Reduced human growth hormone (hGH) bioactivity without a defect of the GH-1 gene in three patients with rhGH responsive growth failure

Differential Diagnosis of the Short IGF-I-Deficient Child with Apparently Normal Growth Hormone Secretion

The current differential diagnosis for a short child with low insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and a normal growth hormone (GH) peak in a GH stimulation test (GHST), after exclusion of acquired causes, includes the following disorders: (1) a decreased spontaneous GH secretion in contrast to a normal stimulated GH peak ("GH neurosecretory dysfunction," GHND) and (2) genetic conditions with a normal GH sensitivity (e.g., pathogenic variants of GH1 or GHSR) and (3) GH insensitivity (GHI). We present a critical appraisal of the concept of GHND and the role of 12- or 24-h GH profiles in the selection of children for GH treatment. The mean 24-h GH concentration in healthy children overlaps with that in those with GH deficiency, indicating that the previously proposed cutoff limit (3.0-3.2 μg/L) is too high. The main advantage of performing a GH profile is that it prevents about 20% of false-positive test results of the GHST, while it also detects a low spontaneous GH secretion in children who would be considered GH sufficient based on a stimulation test. However, due to a considerable burden for patients and the health budget, GH profiles are only used in few centres. Regarding genetic causes, there is good evidence of the existence of Kowarski syndrome (due to GH1 variants) but less on the role of GHSR variants. Several genetic causes of (partial) GHI are known (GHR, STAT5B, STAT3, IGF1, IGFALS defects, and Noonan and 3M syndromes), some responding positively to GH therapy. In the final section, we speculate on hypothetical causes.

Efficacy of long-term growth hormone therapy in short children with reduced growth hormone biological activity

AIM

The optimal GH regimen, in terms of cost-effectiveness, in children with normal GH immunoreactivity but reduced bioactivity is still debated.

METHODS

In 12 GH-deficient (GHD) and 12 bioinactive GH children undergoing GH treatment we evaluated the increase in growth velocity, the difference between target height and final stature and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

RESULTS

We found a significant (p < 0.05) increase in growth velocity in both groups during the first year of GH treatment (non- GHD: from -1.7 to 5.4 SDS; GHD: from -1.46 to 4.74 SDS). There was no statistically significant variation between the two groups in the difference between final height and target height. We did not find any significant difference in cost/height gain between GHD (1925.28 ± 653.15 euro) and bioinactive GH children (1639.55 ± 631.44 euro). There were also no significant differences in cost/year of therapy between GHD (12347.68 ± 2018.1 euro) and bioinactive GH children (11355.08 ± 1747.61 euro).

CONCLUSION

In children with reduced GH biological activity, confirmed by the increase of serum IGF-I levels during generation test, the cost of GH treatment is justified by the positive results obtained in growth and adult height as in classical GHD patients.

Is BaF3 bioassay useful to identify patients with bioinactive growth hormone?

We analyzed the ability of the BaF3 cell line bioassay to select patients with biologically inactive GH. We first evaluated the biological response of the Ba/F3-hGHR cells to rhGH additional doses from 10 to 5000 pg/ml. The concentration points corresponding to the linear part of the curve were selected. We then analyzed a group of sera, diluted like the standard, including the entire range of GH concentrations that can be analyzed by bioassay. The serum/standard area below the curve ratio was calculated. Serum GH immunoactivity determined by IMMULITE/GH bioactivity ratios was calculated. Our experimental data showed that GH-bioactivity/GH-immunoactivity ratios below 0.303 are indicative of a bioinactive GH molecule. This bioassay would recognize only extreme cases of GH bioinactivity, and it would not be a useful tool in the search for patients with altered forms of GH.

Response to Long-Term Growth Hormone Therapy in Short Children with Reduced GH Bioactivity

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether short children with normal growth hormone (GH) immunoreactivity, but reduced bioactivity (bioinactive GH) could benefit from rhGH treatment as GH deficient (GHD) patients.

