Recombinant factor VIIa versus aPCCs in haemophiliacs with inhibitors: treatment and cost considerations

Cost-utility analysis of immune tolerance induction therapy versus on-demand treatment with recombinant factor VII for hemophilia A with high titer inhibitors in Iran

Background

In developing countries, the treatment of hemophilia patients with inhibitors is presently the most challenging and serious issue in hemophilia management, direct costs of clotting factor concentrates accounting for >98% of the highest economic burden absorbed for the health care of patients in this setting. In the setting of chronic diseases, cost-utility analysis, which takes into account the beneficial effects of a given treatment/health care intervention in terms of health-related quality of life, is likely to be the most appropriate approach.

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy with plasma-derived factor VIII concentrates versus on-demand treatment with recombinant-activated FVIIa (rFVIIa) in hemophilia A with high titer inhibitors from an Iranian Ministry of Health perspective.

Methods

This study was based on the study of Knight et al, which evaluated the cost- effectiveness ratios of different treatments for hemophilia A with high-responding inhibitors. To adapt Knight et al’s results to the Iranian context, a few clinical parameters were varied, and cost data were replaced with the corresponding Iranian estimates of resource use. The time horizon of the analysis was 10 years. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed, varying the cost of the clotting factor, the drug dose, and the administration frequency, to test the robustness of the analysis.

Results

Comparison of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios between the three ITI protocols and the on-demand regimen with rFVIIa shows that all three ITI protocols dominate the on-demand regimen with rFVIIa. Between the ITI protocols the low-dose ITI protocol dominates both the Bonn ITI protocol and the Malmö ITI protocol and would be the preferred ITI protocol. All of the three ITI protocols dominate the on-demand strategy, as they have both a lower average lifetime cost and higher quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. The cost per QALY gained for the Bonn ITI protocol compared with the Malmö ITI protocol was $249,391.84. The cost per QALY gained for the Bonn ITI protocol compared with the low-dose ITI protocol was $842,307.69.

Conclusion

The results of data derived from our study suggest that the low-dose ITI protocol may be a less expensive and/or more cost-effective option compared with on-demand first-line treatment with rFVIIa.

Factor VIII inhibitor bypassing activity (FEIBA) - addressing safety issues

Bypassing therapy is usually necessary to control or prevent bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia A or B and high-titre inhibitors. Factor VIII inhibitor bypassing activity (FEIBA) has a long history of successful use in the acute, surgical and prophylactic treatment settings, but safety concerns have made some reluctant to administer this bypassing agent. A review of the literature and clinical trial data show that FEIBA has a low prevalence of thrombosis, a low prevalence of anamnesis that does not impact haemostatic efficacy and an excellent record of pathogen safety and clinical tolerability.

An overview of the history, clinical practice concerns, comparative studies and strategies to optimize therapy of bypassing agents

Despite significant advances in the treatment of haemophilia, including availability of recombinant coagulation factor replacement products and the use of prophylactic infusion regimens, the segment of haemophilic patients who develop inhibitory antibodies remain at higher risk for morbidity and mortality associated with recurrent or uncontrolled bleeding events. Bypassing agents represent the mainstay of treatment and prevention of bleeding. The most commonly used of the currently available therapeutic agents are a plasma-based therapy, factor eight inhibitor bypassing activity, vapour heated, and a recombinant therapy, NovoSeven (recombinant activated factor VIIa). A substantial body of literature exists to document efficacy and adverse event profiles for these two products. There is, however, a paucity of data arising from adequately powered prospective trials to determine optimal treatment and dosing in various clinical situations. Certain clinical circumstances, patient profiles, individual responses, or provider predilection may lead to preferential use of one of these products over the other; however, the continued presence of both agents in the therapeutic armamentarium remains critically important to this fragile population. The historical use, clinical practice concerns, published comparative studies and methods for optimization of these two bypassing agents are reviewed.

Health economic review of recombinant activated factor VII for treatment of bleeding episodes in hemophilia patients with inhibitors

Severe hemophilia with inhibitors is a rare disease with substantial clinical, humanistic and economic consequences. This review provides an overview of the role of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) versus plasma-derived bypassing agents for hemophilia with inhibitors and summarizes the 13 formal economic analyses (6 burden of illness and 7 comparative studies) that have been published in this indication. The findings suggest that the economic impact of rFVIIa has occurred primarily during hospitalization to manage major bleeding episodes and to allow for elective orthopedic surgeries that would not have been attempted prior to rFVIIa. Comparative analyses for on-demand treatment suggest that the total cost of treating a bleeding episode with rFVIIa may be lower than with plasma-based agents due to faster bleeding resolution, higher initial efficacy rates and avoidance of second and third lines of treatment.

