Autoregulation of neurotransmitter release at autonomic nerve terminals: a questionable theory

Pathophysiological Effects of Pancreatic Sympathetic Denervation in Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis in Dogs

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the greater splanchnic nerve (GSN) transection on the pathophysiological process of acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP).

METHODS

The dogs were divided into a sham operation (SO) group, ANP group, and ANP with bilateral GSN transection (GSNT) group. Dogs in the GSNT group underwent bilateral GSNT immediately after ANP induction. The levels of serum pancreatic amylase (AMY), calcium, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (HCRP), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin 10 (IL-10), and neutrophile granulocyte (NEU) counts were monitored dynamically, and the pathological examinations of the pancreas was performed at postoperative day 7.

RESULTS

All the parameters among the 3 groups showed no differences before the experiment (P > 0.05). At different postoperative times, the NEU count and serum AMY, TNF-α, HCRP, and IL-10 were significantly increased; however, the serum calcium had decreased in the ANP group versus SO (P < 0.05). The postoperative serum IL-10 and calcium levels were higher, and TNF-α, HCRP, and NEU counts were lower in the GSNT group compared with those in the ANP group (P < 0.05); as for AMY, no significant difference was found between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The pancreas pathological scoring of the GSNT group was lower versus the ANP group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Greater splanchnic nerve transection can alleviate development of pathophysiological processes in ANP.

Beneficial effect of splanchnic nerve transection and harmful effect of vagotomy on acute necrotizing pancreatitis in the dog

BACKGROUND

The nervous system interacts dynamically with the immune system to modulate inflammation through humoral and neural pathways. However, the influence of visceral nerve (VN) on acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) has drawn little attention.

AIM

To investigate the influence of VN on the pathophysiological process of ANP in dogs.

METHODS

The dogs were divided into a sham operation (SO) group, ANP group, ANP + vagal nerve trunk transection (VNTT) group, and ANP + greater splanchnic nerve transection (GSNT) group. The VNTT and GSNT groups underwent VNTT and GSNT respectively immediately after ANP induction. The levels of serum pancreatic amylase (AMY), calcium, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (HCRP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and interleukin-10 (IL-10) were monitored dynamically and the pathological examinations of the pancreas was performed at postoperative day 7.

RESULTS

All serum parameters among the four groups showed no differences before the experiment (p > 0.05). At different postoperative times, the serum TNF-α, IL-1β, HCRP, and AMY were significantly increased, however, the serum calcium and IL-10 had dropped in the ANP group versus SO group (p < 0.05); an alike variation trend occurred between the VNTT group and ANP group (p < 0.05); an opposite variation trend occurred between the GSNT group and the ANP group (p < 0.05). The pancreas pathological scoring of VNTT group was highest in the four groups (p < 0.05) and GSNT group was lower versus ANP group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The GSNT has been shown to alleviate development of ANP, however, VNTT may exacerbate the ANP.

Basal and activity-induced release of substance P from primary afferent fibres in NK1 receptor knockout mice: evidence for negative feedback

The concept that NK1 receptors are located pre-junctionally on substance P (SP)-containing nerves, acting as autoreceptors to inhibit SP release, has been suggested, but remains a controversial issue. To further investigate the existence of this receptor on central and peripheral terminals of primary afferent fibres, NK1 receptor knockout mice and an NK1 receptor antagonist were used in nerve-attached tissue preparations. These were the isolated dorsal horn of the spinal cord with dorsal roots attached, and the hairy skin of the hind paw with attached saphenous nerve. The results reveal that in the dorsal horn preparation, basal release of SP is significantly higher in NK1(-/-) mice than NK1(+/+) mice (P<0.05, n=7 mice/strain). However, a difference in SP release evoked in the dorsal horn by electrical stimulation of the dorsal roots or capsaicin application was not observed. In contrast, antidromic electrical stimulation of the saphenous nerve caused a substantially greater release of SP in the skin of NK1(-/-) mice than in NK1(+/+) mice (P<0.05, n=5 to 6 mice/strain). These results provide evidence for the existence of NK1 autoreceptors on sensory nerves in skin, which may be relevant to the modulation of their peripheral pathophysiological effector functions.

Co-localization of histamine and dopamine-beta-hydroxylase in sympathetic ganglion and release of histamine from cardiac sympathetic terminals of guinea-pig

1. The aim of this study was to investigate the co-localization of histamine and dopamine-beta-hydroxylase in the superior cervical ganglion of guinea-pig and release of histamine from cardiac sympathetic terminals in guinea-pig isolated atrium. 2. Histidine decarboxylase (a histamine-synthesizing enzyme) mRNA signals were detected in the neurones of superior cervical ganglion of guinea-pig by in situ hybridization. The results of double-labelled immunofluorescence further confirmed the co-localization of histamine and dopamine-beta-hydroxylase in the large principle neurons and small intensely fluorescent cells in the superior cervical ganglion. The immunoreactivities of both histamine and dopamine-beta-hydroxylase were significantly attenuated after 6-hydroxydopamine-induced lesion of sympathetic nerves. 3. The refractory electrical field stimulation caused the release of histamine from cardiac sympathetic terminals of guinea-pig isolated atria (112.14 +/- 40.34 ng x ml(-1)), which was significantly attenuated to 35 +/- 15.57 ng x ml(-1) by reserpine pretreatment. Following administering compound 48/80, a mast cell degranulator, electrical field stimulation induced a dramatic increase of endogenous histamine release from isolated atria (303.57 +/-72.93 ng x ml(-1)). When compound 48/80 was added to the reserpine-treated atria, the release of histamine induced by field stimulation was decreased to 207.14 +/- 76.39 ng x ml(-1). 4 These results provide novel evidence that histamine co-exists with noradrenaline in sympathetic nerves and might act as a neurotransmitter to modulate sympathetic neurotransmission.

