Hormone receptor status in breast cancer--a comparison between surgical specimens and fine needle aspiration biopsies

Clinical and Cyto-Morphological Characterization of Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Objective:

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), despite being the uncommon subtype, contributes a major portion to mortality and associated with poor prognosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cytological criteria for the diagnosis of TNBC through fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC).

Material and Method:

Clinical, cytological, histological, and immunohistochemical (IHC) data of 256 patients were evaluated, and patient were classified as TNBC and non-TNBC phenotype by IHC. All cytological specimens were reviewed for 12 criteria: cellularity, tubule/gland formation, syncytial clusters, large bare nuclei, nuclear atypia, chromatin pattern, cell borders, nucleolus, cytoplasm, lymphocytic infiltrate, calcification, and necrosis. The Fischer's exact test was used to show test association.

Result:

Out of 256 patients, 82 patients were TNBC, and 174 patients were non-TNBC. TNBC phenotype showed statistically significant association to cellularity, tubule/gland formation, syncytial cluster formation, bare nuclei, nuclear atypia, cell borders, lymphocyte infiltration, and necrosis.

Conclusion:

FNAC can be helpful in making diagnosis of TNBC and along with ER, PR, HER2 characterization, helpful in planning treatment strategy, saving time, manpower, and resources in the patient management.

A Review of the Use of Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy of Mammary Tumors for Diagnosis and Research

The article "Aspiration Biopsy of Mammary Tumors in Diagnosis and Research - A Critical Review of 2,200 Cases" by Zajicek et al. [Acta Cytol 1967;11:169-175] is composed of two separate parts as can be seen from the title. Both are, however, of great historical interest. The first describes the early days of fine-needle aspiration cytology diagnosis of breast lesions in particular carcinomas. The results are still impressive with a diagnostic accuracy close to 90%. The second deals with the effect of negative pressure on cell viability during the aspiration procedure. These studies were aimed at evaluating the usefulness of aspirated tumor cells to analyze the effects of therapy and the origin of tumor cells.

Cytological Criteria for Predicting the Luminal Phenotype of Breast Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Specific cytological criteria for the luminal phenotype of breast carcinoma, despite it being the most common and having a better prognosis as well as targeted therapies under study, remain to be established. Using fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), we aimed to identify the luminal phenotype through the evaluation of cytological criteria recognized in routine practice.

METHODS

We correlated 169 FNACs of breast carcinomas with their tissue specimens, classified into phenotypes by immunohistochemistry (applying tissue microarray technology) as luminal A, luminal B, HER2 overexpression, and triple negative. All FNAC samples were blindly reviewed according to cellularity, cell cohesion, necrosis, nucleoli, and nuclear atypia. Fisher's exact test was used to test associations between the cytological criteria and phenotypes.

RESULTS

The following phenotypes were obtained - luminal A: 107 (63.3%), luminal B: 39 (23.1%), HER2 overexpression: 8 (4.7%), and triple negative: 15 (8.9%). The luminal phenotype showed mild/moderate cellularity (40.4%) (OR = 7.12, 95% CI: 1.61-31.52), inconspicuous, present nucleoli (55.5%) (OR = 8.31, 95% CI: 2.36-29.19), and mild/moderate nuclear atypia (44.5%) (OR = 8.42, 95% CI: 1.90-37.25).

CONCLUSION

The criteria that might indicate the luminal phenotype of breast carcinoma in FNAC were mild/moderate cellularity, inconspicuous, present, and nonprominent nucleoli, and mild/moderate nuclear atypia.

Evaluation of grading and hormone receptor immunostaining on fine needle aspirates in carcinoma breast

Background:

Grading and hormone receptor determination in breast carcinoma are predictive factors for response to hormonal therapy.

Aim:

This study was undertaken to grade breast carcinoma and to determine estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression on fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). Furthermore, the objective was to compare the results with histological grading and immunohistochemistry on surgical material.

Materials and Methods:

Fifty cases of breast carcinoma diagnosed on FNAC were included. The cytological grading was done according to the Robinson's grading system. The corresponding histology sections were graded using the modified Bloom-Richardson system. Immunostaining for ER and PR was done on smears and tissue sections.