METHODS

We evaluated 12 pre-pubertal children (8 M, 4 F), with GH deficiency-like phenotype showing normal serum GH peak levels (>10 ng/ml), measured by immunofluorimetric assay (IFMA-GH), in contrast with a reduced GH bioactivity (bio-GH), evaluated using the Nb(2) cells. We also evaluated 15 age-matched GHD pre-pubertal children (11 M, 4 F) with serum GH peak <5 ng/ml. Both groups were treated with rhGH therapy at the dose of 0.23 mg/kg/week s.c.

RESULTS

Serum bio-GH/IFMA-GH ratio at peak time for each patient during the provocative test was significantly lower in bioinactive GH than in GHD children (0.29 vs. 2.05, p = 0.00001). Recombinant human GH therapy induced a significant (p < 0.001) increase in growth rate in both groups during the first 2 years. In the third year of treatment, while growth rate in GHD children is maintained, in bioinactive GH patients it decreases remaining, however higher compared to the pre-treatment one.

CONCLUSIONS

Short rhGH therapy given to selected bioinactive GH children improve growth rate and might result in greater final adult height.

Dose dependency of the serum bio/immuno GH ratio in children during pharmacological secretion tests

Dissociation between GH bioactivity (bio-GH) and GH immunoactivity (immuno-GH) is due to the heterogeneity of the molecule: the measurements do not always provide reliable information on the bio-GH. We studied the ratio of bio-GH and immuno-GH during pharmacological secretion tests in 211 sera to study the concentration-response curve of the assay (C1), 16 samples of normally growing subjects with idiopathic short stature (C2), 13 samples from patients with GH deficiency (GHD1) and 6 samples of 3 patients with GHD and normal provocative tests (GHD2). GH bioactivity was determined by the Nb2 cell proliferation assay (bio-GH) and immuno-GH by a time-resolved immunofluorometric assay (IFMA) (immuno-GH). A non-linear negative relationship between the serum bio-GH/immuno-GH ratio and serum immuno-GH was observed in C1. In log-log plotting representation, two cut-off lines were drawn: a vertical cut-off line separating above-below cut-off serum peak immuno-GH values in provocative tests, and a diagonal cut-off line separating normal-abnormal serum bio-GH/immunoGH ratio; four areas were defined. GHD1 had normal ratios, but below cut-off peak immuno-GH responses. P2 and P3 of Group GHD2 had abnormal ratios in samples with low serum immuno-GH but only P2 had autosomal dominant mutation. P1 had the same autosomal dominant isolated GHD as P2 but a low normal ratio. Our data underline the importance of relatively low serum GH concentrations in mediating GH biological actions. An abnormal serum bio-GH/immuno-GH ratio might explain certain cases of GHD and might be useful in detecting abnormal circulating isoforms of GH in patients with growth failure.

Severe short stature and endogenous growth hormone resistance in twin brothers without growth hormone gene mutations

Growth failure in children with high growth hormone (GH) levels, low insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels, and accelerated linear growth in response to exogenous GH is presumed to result from biologically inactive GH. A molecular diagnosis has only been made in two such patients. We analyzed the presentations and the GH-1 genes of twin Egyptian brothers with this phenotype. At 8 yr of age, the boys' heights were -4 SD. Their IGF-1 levels were 64 and 60 ng/mL, baseline GH levels were 2.1 and 11.7 mU/L, and growth hormone binding protein levels were normal. Twin B attained a peak GH level of 30.6 mU/L after L-dopa stimulation (Twin A was not tested). After 1 yr of exogenous GH, their growth velocities were >11 cm/year (>97%). Analysis of their GH-1 exons and introns revealed no mutations, but five polymorphisms were identified that have not been previously reported. The GH-1 DNA sequence was transfected into human cells and the resulting GH-1 transcripts were analyzed. Wildtype GH-1 mRNAs were observed, demonstrating that the polymorphisms do not affect transcript processing. Therefore, although no evidence of GH-1 gene mutations or abnormal GH-1 mRNA processing was found, the subjects' excellent response to exogenous GH supports a trial of GH in children with severe short stature, low IGF-1 levels and normal GH responses to stimulation testing.

