Does the duration of postnatal stay influence breast-feeding rates at one month in women giving birth for the first time? A randomized control trial

Early postnatal discharge from hospital for healthy mothers and term infants

BACKGROUND

Length of postnatal hospital stay has declined dramatically in the past 50 years. There is ongoing controversy about whether staying less time in hospital is harmful or beneficial. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2002, and previously updated in 2009.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of a policy of early postnatal discharge from hospital for healthy mothers and term infants in terms of important maternal, infant and paternal health and related outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (21 May 2021) and the reference lists of retrieved articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing early discharge from hospital of healthy mothers and term infants (at least 37 weeks' gestation and greater than or equal to 2500 g), with the standard care in the respective settings in which trials were conducted. Trials using allocation methods that were not truly random (e.g. based on patient number or day of the week), trials with a cluster-randomisation design and trials published only in abstract form were also eligible for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted and checked data for accuracy, and assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. We contacted authors of ongoing trials for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 17 trials (involving 9409 women) that met our inclusion criteria. We did not identify any trials from low-income countries. There was substantial variation in the definition of 'early discharge', ranging from six hours to four to five days. The extent of antenatal preparation and midwifery home care offered to women following discharge in intervention and control groups also varied considerably among trials. Nine trials recruited and randomised women in pregnancy, seven trials randomised women following childbirth and one did not report whether randomisation took place before or after childbirth. Risk of bias was generally unclear in most domains due to insufficient reporting of trial methods. The certainty of evidence is moderate to low and the reasons for downgrading were high or unclear risk of bias, imprecision (low numbers of events or wide 95% confidence intervals (CI)), and inconsistency (heterogeneity in direction and size of effect). Infant outcomes Early discharge probably slightly increases the number of infants readmitted within 28 days for neonatal morbidity (including jaundice, dehydration, infections) (risk ratio (RR) 1.59, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.98; 6918 infants; 10 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). In the early discharge group, the risk of infant readmission was 69 per 1000 infants compared to 43 per 1000 infants in the standard care group. It is uncertain whether early discharge has any effect on the risk of infant mortality within 28 days (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.74; 4882 infants; two studies; low-certainty evidence). Early postnatal discharge probably makes little to no difference in the number of infants having at least one unscheduled medical consultation or contact with health professionals within the first four weeks after birth (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.16; 639 infants; four studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Maternal outcomes Early discharge probably results in little to no difference in women readmitted within six weeks postpartum for complications related to childbirth (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.54; 6992 women; 11 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) but the wide 95% CI indicates the possibility that the true effect is either an increase or a reduction in risk. Similarly, early discharge may result in little to no difference in the risk of depression within six months postpartum (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.42; 4333 women; five studies; low-certainty evidence) but the wide 95% CI suggests the possibility that the true effect is either an increase or a reduction in risk. Early discharge probably results in little to no difference in women breastfeeding at six weeks postpartum (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.13; 7156 women; 10 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) or in the number of women having at least one unscheduled medical consultation or contact with health professionals (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.20; 464 women; two studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Maternal mortality within six weeks postpartum was not reported in any of the studies. Costs Early discharge may slightly reduce the costs of hospital care in the period immediately following the birth up to the time of discharge (low-certainty evidence; data not pooled) but it may result in little to no difference in costs of postnatal care following discharge from hospital, in the period up to six weeks after the birth (low-certainty evidence; data not pooled).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The definition of 'early discharge' varied considerably among trials, which made interpretation of results challenging. Early discharge probably leads to a higher risk of infant readmission within 28 days of birth, but probably makes little to no difference to the risk of maternal readmission within six weeks postpartum. We are uncertain if early discharge has any effect on the risk of infant or maternal mortality. With regard to maternal depression, breastfeeding, the number of contacts with health professionals, and costs of care, there may be little to no difference between early discharge and standard discharge but further trials measuring these outcomes are needed in order to enhance the level of certainty of the evidence. Large well-designed trials of early discharge policies, incorporating process evaluation and using standardized approaches to outcome assessment, are needed to assess the uptake of co-interventions. Since none of the evidence presented here comes from low-income countries, where infant and maternal mortality may be higher, it is important to conduct future trials in low-income settings.

