CD10 and calretinin staining of endocervical glandular lesions, endocervical stroma and endometrioid adenocarcinomas of the uterine corpus: CD10 positivity is characteristic of, but not specific for, mesonephric lesions and is not specific for endometrial stroma

Comprehensive Immunohistochemical Analysis of Mesonephric Marker Expression in Low-grade Endometrial Endometrioid Carcinoma

Immunohistochemical markers shown to be useful in identifying/confirming mesonephric/mesonephric-like differentiation (MLD markers) include thyroid transcription factor (TTF1), GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3), and cluster of differentiation 10 (CD10). Only a few studies have examined the expression levels of MLD markers in endometrial endometrioid carcinomas (EECs). This study aimed to analyze the frequency and pattern of MLD marker expression in low-grade EECs. We performed immunostaining for the detection of TTF1, GATA3, and CD10 expression in 50 low-grade EEC tissue samples and evaluated their staining proportion and intensity. Nine tumors (18.0%) expressed at least one MLD marker in varying proportions and intensities, and 2 of these tumors were positive for 2 MLD markers (TTF1/GATA3 and GATA3/CD10, respectively). Three (6.0%) tumors showed moderate-to-strong nuclear TTF1 immunoreactivity in ≤5% of the tumor cells. Five tumors (10.0%) had at least moderate nuclear GATA3 staining, and three of them displayed a staining proportion of ≥15%. Three tumors (6.0%) were focal (mean proportion, 15%) but strongly positive for CD10. Our findings indicate that a subset of EEC can express one or more MLD markers with varying staining proportions and intensities. Given that a diagnosis of uterine mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma should be established based on a combination of characteristic histologic features, unique immunophenotypes, and confirmed molecular findings, pathologists should not exclude EEC based only on the presence of focal immunoreactivity for MLD markers. Awareness of the atypical expression patterns of MLD markers in EEC helps pathologists avoid misdiagnosing EEC as a uterine mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma.

An unusual case of carcinoma with mesonephric-like features with a spindle cell component diagnosed on the Pap test of the uterine cervix: Cytomorphologic and immunophenotypic features and diagnostic pitfalls

Mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas (MLA) are rare neoplasms arising in the cervix, endometrium, and ovary. In contrast to mesonephric carcinomas (MC), mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas are not associated with mesonephric remnants. Both entities have a similar appearance with regards to varying histomorphology patterns, including glandular, tubular, spindled, solid, and papillary, and have a specific immunophenotype and molecular features. We present a case of a 54-year-old HPV-negative woman with a Pap test that exhibits high-grade malignancy. The cell block displayed malignant cells with positive stains for PAX8, GATA3, and TTF1 by immunohistochemistry. The diagnosis of adenocarcinoma with mesonephric like features was rendered. MLA can be challenging on the small specimens and often misinterpreted as other endometrial neoplasms. Furthermore, the accurate diagnosis carries a well-described risk of aggressive clinical behavior.

Mesonephric-like Endometrial Carcinoma: Results From Immunohistochemical Screening of 300 Endometrial Carcinomas and Carcinosarcomas for This Often Overlooked and Potentially Aggressive Entity

Mesonephric-like endometrial carcinoma is a rare but frequently misclassified and aggressive malignancy. KRAS mutations, limited estrogen receptor (ER) expression, and TTF-1, GATA3, and luminal CD10 expression are described in these tumors, but an immunohistochemistry-based screening approach has not been studied. We assessed 300 endometrial carcinomas/carcinosarcomas to ascertain the specificity of TTF-1/GATA3/luminal CD10 expression with or without ER staining for this diagnosis. Next-generation sequencing and morphologic review were performed on screen-positive cases. In all, 3% (9/300) were TTF-1+; 2 coexpressed GATA3. No cases expressed luminal CD10 or GATA3 in isolation. Two TTF-1+/ER- cases, one of which was also GATA3+, were reclassified as mesonephric-like based on morphology and molecular results (KRAS mutations without mismatch repair deficiency, TP53 mutations, or PTEN mutations): these represented 0.7% of all cases (2/300). The reclassified cases were originally diagnosed as grade 1 and 2 endometrioid carcinoma, and the latter had pulmonary metastases and pelvic recurrences. Six TTF-1+ cases retained their original serous (3) and endometrioid (3) diagnoses; 1 was reclassified as dedifferentiated. All had negative or low ER. KRAS mutations were identified in 4 TTF-1+ non-mesonephric-like cases, including 1 serous and 1 grade 3 endometrioid with p53 abnormalities, 1 mismatch repair-deficient endometrioid with a complex molecular profile, and 1 endometrioid with mucinous differentiation. These findings suggest that TTF-1 and ER are good first-line screens for mesonephric-like carcinoma, but caution that a TTF-1+/ER- immunoprofile is not specific, even in the setting of KRAS mutations. A final diagnosis of mesonephric-like carcinoma requires integration of morphologic and immunohistochemical features, with molecular support when relevant.

Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinoma of the Female Genital Tract: From Morphologic Observations to a Well-characterized Carcinoma With Aggressive Clinical Behavior

Mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (MLA) was introduced as a new tumor type in the endometrium and the ovary in the 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification. This is a rare recently described (2016) and clinically aggressive carcinoma with a propensity for distant spread, especially to the lungs. MLA has a characteristic morphology and immunophenotype (hormone receptor negative; TTF1 and/or GATA3 positive). These neoplasms are commonly associated with KRAS and PIK3CA mutations and in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) molecular classification of endometrial carcinomas fall into the copy number low/no specific molecular profile category. Although they show significant morphological, immunophenotypic and molecular overlap with cervical mesonephric adenocarcinomas, there are other parameters which suggest a Mullerian origin and, as such, the term MLA seems apt. MLA can be added to the list of endometriosis-associated ovarian neoplasms. In this paper, I outline the series of events which lead to the first description of MLA and review the subsequent literature on this tumor type which has expanded on the morphologic features and immunophenotype, discovered the molecular underpinnings and elucidated the clinical behavior. The discovery of MLA represents an example of "new" entities still to this day being discovered through careful morphologic observations and referral of cases for specialist opinion.

The complex and often confusing history, histology and histogenesis of mesonephric, STK11 adnexal tumour and mesonephric-like neoplasms of the upper female genital tract (including broad ligament)

Mesonephric lesions in the female genital tract are uncommon, with those arising from the upper tract being much less frequent than those developing in the lower tract (mesonephric hyperplasia and carcinoma). The most common upper tract lesions include rete cyst/cystadenoma and female adnexal tumour of Wolffian origin (FATWO). The integration of morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular studies on FATWOs has enabled recognition of a novel entity, the STK11 adnexal tumour, which is often associated with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (~50%) and frequently has a salivary gland morphology but an unknown origin. Similarly, 'mesonephric-like' adenocarcinoma, an entity with striking similarities to mesonephric carcinoma but currently favoured to be of Müllerian derivation based on its association with other Müllerian tumours and molecular findings, has also been recently described, and may histologically mimic both FATWOs and STK11 adnexal tumours. In this review, we provide a historical overview of upper female genital tract mesonephric proliferations and discuss mesonephric lesions, STK11 adnexal tumour, mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma, and mimickers, the most common being endometrioid carcinoma.

Cervical stromal involvement by endometrial 'hyperplasia': a previously unreported phenomenon with recommendations to report as stage II endometrial carcinoma

A subtle 'burrowing' pattern of cervical stromal involvement by low-grade endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterine corpus is described in the literature. We report a small case series in which this pattern of cervical stromal involvement, warranting a diagnosis of endometrioid adenocarcinoma in the cervix, occurred in association with sometimes subtle endometrioid proliferations within the endometrium which fall short of the criteria for endometrioid adenocarcinoma and are in keeping with atypical hyperplasia or hyperplasia without atypia. In reporting this phenomenon, which has not been described previously, we highlight the importance of immunohistochemistry in the differential diagnosis, particularly in the exclusion of primary cervical glandular lesions, including those of mesonephric type. We discuss the differential with primary endometrioid adenocarcinoma (including minimal deviation type) of the cervix and other lesions and stress the importance of sampling the endometrium and lower uterine segment in their entirety in order to exclude an atypical hyperplasia or an adenocarcinoma in these locations. Although the pathogenesis of the cervical lesion we report is controversial, we believe that it is most likely a result of spread from the endometrium and results in the unusual occurrence of the malignant nature of the lesion being only apparent in the secondary rather than the primary lesion. We provide recommendations for reporting such cases and recommend designating them as stage II endometrial carcinoma, although the prognostic and management implications of such cases will only be clear once further cases with follow-up are reported.

Tumor Typing of Endocervical Adenocarcinoma: Contemporary Review and Recommendations From the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists

The incidence of endocervical adenocarcinoma, the second most common cervical cancer in the world, has been on the rise. While most cervical cancers are squamous cell carcinomas and associated with high-risk oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV), approximately 15% of endocervical adenocarcinomas, which now represent about one quarter of all cervical cancers, are HPV-independent. In this review, we will focus on the shortcomings of historical histologic classification systems of female genital tract tumors as they pertain to endocervical adenocarcinomas, and we will highlight the advantages of the new International Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Criteria and Classification system, which forms the basis for the WHO 2020 classification. We will cover the various histologic types, subtypes, and variants of endocervical adenocarcinoma with regard to morphology, immunophenotype, molecular genetics, HPV status and differential diagnosis, and we will provide International Society of Gynecological Pathologists recommendations for diagnosing these tumors.

Incidental mesonephric remnant hyperplasia of the jejunal mesentery: A diagnostic challenge

Mesonephric remnants are embryonic vestiges of the mesonephric (Wolffian) ducts which regress during normal development. These remnants have been uncommonly reported in the female and male reproductive tract as a spectrum of morphologic lesions that can be misdiagnosed as carcinoma. One case of mesonephric remnant hyperplasia of the jejunal mesentery incidentally found in a 47-year-old man is herein reported. This is the first description of mesonephric hyperplasia arisen in the mesentery. The presence of ducts, tubules, and cysts lined by bland, epithelial, cuboidal cells with scant cytoplasm, and diffuse pseudoinfiltrative growth pattern can raise the possibility of neoplasia. Immunohistochemically, mesonephric epithelia have a characteristic staining. CD10 highlights the apical-luminal aspect of the cells. Besides, intense reactivity is showed for high-molecular-weight cytokeratin (CK), CK7, bcl2, and vimentin. The main differential diagnosis includes mesothelial hyperplasia, epithelial mesothelioma, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, and infiltration due to acinar adenocarcinoma of the prostate. However, a detailed microscopic study with the aid of immunohistochemistry helps separate mesonephric remnants from malignant processes. The mesonephric hyperplasia of the mesentery we have reported adds to the spectrum of mesonephric remnants a new location. Familiarity with this lesion is indispensable to avoid overdiagnosis.

Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix: Immunohistochemical Biomarker Expression and Diagnostic Performance

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) improves the diagnosis of cervical adenocarcinoma but is not adequately studied. The performance of 16 antibodies previously reported as potentially discriminating between some histotypes was investigated in 184 tumors comprised of 12 histotype groups collapsed into 3 categories [47 adenocarcinomas in situ (AIS), 121 probable human papillomavirus-dependent adenocarcinomas (HPVD), and 16 of probable independence (HPVI)]. IHC sections from 5 tissue microarrays were scanned, and 3 pathologists independently reviewed images to assess staining percentages and intensities. Biomarker expression was based on published positive and negative cutoffs and agreement between any 2 pathologists. Differences between the 3 categories in the hierarchical ranking of biomarker positivity were analyzed by Random Forest classification, and between select groups by Unsupervised Hierarchical Clustering. Important category discriminants were combined in logistic regression models and the area under the curve (AUC) computed. Potential group discriminants were terminal cluster biomarkers with a 50% or more difference in positivity. Strong associations occurred between the lower expression of carcinoembryonic antigen and stromal actin in AIS compared with HPVD [AUC=0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.59-0.80] and in the higher expression of p16 and estrogen receptor in comparison to HPVI (AUC=0.86, 95% CI, 0.73-0.98), and between the higher expression of p16, carcinoembryonic antigen and estrogen receptor in HPVD compared with HPVI (AUC=0.88, 95% CI, 0.77-0.99). Between select groups, 9 biomarkers emerged as potential discriminants. Select IHC biomarkers can discriminate AIS from invasive adenocarcinomas, and invasive adenocarcinomas stratified by human papillomavirus dependency from each other. Independent replication in larger studies is needed, and to confirm discriminants of histotype groups.

Uncommon Cervical Lesions: A Review and Discussion of the Differential Diagnosis

CONTEXT.—

While the vast majority of cervical tumors consist of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma, a subset of rare tumor types, frequently unrelated to HPV, does occur in this location. These tumors vary widely in prognostic and therapeutic implications, and accurate recognition is crucial to providing appropriate treatment. Some are benign or portend a favorable prognosis (adenoid basal carcinoma, ectopic prostate tissue), while others are frankly malignant lesions with a less favorable prognosis (adenoid cystic carcinoma, HPV-negative endocervical adenocarcinoma, mesonephric adenocarcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, small cell carcinoma, and adenosquamous carcinoma).

OBJECTIVE.—

To review the morphologic features of uncommon cervical lesions, the utility of immunohistochemistry for distinction between these entities, and the clinical and prognostic implications of accurate diagnosis.

DATA SOURCES.—

University of Michigan cases and review of the pertinent literature regarding the entities described.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Key morphologic and immunohistochemical features detailed herein will allow for the accurate distinction between these uncommon cervical lesions. Morphology is most useful in discriminating between the entities, as there is frequent immunohistochemical overlap between them; however, in rare instances immunohistochemistry can be useful in resolving the diagnosis.

Ovarian Combined Low-grade Serous and Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinoma: Further Evidence for A Mullerian Origin of Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinoma

Mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas are rare neoplasms occurring in the uterine corpus and ovary which bear a close morphologic resemblance to cervical mesonephric adenocarcinomas. They also have a similar immunophenotype and harbor similar molecular abnormalities to mesonephric adenocarcinomas and it is debated whether they are truly of mesonephric origin or represent Mullerian neoplasms closely mimicking mesonephric adenocarcinomas. We report an unusual case with bilateral ovarian serous borderline tumors and extraovarian low-grade serous carcinoma (invasive implants). In one ovary, there was a component of mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma. The immunophenotypes of the serous and the mesonephric-like components were distinct and as expected for the individual tumor types (serous component diffusely positive with WT1 and estrogen receptor and negative with GATA3, TTF1 and CD10; mesonephric-like component WT1 and estrogen receptor negative and GATA3, TTF1, and CD10 positive; both components diffusely positive with PAX8 and exhibiting "wild-type" p53 immunoreactivity). In all components (bilateral serous borderline tumors, low-grade serous carcinoma and mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma), an identical KRAS mutation was detected (NM_004985.4): c.35G>A, p.(G12D) proving a clonal association between the serous and mesonephric-like components and excluding a collision neoplasm. This represents the second reported case of a combined ovarian low-grade serous tumor and mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma; in the previously reported case, an identical NRAS mutation was present in both components. These 2 cases provide evidence that ovarian mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas have, at least in some cases, a Mullerian origin and differentiate along mesonephric lines. We present additional evidence for this by reviewing associated findings in published and unpublished ovarian mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas; 8 of 11 of these neoplasms contained other Mullerian lesions in the same ovary, mainly endometriosis and adenomas/adenofibromas.

A Comprehensive Review of Biomarker Use in the Gynecologic Tract Including Differential Diagnoses and Diagnostic Pitfalls

Morphologic (ie, hematoxylin and eosin) evaluation of the Mullerian tract remains the gold standard for diagnostic evaluation; nevertheless, ancillary/biomarker studies are increasingly utilized in daily practice to assist in the subclassification of gynecologic lesions and tumors. The most frequently utilized "biomarker" technique is immunohistochemistry; however, in situ hybridization (chromogenic and fluorescence), chromosomal evaluation, and molecular analysis can also be utilized to aid in diagnosis. This review focuses on the use of immunohistochemistry in the Mullerian tract, and discusses common antibody panels, sensitivity and specificity of specific antibodies, and points out potential diagnostic pitfalls when using such antibodies.

