2 mRNAs in human peripheral blood eosinophils, neutrophils, monocytes and T lymphocytes has been measured by competitive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reactions using RNA or DNA competitors.

RESULTS

(a) When cellular levels of CysLTR1 mRNA were normalized to those of G3PDH mRNA, the relative concentration of CysLTR1 mRNA in eosinophils (43.8 +/- 37.2, n = 29) was significantly higher than that in neutrophils (18.7 +/- 23.3, n = 11), monocytes (0.93 +/- 1.1, n = 10) and T lymphocytes (3.4 +/- 2.4, n = 11). (b) When measured using each DNA competitor, mRNAs for both types of CysLTR coexisted in each type of leucocyte. The ratio of CysLTR1 mRNA to CysLTR2 mRNA was significantly lower in eosinophils (0.65 +/- 0.42, n = 12) than in neutrophils (6.9 +/- 4.9, n = 12), monocytes (1.8 +/- 0.9, n = 10) and T lymphocytes (4.5 +/- 5.7, n = 10). (c) Human umbilical vein endothelial cells expressed CysLTR2 mRNA, but not CysLTR1 mRNA.

CONCLUSION

These studies reveal that CysLTR1 mRNA and, in particular, CysLTR2 mRNA are abundantly expressed at high levels in eosinophils, raising the possibility that CysLTR2 may have an important physiological role in eosinophils and a CysLTR2 antagonist may be a good target for preventing signal transduction by CysLTs in eosinophils.

Anti-inflammatory drugs: new multitarget compounds to face an old problem. The dual inhibition concept

In this short review we have tried to focus on some new relevant aspects of the pharmacological control of inflammation. The clinical availability of new drugs able to produce a selective inhibition of type 2 cyclooxygenase (COX-2), the enzyme thought to be mainly responsible for generating arachidonic-acid-derived inflammatory mediators, has been the origin of much hope. However, expectations of having an effective and completely safe non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) have been only partially fulfilled. Emerging information has challenged some aspects of the original hypothesis indicating COX-2 as devoid of 'housekeeping' physiological functions. Moreover, the recently available clinical studies have indicated only a relatively small improvement in the tolerability of the newer 'selective' COX-2 inhibitors over the classical COX-1/COX-2 mixed type NSAIDs. The new appreciation of the role of other arachidonic acid derivatives, the leukotrienes (LTS), in producing and maintaining inflammation has generated considerable interest in drugs able to block LTS receptors or to produce a selective inhibition of 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO), the initial key enzyme of the leukotriene pathway. These drugs are now included among the effective therapies of asthma but appear, in the few clinical studies performed, to be an insufficient single therapeutic approach in other inflammatory diseases. Drugs able to block equally well both COX and 5-LO metabolic pathways (dual inhibitors) have been developed and experimentally evaluated in the last few years, but none are available on the market yet. The pharmacological rationale at the basis of their development is strong, and animal studies are indicative of a wide range of anti-inflammatory activity. What appears most impressive from the available studies on dual inhibitors is their almost complete lack of gastric toxicity, the most troublesome side effect of NSAIDs. The mechanism of the gastric-sparing properties of these drugs is not yet completely understood; however, it appears that leukotrienes significantly contribute to gastric epithelial injury particularly when these compounds represent the major arachidonic acid derivatives present in the gastric mucosa after inhibiton of prostanoid production.

Update on the role of leukotrienes in the pathogenesis of atopy: a comparative review

The pathogenesis of atopic disease (AD) is controversial in humans and dogs. In humans, leukotrienes (LT) are thought to play an important role in this disease and LT inhibitors are commonly used as treatment for AD. Leukotrienes are a heterogeneous group of biologically active compounds that mediate many aspects of inflammatory and allergic reactions. This paper will review the role of LT in atopic disease in a comparative manner. Leukotriene inhibitors and their therapeutic use in the management of atopic disease in humans and dogs are discussed.

Montelukast or salmeterol combined with an inhaled steroid in adult asthma: design and rationale of a randomized, double-blind comparative study (the IMPACT Investigation of Montelukast as a Partner Agent for Complementary Therapy-trial)

Asthma patients who continue to experience symptoms despite taking regular inhaled corticosteroids represent a management challenge. Leukotrienes play a key role in asthma pathophysiology, and since pro-inflammatory leukotrienes are poorly suppressed by corticosteroids it seems rational to add a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) when a low to moderate dose of inhaled corticosteroids does not provide sufficient disease control. Long acting beta2-agonist (LABA) treatment represents an alternative to LTRAs and both treatment modalities have been shown to provide additional disease control when added to corticosteroid treatment. To compare the relative clinical benefits of adding either a LTRA or a LABA to asthma patients inadequately controlled by inhaled corticosteroids, a randomized, double-blind, multi-centre, 48-week study will be initiated at approximately 120 centres throughout Europe, Latin America, Middle East, Africa and the Asia-Pacific region in early 2000. The study will compare the oral LTRA montelukast with the inhaled LABA salmeterol, each administered on a background of inhaled fluticasone, on asthma attacks, quality of life, lung function, eosinophil levels, healthcare utilization, and safety, in approximately 1200 adult asthmatic patients. The requirements for study enrollment include a history of asthma, FEV1 or PEFR values between 50% and 90% of the predicted value together with > or = 12% improvement in FEV1 after beta-agonist administration, a minimum pre-determined level of asthma symptoms and daily beta-agonist medication. The study will include a 4-week run-in period, during which patients previously taking inhaled corticosteroids are switched to open-label fluticasone (200 microg daily), followed by a 48-week double-blind, treatment period in which patients continuing to experience abnormal pulmonary function and daytime symptoms are randomized to receive montelukast (10 mg once daily) and salmeterol placebo, or inhaled salmeterol (100 microg daily) and montelukast placebo. All patients will continue with inhaled fluticasone (200 microg daily). During the study, asthma attacks, overnight asthma symptoms, and morning peak expiratory flow rate will be assessed using patient diary cards; quality of life will also be assessed using an asthma-specific quality-of life questionnaire. The results of this study are expected to provide physicians with important clinical evidence to help them make a rational and logical treatment choice for asthmatic patients experiencing breakthrough symptoms on inhaled corticosteroids.