Exercise-induced aortic flow parameters in early postmenopausal women and middle-aged men

Hemodynamic Changes During Physiological and Pharmacological Stress Testing in Healthy Subjects, Aortic Stenosis and Aortic Coarctation Patients-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Exercise testing has become a diagnostic standard in the evaluation and management of heart disease. While different methods of exercise and pharmacological stress testing exist, only little is known about their comparability. We aimed to assess hemodynamic changes during dynamic exercise, isometric exercise, and dobutamine stress testing at different stress intensities in healthy subjects and patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and aortic coarctation (CoA).

Methods: A systematic literature search (PROSPERO 2017:CRD42017078608) in MEDLINE of interventional trials was conducted to identify eligible studies providing evidence of changes in hemodynamic parameters under different stress conditions acquired by MRI or echocardiography. A random effects model was used to estimate pooled mean changes in hemodynamics.

Results: One hundred and twenty-eight study arms with a total of 3,139 stress-examinations were included. In healthy subjects/(where available) in AS, pooled mean changes (95% CIs) during light dynamic stress were 31.78 (27.82–35.74) bpm in heart rate (HR) and 6.59 (2.58–10.61) ml in stroke volume (SV). Changes during light pharmacological stress were 13.71 (7.87–19.56)/14.0 (9.82–18.18) bpm in HR, and 5.47 (0.3–10.63)/8.0 (3.82–12.18) ml in SV. Changes during light isometric stress were 18.44 (10.74–26.14)/5.0 (−1.17–11.17) bpm in HR and −4.17 (−14.37–6.03)/−4.0 (−16.43–8.43) ml in SV. Changes during moderate dynamic stress were 49.57 (40.03–59.1)/46.45 (42.63–50.27) bpm in HR and 11.64 (5.87–17.42) ml in SV. During moderate pharmacological stress, changes in HR were 42.83 (36.94–48.72)/18.66 (2.38–34.93) bpm and in SV 6.29 (−2.0–14.58)/13.11 (7.99–18.23) ml. During high intensity dynamic stress changes in HR were 89.31 (81.46–97.17)/55.32 (47.31–63.33) bpm and in SV 21.31 (13.42–29.21)/−0.96 (−5.27–3.35) ml. During high pharmacological stress, changes in HR were 53.58 (36.53–70.64)/42.52 (32.77–52.28) bpm, and in SV 0.98 (−9.32–11.27)/14.06 (−1.62–29.74) ml. HR increase and age were inversely correlated at high stress intensities. In CoA, evidence was limited to single studies.

Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis presents pooled hemodynamic changes under light, moderate and high intensity exercise and pharmacological stress, while considering the potential influence of age. Despite limited availability of comparative studies, the reference values presented in this review allow estimation of the expected individual range of a circulatory response in healthy individuals and patients with AS and may contribute to future study planning and patient-specific models even when stress testing is contraindicated.

Aortic valve calcification in hypertensive patients: prevalence, risk factors and association with transvalvular flow velocity

BACKGROUND

The important role of the "nonobstructive" aortic valve calcification (AVC) in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality has recently been emphasized. The present work had two goals: (1) to analyze the prevalence and factors determining the extent of AVC in hypertensive patients; (2) to investigate a possible association between the extent of AVC and flow velocity across the aortic valve.

METHODS

This was a prospective study performed in a university hospital. The sample included 263 consecutive patients (139 men and 124 women), mean age 65+/-6, who underwent echo-Doppler. The upper quartile of peak flow velocity across the aortic valve (>130 mm/s in our population) was defined as augmented flow velocity.

RESULTS

There were 31 (12%) patients in the advanced AVC group and 122 (46%) without any calcified deposits (the no AVC group). The remaining 110 (42%), who did not meet criteria for advanced AVC, comprised the trivial AVC group. Peak flow velocity was significantly higher in patients with advanced vs. trivial AVC and no AVC groups: 135+/-45, 116+/-23 and 113+/-23 cm/s, respectively; p=0.0002. Prevalence of augmented transvalvular aortic flow was significantly higher (p=0.01) among patients with advanced AVC (41.9%) vs. trivial (20.9%) and no AVC (20.5%). Multivariate analyses identified age as the only independent variable associated with advanced AVC [OR 1.6 (CI 1.2-2.3), 5 years increment]. Advanced AVC and female gender were identified as independent variables for augmented transvalvular aortic flow with OR 2.9 (CI 1.3-6.4) and 2.5 (CI 1.4-4.6), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of AVC among hypertensive patients is high and clearly age-related. Female gender and advanced (but not trivial) AVC are associated with augmented aortic transvalvular peak flow. Our results stress the role of protruding calcium deposits in augmentation of rest flow velocity across the aortic valve regardless of visible restriction of leaflet opening.

Comparison of abdominal aortic hemodynamics between men and women at rest and during lower limb exercise

INTRODUCTION

Biologic variations between men and women have been hypothesized to contribute to the differences in atherosclerosis epidemiology of the two genders. Hemodynamics are also hypothesized to play an important role in the localization of atherosclerosis in the abdominal aorta. However, the hemodynamics of men and women have not been compared at this location at rest or during lower limb exercise conditions.