A Comparison of GATA3, TTF1, CD10, and Calretinin in Identifying Mesonephric and Mesonephric-like Carcinomas of the Gynecologic Tract

Mesonephric carcinomas of the gynecologic tract are neoplasms that are often under-recognized due to their varied morphologic appearances. Recently, GATA3 and TTF1 have been reported to be useful immunohistochemical markers for distinguishing mesonephric carcinomas from its morphologic mimics. Herein, we compared the performance of GATA3 and TTF1 to the traditional markers used for mesonephric carcinomas, CD10 and calretinin. We studied 694 cases: 8 mesonephric carcinomas (7 cervical [includes 3 mesonephric carcinosarcomas], 1 vaginal), 5 mesonephric-like carcinomas (4 uterine corpus, 1 ovarian), 585 endometrial adenocarcinomas, and 96 cervical adenocarcinomas. Mesonephric-like carcinomas were defined as tumors exhibiting the classic morphologic features of mesonephric carcinoma, but occurring outside of the cervix and without convincing mesonephric remnants. GATA3 had the highest sensitivity and specificity (91% and 94%) compared with TTF1 (45% and 99%), CD10 (73% and 83%), and calretinin (36% and 89%). GATA3, however, also stained a substantial number of uterine carcinosarcomas (23/113, 20%). TTF1 was positive in 5/5 (100%) mesonephric-like carcinomas and only 1/8 (13%) mesonephric carcinomas. In 4/6 (67%) TTF1 positive cases, GATA3 exhibited an inverse staining pattern with TTF1. In summary, GATA3 was the best overall marker for mesonephric and mesonephric-like carcinomas, but cannot be used to distinguish mesonephric carcinosarcomas from Müllerian carcinosarcomas. The inverse staining pattern between GATA3 and TTF1, suggests that TTF1 may be useful when GATA3 is negative in small biopsies where mesonephric or mesonephric-like carcinoma is suspected. The greater TTF1 positivity in mesonephric-like carcinomas suggests they may be biologically different from prototypical mesonephric carcinomas.

Cervical Mesonephric Adenocarcinoma With Novel FGFR2 Mutation

Mesonephric adenocarcinoma is a rare tumor, accounting for <1% of cervical cancers. Well-differentiated mesonephric adenocarcinoma can be difficult to distinguish from diffuse mesonephric hyperplasia. Herein, we report a case of well-differentiated mesonephric adenocarcinoma with an FGFR2 mutation not previously reported in the literature. Nonselective tyrosine kinase inhibitors or FGFR2 inhibitors may represent options for targeted therapy.

Guidelines to Aid in the Distinction of Endometrial and Endocervical Carcinomas, and the Distinction of Independent Primary Carcinomas of the Endometrium and Adnexa From Metastatic Spread Between These and Other Sites

In most cases of suspected endometrial neoplasia tumor origin can be correctly assigned according to a combination of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic features, even when the latter are based upon the examination of relatively small biopsy samples. However there are well-recognized exceptions to this rule which continue to create diagnostic difficulty, and sometimes difficulties persist even after the detailed examination of resection specimens. Among the most common problems encountered in practice are the distinction of primary endometrial and primary endocervical adenocarcinomas, and the determination of tumor origin when there is synchronous, multifocal involvement of gynecologic tract sites, for example the endometrium and the ovary. However, accurate diagnosis in these cases is important because this has significant staging, management and prognostic implications. In this review we discuss the value and limitations of key morphologic, immunophenotypic and molecular findings in these diagnostic scenarios.

Cervical Adenocarcinomas: A Heterogeneous Group of Tumors With Variable Etiologies and Clinical Outcomes

Context.—

Cervical adenocarcinomas are a heterogeneous group of tumors with varying morphologies, etiologies, molecular drivers, and prognoses, comprising approximately 25% of all cervical cancers. Unlike cervical squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinomas are not uniformly caused by high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and, therefore, would not necessarily be prevented by the HPV vaccine.

Objective.—

To provide a review of endocervical adenocarcinoma subtypes and, when appropriate, discuss precursor lesions, etiologies, molecular genetics, and ancillary studies within the context of clinical care. Some historical perspectives will also be provided.

Data Sources.—

Data sources included published peer-reviewed literature and personal experiences of the senior author.

Conclusions.—

Endocervical adenocarcinomas are a histologically diverse group of tumors with various causes and molecular drivers, not all related to HPV infection. Distinguishing them has important implications for treatment and prognosis as well as strategies for prevention.

Tissue-based Immunohistochemical Biomarker Accuracy in the Diagnosis of Malignant Glandular Lesions of the Uterine Cervix: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

