Critical care cardiovascular nurse expert and novice diagnostic cue utilization

A Validation Argument for a Simulation-Based Training Course Centered on Assessment, Recognition, and Early Management of Pediatric Sepsis

INTRODUCTION

Early recognition of sepsis remains one of the greatest challenges in medicine. Novice clinicians are often responsible for the recognition of sepsis and the initiation of urgent management. The aim of this study was to create a validity argument for the use of a simulation-based training course centered on assessment, recognition, and early management of sepsis in a laboratory-based setting.

METHODS

Five unique simulation scenarios were developed integrating critical sepsis cues identified through qualitative interviewing. Scenarios were piloted with groups of novice, intermediate, and expert pediatric physicians. The primary outcome was physician recognition of sepsis, measured with an adapted situation awareness global assessment tool. Secondary outcomes were physician compliance with pediatric advanced life support (PALS) guidelines and early sepsis management (ESM) recommendations, measured by two internally derived tools. Analysis compared recognition of sepsis by levels of expertise and measured association of sepsis recognition with the secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Eighteen physicians were recruited, six per study group. Each physician completed three sepsis simulations. Sepsis was recognized in 19 (35%) of 54 simulations. The odds that experts recognized sepsis was 2.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.5-13.8] times greater than novices. Adjusted for severity, for every point increase in the PALS global performance score, the odds that sepsis was recognized increased by 11.3 (95% CI = 3.1-41.4). Similarly, the odds ratio for the PALS checklist score was 1.5 (95% CI = 0.8-2.6). Adjusted for severity and level of expertise, the odds of recognizing sepsis was associated with an increase in the ESM checklist score of 1.8 (95% CI = 0.9-3.6) and an increase in ESM global performance score of 4.1 (95% CI = 1.7-10.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Although incomplete, evidence from initial testing suggests that the simulations of pediatric sepsis were sufficiently valid to justify their use in training novice pediatric physicians in the assessment, recognition, and management of pediatric sepsis.

Simulation-Based Education for Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Anesthesiology

Simulation has been used for medical teaching and testing for at least four decades in some form, such as that used for cardiopulmonary resuscitation training; however, new technology applied to medical and procedural training has recently led to a marked increase in the use of simulation-based instruction. Educational theory has further supported simulation for medical education and procedural training. Simulation-based testing to demonstrate competence with new procedures is already required by the US Food and Drug Administration for one angiographicallyplaced device, and it is likely that simulationbased credentialing for procedures will be increasingly prevalent. Anesthesiologists, like other physicians, may be credentialed or certified based on their performance in a simulated environment in the future. This review describes some of the current simulation-based education techniques related to cardiovascular and thoracic anesthesiology. Additional discussion covers some of the applicable educational theory and the expected future uses of simulation modalities in healthcare education, testing, and practice.

Competence of nurses in the intensive cardiac care unit

INTRODUCTION

Competence of nurses is a complex combination of knowledge, function, skills, attitudes, and values. Delivering care for patients in the Intensive Cardiac Care Unit (ICCU) requires nurses' competences. This study aimed to explain nurses' competence in the ICCU.

METHODS

This was a qualitative study in which purposive sampling with maximum variation was used. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 23 participants during 2012-2013. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed by using the content-analysis method.

RESULTS

The main categories were "clinical competence," comprising subcategories of 'routine care,' 'emergency care,' 'care according to patients' needs,' 'care of non-coronary patients', as well as "professional competence," comprising 'personal development,' 'teamwork,' 'professional ethics,' and 'efficacy of nursing education.'

CONCLUSION

The finding of this study revealed dimensions of nursing competence in ICCU. Benefiting from competence leads to improved quality of patient care and satisfaction of patients and nurses and helps elevate nursing profession, improve nursing education, and clinical nursing.

Expert clinical reasoning and pain assessment in mechanically ventilated patients: A descriptive study

BACKGROUND

Pain assessment in mechanically ventilated patients is challenging, because nurses need to decode pain behaviour, interpret pain scores, and make appropriate decisions. This clinical reasoning process is inherent to advanced nursing practice, but is poorly understood. A better understanding of this process could contribute to improved pain assessment and management.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the indicators that influence expert nurses' clinical reasoning when assessing pain in critically ill nonverbal patients.

