Musculo-skeletal pathology in patients with angina pectoris and normal coronary angiograms

Musculoskeletal pain and related factors in coronary artery disease: An observational cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

In patients diagnosed with coronary artery disease (CAD), we aimed to determine the characteristics and risk factors of co-occurring musculoskeletal pain and examine its effects on functional capacity, psychological status and health-related quality of life.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 100 patients with (n= 50) and without (n= 50) musculoskeletal pain were enrolled. All patients were assessed on sociodemographic and clinical properties. The Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) were applied as clinical assessment scales.

RESULTS

Patients with musculoskeletal pain were mostly female, and had a lower education level and annual income. The pain was mostly nociceptive, intermittent, sharp/stabbing in character, and located in the chest and spine. Having musculoskeletal pain resulted in lower levels on the DASI and all subgroups of the SF-36, and higher levels on the HADS. Female gender, lower education level and severity of emotional distress proved to be independent risk factors for the development of musculoskeletal pain.

CONCLUSIONS

In CAD, the co-occurrence of musculoskeletal pain leads to a further decrease in health-related quality of life and functional status, and increased severity of anxiety and depression. This stresses the importance of the detection and optimal treatment of musculoskeletal pain in patients diagnosed with CAD.

Self-reported pain severity is associated with a history of coronary heart disease

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have found an association between chronic pain and cardiovascular (CV) mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the relationship between the severity of pain and non-fatal CV disease.

METHODS

A total of 45,994 adults randomly selected from general practice registers in Manchester and Aberdeen were posted a survey, which included a Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire, pain manikin and questions about lifestyle and medical history. A single component measuring pain severity was extracted using factor analysis. Logistic regression was used to test for an association between quintiles of pain severity and a history of CV disease, adjusting for confounders.

RESULTS

Of the 15,288 responders, 61% (n = 9357) reported pain for ≥ 1 day in the past month. Compared with the first (lowest) pain severity quintile, the fully adjusted odds ratio for heart attack in the second severity quintile was 1.25 (95% confidence interval 0.68, 2.30); third quintile: 1.65 (0.93, 2.94); fourth quintile: 1.76 (1.00, 3.11) and fifth (highest) quintile 2.47 (1.43, 4.28). Corresponding figures for angina (excluding heart attack) were: 1.79 (0.93, 3.45), 1.91 (1.00, 3.62), 1.03 (0.50, 2.11) and 3.17 (1.71, 5.85).

CONCLUSION

A history of CV disease is reported more often in those with severe pain than would be expected by chance, even when adjusting for shared risk factors.

Pain symptoms accompanying chronic poststernotomy pain: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

Despite the technical developments in surgical procedures, chronic poststernotomy pain (CPSP) is still very common. Many theories for its cause have been proposed in the literature, but the etiology is still not clear. Pain along the sternal scar and in the upper extremities (sometimes accompanied with paresthesia) persists in about 30% of cases. These symptoms have been regarded as two separate complications. This study investigated all pain symptoms in patients following sternotomy.

DESIGN

Retrospective pilot study.

SETTING

Outpatient clinic at the Leiden University Medical Center.

PATIENTS

A cohort of patients who underwent open heart surgery by median sternotomy between January 1, 2004 and January 1, 2006.

INTERVENTIONS

A questionnaire was completed by 631 patients, and a selected sample of 277 patients was examined for pain of the head, neck, back, and chest and upper extremities.

OUTCOME MEASURES

All pain locations were compared in two groups: 189 patients with sternal pain and 88 patients without sternal pain.

RESULTS

We found that pain and muscular tenderness in the investigated areas unrelated to the chest wall incision were significantly more common in patients with sternal pain compared to the nonsternal pain group. No surgical or demographic factors with the exception of female gender were consistent predictors of sternal pain.

CONCLUSION

CPSP is an extensive pain syndrome. Sternal pain is frequently accompanied by pain of the head, neck, back, and upper extremities. Further research on the possible etiology is warranted.

Thoracic costotransverse joint pain patterns: a study in normal volunteers

Background

Pain referral patterns of asymptomatic costotransverse joints have not been established. The objective of this study was to determine the pain referral patterns of asymptomatic costotransverse joints via provocative intra-articular injection.

Methods

Eight asymptomatic male volunteers received a combined total of 21 intra-articular costotransverse joint injections. Fluoroscopic imaging was used to identify and isolate each costotransverse joint and guide placement of a 25 gauge, 2.5 inch spinal needle into the costotransverse joint. Following contrast medium injection, the quality, intensity, and distribution of the resultant pain produced were recorded.

Results

Of the 21 costotransverse joint injections, 16 (76%) were classified as being intra-articular via arthrograms taken at the time of injection, and 14 of these injections produced a pain sensation distinctly different from that of needle placement. Average pain produced was 3.3/10 on a 0–10 verbal pain scale. Pain was described generally as a deep, dull ache, and pressure sensation. Pain patterns were located superficial to the injected joint, with only the right T2 injections showing referred pain 2 segments cranially and caudally. No chest wall, upper extremity or pseudovisceral pains were reported.