Immunohistochemistry is widely used to support a pathology diagnosis of cervical adenocarcinoma despite the absence of a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published data. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemistry biomarkers in the tissue-based diagnosis of cervical adenocarcinoma histotypes compared with normal endocervix and benign glandular lesions. The systematic review and meta-analysis used a PICOT framework and QUADAS-2 to evaluate the quality of included studies. The literature search spanned 40 years and ended June 30, 2015. Abstracts of identified records were independently screened by 2 of the authors who then conducted a full-text review of selected articles. Sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemistry expression in malignant glandular lesions of the cervix classified per WHO 2003 compared with 5 benign comparators (normal/benign endocervix, and benign endocervical, endometrioid, gastric, and mesonephric lesions) were calculated. Of 902 abstracts screened, 154 articles were selected for full review. Twenty-five articles with results for 36 biomarkers were included. The only biomarker with enough studies for a meta-analysis was p16 and the definition of positive p16 staining among them was variable. Nevertheless, any positive p16 expression was sensitive, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 with narrow confidence intervals (CIs), for adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and mucinous adenocarcinomas in comparison with normal/benign endocervix and benign endocervical and endometrioid lesions. Specificity for AIS and mucinous adenocarcinomas was also high with narrow CIs compared with benign endocervical lesions. The specificity was high for AIS, 0.99 (0.24, 1.0), and mucinous adenocarcinoma, 0.95 (0.52, 1.0), compared with normal/benign endocervix but with wider CIs, and low with very wide CIs compared with benign endometrioid lesions: 0.31 (0.00, 0.99) and 0.34 (0.00, 0.99), respectively. Results from single studies showed that p16, p16/Ki67 dual stain, ProExC, CEA, ESA, HIK1083, Claudin 18, and ER loss in perilesional stromal cells were useful with high (≥0.75) sensitivity and specificity estimates in ≥1 malignant versus benign comparisons. None of the biomarkers had highly useful sensitivity and specificity estimates for AIS, mucinous adenocarcinomas, or minimal deviation adenocarcinoma/gastric adenocarcinoma compared with benign gastric or mesonephric lesions or for mesonephric carcinoma compared with normal/benign endocervix, benign endocervical, endometrial, or mesonephric lesions. Any expression of p16 supports a diagnosis of AIS and mucinous adenocarcinomas in comparison with normal/benign endocervix and benign endocervical lesions. The majority of studies did not separate mosaic/focal p16 staining from diffuse staining as a distinct pattern of p16 overexpression and this may have contributed to the poor performance of p16 in distinguishing AIS and mucinous adenocarcinomas from benign endometrioid lesions. Single studies support further investigation of 8 additional biomarkers that have highly useful sensitivity and specificity estimates for ≥1 malignant glandular lesions compared with ≥1 of the 5 benign comparators.

Mesonephric proliferations of the female genital tract

The mesonephric (Wolffian) duct regresses in females during embryological development. Remnants of this duct may persist typically along the lateral walls of the cervix, vagina, adnexa, and uterine corpus. These mesonephric epithelia may expand into hyperplastic proliferations and rarely form neoplasms. The spectrum of morphology, immunophenotype, clinical presentation, and molecular characteristics of mesonephric lesions is reviewed, with attention to distinction from entities in the differential diagnosis.

Differential Expression Patterns of GATA3 in Uterine Mesonephric and Nonmesonephric Lesions

GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3) is a recently described immunohistochemical marker that has proven useful in the characterization of breast and urothelial carcinomas. However, the expression pattern of GATA3 in mesonephric proliferations is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the immunohistochemical expression of GATA3 in cervicovaginal mesonephric lesions and compare it to its expression in endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas and cervicovaginal endometriosis. A cohort of 107 cases, including 33 cases of mesonephric lesions and 74 cases of nonmesonephric lesions, was selected for the study. Of 33 mesonephric lesions, 31 (94%) cases (16 remnants, 12 hyperplasias, and 3 adenocarcinomas) were strongly and diffusely positive in tumor cell nuclei for GATA3. The remaining 2 mesonephric carcinosarcomas showed focal nuclear staining and rare nuclear positivity, respectively. Of 36 endocervical adenocarcinomas, 33 (92%) were negative for GATA3 and the remaining revealed focal weak nuclear staining. Of 34 endometrial adenocarcinomas, 32 (94%) were negative, whereas 2 showed rare nuclear positivity. All 4 cases of endometriosis were negative. The benign endocervical epithelium and the benign endometrium in most cases lacked GATA3 expression, whereas the benign squamous epithelium in the majority exhibited nuclear basal and parabasal staining pattern. Our study demonstrates that GATA3 protein is expressed in most mesonephric lesions, regardless of them being benign or malignant. In contrast, GATA3 is absent in the majority of endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinomas. These results support that GATA3 immunostain can be a useful tool in differentiating mesonephric lesions from endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas.

Clear-Cell Atypical Fibroxanthoma: A Combined Immunohistochemistry Analysis

Atypical fibroxanthoma is considered to be a low-grade sarcoma, characterized by a proliferation of bizarre spindled cells. A case of a rare variant of this tumor, a clear-cell atypical fibroxanthoma, presenting with rapid growth on a 63-year-old female, is reported. The differential diagnosis of a clear cell proliferation and a review of the immunohistochemistry markers used in the diagnosis of atypical fibroxanthoma are discussed. In particular, the usefulness of markers such as CD10, procollagen 1, CD68, CD163, CD99, and S100A6, and the importance of negative markers such as S100, cytokeratin, and desmin are emphasized. Furthermore, the development of a keratoacanthoma at the site of previous Mohs surgery is recounted.

Hormone receptor-negative, thyroid transcription factor 1-positive uterine and ovarian adenocarcinomas: report of a series of mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas

AIMS

To report a series of uterine corpus (n = 7) and ovarian (n = 5) neoplasms which we believe probably represent mesonephric adenocarcinomas based on their characteristic morphology and immunophenotype.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All neoplasms exhibited a relatively constant and characteristic morphological appearance with an admixture of architectural patterns with small glands or tubules, some containing luminal eosinophilic colloid-like material, typically predominating. Solid and papillary architectures were also often present. The nuclear features were characteristic with atypical angulated clear vesicular nuclei which often exhibited overlapping. All the tumours were 'flat' negative with oestrogen receptor and progesterone receptor and all except one exhibited nuclear staining with thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF1), which was often diffuse. All tumours exhibited wild-type staining with p53. CD10, calretinin and GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3) were positive in a variable proportion of the neoplasms.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe these neoplasms to represent mesonephric adenocarcinomas which have only rarely been reported to arise in the uterine corpus and never in the ovary. We recommend they be termed mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas until their histogenesis is firmly established.