Reduction of hospital stay at maternity unit: an evaluation of the impact on maternal and neonatal readmission

In June 2015, the Belgian federal minister of public health imposed a reduction of 1 day in hospital stay at the maternity unit. This retrospective cohort study evaluated data of all patients who delivered between January 01 2010 and November 30 2015. Neonatal readmissions during the first 28 days postpartum and maternal readmissions during the first 6 weeks postpartum were studied. In total, 6009 births were included. The neonatal readmissions significantly increased (4.8% versus 6.9%, p value = .04) after June 2015. There was no significant difference in maternal readmissions between groups. In conclusion, hospital stay reduction at the maternity unit was linked with an increase of neonatal readmissions in the first 28 days postpartum, but did not have an effect on the maternal readmissions.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Many studies have evaluated the impact of early discharge on maternal and neonatal morbidity since 1950. Nevertheless, there are still concerns regarding the advantages and inconveniences of this policy. This retrospective cohort study took place in a tertiary referral centre in Belgium (CHU Tivoli) and evaluated data of all patients who delivered between January 01 2010 and November 30 2015.What the results of this study add? The readmissions for icterus increased significantly after the introduction of the reduced stay. There was no significant difference in maternal readmissions between groups.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? A shorter hospital may be linked with an increase of neonatal readmissions in the first 28 days postpartum, but does not seem to have an effect on the maternal readmissions. Further prospective studies are needed in order to validate this hypothesis and also elucidate the reasons leading to a higher neonatal readmission rate.

[Early postpartum discharge: outcomes and risk factors of readmission]

The objective of this study is to evaluate the practice of early postpartum discharge by analyzing maternal readmission rates and identifying readmission risk factors. This is a prospective and analytical study of 1206 patients discharged from hospital on postpartum day 1. For each patient we collected the epidemiological data, the course of pregnancy and childbirth. We identified the causes of readmission and their evolution. Cesarean delivery rate was 42%. Maternal readmission rate was 0.99%. The average length of stay in hospital after readmission was 26 hours. Intestinal transit disorders were the most frequent reason for consultation (50% of cases) followed by fever (25% of cases). The readmission risk factors identified in our study were: cesarean section (p = 0.004), emergency cesarean section (p = 0.016) anemia (P < 0.001) and thrombopenia (p = 0.003). Early postpartum discharge seems a safe option for the mother and their newborn children subject to the ability to clearly communicate health information to the patient and to the compliance with selection criteria.

The effect of early postnatal discharge from hospital for women and infants: a systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND

The length of postnatal hospital stay has declined over the last 40 years. There is little evidence to support a policy of early discharge following birth, and there is some concern about whether early discharge of mothers and babies is safe. The Cochrane review on the effects of early discharge from hospital only included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which are problematic in this area, and a systematic review including other study designs is required. The aim of this broader systematic review is to determine possible effects of a policy of early postnatal discharge on important maternal and infant health-related outcomes.

METHODS/DESIGN

A systematic search of published literature will be conducted for randomised controlled trials, non-randomised controlled trials (NRCTs), controlled before-after studies (CBA), and interrupted time series studies (ITS) that report on the effect of a policy of early postnatal discharge from hospital. Databases including Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Science Citation Index will be searched for relevant material. Reference lists of articles will also be searched in addition to searches to identify grey literature. Screening of identified articles and data extraction will be conducted in duplicate and independently. Methodological quality of the included studies will be assessed using the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) criteria for risk of bias tool. Discrepancies will be resolved by consensus or by consulting a third author. Meta-analysis using a random effects model will be used to combine data. Where significant heterogeneity is present, data will be combined in a narrative synthesis. The findings will be reported according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews (PRISMA) statement.