METHODS

This descriptive observational study was conducted in the adult intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary referral hospital in Western Switzerland. A purposive sample of expert nurses, caring for nonverbal ventilated patients who received sedation and analgesia, were invited to participate in the study. Data were collected in "real life" using recorded think-aloud combined with direct non-participant observation and brief interviews. Data were analysed using deductive and inductive content analyses using a theoretical framework related to clinical reasoning and pain.

RESULTS

Seven expert nurses with an average of 7.85 (±3.1) years of critical care experience participated in the study. The patients had respiratory distress (n=2), cardiac arrest (n=2), sub-arachnoid bleeding (n=1), and multi-trauma (n=2). A total of 1344 quotes in five categories were identified. Patients' physiological stability was the principal indicator for making decision in relation to pain management. Results also showed that it is a permanent challenge for nurses to discriminate situations requiring sedation from situations requiring analgesia. Expert nurses mainly used working knowledge and patterns to anticipate and prevent pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient's clinical condition is important for making decision about pain in critically ill nonverbal patients. The concept of pain cannot be assessed in isolation and its assessment should take the patient's clinical stability and sedation into account. Further research is warranted to confirm these results.

Evaluation of a configural vital signs display for intensive care unit nurses

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to evaluate a configural vital signs (CVS) display designed to support rapid detection and identification of physiological deterioration by graphically presenting patient vital signs data.

BACKGROUND

Current display technology in the intensive care unit (ICU) is not optimized for fast recognition and identification of physiological changes in patients. To support nurses more effectively, graphical or configural vital signs displays need to be developed and evaluated.

METHOD

A CVS display was developed based on findings from studies of the cognitive work of ICU nurses during patient monitoring. A total of 42 ICU nurses interpreted data presented either in a traditional, numerical format (n = 21) or on the CVS display (n = 21). Response time and accuracy in clinical data interpretation (i.e., identification of patient status) were assessed across four scenarios.

RESULTS

Data interpretation speed and accuracy improved significantly in the CVS display condition; for example, in one scenario nurses required only half of the time for data interpretation and showed up to 1.9 times higher accuracy in identifying the patient state compared to the numerical display condition.

CONCLUSION

Providing patient information in a configural display with readily visible trends and data variability can improve the speed and accuracy of data interpretation by ICU nurses.

APPLICATION

Although many studies, including this one, support the use of configural displays, the vast majority of ICU monitoring displays still present clinical data in numerical format. The introduction of configural displays in clinical monitoring has potential to improve patient safety.

Human Factors in Critical Care Medical Environments

The purpose of this chapter on human factors in critical care medical environments is to provide a systematic review of the human factors and ergonomics contributions that led to significant improvements in patient safety over the last five decades. The review will focus on issues that contributed to patient injury and fatalities and how human factors and ergonomics can improve performance of providers in critical care. Given the complexity of critical care delivery, a review needs to cover a wide range of subjects. In this review, I take a sociotechnical systems perspective on critical care and discuss the people, their technical and nontechnical skills, the importance of teamwork, technology, and ergonomics in this complex environment. After a description of the importance of a safety climate, the chapter will conclude with a summary on how human factors and ergonomics can improve quality in critical care delivery.

What patients' problems do nurses e-chart? Longitudinal study to evaluate the usability of an interface terminology

BACKGROUND

The nurses' ability to document patient's status, problems and progress is an important issue in patients' safety. Nursing terminologies are intended to support nursing practice but as any other clinical tool, they should be evaluated to assure quality and warrant effective written communication among clinicians.

OBJECTIVES

This study was aimed to evaluate the usability of the diagnosis axis of an interface terminology by assessing its completeness and the frequency of use of its concepts.

DESIGN

Observational, longitudinal, multicentre study.

SETTING

A total of 8 hospitals representing 162 acute medical-surgical, obstetric and mental health nursing wards, step-down units and home in-patient units were included.

PARTICIPANTS

Overall, 246,400 electronic care plans were studied; 53.5% from male patients; 14.6% paediatrics and 33.7% from patients elder than 70 years old. Most were admitted due to cardiocirculatory, respiratory, digestive or musculoskeletal conditions (50.5%), other acute medical or surgical disorders (29.8%) and obstetrics (19.3%).