Recent Developments in Non-HPV-related Adenocarcinomas of the Lower Female Genital Tract and Their Precursors

Most adenocarcinomas in the lower female genital tract (cervix, vagina, vulva) arise in the cervix and are associated with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. However, there is an emerging spectrum of non-HPV-related cervical adenocarcinomas, the most common of which is so-called gastric type. In this review, the concept of gastric-type cervical adenocarcinomas and their possible precursor lesions is covered, the precursor lesions still being poorly understood. Other non-HPV-related cervical adenocarcinomas are also discussed, including new information regarding molecular events in mesonephric adenocarcinoma. A variety of primary vaginal adenocarcinomas, including clear cell, endometrioid, intestinal and gastric types are also discussed. The spectrum of benign and malignant glandular lesions involving the lower female genital tract and probably derived from misplaced Skene's (periurethral) glands is also covered.

GATA3 Is a Sensitive and Specific Marker of Benign and Malignant Mesonephric Lesions in the Lower Female Genital Tract

GATA3 is a transcription factor critical for embryogenesis, development, and cell differentiation. Recent studies have suggested that GATA3 is a sensitive and relatively specific biomarker for urothelial and breast carcinomas, with most Müllerian carcinomas being negative. We investigated GATA3 expression in mesonephric/Wolffian remnants and tumors in the female genital tract. A western blot was performed to assess specificity for the GATA3 antibody. GATA3 immunohistochemistry was performed on 59 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded mesonephric samples, including 17 mesonephric remnants (MR; 11 cervical and 6 fallopian tube), 15 mesonephric hyperplasias, 21 mesonephric carcinomas, and 6 female adnexal tumors of probable Wolffian origin. Thirty conventional endocervical adenocarcinomas (ENDO-CA), 9 gastric-type cervical adenocarcinomas, and 165 endometrial adenocarcinomas (EM-CA) were also evaluated. GATA3 nuclear intensity and extent of staining was evaluated. The western blot revealed GATA3 expression in seminal vesicle and cell lines derived from breast and urothelial carcinomas, but not in other cell lines including ovarian, cervical, and endometrial cancers. All cervical MRs and mesonephric hyperplasias, 5/6 (83%) fallopian tube MRs, and 20/21 (95%) mesonephric carcinomas were GATA3 positive, although with great variability in both intensity (weak to strong) and extent (1+ to 3+) of staining. Only 1/6 (17%) female adnexal tumors of probable Wolffian origin showed weak multifocal staining. One of 30 (3%) usual-type ENDO-CAs and 3/165 EM-CAs exhibited weak-moderate GATA3 immunoreactivity; all gastric-type cervical adenocarcinomas were negative. GATA3 is a highly sensitive and specific marker for mesonephric lesions in the lower genital tract; however, its utility in the upper genital tract may be more limited. In addition, GATA3 can aid in distinguishing lower genital mesonephric lesions from usual-type and gastric-type ENDO-CAs and uterine EM-CAs.

Targeted genomic profiling reveals recurrent KRAS mutations and gain of chromosome 1q in mesonephric carcinomas of the female genital tract

Mesonephric carcinoma is a rare form of gynecologic cancer derived from mesonephric remnants usually located in the lateral wall of the uterine cervix. An analogous tumor occurs in the adnexa, female adnexal tumor of probable Wolffian origin. The pathogenesis and molecular events in mesonephric carcinoma are not known. The aim of this study was to examine the molecular alterations in mesonephric carcinoma to identify driver mutations and therapeutically targetable mutations. This study consisted of 19 tumors from 17 patients: 18 mesonephric carcinomas (15 primary tumors and three metastatic tumors) and 1 female adnexal tumor of probable Wolffian origin. In two patients, both primary and metastatic tumors were available. Genomic DNA was isolated and targeted next-generation sequencing was performed to detect mutations, copy number variations, and structural variants by surveying full exonic regions of 300 cancer genes and 113 selected intronic regions across 35 genes. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for 1p and 1q was performed in two cases. Eighty-one percent (13/16) of mesonephric carcinomas had either a KRAS (n=12) or NRAS (n=1) mutation. Mutations in chromatin remodeling genes (ARID1A, ARID1B, or SMARCA4) were present in 62% of mesonephric carcinomas. All mesonephric carcinomas lacked mutations in PIK3CA and PTEN. The most common copy number alteration was 1q gain, found in 12 (75%) mesonephric carcinomas; this was confirmed by FISH in two cases. Mesonephric carcinoma is characterized by molecular alterations that differ from those of more common variants of cervical and endometrial adenocarcinoma, which harbor KRAS/NRAS mutations in 7% and 25% of cases, respectively. KRAS/NRAS mutations are common in mesonephric carcinoma and are often accompanied by gain of 1q and mutations in chromatin remodeling genes. Targeting inhibitors of the RAS/MAPK pathway may be useful in the treatment of mesonephric carcinoma.

