On the diagnosis of polycythaemia vera as assessed in the health and medical care in the Västra Götaland region, Sweden

An elevated venous haemoglobin concentration cannot be used as a surrogate marker for absolute erythrocytosis: a study of patients with polycythaemia vera and apparent polycythaemia

The diagnosis of polycythaemia vera (PV) has been established upon sets of clinical criteria, which require the presence of absolute erythrocytosis (AE). The most recent clinical criteria for PV, published by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2001, also required AE, and stated that the measured red cell mass (RCM) could be replaced by a surrogate marker for AE; a haemoglobin (Hb) value of >18.5 g/dl in males and >16.5 g/dl in females. The present study evaluated the potential of venous haematocrit (Hct) and Hb values as possible surrogate markers for AE in a series of 77 consecutive patients with PV and 66 patients with apparent polycythaemia (AP), in all of whom the RCM had been previously determined. In only 35% of the male PV patients would Hb values >18.5 g/dl indicate the presence of AE. Conversely, 14% of male AP patients would be misdiagnosed as having AE. A Hb > 16.5 g/dl would predict the presence of AE in 63% of the female PV patients, but 35% of female AP cases would be misdiagnosed as having AE. However, when the Hct was > or =0.60 an AE was always present, and this was true for both male and female subjects.

Gene expression profiling in polycythaemia vera: overexpression of transcription factor NF-E2

Summary The molecular aetiology of polycythaemia vera (PV) remains unknown and the differential diagnosis between PV and secondary erythrocytosis (SE) can be challenging. Gene expression profiling can identify candidates involved in the pathophysiology of PV and generate a molecular signature to aid in diagnosis. We thus performed cDNA microarray analysis on 40 PV and 12 SE patients. Two independent data sets were obtained: using a two-step training/validation design, a set of 64 genes (class predictors) was determined, which correctly discriminated PV from SE patients. Separately 253 genes were identified to be upregulated and 391 downregulated more than 1.5-fold in PV compared with healthy controls (P < 0.01). Of the genes overexpressed in PV, 27 contained Sp1 sites: we therefore propose that altered activity of Sp1-like transcription factors may contribute to the molecular aetiology of PV. One Sp1 target, the transcription factor NF-E2 [nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)], is overexpressed 2- to 40-fold in PV patients. In PV bone marrow, NF-E2 is overexpressed in megakaryocytes, erythroid and granulocytic precursors. It has been shown that overexpression of NF-E2 leads to the development of erythropoietin-independent erythroid colonies and that ectopic NF-E2 expression can reprogram monocytic cells towards erythroid and megakaryocytic differentiation. Transcription factor concentration may thus control lineage commitment. We therefore propose that elevated concentrations of NF-E2 in PV patients lead to an overproduction of erythroid and, in some patients, megakaryocytic cells/platelets. In this model, the level of NF-E2 overexpression determines both the severity of erythrocytosis and the concurrent presence or absence of thrombocytosis.

Molecular markers for the diagnosis of Philadelphia chromosome negative myeloproliferative disorders

Polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, idiopathic myelofibrosis and chronic myelogenous leukemia have been collectively termed the myeloproliferative disorders due to similarities in their clinical presentation. With the exception of chronic myelogenous leukemia, which is characterized by the presence of the Philadelphia chromosome, the myeloproliferative disorders display no consistent cytogenetic abnormalities. Hence, the diagnosis of Polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia and idiopathic myelofibrosis to date relies on clinical criteria. However, several molecular aberrations have been described, which can be used as molecular markers for the diagnosis of these clinical entities. This review outlines the diagnostic assays developed and highlights the advantages and disadvantages of the following markers: (1). Endogenous Erythroid Colonies, (2). Clonality, (3). Reduced c-Mpl protein expression and (4). PRV-1 mRNA over expression.

Polycythemia vera

The differential diagnosis of an elevated hematocrit and the criteria for the diagnosis of polycythemia vera present little or no problem; however, there is not a consensus on therapy. Spivak likened this to a conundrum--"an intricate and difficult problem." Nonetheless, it can be argued that on the basis of the following criteria--life expectancy, the absence of toxicity, and long remissions an average of 3.1 years or a median of 2 years--and with acute leukemia no more common than in other regimens except phlebotomy alone (a regimen that cannot be sustained), 32P should be the treatment of choice except in pregnant women. Others, but not all, share this view. This is in contrast to the statement, "Thus chemotherapy treatment of [polycythemia vera] patients is not as easy, innocuous, and well tolerated as it is generally believed". Patients treated with phlebotomy alone were subjected to an unacceptably high incidence of early thrombotic events. Unavailability of pipobroman eliminates this choice.