Expression of MUC1 and MUC2 glycoproteins in laryngeal cancer

MUC1 confers radioresistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cells

Mucin 1 (MUC1), a transmembrane glycoprotein, has shown to be as the possible prognostic marker to predict the risk of aggressive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). In the present study, we investigated the effect of MUC1 in HNSCC cells and the response to X-ray irradiation (IR). Here, we examined the impact of MUC1 overexpression or downexpression on clonogenic survival and apoptosis in response to X-ray irradiation (IR). Radioresistance and radiosensitivity were also observed in HNSCC cells that are MUC1 overexpression and MUC1 downexpression. This enhanced resistance to IR in MUC1-overexpressing cells is primarily due to increased the number of radiation-induced γH2AX/53BP1-positive foci and DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair kinetics. MUC1 overexpression repaired more than 90% of DSBs after 2 Gy radiation by 24 h compared to the empty vector overexpressing cells with less than 50% of DSB repair. However, MUC1 downexpression repaired less than 20% of DSBs compared to the empty vector-overexpresing cells. MUC1 overexpression inhibited proapoptotic protein expression, such as caspase-3, caspase-8, and caspase-9, and induced antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2, followed by resistance to IR-induced apoptosis. Our results showed that targeting MUC1 may be as a promising strategy to counteract radiation resistance of HNSCC cells.

Prognostic Value of MUC2 Expression in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The reliability of MUC2 as a prognostic marker in colorectal cancer (CRC) is controversial. This study evaluated the association between MUC2 expression levels in CRC tissues and prognosis.

Methods

The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, China Biology Medicine disc (CBMdisc), Wanfang Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were searched to identify studies exploring the relationship between MUC2 expression in CRC tissues and overall survival (OS). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the associations between MUC2 expression levels and prognosis and MUC2 expression levels and CRC clinicopathological characteristics, respectively.

Results

The meta-analysis included 11 studies (2619 patients). Low MUC2 expression level was significantly associated with poor OS (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.43–1.94; P < 0.00001) and disease-free survival (DFS)/recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.21–2.12; P = 0.001) in patients with CRC. Low MUC2 expression level was associated with advanced TNM stage (RR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.26–1.60; P < 0.00001), lymph node metastasis (RR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.25–1.60; P < 0.00001), lymphatic invasion (RR,1.64; 95% CI, 1.26–2.12; P = 0.0002), rectal tumor site (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.09–1.46; P = 0.001), and large tumor size (RR,1.32; 95% CI, 1.02–1.70; P = 0.03). There were no associations between low MUC2 expression level and gender, histological grade, depth of invasion, and distant metastasis.

Conclusion

The low levels of MUC2 in CRC tissues are poor prognostic factor independent of stage or other well-recognized markers of later-stage disease. Large well-designed cohort studies are required to validate MUC2 as a biomarker for poor prognosis in CRC.

Mucin gene expression in reflux laryngeal mucosa: histological and in situ hybridization observations

Objectives/Hypothesis. To determine if laryngopharyngeal reflux alters mucin gene expression in laryngeal mucosa. Methods. In situ hybridization was employed to study the expression of the 8 well-characterised mucin genes MUC1-4, 5AC, 5B, 6, and 7 in reflux laryngeal mucosa from laryngeal ventricles, posterior commissures, and vocal folds compared to control/normal laryngeal mucosa. Results. MUC1-5 genes are expressed in normal and reflux laryngeal mucosa. MUC1, 3 and 4 are expressed in respiratory and squamous mucosa whereas MUC2 and 5AC are expressed in respiratory mucosa only. MUC3, 4 and 5AC are downregulated in reflux mucosa. MUC5AC expression is significantly reduced in the 3 mucosal sites and when mucosal type was taken into account, this remains significant in combined laryngeal and ventricular mucosa only. Conclusions. MUC3, 4 and 5AC expression is downregulated in laryngopharyngeal reflux. This may be due to laryngeal mucosal metaplasia and/or alteration of mucin gene expression in the preexisting mucosa. Altered mucin gene expression might predispose laryngeal mucosa to the damaging effect of reflux.