Conclusion

This study provides preliminary data of the pain referral patterns of costotransverse joints. Further research is needed to compare these findings with those elicited from symptomatic subjects.

Experiences and concerns among patients being treated for atypical chest pain

BACKGROUND

Many patients who are discharged from the hospital without receiving a clear-cut diagnosis of their chest pain continue to consume health care because of disabling physical and psychological symptoms. By identifying their experiences and concerns following hospitalization, an empirical basis for discussions on ways of improving the care of these particular patients will be obtained.

METHODS

A qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with 38 patients with a diagnosis of unspecified chest pain was carried out.

RESULTS

Two-thirds of the respondents had unanswered questions and concerns that had not been addressed. They found it difficult to understand why they had not undergone more tests. They requested an explanation for their chest pain, at the very least, or were worried about the future. Some respondents accepted the fact that they had not been given a sufficient amount of time and information. They referred to the stressful working situation of the physicians, the view that their admission could be regarded as unnecessary or that physicians at the hospital could not be expected to do more than exclude serious diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

Health professionals should address their patients' questions and fears properly and provide them with the most probable explanation for their symptoms. When taking the harmlessness of their symptoms or the situation of their caregivers into account, patients may find it inappropriate to impose further demands on care.

Cervicothoracic Angina Identified by Case History and Palpation Findings in Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the decision-making process of an experienced chiropractor in diagnosing noncardiac musculoskeletal chest pain of cervicothoracic angina in patients with stable angina pectoris, based on patient history and clinical examination. Secondly, to examine the possibility of obtaining an objective diagnostic rule tool for the identification of cervicothoracic angina and to validate the diagnosis of this disorder.

METHODS

A nonrandomized prospective trial was performed at a university hospital. A total of 516 of 972 consecutive patients referred for coronary angiography because of known or suspected angina pectoris were asked to participate in the study. Of these, 275 gave informed consent to a standardized manual examination of their spine and thorax. Diagnoses of an experienced chiropractor on cervicothoracic angina patients. Myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary angiography were used for validation. A set of candidate variables from patient history and clinical examination were tested for their role in the decision-making process.

RESULTS

Eighteen percent of the patients were diagnosed with cervicothoracic angina. Of these, 80% had normal myocardial perfusion compared to 50% of cervicothoracic angina-negative patients. The main determinants of the decision-making process could be identified.

CONCLUSION

An experienced chiropractor could identify a subset of patients with angina pectoris as having cervicothoracic angina. Systematic manual palpation of the spine and thorax could be used as part of the clinical examination together with basic cardiological variables to screen patients with chest pain allowing for improvements in referral patterns for specialist opinion or angiography.

Psychological factors, pain attribution and medical morbidity in chest-pain patients with and without coronary artery disease

This cross-sectional psychiatric and cardiological study compared patients with and without coronary artery disease (CAD) with respect to psychiatric morbidity, psychological factors, pain characteristics, medical morbidity and the prevalence of coronary risk factors. The 199 participants had been referred to cardiological outpatient clinics for the investigation of chest pain and had no history of heart disease. Current panic disorder occurred significantly more often in non-CAD patients (41% vs. 22%). No significant differences were found for other psychiatric disorders and psychological variables. Non-CAD patients reported significantly longer histories of pain and a higher prevalence of atypical chest pain. In other respects, there were surprisingly few differences between the groups. High morbidity of both psychiatric disease (pain disorder, 19%; any current psychiatric disorder, 72%) and somatic conditions (musculoskeletal disease, 33%; dyspepsia, 23%) was found with no significant differences between the groups. In these patients, multifactorial complaints may explain chest pain in both patient groups. The physicians should attend to psychiatric disorders in non-CAD as well as in CAD patients.

Chest pain in the emergency department: the broad spectrum of causes

We performed a prospective study to describe the broad spectrum of causes of chest pain in patients presenting to the emergency department and to compare the diagnoses in referred patients, self-referred patients and patients rushed in by ambulance. The final diagnosis in a consecutive case series of 578 chest pain patients was established after discharge from the hospital. The underlying disorders were grouped into cardiac, respiratory, gastro-oesophageal disorders, musculoskeletal pathology, somatization disorders, other diseases and unknown. For comparison of the frequencies of the disease categories the Chi-squared test was used. Out of 578 patients, 161 (27.9%) were self-referred, 369 (63.8%) were referred by the general practitioner and 48 (8.3%) were rushed in by ambulance. Cardiac diseases represented 51.7% of the cases, myocardial infarction and unstable angina 19% and 12.8% respectively Cardiac diseases were statistically significantly less common in self-referred patients (p<0.0005). Pulmonary diseases encompassed 14.2% of the population, followed by somatization disorders (9.2%), musculoskeletal pathology (7.1%) and other causes (4.3%). In 11.1% of the cases no definite final diagnosis could be established. Somatization disorders were significantly more frequent in self-referred and ambulance patients. Cardiac and pulmonary problems are the most frequent underlying disorders in acute chest pain patients in the emergency department. Somatization disorders and musculoskeletal pathology represented respectively 19.1% and 14.8% of the non-cardiac causes. The referral pattern influenced significantly the distribution of the disease categories with more cardiac and less psychiatric disorders in referred patients.