METHODS

The main outcome measures were: the use of nursing diagnoses from the interface terminology evaluated and their accumulated frequency, analysed over a 3-year retrospective review of the electronic nursing care plans. The analysis of data included descriptive statistics with a confidence level of 95% for confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Most of the diagnostic concepts from the interface terminology were used (92.3%) by nurses to illustrate patients' problems in the electronic care plans. Their frequency of use widely varied, from some very frequent diagnoses like Risk for haemorrhage (51.4%; CI 95%: 51.25-51.65) or Acute pain (49.6%; CI: 49.49-49.88) to others used only in exceptional cases like Faecal impaction or Extravasation. The first nursing diagnosis related to family or caregiver emerges in the 32nd place of the ranking.

CONCLUSIONS

Results for outcome measures oriented that the diagnosis axis of this interface terminology meets the usability criterion of completeness when assessing for the use of its concepts in the acute care setting.

Pediatric sepsis: preparing for the future against a global scourge

Sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among children worldwide. As consensus statements emerge regarding early recognition and goal-directed management of sepsis, scrutiny should be given to the unique characteristics of sepsis in children. Pediatric patients are not small adults! Sepsis epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management strategy can vary significantly from those for adults. Herein, we describe the epidemiology of pediatric sepsis, in both resource-rich and resource-poor worlds, and discuss how the pathophysiology of pediatric sepsis differs from that for adults. We discuss the timeline of management of pediatric sepsis, studying how discoveries over the past 50 years have changed the way sepsis is treated. Finally, we discuss the future of pediatric sepsis. We focus on approaches that carry the most substantive impact on the global burden of disease.

Mapping the Diagnosis Axis of an Interface Terminology to the NANDA International Taxonomy

Background. Nursing terminologies are designed to support nursing practice but, as with any other clinical tool, they should be evaluated. Cross-mapping is a formal method for examining the validity of the existing controlled vocabularies. Objectives. The study aims to assess the inclusiveness and expressiveness of the nursing diagnosis axis of a newly implemented interface terminology by cross-mapping with the NANDA-I taxonomy. Design/Methods. The study applied a descriptive design, using a cross-sectional, bidirectional mapping strategy. The sample included 728 concepts from both vocabularies. Concept cross-mapping was carried out to identify one-to-one, negative, and hierarchical connections. The analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics. Results. Agreement of the raters' mapping achieved 97%. More than 60% of the nursing diagnosis concepts in the NANDA-I taxonomy were mapped to concepts in the diagnosis axis of the new interface terminology; 71.1% were reversely mapped. Conclusions. Main results for outcome measures suggest that the diagnosis axis of this interface terminology meets the validity criterion of cross-mapping when mapped from and to the NANDA-I taxonomy.

What factors influence the prevalence and accuracy of nursing diagnoses documentation in clinical practice? A systematic literature review

AIM

To identify what determinants influence the prevalence and accuracy of nursing diagnosis documentation in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND

Nursing diagnoses guide and direct nursing care. They are the foundation for goal setting and provide the basis for interventions. The literature mentions several factors that influences nurses' documentation of diagnoses, such as a nurse's level of education, patient's condition and the ward environment.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHOD

MEDLINE and CINAHL databases were searched using the following headings and keywords: nursing diagnosis, nursing documentation, hospitals, influence, utilisation, quality, implementation and accuracy. The search was limited to articles published between 1995-October 2009. Studies were only selected if they were written in English and were primary studies addressing factors that influence nursing diagnosis documentation.

RESULTS

In total, 24 studies were included. Four domains of factors that influence the prevalence and accuracy of diagnoses documentation were found: (1) the nurse as a diagnostician, (2) diagnostic education and resources, (3) complexity of a patient's situation and (4) hospital policy and environment.

CONCLUSION

General factors, which influence decision-making, and nursing documentation and specific factors, which influence the prevalence and accuracy of nursing diagnoses documentation, need to be distinguished. To support nurses in documenting their diagnoses accurately, we recommend taking a comprehensive perspective on factors that influence diagnoses documentation. A conceptual model of determinants that influence nursing diagnoses documentation, as presented in this study, may be helpful as a reference for nurse managers and nurse educators.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

This review gives hospital management an overview of determinants for possible quality improvements in nursing diagnoses documentation that needs to be undertaken in clinical practice.