5-HT1A receptor-mediated autoinhibition does not function at physiological firing rates: evidence from in vitro electrophysiological studies in the rat dorsal raphe nucleus

5-HT(1A)-mediated autoinhibition of neurones in the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) is considered to be the principal inhibitory regulator of 5-HT neuronal activity. The activation of this receptor by endogenous 5-HT was investigated using electrophysiological recordings from the rat DRN in vitro. At a concentration which blocked the inhibitory effect of exogenous 5-HT, the 5-HT(1A) antagonist WAY 100635 did not alter basal firing rate or modulate the excitatory response to the alpha(1)-agonist phenylephrine. Blockade of 5-HT reuptake by a concentration of fluoxetine, which enhanced the inhibitory effect of exogenous 5-HT, lowered phenylephrine-induced basal firing presumably due to potentiation of the effect of endogenous 5-HT. However, this effect was not firing rate dependent and neither the proportional increase nor the time-course of the response to a higher concentration of phenylephrine were altered in the presence of fluoxetine. These data suggest that the inhibitory 5-HT(1A) receptor on raphe neurones is neither tonically activated nor plays any role in modulating the response to excitatory transmitters. Thus, at physiological firing rates this receptor does not appear to function as an autoreceptor of serotonergic neurones of the DRN.

Neurotransmitter release in an arterial preparation and the action of alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists

1 This study examined the potentiating effects of competitive antagonists of the adrenergic alpha2 receptors and of phenoxybenzamine (POB) an irreversible antagonist, on the stimulation-induced efflux of [3H]-noradrenaline in arterial tissue of rabbit. This was done to determine if the lack of concordance of efflux potentiation by antagonists with the expectations of presynaptic negative feedback theory can be attributed to increasingly successful competition from rising perineuronal transmitter concentrations, when stimulation parameters are increased, in the presence of a fixed concentration of competitive antagonist. 2 Tissues were stimulated with a fixed pulse number and frequency, to rule out confounding factors, and major alterations in the concentration of released transmitter were achieved through variations in the pulse duration. 3 Rauwolscine potentiated transmitter release less at the longest, rather than at the shortest pulse duration, and showed a potentiation of release that was indifferent to the quantities of released transmitter. This was also seen with POB although it binds covalently to the presynaptic receptor. 4 Noradrenaline inhibited stimulation-induced transmitter release confirming the presence of presynaptic alpha inhibitory sites. 5 Yohimbine potentiated transmitter release the same as did rauwolscine and POB, and protected the relevant sites against POB potentiation, confirming site identity. The combination of POB and rauwolscine had no greater effect than did either alone certifying that they acted similarly and that maximally effective concentrations of each were used. 6 Consequently, noradrenaline breakthrough of presynaptic receptor blockade does not explain the non-conforming observations made with competitive antagonists in tests of presynaptic theory.

Autoreceptors do not regulate routinely neurotransmitter release: focus on adrenergic systems

The theory that neurotransmitter release is regulated locally at the individual terminals of neurons has achieved a rapid and seemingly secure status in our understanding of neuronal function both in the periphery and in the central nervous system. This concept of negative feedback control through the monitoring of the perineuronal concentration of previously released transmitter has been extended to a multiplicity of transmitters and utilized to explain the mechanisms of action of diverse classes of drugs, ranging from antihypertensives to antidepressants. It is my view that negative feedback by terminal and by somadendritic receptors cannot account for the existing body of experimental work. Analyses of the profiles of action of agonists and antagonists, and of the per pulse release of transmitter in the absence of drugs in a variety if peripheral organ systems, as well as in superfused brain slices, demonstrates the need for alternate interpretations of the available data. Evidence is provided that the actions of agonists to inhibit transmitter release and that of antagonists to enhance release occur at different cellular loci and that the purported unitary action of these two classes that is so central to the validity of presynaptic theory is unsupportable.

Regarding the unitary theory of agonist and antagonist action at presynaptic adrenoceptors

1. The linkage between potentiation of field stimulation-induced noradrenaline release and blockade of the presynaptic inhibitory effect of exogenous noradrenaline by a presynaptic antagonist was examined in superfused rabbit aorta preparations. 2. Rauwolscine clearly potentiated the release of noradrenaline in response to 100 pulses at 2 Hz but reduced the capacity of noradrenaline to inhibit transmitter release to a questionable extent, and then only when comparisons were made with untreated, rather then to rauwolscine-treated, controls. 3. Aortic preparations exposed for 60 min to rauwolscine followed by superfusion with antagonist-free Krebs for 60 min retained the potentiation of stimulation-induced transmitter release but no antagonism of the noradrenaline-induced inhibition could be detected at either of two noradrenaline concentrations when comparisons were made with rauwolscine treated controls. 4. Comparisons of the inhibitory effect of exogenous noradrenaline (1.8 x 10-6 M) on transmitter efflux in the presence and absence of rauwolscine pretreatment revealed that the antagonist enhanced rather than antagonized the presynaptic inhibition by noradrenaline. 5 It is concluded that the unitary hypothesis that asserts that antagonist enhancement of transmitter release and its blockade of noradrenaline induced inhibition are manifestations of a unitary event are not supportable.