DISCUSSION

Information on the effects of early postnatal discharge from hospital will be important for policy makers and clinicians providing maternity care. This review will also identify any gaps in the current literature on this topic and provide direction for future research in this area of study.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42015020545.

Factors influencing breastfeeding exclusivity during the first 6 months of life in developing countries: a quantitative and qualitative systematic review

Breastfeeding is the most advantageous feeding option for infants, and epidemiological studies provide evidence for its promotion. The objective of this review was to comprehensively delineate the barriers and facilitators of exclusive breastfeeding of infants aged 0-6 months old by mothers in developing countries. A search of CINAHL, MEDLINE and PsycINFO was carried out to retrieve studies from January 2001 to January 2014. Using our inclusion criteria, we selected studies that described barriers and facilitators of exclusive breastfeeding. Qualitative and quantitative studies were considered. Twenty-five studies involving 11 025 participants from 19 countries were included. Barriers and facilitators of exclusive/full breastfeeding were identified, analysed tabulated and summarised in this review. Maternal employment was the most frequently cited barrier to exclusive breastfeeding. Maternal perceptions of insufficient breast milk supply was pervasive among studies while medical barriers related to illness of mothers and/or infants as well as breast problems, rather than health care providers. Socio-cultural factors such as maternal and significant other's beliefs about infant nutrition also often constitute strong barriers to exclusive breastfeeding. Despite these barriers, mothers in developing countries often possess certain personal characteristics and develop strategic plans to enhance their success at breastfeeding. Health care providers should be informed about the determinants of exclusive breastfeeding and provide practical anticipatory guidance targeted at overcoming these barriers. In so doing, health care providers in developing countries can contribute to improving maternal and child health outcomes.

Early postnatal hospital discharge: the consequences of reducing length of stay for women and newborns

The objective of this study is to examine the literature and identify most salient outcomes of early postnatal discharge for women, newborns and the health system. An electronic search strategy was designed including the following sources: Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest and PubMed/MEDLINE, using the following terms: (early AND discharge) OR (length AND stay) AND (postpartum OR postnatal) AND (effect* OR result OR outcome). Content analysis was used to identify and summarise the findings and methods of the research papers. The evidence available is not enough to either reject or support the practice of early postnatal discharge; different studies have reported different outcomes for women and newborns. The need of systematic clinical research is discussed.

Predictors of breast-feeding in a developing country: results of a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Data on the prevalence and predictors of breast-feeding remain scarce in Lebanon. Moreover, no study has previously addressed the effect of the paediatrician's sex on breast-feeding. The present study aimed to assess the prevalence and predictors of breast-feeding at 1 and 4 months of infant age while exploring the potential role of the sex of the paediatrician.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study. Predictors of breast-feeding significant at the bivariate level were tested at 1 and 4 months through two stepwise regression models.

SETTING

Infants were enrolled through the clinics and dispensaries of 117 paediatricians located in Beirut, Lebanon, and its suburbs.

SUBJECTS

A total of 1,320 healthy newborn infants born between August 2001 and February 2002 were prospectively followed during the first year.

FINDINGS

Breast-feeding rates at 1 and 4 months were 56.3 % and 24.7 %, respectively. Early discharge, high parity and religion were significantly associated with higher breast-feeding rates at 1 and 4 months of age. Maternal age proved significant only at 1 month, while maternal working status and sex of the paediatrician were significant at 4 months. A novel finding of our study was the positive effect of female paediatricians on breast-feeding continuation until 4 months of age (OR = 1.49; 95 % CI 1.03, 2.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Breast-feeding rates are low at 1 and 4 months of infant age in Beirut. Further research to investigate the interactions between female physicians and lactating mothers in maintaining breast-feeding in other populations is warranted. The results constitute the basis for designing interventions targeting policy makers, health professionals and mothers.