Flight nursing expertise: towards a middle-range theory

AIM

This paper presents a middle-range Theory of Flight Nursing Expertise.

BACKGROUND

Rotary-wing (helicopter) medical transport has grown rapidly in the USA since its introduction, particularly during the past 5 years. Patients once considered too sick to transport are now being transported more frequently and over longer distances. Many limitations are imposed by the air medical transport environment and these require nurses to alter their practice.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was conducted using Pubmed, Medline, CINAHL, secondary referencing and an Internet search from 1960 to 2008 for studies related to the focal concepts in flight nursing.

DISCUSSION

The middle-range Theory of Flight Nursing Expertise is composed of nine concepts (experience, training, transport environment of care, psychomotor skills, flight nursing knowledge, cue recognition, pattern recognition, decision-making and action) and their relationships. Five propositions describe the relationships between those concepts and how they apply to flight nursing expertise.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

After empirical testing, this theory may be a useful tool to assist novice flight nurses to attain the skills necessary to provide safe and competent care more efficiently, and may aid in designing curricula and programmes of research.

CONCLUSION

Research is needed to determine the usefulness of this theory in both rotary and fixed-wing medical transport settings, and to examine the similarities and differences related to expertise needed for different flight nurse team compositions. Curriculum and training innovations can result from increased understanding of the concepts and relationships proposed in this theory.

Nurse-led telephone interventions for people with cardiac disease: a review of the research literature

BACKGROUND

Nurse-led telephone follow-up offers a relatively inexpensive method of delivering education and support for assisting recovery in the early discharge period; however, its efficacy is yet to be determined.

AIM

To perform a critical integrative review of the research literature addressing the effectiveness of nurse-led telephone interventions for people with coronary heart disease (CHD).

METHODS

A literature search of five health care databases; Sciencedirect, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Pubmed, Proquest and Medline to identify journal articles between 1980 and 2009. People with cardiac disease were considered for inclusion in this review. The search yielded 128 papers, of which 24 met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 8330 participants from 24 studies were included in the final review. Seven studies demonstrated statistically significant differences in all outcomes measured, used two group experimental research design and valid and reliable instruments. Some positive effects were detected in eight studies in regards to nurse-led telephone interventions for people with cardiac disease and no differences were detected in nine studies.

DISCUSSION

Studies with some positive effects generally had stronger research designs, large samples, used valid and reliable instruments and extensive nurse-led educative interventions.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that people with cardiac disease showed some benefits from nurse-led/delivered telephone interventions. More rigorous research into this area is needed.

Competence in intensive and critical care nursing: a literature review

This literature review defines and describes the concept of competence in adult intensive care nursing, with special reference to clinical and professional competence. The aim was to see whether and how the studies reviewed defined or described the concept of competence, and which domains of competence have been investigated in intensive and critical care nursing research. The review focuses on empirical studies retrieved from the COCHRANE and MEDLINE (1994-2005) databases. The final analysis comprised 45 studies. The studies were analysed by inductive content analysis. Very few (n=7) of the studies offered any definitions or descriptions of the concept of competence. Clinical and professional competence in intensive and critical care nursing can be defined as a specific knowledge base, skill base, attitude and value base and experience base of intensive and critical care nursing. Clinical competence can be divided into three and professional competence into four constituent domains. In clinical competence, these are the principles of nursing care; clinical guidelines; and nursing interventions. In professional competence, the domains are ethical activity; decision-making; development work; and collaboration. More empirical research is needed to examine competence in intensive and critical care nursing.

Maintaining Vigilance to Promote Best Outcomes for Hospitalized Elders

This article presents contemporary evidence regarding the promotion of a culture of caring for hospitalized older persons through nursing vigilance. A summary of the literature regarding the need for vigilance, what to be vigilant about, and how vigilance can be enhanced for hospitalized older persons is provided, as well as recommendations for practice, education, research, and policy. Evidence indicates that vigilance is enhanced by having nurses who have specialized knowledge to differentiate normal aging from abnormal pathology, and who use point-of-care information, electronic health records, patient care information systems, and computerized adverse events detection systems to monitor symptoms and outcomes and prevent errors. The use of specialized models of patient care and adequate nurse-patient staffing also have been shown to prevent errors and improve patient outcomes.