The GH-IGF-I axis in children with idiopathic short stature

Idiopathic short stature (ISS) is a term used for children in whom the etiology of the short stature is undefined. Investigations of the growth hormone (GH)-insulin-like growth factor I axis have revealed several molecular and endocrinological defects in ISS patients. Abnormalities of GH secretion and action, although not frequent, will help to categorize some children with ISS. Because most diagnostic methods remain crude, however, their modification might be necessary to identify more subtle and yet functionally significant abnormalities of this endocrine axis.

Genética molecular do eixo GH-IGF1

O hormônio de crescimento (GH, growth hormone), o fator de crescimento insulina símile-1 (IGF1, insulin-like growth factor-1) e uma enorme variedade de moléculas afins formam um eixo regulador do crescimento pré e pós-natal. Os permanentes avanços nas técnicas de biologia molecular têm facilitado a identificação de defeitos genéticos nos diferentes componentes do eixo GH-IGF1 em crianças com baixa estatura. Por outro lado, a aplicação de novos métodos de dosagens hormonais tem revelado a existência de formas inativas de GH ou quantidades aumentadas de formas com menor atividade biológica, cuja presença na circulação poderia justificar o retardo de crescimento em certas crianças com baixa estatura. Clinicamente, os defeitos genéticos no eixo GH-IGF1 podem se manifestar tanto em síndromes de deficiência como de resistência hormonal, enfatizando a importância de se avaliar não apenas a secreção de GH numa criança com baixa estatura, mas também marcadores periféricos de uma possível resistência tecidual ao hormônio. Neste artigo, os principais defeitos genéticos descritos até o presente momento no eixo GH/IGF1 são revisados, com enfoque sobre as repercussões clínicas destes defeitos e a importância da avaliação genética no diagnóstico diferencial da baixa estatura idiopática e da baixa estatura familiar. Na parte final, alguns breves comentários são feitos sobre defeitos genéticos encontrados em dois importantes fatores de transcrição da hipófise, que provocam um quadro clínico de deficiência combinada de hormônios pituitários, incluindo a deficiência de GH.

Circulating GH isoforms and GH bioactivity in preterm neonates

Among the molecular variants of human GH, the monomeric 22-kD is the predominant isoform, whereas the 20-kD is the second most abundant isoform. Because little is known on the pattern of human GH isoforms in the early postnatal period, we evaluated serum levels of 22-kD GH by an immunofluorometric assay and of 20-kD GH by an ELISA using an anti-20-kD antibody, and measured GH bioactivity with the Nb2 cell bioassay in 19 preterm neonates (gestational age, 32 +/- 0.5 wk; mean +/- SEM) on the fourth and 15th days of life. As control subjects, we studied 19 full-term neonates (gestational age, 39 +/- 0.3 wk) on the fourth day of life and 20 healthy adults, aged 20 +/- 0.3 y. Four-day-old preterm neonates showed significantly higher serum values of 20-kD GH (0.99 - 0.14 ng/mL) than full-term neonates (0.33 +/- 0.07 ng/mL; p < 0.001) and adults (0.09 +/- 0.02; p < 0.0001). Likewise, 22-kD GH and GH levels by Nb2 cell bioassay were also significantly higher (p < 0.001) in preterm than in full-term neonates and young adults. A significant decrease (p < 0.01) in 20-kD, 22-kD, and Nb2-determined GH was observed in preterm neonates on the 15th day of life The percentage of the 20-kD isoform was similar in the preterm infants at the fourth and 15th day, in full-term-infants, and in adults (2.7%, 2.7%, 2.8%, and 3.16%, respectively). Our results indicate that 20-kD GH serum levels change throughout life as regards total amount, but not as regards percentage.