Postnatal care in the community: report of an evaluation of birthing women's assessments of a postnatal home-care programme

For more than a decade, there has been a strong trend in many Western countries to decrease the length of time that women spend in hospital following childbirth. The research evidence regarding the consequences of early discharge for mothers and babies is mixed. Recent evidence has suggested that early discharge may not be randomly distributed across all sociodemographic groups of birthing women, and that the structures of home care have an important influence on maternal and child outcomes. In the context of decreasing lengths of hospital stay, the aim of the present study was to evaluate a new postnatal home support worker introduced into a geographically defined catchment area of a metropolitan hospital in South Australia. The evaluation included a formative process component to monitor recruitment strategies into the programme, as well as summative evaluation of a number of projected programme outcomes. The research methods used included interviews with antenatal women (n = 20) about their knowledge of and attitudes to the programme, and interviews with postnatal women (n = 63) about their transition home experience and assessment of the programme. Secondary analysis of client satisfaction surveys (n = 163) and aggregate breast-feeding data was also conducted. The results concur with previous research findings regarding the importance of rest and practical, home-based support in the postnatal period to maternal well-being, successful bonding and transition to motherhood. The results demonstrate the importance of well-structured home support services to maternal satisfaction and maternal well-being through the provision of physical, social and emotional care and support in the home.

Early post partum discharge: is it possible?

OBJECTIVES

To characterize maternal post partum complications and to identify risk factors for the development of post partum complications in low risk parturients.

STUDY DESIGN

The first part of our research was a case study only. It included low risk parturients identified using a computerized database who developed post partum complication between the years 2000 and 2003 (n = 136). The second part of the study was in a case-control format. The control group consisted of low risk parturients who gave birth during the same time period and did not develop post partum complications (n = 31,211).

RESULTS

Fever was the most common complication (36%) identified, with a mean delivery to complication time of 31.1 h. Excessive vaginal bleeding (22%) was diagnosed earlier, with a mean delivery to complication time of 4.2 h. The risk factors for complications identified were the following: first delivery, fifth delivery or more and cesarean delivery in the past (P = 0.009 and 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study support the possibility of early discharge for women in a predefined low-risk group. Most of the complications that may occur after discharge do not pose an immediate threat and afford the patient enough time to safely reach the hospital. Most of the complications in a low risk parturient group occur within 6 h post partum and may allow consideration of an early discharge policy.

Factors that influence first-time mothers' choice and experience of early discharge

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe factors that influenced first-time mothers' choice of and experiences during the first postnatal week, after early discharge without a domiciliary visit by the midwife.

DESIGN

Interviews were analysed using content analysis.

SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS

The nine participants were recruited from the Maternity Department at a University Hospital in Sweden. The catchment area included both an urban and rural population.

MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS

One main category and three subcategories emerged from the text. The main category was a feeling of confidence and security and the subcategories were being able to meet the needs of the baby, feeling 'back to normal' and receiving support.

KEY CONCLUSION

Factors that influenced first-time mothers' choice and experience of early discharge were their sense of confidence and security, that they had support from their partner and that they could trust the follow-up organization.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

A booked telephone call and a follow-up visit to the midwife can be sufficient as a programme for first-time mothers choosing early discharge.

Views of breastfeeding difficulties among drop-in-clinic attendees

Breast-milk is the optimum form of nutrition for the first 6 months of life. However, breastfeeding rates in the UK are low and static compared to other European countries and those in the North-west of England in the UK are even lower. Of the women who initiate breastfeeding, many cease in the first month following the birth for reasons that might be avoided. To try and prevent this, UNICEF Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) 'Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding' state that maternity facilities should foster the development of support groups for breastfeeding women. The aim of the present study was to describe breastfeeding difficulties reported by women who attended the infant feeding clinic at a Women's Hospital in the North-west of England. During the study period, the clinic was attended mainly by primiparous mothers who were educated beyond 18 years of age and of higher socio-economic status. They presented with a variety of problems including baby not latching on, concerns about baby's weight gain/loss, sore nipples and advice about expressing milk in preparation for return to work. The women highlighted the importance of meeting other mothers and having someone to talk to who understood what they were going through. Inconsistent information/lack of detailed knowledge from health professionals was cited as contributing to breastfeeding difficulties. A number of women reported that expert hands-on, one-to-one support, was invaluable and many felt they were able to continue breastfeeding but without the support, they may have given up.