Differential patterns of PAX8, p16, and ER immunostains in mesonephric lesions and adenocarcinomas of the cervix

Mesonephric remnants, usually located deep in the lateral cervical wall, may become hyperplastic resulting in a florid proliferation. These can be misinterpreted as malignant and confused with endocervical adenocarcinomas. Recent data have shown that PAX2 is diffusely expressed in mesonephric remnants and hyperplasias. PAX8 is a related transcription protein that is expressed in tissues of müllerian and wolffian origin. In this study, we have investigated the utility of an immunohistochemical panel comprising of PAX8, estrogen receptor (ER), and p16 in the differential diagnosis between mesonephric proliferations and cervical adenocarcinomas. A database search was conducted for cases of mesonephric remnants/hyperplasia/carcinoma of cervix and invasive cervical adenocarcinomas. Immunohistochemical stains for PAX8, ER, and p16 were performed using the avidin-biotin peroxidase technique on the most representative tissue. The search yielded 28 cases of mesonephric proliferations of cervix (15 mesonephric remnants, 12 mesonephric hyperplasias, and 1 mesonephric adenocarcinoma) and 16 cases of cervical adenocarcinomas (15 usual type and 1 adenoma malignum). Immunohistochemically, all the mesonephric proliferations, regardless of being benign or malignant, displayed a consistent staining pattern-diffusely and strongly positive for PAX8, negative for ER, and patchy cytoplasmic staining for p16. The usual type cervical adenocarcinomas exhibited a variable staining pattern with PAX8 and ER but all were strongly and diffusely positive for p16. The case of adenoma malignum was PAX8 positive, ER negative, and showed weak and patchy staining with p16. Our study suggests that a panel of immunohistochemical stains composed of PAX8, p16, and ER is useful in the distinction between mesonephric proliferations and cervical adenocarcinomas.

Diagnostic value of CD-10 marker in differentiating of papillary thyroid carcinoma from benign thyroid lesions

Background:

Using of CD10 in accordance with clinical and histological features of thyroid lesions could be used as both diagnostic and prognostic tool, which consequently influence the management and their prognosis for survival of patients with thyroid neoplasms especially papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). The aim of this study was to determine its expression in PTC and different benign thyroid lesions.

Materials and Methods:

In this descriptive-analytic, cross-sectional study, paraffin-embedded tissues of patients with definitive pathologic diagnosis of different benign thyroid lesions and PTC were retrieved. Immunostained sections of each slides was performed using immunohistochemistry methods and expression of CD10 was compared in two groups of benign thyroid lesions and PTC.

Results:

From selected cases 134 sections studied in two groups of PTC (n = 67) and benign thyroid lesions (n = 67). CD10 were immunohistochemically positive in 29.9% of PTC cases, but in none of the thyroid benign lesions (0%) (P < 0.001). There was not significant relationship between expression of CD10 with age and sex of the studied population (P > 0.05).

Conclusion:

The results of the current study indicate that due to the higher expression of CD10 in PTC than benign thyroid lesions it might be used for differentiating mentioned lesions. But for using it as a diagnostic tool further studies with larger sample size and determination of its sensitivity, specificity and cut-off point is necessary.

The spectrum of cervical glandular neoplasia and issues in differential diagnosis

CONTEXT

Premalignant and malignant glandular lesions of the cervix are known to often cause diagnostic problems with a variety of benign (more common) as well as other malignant mimics, the latter setting often being represented by secondary involvement by endometrioid endometrial carcinoma especially in small samplings.

OBJECTIVE

To highlight key histologic features and immunohistochemical markers that may be helpful in the distinction of in situ endocervical carcinoma from benign glandular proliferations, and those that separate different subtypes of invasive endocervical carcinoma, as well as invasive carcinoma from other carcinomas secondarily involving the cervix and nonneoplastic proliferations of the cervix.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical and morphologic features as well as immunohistochemistry results should be used in conjunction in the differential diagnosis of glandular proliferations of the cervix, as correct interpretation has major clinical consequences for the patient in most instances (especially benign versus malignant). Immunohistochemical markers should be used as part of a panel of antibodies, as exceptions may occur to the usual pattern of staining, and if used singly, they may mislead the pathologist to establish a wrong diagnosis.

Endometrial carcinomas: a review emphasizing overlapping and distinctive morphological and immunohistochemical features

This review focuses on the most common diagnostic pitfalls and helpful morphologic and immunohistochemical markers in the differential diagnosis between the different subtypes of endometrial carcinomas, including: (1) endometrioid versus serous glandular carcinoma, (2) papillary endometrioid (not otherwise specified, villoglandular and nonvillous variants) versus serous carcinoma, (3) endometrioid carcinoma with spindle cells, hyalinization, and heterologous components versus malignant mixed müllerian tumor, (4) high-grade endometrioid versus serous carcinoma, (5) high-grade endometrioid carcinoma versus dedifferentiated or undifferentiated carcinoma, (6) endometrioid carcinoma with clear cells versus clear cell carcinoma, (7) clear cell versus serous carcinoma, (8) undifferentiated versus neuroendocrine carcinoma, (9) carcinoma of mixed cell types versus carcinoma with ambiguous features or variant morphology, (10) Lynch syndrome-related endometrial carcinomas, (11) high-grade or undifferentiated carcinoma versus nonepithelial uterine tumors. As carcinomas in the endometrium are not always primary, this review also discusses the differential diagnosis between endometrial carcinomas and other gynecological malignancies such as endocervical (glandular) and ovarian/peritoneal serous carcinoma, as well as with extra-gynecologic metastases (mainly breast and colon).

