Role of the B domain in proteolytic inactivation of activated coagulation factor VIII by activated protein C and activated factor X

Hereditary deficiency of factor VIII (FVIII), haemophilia A, is treated by plasma-derived FVIII (pd-FVIII) or recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) infusions. B-domain-deleted FVIII (BDD-rFVIII), although generally safe and effective, was less effective than pd-FVIII in prophylaxis -- evidenced by a 2.5-fold higher bleeding incidence. Assessment of BDD-rFVIII activity in chromogenic and one-stage clotting assays gives up to 50% difference in activity values. As earlier studies demonstrated identical activation and cofactor activity of BDD-rFVIII and pd-FVIII, we decided to study susceptibility of thrombin-activated pd-FVIII, full-length rFVIII and BDD-rFVIII to proteolytic inactivation by activated protein C (APC) and activated factor X (FXa) in a purified system. Proteolysis was monitored by Western blot using monoclonal antibodies C5 and R8B12 specific for the A1 and A2 domains, respectively. Inactivation was monitored by measuring the residual cofactor activity of FVIII forms in a one-stage clotting assay. Proteolysis of A1 and A2 domains of activated BDD-rFVIII proceeded 11 or 13 times faster than that of pd-FVIII or full-length rFVIII. Inactivation of activated BDD-rFVIII was two to three times faster by APC and five to six times faster by FXa. We suggest that differences in proteolytic inactivation may contribute to differences between BDD-rFVIII and pd-FVIII in assaying and in clinical use.

A postmarketing surveillance study of the safety and efficacy of ReFactoR (St Louis-derived active substance) in patients with haemophilia A

This clinical trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of ReFacto (St Louis-derived active substance) in patients with severe or moderately severe haemophilia A over a period of 6 months or 50 exposure days (EDs), whichever occurred first. Sixty patients, 58 previously treated and two previously untreated, were enrolled into this study. This was an open-label, multicentre, postmarketing surveillance study in which patients received prophylaxis or on-demand treatment as determined by their doctor. Surgical prophylaxis was evaluated in seven patients requiring elective surgery. Thirty-two patients aged <1 to 66 years (median 19.5) received prophylaxis and 28 patients, aged 1-71 years (median 33.5), received on-demand treatment. The majority of patients had severe haemophilia A (FVIII:C < 2%): 84.4% in the prophylaxis group and 85.7% in the on-demand group. Prophylaxis with ReFacto was associated with a median of 6.7 bleeds per year (range: 0-37). The investigator's assessment of final outcome for prophylactic treatment was excellent or effective for 93.1% of patients. ReFacto resolved 92.8% of bleeds with one or two infusions. The investigator's assessment was excellent or good for 98.2% of bleeds treated with ReFacto. Haemostasis was achieved for all seven surgical cases and ReFacto gave an excellent or good response for each. The nature and incidence of adverse events was as expected and no new safety concerns emerged. One previously treated patient (PTP) developed a high-titre inhibitor (maximum 75 BU) and one minimally treated patient (MTP) developed a low-titre inhibitor while on the study but eventually achieved high titres (maximum 30 BU) after immune tolerance therapy was initiated with a plasma-derived FVIII product. One previously untreated patient (PUP) developed a transient low-titre inhibitor (0.4 BU). Other serious adverse events (SAEs) were unrelated to study treatment. There were no allergic events. The results of this study are consistent with the previously published ReFacto pivotal studies.

B-domain deleted recombinant factor VIII preparations are bioequivalent to a monoclonal antibody purified plasma-derived factor VIII concentrate: a randomized, three-way crossover study

BACKGROUND

Deletion of the B-domain of recombinant blood coagulation factor VIII (BDDrFVIII) increases the manufacturing yield of the product but does not impair in vitro or in vivo functionality. BDDrFVIII (ReFacto) has been developed with the additional benefit of being formulated without human albumin.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this three-way crossover-design study was to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of two BDDrFVIII formulations (one reconstituted with 5 mL of sterile water, the other reconstituted with 4 mL sodium chloride 0.9% USP) with those of a plasma-derived, full-length FVIII preparation (Hemofil M) in patients with haemophilia A to determine bioequivalence.

METHODS

A series of blood samples were collected over a period of 48 h after i.v. administration of each of the FVIII preparations. Plasma FVIII activity was determined using a validated chromogenic substrate assay. Plasma FVIII activity vs. time curves was characterized for a standard set of PK parameter estimates. Two parameter estimates, the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under plasma concentration vs. time curves (AUCs), were used to evaluate bioequivalence. The two preparations were considered bioequivalent if the 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of geometric means for Cmax and AUCs fell within the bioequivalence window of 80% to 125%.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Results show that each BDDrFVIII formulation is bioequivalent to Hemofil M and the two formulations of BDDrFVIII are bioequivalent to each other.

Meta-analytic evidence of increased breakthrough bleeding during prophylaxis with B-domain deleted factor VIII

A recent meta-analysis of 13 observational studies suggested reduced haemostatic efficacy during prophylaxis and shortened half-life of B-domain deleted factor VIII (BDD-rFVIII) as compared with full-length factor VIII (FL-FVIII). The meta-analysis included a multivariate model that took both dose and age into account. In addition, several assumptions and interpretations were required in order to conduct the meta-analysis. It is important to test the impact of such assumptions and interpretations through sensitivity analysis. In the published meta-analysis, results of several sensitivity analyses were described involving the effect of study design; heterogeneity of subjects in some studies; type of assay used for half-life determinations; and year of publication. In two subsequent brief reports, additional sensitivity analyses addressed choice of median-to-mean conversion factor over a wide range of scenarios and use of age at start of prophylaxis vs mean age during prophylaxis in the multivariate model. A recognized inherent difficulty in the meta-analysis of multiple published reports from similar studies is the possibility of some subject or data overlap. Therefore, the present communication details further sensitivity analyses encompassing assumptions regarding the possibility of subject duplication in a subgroup of subjects from one study and possible duplication of pharmacokinetic data from two smaller studies within the reports of two larger studies. All the sensitivity analyses support the main conclusions of the meta-analysis, namely, that BDD-rFVIII substantially increases the risk of breakthrough bleeding during prophylaxis, possibly at least partly because of shorter half-life than that of FL-FVIII.