An alternate model of thyroid cytology: practical not perfect

The impact of using defined criteria for adequacy of fine needle aspiration cytology of the thyroid in routine practice

The fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of the thyroid is the predominant method of preoperative tissue diagnosis of thyroid lesions. The routine use of FNAC has reduced the rate of unnecessary surgery for thyroid nodules. However, there are overlaps in the existing criteria for defining adequacy in thyroid aspirates. In this study, we aimed to explore the reasons for high percentage of inadequate thyroid FNAC samples and to reevaluate those samples by applying clearly defined criteria suggested in the literature to reduce the proportion of inadequate aspirates. The results of 550 smears reported as inadequate FNAC samples are presented over a period of 15 years extending from 1986 to 2000 (18.8%). For the purpose of the study, only those patients with subsequent histological or cytological analysis were included (279). The original FNA samples were reviewed by two cytopathologists, unaware of the subsequent repeat cytology or histology results. Specific criteria for adequacy of specimens were used which include the presence of six or more groups of follicular cells, each having more than 10 discernable viable cells or 60 isolated viable follicular cells. Out of 279, 82 (29%) FNAC samples originally reported as inadequate met our criteria and were considered adequate on review. Of these 82 cases, subsequent surgical excision showed malignancy in 5 cases (6%), adenoma in 7 (9%), and benign hyperplasia and thyroiditis in 70 cases (85%). In addition, 16 (5%) cases were classified as cysts. The slide preparation error was noticed in 26 (14%) and the sampling error was observed in 160 (86%) cases. The use of well-defined criteria for adequacy is helpful because it improves the diagnostic efficiency of thyroid FNA and avoids unnecessary surgery for benign nonneoplastic thyroid lesions. However, since application of these criteria has also resulted in an increase in the false-negative diagnoses, they should be applied in the multidisciplinary context.

CXC chemokine receptor 4 immunodetection in the follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: comparison to galectin-3 and hector battifora mesothelial cell-1

BACKGROUND

The cytological discrimination between benign and malignant follicular-patterned lesions of the thyroid can represent a diagnostic challenge, even for experienced pathologists. We evaluated the diagnostic use of protein expression of CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) and galectin-3 (gal-3) that were found to be upregulated in papillary thyroid carcinoma compared to normal thyroid and of mesothelial cell surface protein recognized by monoclonal antibody Hector Battifora Mesothelial cell (HBME)-1 in thyroid tumors.

METHODS

Expression of CXCR4, HBME-1, and gal-3 was examined immunohistochemically in total of 100 aspirates of thyroid lesions, categorized as benign (n = 22), indeterminate lesion (n = 43), suspicious of papillary thyroid carcinoma (n = 10), or malignant (n = 25) by preoperative cytology.

RESULTS

Expression of each individual marker was significantly associated with malignancy (p < 0.0001), although the sensitivity of detection ranged from 56% for gal-3 to 94% for HBME-1. When focusing on the indeterminate lesions, only CXCR4 and HBME-1 expression was associated with malignancy; moreover, these two markers either used individually or in combination showed good values of diagnostic accuracy (88.4% and 90.7%, respectively). Further, the combination of CXCR4 plus HBME-1 or the simultaneous use of all the three markers provided absolute value of sensitivity and negative predictive value in the same group of lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

An immunohistochemical panel, including CXCR4, could be useful in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant well-differentiated follicular-patterned thyroid lesions.

Immunocytochemical evaluation of thyroid neoplasms on thin-layer smears from fine-needle aspiration biopsies

BACKGROUND

Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is the most reliable diagnostic tool for thyroid nodules. A difficult cytologic diagnosis may be supported by an immunocytochemical study. The efficacy of a panel made up of RET, HBME-1, and Galectin-3 antibodies was evaluated in smears processed by thin-layer cytology (TLC).

DESIGN

Thyroid FNABs (n = 99) with both conventional (CS) and thin-layer cytology (TLC) smears were studied. The cases were diagnosed as follows: 5 benign lesions (BL), 13 papillary carcinomas (PC), and 81 follicular proliferations (FP). The category of FP was divided into three subgroups according to nuclear features of follicular cells: Follicular neoplasm (FN NOS), oxyphilic follicular neoplasm (OFN), and follicular lesion with nuclear pleomorphism (FLWNP). Immunostains for HBME-1, Galectin-3, and RET were carried out on TLC slides.

RESULTS

Among 49 cases undergoing surgery, all 10 PC and 2 BL were histologically confirmed, whereas 15 out of 37 FP (40.5%) were malignant. The complete immunocytochemical panel (ICCP) was positive in 9 of 10 malignancies (90%) and negative in both BLs. Out of 37 FP, the ICCP yielded positive in 15 cases (4 benign, 11 malignant) and negative in 11 (all benign). In the FLWNP subgroup, the ICCP was positive in 11 (84.6%) and negative in 2 histologically benign cases.

CONCLUSION

The combined panel of antibodies and the nuclear pleomorphism of follicular cells were effective in distinguishing between thyroid nodules requiring surgery from thyroid nodules requiring just follow-up.