Home-based versus hospital-based postnatal care: a randomised trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare a shortened hospital stay with midwife visits at home to usual hospital care after delivery.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Maternity unit of a Swiss teaching hospital.

POPULATION

Four hundred and fifty-nine women with a single uncomplicated pregnancy at low risk of caesarean section.

METHODS

Women were randomised to either home-based (n= 228) or hospital-based postnatal care (n= 231). Home-based postnatal care consisted of early discharge from hospital (24 to 48 hours after delivery) and home visits by a midwife; women in the hospital-based care group were hospitalised for four to five days.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Breastfeeding 28 days postpartum, women's views of their care and readmission to hospital.

RESULTS

Women in the home-based care group had shorter hospital stays (65 vs 106 hours, P < 0.001) and more midwife visits (4.8 vs 1.7, P < 0.001) than women in the hospital-based care group. Prevalence of breastfeeding at 28 days was similar between the groups (90%vs 87%, P= 0.30), but women in the home-based care group reported fewer problems with breastfeeding and greater satisfaction with the help received. There were no differences in satisfaction with care, women's hospital readmissions, postnatal depression scores and health status scores. A higher percentage of neonates in the home-based care group were readmitted to hospital during the first six months (12%vs 4.8%, P= 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

In low risk pregnancies, early discharge from hospital and midwife visits at home after delivery is an acceptable alternative to a longer duration of care in hospital. Mothers' preferences and economic considerations should be taken into account when choosing a policy of postnatal care.

Home-based care after a shortened hospital stay versus hospital-based care postpartum: an economic evaluation

OBJECTIVES

To compare the cost effectiveness of early postnatal discharge and home midwifery support with a traditional postnatal hospital stay.

DESIGN

Cost minimisation analysis within a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

The University Hospital of Geneva and its catchment area.

POPULATION

Four hundred and fifty-nine deliveries of a single infant at term following an uncomplicated pregnancy.

METHODS

Prospective economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial in which women were allocated to either early postnatal discharge combined with home midwifery support (n= 228) or a traditional postnatal hospital stay (n= 231).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Costs (Swiss francs, 2000 prices) to the health service, social services, patients, carers and society accrued between delivery and 28 days postpartum.

RESULTS

Clinical and psychosocial outcomes were similar in the two trial arms. Early postnatal discharge combined with home midwifery support resulted in a significant reduction in postnatal hospital care costs (bootstrap mean difference 1524 francs, 95% confidence interval [CI] 675 to 2403) and a significant increase in community care costs (bootstrap mean difference 295 francs, 95% CI 245 to 343). There were no significant differences in average hospital readmission, hospital outpatient care, direct non-medical and indirect costs between the two trial groups. Overall, early postnatal discharge combined with home midwifery support resulted in a significant cost saving of 1221 francs per mother-infant dyad (bootstrap mean difference 1209 francs, 95% CI 202 to 2155). This finding remained relatively robust following variations in the values of key economic parameters performed as part of a comprehensive sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

A policy of early postnatal discharge combined with home midwifery support exhibits weak economic dominance over traditional postnatal care, that is, it significantly reduces costs without compromising the health and wellbeing of the mother and infant.

Misrepresenting random sampling? A systematic review of research papers in the Journal of Advanced Nursing

AIM

This paper discusses the theoretical limitations of the use of random sampling and probability theory in the production of a significance level (or P-value) in nursing research. Potential alternatives, in the form of randomization tests, are proposed.

BACKGROUND

Research papers in nursing, medicine and psychology frequently misrepresent their statistical findings, as the P-values reported assume random sampling. In this systematic review of studies published between January 1995 and June 2002 in the Journal of Advanced Nursing, 89 (68%) studies broke this assumption because they used convenience samples or entire populations. As a result, some of the findings may be questionable.