Current opinion on inhibitor treatment options

Inhibitor development in patients with hemophilia complicates hemostatic management. Currently, high doses of factor concentrates are used to override low-titer, low-responding inhibitors during acute bleeding episodes. Bypassing agents, such as the activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC), Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypassing Activity, Anti-Inhibitor Coagulant Complex, Vapor Heated (FEIBA; Baxter AG, Vienna, Austria), and activated recombinant factor VII (rFVIIa; NovoSeven, Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark), are commonly used to treat acute bleeding episodes in patients with high-titer, high-responding inhibitors, whereas long-term therapeutic options include inhibitor eradication using immune tolerance induction. Neither FEIBA nor rFVIIa can be monitored with a laboratory assay, making it difficult to establish optimal dosages. Comparative studies evaluating the efficacy of FEIBA and rFVIIa for bleed control have been sparse, prompting investigators to initiate crossover comparison studies to assess the efficacy and cost of aPCC and rFVIIa in the treatment of joint hemorrhages. Both the cost of therapy and the outcome of therapy will need to be considered in the development of future hemostatic agents for patients with inhibitors.

A cost minimization model for the treatment of minor bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia A and high-titre inhibitors

Treatment of acute bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitory antibodies to factor VIII (FVIII) most often involves the use of bypassing haemostatic agents, such as activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC) or recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa). We constructed a cost minimization model to compare the costs of initial treatment with aPCC vs. rFVIIa in the home treatment of minor bleeding episodes. We developed a clinical scenario describing such a case and presented it to a panel of US haemophilia specialists. For each product class, we asked panellists to provide dosing regimens required to achieve complete resolution of a minor haemarthrosis in a child with high-titre inhibitors, and for the probabilities of success at two time points (8-12 and 24 h). Consensus among the panellists was refined by a second round of the process, and the median values resulting were used as inputs to a decision analysis model. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine threshold values for key variables. The base case model found that initial treatment with aPCC would result in a mean cost per episode of 21 000 dollars, compared with 33 400 dollars for initial treatment with rFVIIa. Sensitivity analyses over a range of clinically plausible values for cost, dosing, and efficacy did not change the selection of aPCC as the dominant strategy.

Factors affecting choice of hemostatic agent for the hemophilia patient with an inhibitor antibody

Achieving adequate hemostasis in patients with hemophilia and high-titer inhibitor antibodies remains a challenge despite the development of plasma-derived and recombinant therapies to bypass the inhibitory effect. A group of hemophilia treaters met to examine the factors that influence physician choices among the very costly and cumbersome available therapies. Specific knowledge deficits in need of prospective research were identified with respect to the rational treatment of inhibitor patients.

Prevention of bleeds in hemophilia patients with inhibitors: emerging data and clinical direction

In patients with hemophilia, the development of high-responding inhibitors to factor VIII prevents adequate replacement therapy and results in increased risk of serious bleeding episodes, poor control of joint bleeding, and progressive, debilitating joint disease. Immune tolerance therapy can eradicate inhibitors, but it is not uniformly successful. Emerging data suggest that prophylaxis using activated prothrombin complex concentrates may be effective and safe in reducing the incidence of joint bleeding during immune tolerance therapy and for patients in whom immune tolerance induction fails. However, only controlled clinical trials will ultimately demonstrate whether prophylaxis can prevent joint bleeding and damage, and improve quality of life in patients with inhibitors.

Inhibitors in hemophilia A

Factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy remains the mainstay in hemophilia A care. The major complication of replacement therapy is formation of antibodies, which inhibit FVIII activity, thus dramatically reducing treatment efficiency. The present review summarizes the accumulated knowledge on epitopes of FVIII inhibitors and mechanisms of their inhibitory effects. FVIII inhibitors most frequently target the A2, C2 and A3 domains of FVIII and interfere with important interactions of FVIII at various stages of its functional pathway; a class of FVIII inhibitors inactivates FVIII by proteolysis. We discuss therapeutic approaches currently used for treatment of hemophilia A patients with inhibitors and analyze the factors that influence the outcome. The choice between options should depend on the level of inhibitors and consideration of efficacy, safety, and availability of particular regimens. Advances of basic science open avenues for alternative targeted, specific and long-lasting treatments, such as the use of peptide decoys for blocking FVIII inhibitors, bypassing them with human/porcine FVIII hybrids, neutralizing FVIII-reactive CD4 T cells with anti-clonotypic antibodies, or inducing immune tolerance to FVIII with the use of universal CD4 epitopes or by genetic approaches.

Unexpected bleeding disorders

Patients with known coagulation deficiencies, either congenital or acquired, may bleed spontaneously with trauma or with surgical intervention. In contrast, however, are the unchallenged patients who bleed in a variety of clinical settings that demand rapid diagnosis so that appropriate therapy can be instituted. In the first section Dr. Louis M. Aledort demonstrates a series of vignettes of actual cases who presented with unexpected bleeding or a screening laboratory abnormality prior to a needed surgical intervention. Settings include dental, oral surgical, obstetrical, surgical and gynecological. The differential diagnoses of these cases are discussed. In the second section Dr. David Green also uses vignettes to demonstrate how the laboratory is used to differentiate the various clinical entities. The choice and priority of required tests indicated by the settings, history, site and type of bleeding, and the syllogisms used to define the abnormality are stressed. In the third section, Dr. Jerome Teitel reviews in detail the therapeutic armamentarium available to the clinician and presents algorithms for the management of these bleeding disorders.