Advances in the therapy of von Willebrand disease

Von Willebrand factor/factor VIII concentrates in the treatment of von Willebrand disease

Therapy for von Willebrand disease (VWD) aims to restore the hemostatic function conferred by von Willebrand factor (VWF), which facilitates platelet adhesion and aggregation, and serves to increase potentially low coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) in plasma. In patients unresponsive to desmopressin (DDAVP), the preferred treatment is with plasma-derived VWF-containing FVIII concentrates. Only a few of the available VWF/FVIII concentrates have been licensed for use in VWD based on prospective studies. The efficacy of VWF/FVIII concentrates depends on the content and quality of VWF and FVIII. Several studies have demonstrated the variability of the VWF contents, as well as the differences in the VWF multimer patterns (including the high molecular weight VWF multimers that are most effective in restoring hemostasis), among these concentrates. Treating physicians should be aware of these disparities and the potential clinical implications for patients with different VWD subtypes. Dosing has traditionally been calculated based on the FVIII content of the products, although dosing based on VWF functional activity [e.g., VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo)] addresses the primary protein deficiency in VWD patients. Several clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of concentrates dosed according to VWF:RCo. Dosing is generally consistent across VWD subtypes, although patients with severe phenotypes or undergoing major procedures may require more infusions or longer treatment duration. Other considerations for the use of VWF-containing concentrates include laboratory monitoring of efficacy and safety issues such as thrombosis risk and thromboprophylaxis.

Coagulation Defects

The present understanding of the coagulation process emphasizes the final common pathway and the proteolytic systems that result in the degradation of formed clots and the prevention of unwanted clot formations, as well as a variety of defense systems that include tissue repair, autoimmune processes, arteriosclerosis, tumor growth, the spread of metastases, and defense systems against micro-organisms. This article discusses diagnosis and management of some of the most common bleeding disorders. The goals are to provide a simple guide on how best to manage patients afflicted with congenital or acquired clotting abnormalities during the perioperative period, present a brief overview of the methods of testing and monitoring the coagulation defects, and discuss the appropriate pharmacologic or blood component therapies for each disease.

von Willebrand disease R1374C: type 2A or 2M? A challenge to the revised classification. High frequency in the northwest of Spain (Galicia)

Patients initially diagnosed with type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) have been reclassified as type 2 after a more exhaustive analysis in several studies. Our study's objectives were (1) to reanalyze patients that were previously diagnosed as type 1 to achieve a more accurate diagnosis and (2) to compare the von Willebrand factor (VWF) ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo) and the VWF collagen binding assay (VWF:CB) in order to evaluate the possibility of replacing the former assay with the latter in the diagnosis of VWD. Twenty-one patients from two large unrelated families and 104 normal controls were studied. VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, FVIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C), bleeding time (BT), PFA(100), and multimeric analysis of VWF were tested. Genetic analysis by sequencing exon 28 on the VWF gene was also carried out. Patients presented lower levels of VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo, a dissociation between VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag, and the presence of all sizes of multimers in plasma VWF. The results for VWF:CB varied depending on the type of collagen used. The genetic analysis showed that the mutation R1374C is responsible for type 2M VWD. A high frequency of the R1374C mutation is observed in northwestern Spain (Galicia). Some types of 2M VWD are misdiagnosed as type 1 VWD. The VWF:CB (with type I collagen) assay was unable to discriminate defective platelet binding of the R1374C VWF. This confirms that VWF:CB cannot substitute for VWF:RCo, and both should be tested when diagnosing VWD.

Haemostatic management of intraoral bleeding in patients with von Willebrand disease

OBJECTIVES

To develop plans for the haemostatic management of intraoral bleeding in patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Thirty-seven episodes of haemostatic management of intraoral bleeding in 19 VWD patients were analysed retrospectively based on the medical records.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

When performing tooth extractions in patients with type 1 or 2A VWD [responsive to 1-deamino-8-D-arginine-vasopressin (DDAVP)], 0.35-0.4 microg kg(-1) of DDAVP should be administered intravenously at three times. In patients with type 2A VWD (unresponsive to DDAVP) or patients with type 2B or 2N VWD, 50-90 U [as ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCof)] kg(-1) of a factor VIII concentrate containing von Willebrand factor (FVIII/VWF concentrate) should be administered twice in routine extractions, and four to six times in surgical extractions. Gingival bleeding related to primary teeth can be mostly managed by pressure haemostasis alone. However, when treating gingival bleeding caused by marginal periodontitis, it is often necessary to administer 0.4 microg kg(-1) of DDAVP or 40-70 U (as VWF:RCof) kg(-1) of a FVIII/VWF concentrate. As local haemostasis is difficult to achieve in bleeding from the tongue or labial or mandibular haematoma, it is necessary to administer 0.4 microg kg(-1) of DDAVP or 60-80 U (as VWF:RCof) kg(-1) of a FVIII/VWF concentrate. In addition, oral administration of 20 mg kg(-1) day(-1) of tranexamic acid should be combined with the regimens described above.

Content and functional activity of von Willebrand factor in apheresis plasma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Von Willebrand Factor (VWF) is a complex high-molecular-weight (HMW) plasma glycoprotein playing a critical role in primary and secondary haemostasis. Owing to its multimeric structure and sensitivity to proteolysis, VWF can be used as a marker of the impact of collection procedures on the characteristics of plasma for transfusion and for fractionation. We studied VWF content, functional activity and HMW multimers in plasmas collected by five different automated apheresis collection procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five series of 30 plasma units were obtained from volunteer donors at two collection sites using Haemonetics PCS2 machines with Revision (Rev) F, Rev G, high-separation core (HSC), or filter core (FC) procedures, or Baxter-Fenwall Autopheresis-C (Auto-C). VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) activity and HMW multimers were first determined in 10 randomly selected plasma donations collected with Rev G, HSC, FC and Auto-C procedures. Then, the same analyses and the collagen binding (VWF:CB) activity were determined in the pools of 30 donations from each of the five procedures and compared with two normal plasma pools (NPP1 and NPP2). A reference plasma (RP) was used to calibrate each assay.

RESULTS

There were a greater number of group O individuals in the Rev F, Rev G and FC donors than in the HSC and Auto-C donors. The mean VWF:Ag level was > 100 IU/dl, VWF:RCo activity was > 90 U/dl, the VWF:RCo/Ag ratio was close to 1, and the percentage of 11-15 mers was above 100% of RP in the 10 individual plasma units from Rev G, HSC, FC, and Auto-C and in their respective pools. The mean percentage of multimers > 15 mers, relative to RP, was significantly less in Rev G plasmas (48 +/- 17%; range 32-91%), compared with Auto-C, HSC and FC plasmas (P = 0.0211; 0.0257; and 0.0376, respectively). The VWF:CB activity of the 30-donation pools was 61 and 60 U/dl in Auto C and HSC, 50 U/dl in Rev F and FC, and 43 U/dl in the Rev G pool. The VWF:CB/Ag ratio was 0.54 (Auto-C), 0.49 (HSC), 0.46 (Rev F), 0.45 (FC) and 0.37 (Rev G), compared with 0.81and 0.92 in NPPs. The percentage of VWF multimers of 11-15 mers in apheresis plasma and NPP was normal. VWF multimers > 15 mers ranged from 38 to 64% of that of RP plasma, and was 111 and 112% in NPPs.

CONCLUSIONS

The VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo activity and 11-15 mer VWF multimers were well preserved in all plasma units from each of the five apheresis procedures. The VWF:CB activity and the percentage of multimers > 15 mers in apheresis plasma was less than in normal plasma pools and differed slightly among procedures.