METHODS

A magnetic resonance-compatible exercise bicycle, magnetic resonance imaging techniques, and custom data processing software were used to quantify blood flow rate, wall shear stress, and oscillations in flow and wall shear stress at the supraceliac and infrarenal levels of the abdominal aorta of young healthy men and women at rest and during lower limb exercise.

RESULTS

Heart rate increased from 73 +/- 6.2 bpm at rest to 110 +/- 8.8 bpm during exercise (P <.0001). No statistical differences were found at the infrarenal level for mean blood flow rate (men, 0.9 +/- 0.4 L/min; women, 0.8 +/- 0.4 L/min) or mean wall shear stress (men, 1.2 +/- 0.5 dynes/cm(2); women, 1.4 +/- 0.7 dynes/cm(2)) at rest or mean blood flow rate (men, 5.9 +/- 1.3 L/min; women, 5.2 +/- 0.8 L/min) or mean wall shear stress (men, 5.1 +/- 0.8 dynes/cm(2); women, 5.4 +/- 2.1 dynes/cm(2)) during exercise. Also, no differences were seen in temporal flow and wall shear stress oscillations between men and women at rest or during exercise. Similarly, no significant hemodynamic differences were found between the genders at the supraceliac level.

CONCLUSION

These similarities suggest that hemodynamics may not play a significant role in abdominal aortic disease differentiation between the genders and that biologic factors may be more important.

Hypertension in menopausal women--a special case, for special treatment?

After the menopause the consequences of hypertension in women change. Their risks of myocardial infarction and stroke rise steeply, a rise that has been blamed in part on the loss of estrogen and the onset of menopausal metabolic syndrome, with endothelial dysfunction, hyperlipidemia, insulin resistance and derangement in coagulation. Hypertensive menopausal women have not had optimum treatment. They have poorer prognoses than men of the same age. Their antihypertensive management therefore merits special attention. Hormone replacement, aspirin prophylaxis and lipid-lowering drugs have their place. The antihypertensive drug chosen should not worsen the metabolic syndrome: angiotensin-II converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are therefore among the first-line drugs. Few drugs have been specifically aimed at menopausal hypertension and these are reviewed here.

The acute effects of sublingual estradiol on left ventricular diastolic function in normotensive and hypertensive postmenopausal women

AIM

limited information is available on estrogen influences on diastole. We aimed to investigate the acute effects of a single dose of sublingual 17beta-estradiol on left ventricular diastolic function in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

the study included 28 women aged 55.6 +/- 6 (15 normotensive and 13 hypertensive), who underwent Doppler echocardiography and estradiol plasma levels determination before and 60 min after sublingual administration of 4 mg of 17beta-estradiol.

RESULTS

there were no modifications in heart rate. Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure dropped significantly in the hypertensives and remained unchanged in normotensives. Estradiol levels were 1790 +/- 869 pg/ml in the normotensives and 2664 +/- 1490 in the hypertensives (P < 0.05). Peak early velocity, in the population as a whole, increased from 84 +/- 18 to 91 +/- 18 cm/s and the early-to-atrial velocity ratio from 1.1 +/- 0.4 to 1.4 +/- 0.6 (P < 0.0001 for both). Both acceleration and deceleration rates increased significantly (P < 0.0001). These changes were shared by all the patients. In addition, the hypertensive patients, who presented a baseline pattern characterized mainly by a grossly increased peak atrial velocity with reduction in the early-to-atrial velocity ratio, demonstrated a decrease in peak atrial velocity from 92 +/- 12 to 78 +/- 10 cm/s (P < 0.0001), associated with significant reductions in deceleration time (P < 0.0001) and pressure half time (P < 0.005). Therefore, the typical picture of impaired ventricular relaxation was favorably changed after estradiol administration.

CONCLUSIONS

the sublingual administration of estradiol induces acute modifications in left ventricular diastolic function in postmenopausal women, with improvement in the age-related left ventricular relaxation pattern, and that these beneficial changes are more pronounced in hypertensive that in normotensive women.

Lack of effects of transdermal estradiol on diastolic function: a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind short-term trial

OBJECTIVE

Limited information is available on the effects of transdermal estradiol on diastole. The present study was a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial designed to investigate the short-term effects of transdermal estradiol on left ventricular diastolic function in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

The study included 45 women aged 50.8 +/- 3.6 years (25 randomized to the study group and 20 to placebo), who underwent Doppler echocardiography and determination of the plasma estradiol level after 4 and 8 weeks of transdermal estradiol administration in a dose of 50 micrograms per 24 h.

RESULTS

There were no modifications in heart rate. Systolic blood pressure dropped in the study patients after 8 weeks (p < 0.03); diastolic blood pressure remained unchanged. Estradiol levels were 67 +/- 36 pg/ml at 4 weeks and 70 +/- 49 pg/ml at 8 weeks in the study group. Basal values of peak early and peak atrial velocities, acceleration time and rate, deceleration time and rate, early/atrial velocity ratio and pressure half-time were not significantly different between the estradiol and placebo groups. Doppler values remained unchanged after both 4 and 8 weeks in women receiving estradiol. Women with relatively high serum 17 beta-estradiol levels (> 100 pg/ml) at 4 or 8 weeks of treatment did not present more pronounced changes in the Doppler-derived parameters compared with patients with low hormone levels.

CONCLUSION

The results showed a lack of short-term effects of transdermal estradiol on left ventricular diastolic function in postmenopausal women, irrespective of serum estradiol levels.