Cutaneous endometriosis: diagnostic immunohistochemistry and clinicopathologic correlation

Endometriosis is a condition where endometrial glands and stroma are ectopically located in sites other than the uterine cavity. Cutaneous endometriosis is very rare, representing approximately 1.1% of cases of extrapelvic endometriosis. We report a case of a 44-year-old female with no prior surgical history who presented with multiple tan brown periumbilical nodules. Histopathological examination revealed multiple glandular structures in the dermis with surrounding stroma. Immunohistochemistry cinches the diagnosis, as CD10, estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor are strongly positive in our case. The mainstay of treatment of cutaneous endometriosis is surgical excision of the lesion.

CD10, p63 and CD99 expression in the differential diagnosis of atypical fibroxanthoma, spindle cell squamous cell carcinoma and desmoplastic melanoma

BACKGROUND

Atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) is a pleomorphic spindle cell lesion of the skin; it is considered in the differential diagnosis with spindle cell malignant melanoma (MM) and sarcomatoid carcinoma/spindle cell squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). An optimum approach has yet to fully emerge with respect to the immunohistochemical discrimination of these lesions.

METHODS

Departmental archives from 1978 onwards were searched for clinicopathologically confirmed cases of AFX, MM and SCC. Immunostains for CD10, CD99 and p63 were performed in each case. Scored staining results were analyzed using Fisher's Exact Test.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven of 31 cases of AFX were positive for CD10, as compared with 3 of 22 SCCs and 0 of 20 MMs. CD10 positivity was preferentially associated with the diagnosis of AFX (p < 0.001). p63 reactivity was observed in 15/22 cases of SCCs, 5/31 AFXs and 1/20 MMs. CD99 reactivity was observed in 3/31 cases of AFX, 2/22 SCCs and 3/20 MMs.

CONCLUSION

CD10 positivity is relatively specific in this context for the diagnosis of AFX. Its utility is enhanced when only strong, diffuse membranocytoplasmic staining is considered as a positive result. In contrast to prior reports, p63 was not found to be highly sensitive for SCC. Similarly, CD99 showed no preferential staining of any single diagnostic group of lesions.

PAX2 distinguishes benign mesonephric and mullerian glandular lesions of the cervix from endocervical adenocarcinoma, including minimal deviation adenocarcinoma

Mesonephric remnants of the cervix are vestiges of the embryonic mesonephric system which typically regresses during female development. Uncommonly, hyperplasia of the mesonephric remnants may occur. The differential diagnosis of exuberant mesonephric hyperplasia includes minimal deviation adenocarcinoma of the cervix, a tumor with deceptively bland morphology for which no reliable diagnostic biomarkers currently exist. PAX2 encodes a transcription factor necessary in the development of the Wolffian duct system, and the protein is expressed in several tumors of mesonephric origin, including renal cell carcinoma, Wilm tumor, and nephrogenic adenoma. We hypothesized that PAX2 may also be expressed in mesonephric lesions of the cervix and may distinguish mesonephric hyperplasia from minimal deviation adenocarcinoma of the cervix. We demonstrated that PAX2 was strongly and diffusely expressed in mesonephric remnants (6 of 6) and in mesonephric hyperplasia (18 of 18); however, no expression was noted in mesonephric adenocarcinoma (0 of 1). PAX2 was expressed in normal endocervical glands (including tunnel clusters and Nabothian cysts) (86 of 86), lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia (5 of 5), tubal/tuboendometrioid metaplasia (8 of 8), and cervical endometriosis (13 of 14). In contrast, only 2 cases of endocervical adenocarcinoma were positive for PAX2 [invasive adenocarcinoma of the minimal deviation type (0 of 5), usual type (1 of 22), and endometrioid type (1 of 1)]. Adjacent adenocarcinoma in situ, as well as cases of pure adenocarcinoma in situ (0 of 6), were also PAX2 negative. PAX2 expression in the 2 positive endocervical adenocarcinomas was patchy and weak. Most (11 of 15) stage II endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinomas lacked PAX2 expression but 1 of 10 grade 1 tumors and 3 of 5 grade 2 tumors did express PAX2. These results suggest that PAX2 immunoreactivity may be useful to (1) distinguish mesonephric hyperplasia from minimal deviation adenocarcinoma, (2) to distinguish lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia from minimal deviation adenocarcinoma, and (3) to distinguish endocervical tubal metaplasia or cervical endometriosis from endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ. Overall, a strong, diffuse nuclear PAX2 expression pattern in a cervical glandular proliferation predicts a benign diagnosis (positive predictive value 90%, negative predictive value 98%; P<0.001); however, PAX2 should not be interpreted in isolation from the architectural and cytologic features of the lesion as it may be expressed in some stage II endometrial adenocarcinomas involving the cervix.

Immunohistochemical Markers of Value in the Diagnosis of Mesenchymal Lesions of the Female Genital Tract

Pure mesenchymal tumors may occur anywhere in the female genital tract, but they are most common in the uterine corpus, leiomyoma being by far the most prevalent. These tumors, and other uncommon mesenchymal lesions within the uterine corpus and elsewhere in the female genital tract, may result in several diagnostic problems. Morphology remains paramount and, in most cases, an unequivocal diagnosis can be made based on examination of the hematoxylin and eosin stained sections, combined with an appreciation of the clinical and gross pathologic features. In difficult cases, immunohistochemistry can significantly contribute to the final diagnosis. In this article, the immunohistochemistry of neoplastic and nonneoplastic mesenchymal lesions of the female genital tract is discussed site by site, concentrating on markers that are of value in diagnosis and in differential diagnosis. The immunophenotype of mixed epithelial and mesenchymal neoplasms and pure epithelial neoplasms with a component of spindle cells is discussed, where appropriate, because these can enter into the differential diagnosis of a pure mesenchymal lesion.