Results:

On both cytological and histological evaluation, 49 cases were infiltrating ductal carcinoma and one case was colloid carcinoma. On comparing cytological and histological grading, 78% were correctly graded on cytology. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for ER detection on immunocytochemistry (ICC) were 55.6%, 95%, 93.8% and 61.3%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value for PR detection on ICC were 57.7%, 95.2%, 93.8% and 64.5%, respectively. The correlation for ER and PR between cytology and histology was 72.3% and 74.5%.

Conclusion:

The grading along with ER and PR immunostaining of breast carcinoma on smears is advocated because of high concordance between cytology and histology. This allows the patient to be treated with hormonal therapy on the basis of FNAC alone.

Clinically used breast cancer markers such as estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 are unstable throughout tumor progression

PURPOSE To investigate whether hormonal receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) change throughout tumor progression, because this may alter patient management. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study cohort included female patients with breast cancer in the Stockholm health care region who relapsed from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2007. Either biochemical or immunohistochemical (IHC)/immunocytochemical (ICC) methods were used to determine estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 status, which was then confirmed by fluorescent in situ hybridization for IHC/ICC 2+ and 3+ status. Results ER (459 patients), PR (430 patients), and HER2 (104 patients) from both primary tumor and relapse were assessed, revealing a change in 32.4% (McNemar's test P < .001), 40.7% (P < .001), and 14.5% (P = .44) of patients, respectively. Assessment of ER (119 patients), PR (116 patients), and HER2 (32 patients) with multiple (from two to six) consecutive relapses showed an alteration in 33.6%, 32.0%, and 15.7% of patients, respectively. A statistically significant differential overall survival related to intraindividual ER and PR status in primary tumor and relapse (log-rank P < .001) was noted. In addition, women with ER-positive primary tumors that changed to ER-negative tumors had a significant 48% increased risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.08 to 2.05) compared with women with stable ER-positive tumors. CONCLUSION Patients with breast cancer experience altered hormone receptor and HER2 status throughout tumor progression, possibly influenced by adjuvant therapies, which significantly influences survival. Hence, marker investigations at relapse may potentially improve patient management and survival.

Difference in hormone receptor content in breast cancers from Vietnamese and Swedish women

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to compare both estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) content in operable breast cancers from Vietnamese and Swedish patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Primary breast cancer tissues were randomly selected from 249 Vietnamese patients treated in Hanoi, Vietnam between 2002 and 2004 and 1 257 Swedish patients treated in Stockholm, Sweden between 2002 and 2003. Clinical information was available for all patients in the study. The hormone receptor content in tumors from Vietnam was analyzed by immunohistochemistry using an automated slide stainer (Bench MarkXT, Ventana) in combination with anti-ER (SP1 250), and anti-PgR (clone 1E2) rabbit monoclonal antibody. Tumors with ≥ 10% stained nuclei were considered as receptor positive. Tumors from Swedish patients were analyzed with an enzyme immunoassay with a cut-off point of ≥ 0.10 fmol/μg DNA as positive. The hormone receptor frequencies between populations were compared according to clincopathology features.

RESULTS

The ER positive rate was higher in premenopausal and lower in postmenopausal Vietnamese patients as compared to Swedish patients with similar menopausal status (71% versus 58%, OR 1.75, p = 0.007; 44% versus 72%, OR 0.32, p < 0.001, respectively). PgR positive tumors were found in 58% and 25% of pre- and postmenopausal Vietnamese patients, respectively. The corresponding figures for Swedish patients were 73% and 66%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There were significant differences in the frequency of ER/PgR positivity between Vietnam and Swedish breast cancer patients. These differences were independent on menopausal status and age of patients at diagnosis can not be explained by these factors and they can be contributed to knowledge about both basic biology features and prognoses.

Liquid based material from fine needle aspirates from breast carcinomas offers the possibility of long-time storage without significant loss of immunoreactivity of estrogen and progesterone receptors

BACKGROUND

Estrogen receptor (ER) status and progesterone receptor (PgR) status are strong prognostic and predictive markers in breast carcinomas. Steroid receptors are fragile and optimal handling of both cytological and histological material, including fixation, is crucial. Liquid based material offers the possibility to prepare a number of slides from one lesion and is increasingly being used for immunocytochemistry. It also offers the possibility to prepare several smears and to store these at different temperatures as well as storing residual material in the liquid.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The samples consisted of fine needle aspirate material from 53 breast carcinomas. Direct smears and liquid based preparations were used in parallel for immunocytochemical detection of ER and PgR receptor status. Slides from liquid suspensions were stored at -20°C and -74°C for 3 and 6 months, respectively. Direct smears were fixed primarily in 4% formalin. Liquid based specimens were post-fixed in 4% formalin. All specimens were subjected to microwave-stimulated epitope retrieval. Antibody concentrations were ER 1:150 and PgR 1:200 for both preparation methods. The immunostaining program was identical for both the methods.

