Reference values for left ventricular function in subjects under general anaesthesia and controlled ventilation assessed by two-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography

Assessment of Left Ventricular Dimensions by Transoesophageal Echocardiography in Patients During Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Normative values of left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic area and diameter (EDA and EDD) for intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) have not been established. We aimed to define the ranges of LV EDA and EDD for intraoperative TEE examinations in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search for studies reporting LV EDA and EDD in CABG patients was performed. Individual-level dataset from 333 anaesthetised and mechanically ventilated patients with preserved LV function (study population) were received from 8 studies. EDA and calculated EDD values in the study population were compared with summary mean EDD values obtained by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in 2 studies of 500 awake patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Further, the influence of prespecified factors on EDD was evaluated through a multivariate regression model.

RESULTS

LV EDA and EDD values measured by TEE in anaesthetised CABG patients were 16.7±4.7 cm2 and 4.6±0.6 cm, respectively. EDD values measured by TEE in anaesthetised patients were 10% to 13% less those measured by TTE in 2 studies of awake patients (p<0.001). Body surface area, age and fractional area change but not sex were factors that affected LV EDD.

CONCLUSION

LV EDD values measured by intraoperative TEE in anaesthetised and mechanically ventilated CABG patients were 10% to 13% less than those measured by TTE in awake CAD patients. This finding indicates that independent normative values specific for intraoperative TEE should be established for guiding intraoperative clinical decisions.

Intraoperative cardiac assessment with transesophageal echocardiography for decision-making in cardiac anesthesia

Transesophageal echocardiography is an invaluable hemodynamic monitoring modality. Extended and anatomically based evaluation of cardiac function with transesophageal echocardiography is essential to prompt and accurate decision-making in anesthetic management during cardiac surgery. Fractional shortening and fractional area changes are indices widely used to assess the global systolic performance of the left ventricle. Monitoring regional function using semi-quantitative scoring has been demonstrated to be a more sensitive indicator of myocardial ischemia. Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function should be performed in a systematic way, measuring transmitral flow, pulmonary venous flow, transmitral color M-mode flow propagation velocity, and mitral annulus tissue Doppler imaging. The unique anatomical features of the right ventricle make echocardiographic evaluation complicated and therefore less frequently employed. Right ventricular fractional area change, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, maximal systolic tricuspid annular velocity with tissue Doppler imaging, and myocardial performance index are indices successfully incorporated into intraoperative right ventricular assessment. Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction with systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve may develop after cardiac procedures. Transesophageal echocardiography plays a central role in prevention as well as diagnosis of systolic anterior motion. Transesophageal echocardiography is extremely useful not only for detecting and locating intracardiac air, but also for guiding and evaluating the procedures to remove air. Air is likely to persist in the right and left superior pulmonary vein, left ventricular apex, left atrium, right coronary sinus of Valsalva, and ascending aorta. Accurate evaluation of cardiac function depends on performing TEE examination properly and obtaining optimal images.

[Haemodynamic monitoring in the perioperative phase. Available systems, practical application and clinical data]

A regular hydration status and compensated vascular filling are targets of perioperative fluid and volume management and, in parallel, represent precautions for sufficient stroke volume and cardiac output to maintain tissue oxygenation. The physiological and pathophysiological effects of fluid and volume replacement mainly depend on the pharmacological properties of the solutions used, the magnitude of the applied volume as well as the timing of volume replacement during surgery. In the perioperative setting surgical stress induces physiological and hormonal adaptations of the body, which in conjunction with an increased permeability of the vascular endothelial layer influence fluid and volume management. The target of haemodynamic monitoring in the operation room is to collect data on haemodynamics and global oxygen transport, which enable the anaesthetist to estimate the volume status of the vascular system. Particularly in high risk patients this may improve fluid and volume therapy with respect to maintaining cardiac output. A goal-directed volume management aiming at preventing hypovolaemia may improve the outcome after surgery. The objective of this article is to review the monitoring devices that are currently used to assess haemodynamics and filling status in the perioperative setting. Methods and principles for measuring haemodynamic variables, the measured and calculated parameters as well as clinical benefits and shortcomings of each device are described. Furthermore, the results for monitoring devices from clinical studies of goal-directed fluid and volume therapy which have been published will be discussed.

The use and safety of transoesophageal echocardiography in the general ICU -- a minireview

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been evaluated predominantly in medical and cardiac surgical ICUs. This article reviews the pertinent literature and evaluates the impact of TEE in a general surgical ICU.

METHODS

Twenty studies on TEE in the ICU were evaluated for complications, indications, diagnostic, therapeutic, and surgical impact on patient management. Diagnostic impact was defined as identification of the underlying cardiovascular pathology, therapeutic impact as changes in patient management and surgical impact as indication for operative procedures. In addition, we reviewed the TEE reports and patient charts of 216 critically ill patients in a 16-bed multidisciplinary surgical ICU at our university hospital, who underwent a TEE for differential diagnosis of hemodynamic instability from July 1995 to December 1998 to assess the impact of TEE on patient management in a general surgical ICU.

RESULTS

The diagnostic, therapeutic and surgical impact in a total of 2,508 patients ranged from 44 to 99% (weighted mean 67.2%), 10-69% (36.0%), and 2-29% (14.1%), respectively. The complication rate was 2.6%, with no examination related mortality. In our series in a general surgical ICU, a diagnostic, therapeutic and surgical impact was inferred in 191 (88.4%), 148 (68.5%) and 12 (5.6%) patients, respectively. Adverse effects were observed in 5.6%.

CONCLUSION

TEE is safe, well-tolerated and useful in the management of critically ill patients. This applies as well for hemodynamically unstable patients in a general surgical ICU.