Do knowledge and experience have specific roles in triage decision-making?

Accuracy of triage decisions is a major influence on patient outcomes. Triage nurses' knowledge and experience have been cited as influential factors in triage decision-making. The aim of this article is to examine the independent roles of factual knowledge and experience in triage decisions. All of the articles cited in this review were research papers that examined the relationship between triage decisions and knowledge and/or experience of triage nurses. Numerous studies have shown that factual knowledge is an important factor in improving triage decisions. Although a number of studies have examined the role of experience as an independent influence on triage decisions, none have found a significant relationship between experience and triage decision-making. Factual knowledge appears to be more important than years of emergency nursing or triage experience in triage decision accuracy. Many triage education programs are underpinned by the assumption that knowledge acquisition will result in improved triage decisions. A better understanding of the relationships between clinical decisions, knowledge, and experience is pivotal for the rigorous evaluation of education programs.

A review of clinical decision making: models and current research

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this paper was to review the current literature clinical decision-making models and the educational application of models to clinical practice. This was achieved by exploring the function and related research of the three available models of clinical decision making: information-processing model, the intuitive-humanist model and the clinical decision-making model.

BACKGROUND

Clinical decision making is a unique process that involves the interplay between knowledge of pre-existing pathological conditions, explicit patient information, nursing care and experiential learning. Historically, two models of clinical decision making are recognized from the literature; the information-processing model and the intuitive-humanist model. The usefulness and application of both models has been examined in relation the provision of nursing care and care related outcomes. More recently a third model of clinical decision making has been proposed. This new multidimensional model contains elements of the information-processing model but also examines patient specific elements that are necessary for cue and pattern recognition.

DESIGN

Literature review.

METHODS

Evaluation of the literature generated from MEDLINE, CINAHL, OVID, PUBMED and EBESCO systems and the Internet from 1980 to November 2005.

RESULTS

The characteristics of the three models of decision making were identified and the related research discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Three approaches to clinical decision making were identified, each having its own attributes and uses. The most recent addition to the clinical decision making is a theoretical, multidimensional model which was developed through an evaluation of current literature and the assessment of a limited number of research studies that focused on the clinical decision-making skills of inexperienced nurses in pseudoclinical settings. The components of this model and the relative merits to clinical practice are discussed.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

It is proposed that clinical decision making improves as the nurse gains experience of nursing patients within a specific speciality and with experience, nurses gain a sense of saliency in relation to decision making. Experienced nurses may use all three forms of clinical decision making both independently and concurrently to solve nursing-related problems. It is suggested that O'Neill's clinical decision-making model could be tested by educators and experienced nurses to assess the efficacy of this hybrid approach to decision making.

Haemodynamic instability after cardiac surgery: nurses' perceptions of clinical decision-making

BACKGROUND

Cardiac surgical patients are distinguished by their potential for instability in the early postoperative period, highly invasive haemodynamic monitoring technologies and unique clinical presentations as a result of undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Little is known about nurses' perceptions of assuming responsibility for such patients. An understanding of nurses' perceptions may identify areas of practice that can be improved and assist in determining the adequacy of current decision supports.

AIM

The aim of this study was to describe critical care nurses' perceptions of assuming responsibility for the nursing management of cardiac patients in the initial two-hour postoperative period.

DESIGN

An exploratory descriptive study based on naturalistic decision-making.

METHODS

Thirty-eight nurses were interviewed immediately following a two-hour observation of their clinical practice. Content analysis and a systematic thematic analysis process called 'Framework' were used to analyse the interview transcripts.

RESULTS

Nurses described their perceptions of managing patients in terms of how they felt about making decisions for complex cardiac surgical patients and in terms of how clinical processes unique to the admission phase impacted their decision-making. Nurses felt either daunted or stimulated and challenged when making decisions. Nurses identified handover from anaesthetists, settling in procedures and forms of collegial assistance as important processes that impacted their decision-making.

CONCLUSION

Nurses' previous experiences with similar patients influenced how they felt about making decisions during the initial two-hour postoperative period, but did not alter their views about processes important for patient safety during this time.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Feelings expressed by nurses in this study highlight the need for clinical supervision and appropriate allocation of resources during the immediate recovery period after cardiac surgery. Nurses identified ways to improve clinical processes that impacted their decision-making during the immediate recovery of cardiac surgical patients.