DISCUSSION

The key ideas of random sampling and probability theory for statistical testing (for generating a P-value) are outlined. The result of a systematic review of research papers published in the Journal of Advanced Nursing is then presented, showing how frequently random sampling appears to have been misrepresented. Useful alternative techniques that might overcome these limitations are then discussed. REVIEW LIMITATIONS: This review is limited in scope because it is applied to one journal, and so the findings cannot be generalized to other nursing journals or to nursing research in general. However, it is possible that other nursing journals are also publishing research articles based on the misrepresentation of random sampling. The review is also limited because in several of the articles the sampling method was not completely clearly stated, and in this circumstance a judgment has been made as to the sampling method employed, based on the indications given by author(s).

CONCLUSION

Quantitative researchers in nursing should be very careful that the statistical techniques they use are appropriate for the design and sampling methods of their studies. If the techniques they employ are not appropriate, they run the risk of misinterpreting findings by using inappropriate, unrepresentative and biased samples.

Parents' experience of early discharge from hospital after birth in Sweden

OBJECTIVE

to investigate the factors that influence the experience of mothers and fathers when they have chosen to return home, earlier than is the normal routine, following the birth of their baby.

DESIGN

a qualitative study, using open interviews, was undertaken. The text of the transcripts was coded and categorised according to the grounded theory method using constant comparative analysis.

SETTING

interviews were carried out with 12 parents, six mothers and six fathers, individually in their own homes. They had all left a maternity/family ward at the Helsingborg Hospital in southern Sweden within 26 hours of birth whereas the normal discharge time is 72 hours.

MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS

'a sense of security' was the core category. Achieving a sense of security linked to informed choice for early discharge appeared to be dependent on the following categories: (l) the midwives' empowering behaviour; (2) affinity within the family; (3) the parents' right to autonomy/control; (4) physical well-being. There appears to be an inner connection between each of these categories.

KEY CONCLUSIONS

the midwife's empowering behaviour supports the parents' sense of security and encourages their informed choice of earlier discharge after birth. When the mothers' and babies return home it strengthens the affinity within the family and the father's sense of participation.

Early postnatal discharge from hospital for healthy mothers and term infants

BACKGROUND

Length of postnatal hospital stay has declined dramatically in the past thirty years. There is ongoing controversy concerning whether or not staying less time in hospital is harmful or beneficial.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the safety, impact and effectiveness of a policy of early discharge for healthy mothers and term infants, with respect to the health and well-being of mothers and babies, satisfaction with postnatal care, overall costs of health care and broader impacts on families.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (April 2002), the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group specialised register of clinical trials, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2001), MEDLINE (1966 to 2001), CINAHL (1982 to 2001), EMBASE (1988 to 1993) and reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized trials comparing early discharge from hospital of healthy mothers and term infants, of greater than or equal to 2500 grams, with standard care in the settings in which trials were conducted.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trial quality was assessed and data were abstracted independently by all five reviewers.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight trials were identified involving 3600 women. There was substantial variation in the definition of 'early discharge', and the extent of antenatal preparation and midwife home care following discharge offered to women in intervention and control groups. Five trials recruited and randomized women in pregnancy, three randomized women following childbirth. Post randomization exclusions were high. Protocol violations occurred in both directions. No statistically significant differences in infant or maternal readmissions were found in six trials reporting data on these outcomes. Three trials had mixed results showing either no significant difference or results favouring early discharge for the outcome of maternal depression although none used a well-validated standardised instrument. The results of six trials showed that early discharge had no impact on breastfeeding although significant heterogeneity was present between studies.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The findings are inconclusive. There is no evidence of adverse outcomes associated with policies of early postnatal discharge, but methodological limitations of included studies mean that adverse outcomes cannot be ruled out. It remains unclear how important midwifery support at home is to the safety and acceptability of early discharge. Large well-designed trials of early discharge programs incorporating process evaluation to assess the uptake of co-interventions, and using standardised approaches to outcome assessment are needed.