Recent advances in mucin immunohistochemistry in salivary gland tumors and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

This review focuses on the immunohistochemical expression of members of the MUC-type mucin family in salivary gland tumors and head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). Information is available on changes in the expression levels and distribution profiles of MUC1, MUC2, MUC3, MUC4, MUC5AC, MUC5B, MUC6 and MUC7 in tumors of the salivary glands; and of MUC1, MUC2 and MUC4 in HNSCC. In salivary gland tumors the expression patterns of MUC2, MUC3, MUC5AC and MUC6 appear to be very closely correlated with the histopathological tumor type indicating their potential use to improve diagnostic accuracy in salivary gland neoplasia. Some MUC-type mucins have emerged as valuable prognostic indicators in pleomorphic adenoma, mucoepidermoid carcinoma and HNSCC. Nine antibodies directed against different MUC1 antigens have thus far been examined in HNSCC of which monoclonal antibodies DF3, HMFG-1 and Ma695 have shown significant correlations with disease outcome. The importance of taking the specific anti-MUC antibody into consideration when comparing the results of different studies on MUC expression in salivary gland tumors and HNSCC is also highlighted in this review.

What role do mucins have in the development of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma? A systematic review

Mucins are the dominant component in the protective mucus layer on mucosal surfaces including the larynx. Hence, they are part of the first line of defence against external stimuli including effect of smoking in the larynx. We asked whether existing published evidence supported the hypothesis that alteration in mucins expression/production is related to the laryngeal neoplastic process. The objective of this study is to review published evidence for mucins having an important role in normal laryngeal physiology and the development of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). We aimed to review all available literature on mucins in the larynx in order to develop hypotheses to be tested by future research. Thereby, new potential means of prevention and treatment of laryngeal cancer may be developed. A systematic search of all published literature was conducted. Systematic searches were done in the following databases: AMED, BNI, EMBASE, HMIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and HEALTH BUSINESS ELITE from their respective inception up to 11 February 2011. The following keywords were used in combination: mucin, larynx and squamous cell carcinoma. Altogether, 53 studies were identified; 43 studies were excluded following screening of the titles and abstracts. Full text manuscripts for ten studies were obtained for detailed evaluation and five studies were included in this review. No single study fulfilled all relevant criteria. Based on the included studies, we now know that MUC1 is definitely expressed in SCC larynx. However, there is no definitive evidence to suggest that MUC1 and MUC2 are aberrantly expressed in SCC larynx as compared to normal larynx. Further studies using the best available detection technique to detect MUC1, MUC2 and other possible relevant mucins i.e., MUC4 on adequate numbers of normal and SCC specimens are needed to confirm the findings of this review.

Differential expression of MUC1 and carbohydrate antigens in primary and secondary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), tumor markers may be helpful to evaluate prognosis accurately as well as to improve therapy selection. Detection of human MUC1 has been widely employed for the evaluation of carcinoma patients. This article aims to study MUC1, Tn, sTn, and Lewis antigenic expression in primary HNSCC, lymph node metastasis, and local recurrences.

METHODS

We used immunohistochemistry, tissue homogenization and differential centrifugation, isopycnic density gradient centrifugation, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and Western blot.

RESULTS

In primary tumors, MUC1 was detected in 80.0% of the samples; sLewis x in 23.2%, Lewis x in 45.6%, and Lewis y in 40.8%. Tn and sTn were found in 4.0% and 6.4% of samples, respectively. In metastatic lymph nodes, MUC1 showed a similar positive reaction as in primary tumors. Lewis y was detected in 20% lymph nodes whereas Lewis x, sLewis x, Tn, and sTn did not show differences. Some recurrences expressed MUC1 and only a few Lewis antigens, whereas Tn and sTn were not detected.

