Curing depth of four composite veneering materials polymerized with different laboratory photo-curing units

Effect of metal halide light source on hardness, water sorption and solubility of indirect composite material

This study evaluates the effects of a metal halide light source on the post-polymerization properties of the Sinfony indirect composite material. Two polymerization systems were employed: the Hyper LII system, comprising a metal halide polymerization unit, and the Visio system, comprising two proprietary units designed for polymerizing the Sinfony composite. The composite material was polymerized for 60, 120 or 180 s with the LII system. As a control, the composite was polymerized for 15 min with the Visio system. Knoop hardness, water sorption and solubility were determined. The results were analyzed by Dunnett's T3 multiple comparison test (P<0.05). Knoop hardness was greater for polymerization with the LII unit than for that with the Visio system. Water sorption was greater for polymerization with the Visio system than that with the LII unit. For polymerization with the LII unit for 180 s, solubility was significantly reduced as compared with the Visio system. Within the limitations of the current experiment, it can be concluded that the metal halide unit exhibited better polymerizing performance for the composite material than the proprietary units.

Curing efficiency and heat generation of various resin composites cured with high-intensity halogen lights

The objective of this study was to assess the curing efficiency and heat generation of two high-intensity halogen lamps, the Astralis 10 HIP (1100 mW cm(-2)), and Optilux 501 Boost (1000 mW cm(-2)) in curing three resin composites (InTen-S, Tetric Ceram, and Filtek Z250). It was expected that the two lamps, having similar irradiance would give rise to the same curing efficiency and heat generation. The curing efficiency was evaluated by Vickers hardness and depth of cure measurements. Heat generation in the resin composites was studied in standardized restorations using a thermocouple. No significant differences were observed in curing efficiency between the two lamps for the three resin composites. The temperature rise in the composites during curing was between 11.2 degrees C and 16.2 degrees C. At subsequent irradiation, after the composites had been cured, the temperature rise was between 8.2 degrees C and 12.1 degrees C. The Optilux 501 generated, in all cases, less heat than the Astralis 10. This was not expected based on the irradiance, but could be accounted for by the differing spectra.

Effect of laboratory procedures and thermocycling on the shear bond strength of resin-metal bonding systems

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

During fabrication or repair of removable partial dentures, resin-to-metal or resin-to-denture tooth bonds may be stressed by laboratory procedures.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of steam cleaning, boiling, ultrasonic cleaning (laboratory procedures), and thermocycling on shear bond strength of resin bonds to metal and denture teeth.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Resin-metal bonding systems and their specific veneer resins (Rocatec, Sinfony; Rocatec, Visio-Gem, HLC-BOND, Zeta LC and Ducera experimental veneer resin) were tested on a Co-Cr alloy (Wirobond C). The veneer resins were bonded to resin denture teeth. The experimental groups (n=7) were subjected to the following conditions: 24-hour storage of the specimens in air (group I, control group), storage in air and treated with simulated laboratory procedures (2 minutes steam cleaning, 15 minutes ultrasonic cleaning at room temperature, 1 hour boiling in water, group II), storage in air with thermocycling (5000 cycles, 5 degrees to 55 degrees C, group III), storage in air with laboratory procedures followed by thermocycling (group IV), and storage in air with thermocycling followed by laboratory procedures (group V). Shear strength tests (MPa) were performed with a universal testing machine until fracture. After shear bond testing, the failure mode of the resin-metal and resin-denture tooth bonds was assessed. Statistical analysis of the results was carried out with one-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni-Dunn's multiple comparisons post hoc analysis for test groups (alpha=0.05).

RESULTS

Except for Ducera/denture tooth specimens (groups III to V: 8.7 +/- 3.4-9.1 +/- 1.7; 10.8 +/- 1.9 MPa control group), the Wirobond C and denture tooth specimens (groups III, IV and V: 1.4 +/- 0.9-11.9 +/- 2.3 MPa), showed significantly lower shear bond strengths than the corresponding control groups (7.5 +/- 2.9-21.0 +/- 3.4 MPa, P<.05). The shear bond strengths of group II of Sinfony/Wirobond C (11.6 +/- 3.3 MPa, P<.0001), Visio-Gem/Wirobond C (7.4 +/- 1.9 MPa, P<0.0001), Ducera/Wirobond C (11.8 +/- 2.9 MPa, P<.0001) and of Zeta/denture tooth (3.9 +/- 1.6 MPa, P=.0005) were significantly decreased by steam, boiling, and ultrasonic procedures compared with the corresponding control groups (21.0 +/- 3.4 MPa; 14.7 +/- 4.0 MPa; 19.1 +/- 2.3 MPa; 7.5 +/- 2.9 MPa, respectively). No significant differences were noted among groups III, IV, and V. Co-Cr specimens subjected to the Rocatec system and bonded with Sinfony and HLC BOND/Zeta specimens showed cohesive failure. Adhesive failure was observed for the experimental veneer resin on the Co-Cr specimens and for all veneer resins on the denture teeth.

CONCLUSION

Simulation of laboratory procedures and thermocycling caused a significant drop in shear bond strength of metal-resin and denture tooth-resin bonds for most of the tested veneer resins. Thermocycling before shear testing had the same effect on veneer resin bond strength as the simulated laboratory procedures.

Analysis of composite type and different sources of polymerization light on in vitro toothbrush/dentifrice abrasion resistance

OBJECTIVES

This study examined toothbrush/dentifrice abrasion of a photo-activated prosthetic composite (dentin and enamel variations) for the purpose of evaluating the influence of polymerization sources on abrasive wear.

