The utility of transbronchial (Wang) fine needle aspiration in lung cancer diagnosis

Transbronchial needle aspiration cytology (TBNA) in endobronchial lesions: a valuable technique during bronchoscopy in diagnosing lung cancer and it will decrease repeat bronchoscopy

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths around the world. Globally, lung cancer is the largest contributor to new cancer diagnosis and to death from cancer. Various conventional diagnostic techniques (CDTs) such as endobronchial forcep biopsy (FB), bronchial washing (BW) and bronchial brushing (BB), and transbronchial needle aspiration cytology (TBNA) are employed during fiber-optic bronchoscopy.

METHODS

This is a prospective study conducted between June 2012 and September 2013 at Bronchoscopy unit of MIMSR Medical College Latur, India, to find the role of TBNA in exophytic endobronchial lesions in confirming the diagnosis of lung cancer and to find additive yield over other techniques such as BB, BW and FB, and included 150 patients on the basis of clinical and radiological features of malignancy. In exophytic endobronchial lesions, predominant endoscopic findings were cauliflower, polypoidal-like or nodular or multinodular endobronchial growth. TBNA, FB, BB and BW were performed in all the cases during FOB. Histopathological and cytological examinations of specimens were performed at Pathology department. The statistical analysis was done using chi-square test.

RESULTS

Total 150 patients, between age group 24-80 years, mean age was 57.93 years, male population constitutes 86.17 % of total. 76.14 % cases were smoker of them 61.87 % cases having history of >40 pack years. Commoner symptoms were cough (91.33 %), hemoptysis (54.00 %) and chest pain (46.66 %), and mass lesion (40.66 %), hilar opacity (31.33 %) and collapse segmental/lobar (29.33 %) were commoner radiological abnormalities. Yield of TBNA, CDT and TBNA plus CDT in exophytic lesions is 60.66, 79.33 and 84.66 %, respectively, in diagnosis of lung malignancies (P < 0.001). Sensitivity of forcep biopsy and TBNA in diagnosing lung malignancy was 88.18 and 71.65 %, respectively (P < 0.01). FOB-related hypoxemia documented in two cases and minor bleeding in six cases. Other complications such as significant bleeding, pneumothorax and death were not seen. Minor bleeding was seen with forcep biopsy mainly in 4.0 % cases. TBNA has decreased repeat procedure, decreases cost for diagnosis. IHC on TBNA specimens had increased histological-type confirmation.

CONCLUSION

Transbronchial needle aspiration is a beneficial, safe and minimally invasive bronchoscopic technique with insignificant side effect in the diagnosis bronchogenic carcinoma. TBNA considered safe, especially when fleshy vascular endobronchial growth is present and risk of bleeding is high with forcep biopsy. Inadequate tissue sampling due to the presence of necrosis, blood clot over the lesion and formation of crush artifacts by FB makes TBNA valuable in these lesions. TBNA will definitely decrease need for repeat bronchoscopy.

Transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of endobronchial malignant lesions: a 3-year experience

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To establish the diagnostic yield of transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) and its contribution to conventional diagnostic techniques (CDT) such as forceps biopsy, bronchial washing, and bronchial brushing in the diagnosis of malignant endobronchial lesions.

DESIGN

Retrospective clinical study.

PATIENTS

One hundred fifteen lung cancer patients

MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS

We reviewed files of 115 lung carcinoma cases diagnosed in our clinic from 2001 to 2003 with endobronchial lesions sampled by CDT and TBNA. The lesions were classified into three groups: exophitic mass lesion (EML), submucosal disease, and peribronchial disease. The diagnostic yield of TBNA and CDT was compared to that of the combination of CDT and TBNA with respect to the type and location of the lesion and the histopathologic subgroups. Of the 115 cases, histology findings were confirmed by TBNA in 91 cases (79%), CDT in 75 cases (65%), and TBNA plus CDT in 105 cases (91%). The difference of the diagnostic yield of CDT vs TBNA plus CDT was statistically significant (p < 0.001). In peribronchial disease, the sensitivity of TBNA plus CDT was significantly better than CDT (87% vs 52%, p < 0.001). In EML and submucosal disease, addition of TBNA to CDT improved sensitivity from 85 to 100% and from 84 to 97%, respectively (p > 0.05). Regarding localization, the addition of TBNA to CDT increased sensitivity in the trachea and main bronchi, and in right upper and middle lobe lesions (p < 0.05). By the addition of TBNA to CDT, small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer cases demonstrated improvements in sensitivity from 74 to 100% and 61 to 87%, respectively. This significant difference (p < 0.05) was attributed to the peribronchial disease group.

CONCLUSION

In the case of peribronchial disease, the addition of TBNA to CDT improves the diagnostic yield of the bronchoscopic examination.

Accuracy of touch imprint cytology in diagnosing lung cancer

A 3-year study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of touch imprint smears in the diagnosis of lung cancer. Touch imprint smears were prepared from 90 computerized tomographic-guided core needle lung biopsies. Cytological diagnosis of touch imprint smears were correlated with the histological diagnosis of the corresponding core needle biopsy specimen, which was taken as the gold standard. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of imprint smear results were 89%, 100%, 100% and 68%, respectively. There were no false positives, and all patients with small cell lung cancer were correctly diagnosed with this technique. Imprint cytology can be used to provide a rapid, preliminary diagnosis of lung cancer.