RESULTS

Liquid based specimens had a statistically non-significant higher percentage of positive cases compared to direct smears. Specimens prepared from liquid suspensions and stored at -20°C and -74°C for 3 and 6 months, respectively, showed a virtually unchanged ER and PgR reactivity (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Liquid suspensions and liquid based slide preparations seem to offer an optimal pre-fixation and preservation of ER/PgR in breast carcinoma cells. Post-fixation with 4% formalin followed by microwave-stimulated epitope retrieval before immunostaining is recommended. Long-time storage of liquid based specimens at -20°C or -74°C for at least 6 months without significant loss of immunoreactivity is feasible. They may be used as internal positive and negative controls.

Breast cancer and hormonal therapy

Valid evidence from randomized-controlled trials indicates that breast cancer risk is increased with combined estrogen/progestogen use and that such treatment implies a risk greater than that of estrogen alone. Overall, risk estimates from observational studies are somewhat higher than in randomized-controlled trials but remain modest as compared with other risk factors even after long-term treatment. For combined estrogen/progestogen therapy, risk increases gradually to reach statistical significance after 4 to 5 years. Apart from its many beneficial health effects, the safety data for use of estrogen alone are quite reassuring. The only justifications for progestogen addition are for bleeding control and endometrial protection. At present, there are several new therapeutic compounds and concepts in development, which hold promise to provide both endometrial protection and breast safety.

The role of ThinPrep cytology in the evaluation of estrogen and progesterone receptor content of breast tumors

INTRODUCTION

The objective of the current study was to analyze the potential value of immunocytochemical analysis on ThinPrep (TP)-processed smears, from fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies, of breast tumors for the determination of ER and PR content as compared with the immunohistochemical analysis performed on paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Percutaneous FNA biopsy of focal breast lesions in 119 female adult patients during a 31-month period was performed. Subsequently, these patients underwent surgical resection of the tumors. ER and PR status of the tumors was determined by immunocytochemical analysis on TP-processed smears and by immunohistochemical studies in paraffin-embedded sections.

RESULTS

With the use of TP technique adequate material was observed in all cases. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and overall accuracy (OA) of the TP technique for the ER were 98.95%, 100%, 100%, 95.84% and 99.15% respectively. In addition, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and OA of the TP technique for the PR were 100%, 87.5%, 95.60%, 100% and 96.64%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

ER and PR status can be evaluated in FNA material from breast carcinomas by using the TP technique. Sample collection and storage is simple and permits the assortment of the FNA sample for both morphologic diagnosis and ancillary studies. The accuracy of TP technique in the detection of ER and PR content is comparable to those of the histological evaluation, and could be of paramount importance for the preoperative planning of treatment.

Testosterone inhibits estrogen/progestogen-induced breast cell proliferation in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

During the past few years serious concern has been raised about the safety of combined estrogen/progestogen hormone therapy, in particular about its effects on the breast. Several observations suggest that androgens may counteract the proliferative effects of estrogen and progestogen in the mammary gland. Thus, we aimed to study the effects of testosterone addition on breast cell proliferation during postmenopausal estrogen/progestogen therapy.

DESIGN

We conducted a 6-month prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. A total of 99 postmenopausal women were given continuous combined estradiol 2 mg/norethisterone acetate 1 mg and were equally randomly assigned to receive additional treatment with either a testosterone patch releasing 300 microg/24 hours or a placebo patch. Breast cells were collected by fine needle aspiration biopsy at baseline and after 6 months, and the main outcome measure was the percentage of proliferating breast cells positively stained by the Ki-67/MIB-1 antibody.