The acquisition and exercise of nephrology nursing expertise: a grounded theory study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

This purpose of this study was to describe the process of expertise acquisition in nephrology nursing practice.

BACKGROUND

It has been recognized for a number of decades that experts, compared with other practitioners in a number of professions and occupations, are the most knowledgeable and effective, in terms of both the quantity and quality of output. Studies relating to expertise have been undertaken in a range of nursing contexts and specialties; to date, however, none have been undertaken which focus on nephrology nursing.

DESIGN

This study, using grounded theory methodology, took place in one renal unit in New South Wales, Australia and involved six non-expert and 11 expert nurses.

METHODS

Simultaneous data collection and analysis took place using participant observation, semi-structured interviews and review of nursing documentation.

FINDINGS

The study revealed a three-stage skills-acquisitive process that was identified as non-expert, experienced non-expert and expert stages. Each stage was typified by four characteristics, which altered during the acquisitive process; these were knowledge, experience, skill and focus.

CONCLUSION

This was the first study to explore nephrology nursing expertise and uncovered new aspects of expertise not documented in the literature and it also made explicit other areas, which had only been previously implied. Relevance to clinical practice. Of significance to nursing, the exercise of expertise is a function of the recognition of expertise by others and it includes the blurring of the normal boundaries of professional practice.

Uncovering the evidence of non-expert nephrology nursing practice

Expertise in nursing has been widely studied although there have been no previous studies into what constitutes expertise in nephrology (renal) nursing. This paper, which is abstracted from a larger study into the acquisition and exercise of nephrology nursing expertise, provides evidence of the characteristics and practices of non-expert nephrology nurses. Using the grounded theory method, the study took place in one renal unit in New South Wales, Australia, and involved six non-expert and 11 expert nurses. Sampling was purposive then theoretical. Simultaneous data collection and analysis using participant observation, review of nursing documentation and semistructured interviews was undertaken. The study revealed a three-stage skills-acquisitive process that was identified as non-expert, experienced non-expert and expert stages. Non-expert nurses showed superficial nephrology nursing knowledge and limited experience; they were acquiring basic nephrology nursing skills and possessed a narrow focus of practice.

Coupling the N-CODES System With Actual Nurse Decision-making

Nurses must be involved in the development and testing of clinical decision support systems if systems that fit into the actual clinical decision-making process and the flow of practice are to be designed. This article discusses the first trial of N-CODES, the Nurse Decision Support System. This system is designed to assist nurses, particularly novices, to make clinical decisions. The adequacy of the theoretical framework and selected aspects of the knowledge base were examined. Twelve nurses participated. Results indicated that revision of the theoretical framework is necessary if it is to be a fair representation of nurse's decision-making. The sequencing of information seems appropriate but the process of developing the knowledge base must be made more transparent to nurse users. After modifications, the next trial will test actual clinical use.

A Practice Model for Patient Safety

Creating a culture of patient safety often involves developing nursing care models that effectively use nursing resources. These authors discuss a nursing care model that focuses on the experienced nurses to enhance the use of their expertise. They provide more direct oversight and surveillance for the care given to all patients through leadership, mentoring, and collaborative practice. The experienced nurse is valued as a clinical leader, instrumental to the development of a safe practice environment. Implementation of this model has resulted in dramatic improvements in safety and registered nurse retention.

Measuring the quality of judgement and decision-making in nursing

AIM

This paper discusses measurement of the quality of judgement and decision-making in nursing research. It examines theoretical and research issues surrounding how to measure judgement accuracy as a component of evaluating decision-making in nursing practice.

DISCUSSION

Judgement accuracy is discussed with reference to different methods of measurement, including comparing judgements with independent criteria and inter-judge approaches. Existing research on how judgement accuracy has been measured in nursing practice is examined. Evaluation of decisions is then discussed, including consideration of the process of decision-making and evaluating decision outcomes. Finally, existing research on decision-making in nursing is assessed and the strengths and limitations of different types of measurement discussed.

CONCLUSION

We suggests that researchers examining the quality of judgement and decision-making in nursing need to be aware of both the strengths and limitations of existing methods of measurement. We also suggest that researchers need to use a number of different methods, including normative approaches such as Bayes' Theorem and Subjective Expected Utility Theory.