A detailed profile of pain in severe endometriosis

Objective:

To investigate the detailed nature of pain symptoms reported by women with endometriosis and those without current gynecological complaint.

Design:

Self-administered cross-sectional study was conducted using a structured questionnaire.

Setting:

Teaching hospital clinic, specialist gynecologist, and family practice patients; endometriosis community support group members; and university staff and students.

Subjects:

A total of 737 women returned completed surveys: women with endometriosis ( n = 529) and with no current gynecological complaint ( n = 208).

Intervention(s):

None.

Main outcome measure(s):

Demographics, experience of pain symptoms: frequency, severity, and characteristics.

Results:

All pain symptoms were significantly more common among women with endometriosis compared with controls. Women with endometriosis all reported experiencing dysmenorrhea to some degree ( N = 527, two missing), although the severity was “slight” for 5%. Dyspareunia was reported by 92% of women with endometriosis, most commonly during intercourse, rather than at the start or post-coital. The other pain symptoms experienced by women with endometriosis, in order of frequency, were lower back pain (93%), pain at ovulation (87%), pelvic pain other than during menses, ovulation, urination or intercourse (79%), dysuria (71%), and rectal pain (67%). The great majority of women with endometriosis reported multiple sources and types of pain. Among women with endometriosis there were clear associations between the severity of dysmenorrhea and the frequency of experiencing dyspareunia and other pain symptoms.

Conclusion:

Pain symptoms in women with endometriosis were generally much more extensive and complex than recognized by most clinicians.

A double-blind randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation for women with chronic pelvic pain

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation (LUNA) for chronic pelvic pain in women with endometriosis and women with no laparoscopic evidence of endometriosis.

DESIGN

A prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial (RCT).

SETTING

Single-centre, secondary-level gynaecology outpatient service and tertiary-level pelvic pain and endometriosis outpatient service in Auckland, New Zealand.

POPULATION

One hundred and twenty-three women undergoing laparoscopy for investigation and management of chronic pelvic pain, 56 with no laparoscopic evidence of endometriosis and 67 with endometriosis.

METHODS

Women were randomised from the two populations, firstly those with no evidence of endometriosis and secondly those undergoing laparoscopic surgical treatment for endometriosis, to receive LUNA or no LUNA. Participant and assessor blinding was employed. Follow up for pain outcomes was undertaken at 24 hours, 3 months and 12 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes in non-menstrual pelvic pain, dysmenorrhoea, deep dyspareunia and dyschezia were assessed primarily by whether there was a decrease in visual analogue score for these types of pain of 50% or more from baseline and additionally whether there was a significantly different change in median visual analogue score. The numbers requiring further surgery or starting a new medical treatment for pelvic pain and complications were also measured.

RESULTS

There was a significant reduction in dysmenorrhoea at 12 month follow up in women with chronic pelvic pain in the absence of endometriosis who underwent LUNA (median change in visual analogue scale (VAS) from baseline -4.8 versus-0.8 (P= 0.039), 42.1%versus 14.3% experiencing a successful treatment defined as a 50% or greater reduction in visual analogue pain scale for dysmenorrhoea (P= 0.045). There was no significant difference in non-menstrual pelvic pain, deep dyspareunia or dyschezia in women with no endometriosis undergoing LUNA versus no LUNA. The addition of LUNA to laparoscopic surgical treatment of endometriosis was not associated with a significant difference in any pain outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

LUNA is effective for dysmenorrhoea in the absence of endometriosis, although there is no evidence of effectiveness of LUNA for non-dysmenorrhoeic chronic pelvic pain or for any type of chronic pelvic pain related to endometriosis.