RESULTS

A total of 88 women, 47 receiving active treatment and 41 in the placebo group, completed the study. In the placebo group there was a more than fivefold increase (P<0.001) in total breast cell proliferation from baseline (median 1.1%) to 6 months (median 6.2%). During testosterone addition, no significant increase was recorded (1.6% vs 2.0%). The different effects of the two treatments were apparent in both epithelial and stromal cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of testosterone may counteract breast cell proliferation as induced by estrogen/progestogen therapy in postmenopausal women.

Breast response to menopausal hormone therapy--aspects on proliferation, apoptosis and mammographic density

Breast cancer is the major malignancy among women in the Western world. The breast is clearly a target organ for sex steroid hormones and hormonal treatments have been associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. The balance between proliferation and apoptosis is important for breast cell homeostasis. Mammographic breast density has been identified as a strong and independent risk factor for breast cancer. It seems clear that there is a difference between various hormonal treatments with regard to their effects on breast density and cell proliferation. Also, not all women respond similarly to the same treatment. Combined estrogen and progestogen therapy generally will enhance density and proliferation more than treatment with estrogen alone. Certain constitutional and hormonal factors appear to be predictive of breast reactivity. Older women with a low body mass index respond more strongly to treatment. Estrogen levels have a positive and androgens a negative association to increase in density and proliferation. A combination of increased proliferation and decreased apoptosis could be one mechanism to explain the excess risk of breast cancer during combined estrogen/progestogen treatment. Tibolone seems to have less impact on breast response than conventional hormone therapy. Efforts should be made to identify those women with an adverse response to treatment as well as therapeutic principles with the least possible influence on the breast.

Expression of sex steroid receptor subtypes in normal and malignant breast tissue - a pilot study in postmenopausal women

Female sex steroids are implied in breast cancer development. The estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptor subtypes may have different roles to modulate the cellular response. Paired samples of cancer and adjacent normal tissue were collected from postmenopausal women at surgery for ductal breast cancer. The expression of ERa, ERss, PRA and PRB was quantified by immunostaining and digitized image analysis. We found ERss to be significantly reduced in breast cancer tissue (35% vs 50%; p?=?0.001) and there was also a decrease of the ERss/ERa ratio. Among women using hormones at the time of diagnosis tumor tissue showed higher values for both PRB and PRA, as compared to women without such treatment. The results extend previous animal data to be valid also in women. There is evidence that loss of ERss expression may relate to estrogen dependent tumor progression. Increased PR expression could possibly relate to breast cancer risk during combined estrogen/progestogen treatment.

Breast Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy: Prevailing Recommendations and Contemporary Practices

In 1996, a National Cancer Institute conference was held in Bethesda,Maryland to define parameters for the practice of breast fine needle aspiration (BFNA). Representatives of the American Society of Cytopathology, Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology, American College of Radiology, American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Society of Surgical Oncology, American Academy of Family Physicians, College of American Pathologists, National Consortium of Breast Centers, International Academy of Cytology, American Society of Clinical Pathologists, American Cancer Society, American College of Surgeons, and American Society for Cytotechnology developed and reviewed recommendations. These guidelines were referred to as "The Uniform Approach to Breast Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy." This article reviews these recommendations and the contemporary evolution of the practice of BFNA since their original publication.

Estrogen receptor analysis for breast cancer: current issues and keys to increasing testing accuracy

The estrogen receptor (ER) is a regulator of cellular growth, proliferation, and differentiation. In addition to having prognostic value, ER is the most important biologic marker of therapeutic response in breast cancer. Some level of measurable ER protein is expressed in 70-80% of human breast. Immunohistochemistry is the current method of choice for ER assessment, and its predictive value has been shown to be superior to that of biochemically based assays. Although accurate ER protein assessment is critical for optimal treatment of patients with breast cancer, studies have demonstrated inter-laboratory variability in ER detection. False-negative results for tumors with low ER protein levels have been a subject of recent concern. Lack of standardization for immunohistochemistry between laboratories is thought to be the major reason for testing errors, although variability in scoring methods and reporting practices, which can affect results, also plays a role. In this article, we review studies addressing interlaboratory variability and recommend optimal testing techniques and reporting procedures for ER testing, with the goal of increasing interlaboratory standardization for ER analysis by immunohistochemistry. We additionally highlight recent biologic, molecular, and gene expression profiling data related to ER in breast cancer.