CONCLUSION

In primary HNSCC and metastatic nodes, a high expression of MUC1 and Lewis antigens was detected that diminished in local recurrences. We also found that differentiated tumors mainly expressed a linear pattern of MUC1CT and Lewis x.

Lewis x is highly expressed in normal tissues: a comparative immunohistochemical study and literature revision

An immunohistochemical analysis was employed to determine the expression of carbohydrate antigens associated to mucins in normal epithelia. Tissue samples were obtained as biopsies from normal breast (18), colon (35) and oral cavity mucosa (8). The following carbohydrate epitopes were studied: sialyl-Lewis x, Lewis x, Lewis y, Tn hapten, sialyl-Tn and Thomsen-Friedenreich antigen. Mucins were also studied employing antibodies against MUC1, MUC2, MUC4, MUC5AC, MUC6 and also normal colonic glycolipid. Statistical analysis was performed and Kendall correlations were obtained. Lewis x showed an apical pattern mainly at plasma membrane, although cytoplasmic staining was also found in most samples. TF, Tn and sTn haptens were detected in few specimens, while sLewis x was found in oral mucosa and breast tissue. Also, normal breast expressed MUC1 at a high percentage, whereas MUC4 was observed in a small number of samples. Colon specimens mainly expressed MUC2 and MUC1, while most oral mucosa samples expressed MUC4 and MUC1. A positive correlation between MUC1VNTR and TF epitope (r=0.396) was found in breast samples, while in colon specimens MUC2 and colonic glycolipid versus Lewis x were statistically significantly correlated (r=0.28 and r=0.29, respectively). As a conclusion, a defined carbohydrate epitope expression is not exclusive of normal tissue or a determined localization, and it is possible to assume that different glycoproteins and glycolipids may be carriers of carbohydrate antigens depending on the tissue localization considered.

[MUC1 (EMA): A key molecule of carcinogenesis?]

MUC1 is a large trans-membrane highly glycosylated mucin which is expressed at the apical pole of normal cells in glandular epithelia. MUC1 is implicated in many physiological mechanisms such as adhesion, development and differentiation. Also, MUC1 is frequently deregulated and over-expressed with a membrane circumferential and/or cytoplasmic expression. The intracellular tail of MUC1 is phosphorylated and can interact with many signalling proteins and transcriptional factors. Indeed, MUC1 can interact with B-catenin competitively for E-cadherin, thus destabilizing intercellular junctions and favouring metastatic dissemination. In carcinomas, the overexpression and membrane delocalization of MUC1 is associated with a worse prognosis and a shorter survival in breast, colon, kidney, prostate or gastro-intestinal cancers. MUC1 appears to be a novel therapeutic target for immunotherapy or anti-tumour vaccines.

MUC1 and MUC2 expression in salivary gland tumors and in non-neoplastic salivary gland tissue

The expression of MUC1 and MUC2 was studied in salivary gland tumors and non-neoplastic salivary gland tissue. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens from 101 patients (21 pleomorphic adenomas (PA), 22 Warthin's tumors (WT), 26 adenoid cystic carcinomas (ACC), 13 acinic cell adenocarcinomas (ACA), 9 mucoepidermoid carcinomas (MC), and 10 specimens of non-neoplastic parotid and submandibular gland tissue) were immunostained. All salivary gland tumors expressed MUC1. A strong immunoreactivity was noted in WT and MC, a moderate in ACC and ACA, and a weak in PA. Strong expression of MUC2 was noted in all WT, moderate expression in MC, and weak expression in PA and ACA. All cases of ACC except for two were negative for MUC2. In general, MUC1 expression was stronger than that of MUC2. Non-neoplastic salivary gland tissue revealed a moderate MUC1 and MUC2 expression in excretory ducts and a strong expression in striated ducts. The apical plasma membrane of some serous acini expressed MUC1. Mucous acini were negative for both antigens. No change in immunoreactivity was noted in cases of chronic sclerosing sialadenitis. In conclusion, the different expression pattern of MUC1 and MUC2 in salivary gland neoplasia may be of additional value for the classification of salivary gland tumors.