METHODS

A photo-activated prosthetic composite material (Artglass) was assessed. Dentin and enamel variations were polymerized using a proprietary photo-curing unit with two xenon stroboscopic lamps (UniXS), and other enamel specimens were polymerized either with a laboratory photo-curing unit with three fluorescent tubes or with a high intensity unit with two metal halide lamps. All specimens were stored in water for 14days and subjected to toothbrush/dentifrice abrasion (350g vertical load) using an abrasive slurry (Colgate Fluoriguard) and a toothbrush (Oral-B 40). The amount of vertical loss and the surface roughness of the specimens after 20,000 strokes were determined by profilometer. Average values of groups of five specimens were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Sheffe's S intervals (p<0.05).

RESULTS

When polymerizing with the proprietary unit, the abrasion and surface roughness of the enamel material required respective means of 34.08microm (+/-3.66) and 1.00microm (+/-0.08), and the those of the dentin material required means of 42.02microm (+/-5.62) and 1.23microm (+/-0.20). Both abrasion and surface roughness after toothbrushing of the enamel material were significantly smaller than were those of the dentin material. The abrasion of specimens polymerized with the metal halide unit required a mean of 23.89microm (+/-6.17) and demonstrated minimal wear.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a high intensity metal halide photo-curing unit effectively enhanced the abrasion resistance of the composite. Surfaces of restorations should be covered with the enamel material in order to achieve smoothness and wear resistance.

Depth of cure and compressive strength of dental composites cured with blue light emitting diodes (LEDs)

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this pilot study was to test the hypotheses that (i) depth of cure and (ii) compressive strength of dental composites cured with either a light emitting diode (LED) based light curing unit (LCU) or a conventional halogen LCU do not differ significantly. The second objective of this study was to characterise irradiance and the emitted light spectra for both LCUs to allow comparisons between the units.

METHODS

Dental composite (Spectrum TPH, shades A2 and A4) was cured for 40 s with either a commercial halogen LCU or a LED LCU, respectively. The LED LCU uses 27 blue LEDs as the light source. The composites' depth of cure was measured for 10 samples of 4 mm diameter and 8 mm depth for each shade with a penetrometer. The results were compared using a Student's t-test. Compressive strengths were determined after 6 and 72 h, for six samples of 4 mm diameter and 6 mm depth for each shade after being polymerised for 40 s from each end of the mould. Groups were compared using a three way ANOVA.

RESULTS

The conventional halogen LCU cured composites significantly (p < 0.05) deeper (6.40 mm A2, 5.19 mm A4) than did the LED LCU (5.33 mm A2, 4.27 mm A4). Both units cured the composite deeper than required by both ISO 4049 and the manufacturer. A three way ANOVA showed that there were no significant differences in the compressive strengths of samples produced with either the LED LCU or the halogen LCU (p = 0.460). Significant differences in compressive strength of samples stored for 6 and 72 h (p = 0.0006) and of samples of different shades (p = 0.035) were found as confirmed by the three way ANOVA. The light spectra of both units differed strongly. While the halogen LCU showed a broad distribution of wavelengths with a power peak at 497 nm, the LED LCU emitted most of the generated light at 465 nm. The LED LCU produced a total irradiance of 350 mW cm-2 whereas the halogen LCU produced a total irradiance of 755 mW cm-2.

SIGNIFICANCE

The results showed that both units provided sufficient output to exceed minimum requirements in terms of composites' depth of cure according to ISO 4049 and the depth of cure and the composites' compressive strength stated by the manufacturer. Compressive strengths of dental composites cured under laboratory conditions with a LED LCU were statistically equivalent to those cured with a conventional halogen LCU. With its inherent advantages, such as a constant power output over the lifetime of the diodes, LED LCUs have great potential to achieve a clinically consistent quality of composite cure.

Effectiveness of polymerization of a prosthetic composite using three polymerization systems

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Although properties of laboratory-polymerized composite materials are influenced by the type of polymerizing unit, little information is available regarding the comparison between use of a high-intensity light source and application of secondary heat treatment.

PURPOSE

This study examined properties of a prosthetic veneering composite polymerized with 3 polymerizing systems to evaluate the effects of varying polymerization modes on hardness, solubility, and depth of cure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A composite material designed for a prosthetic veneer (Conquest Crown and Bridge) was polymerized using 3 methods: (1) exposure in the proprietary photopolymerizing unit with 2 halogen lamps (Cure-Lite Plus), followed by heating in an oven (Conquest Automatic Curing Unit); (2) exposure in a photopolymerizing unit with a xenon stroboscopic light source (Dentacolor XS); and (3) exposure in a photopolymerizing unit with 2 metal halide lamps (Hyper LII). Knoop hardness, water solubility, and depth of cure were determined for groups of 5 specimens, according to standardized testing methods. Data were compared using analysis of variance and the Duncan new multiple range test (P <.05).

RESULT

The hardness number generated with the metal halide unit was statistically greater than those produced by the other 2 methods, and material component released into water was minimal when the material was exposed with the metal halide unit (P <.05). Among the 3 photopolymerizing units, the metal halide unit consistently exhibited the greatest depth of cure.

CONCLUSION

Certain properties generated with the use of the high-intensity polymerizing unit exceeded those obtained from a proprietary system that requires a postheat treatment.

Curing depth of prosthetic composite materials polymerized with their proprietary photo-curing units

This study examined curing depth of eight prosthetic composite materials polymerized by means of six photo-curing units for the purpose of evaluating the curing performance of material-curing unit combinations. Each composite material was exposed with a photo-curing unit recommended by the manufacturer. The light sources of the units were halogen/fluorescent, xenon, metal halide, fluorescent, and halogen lamps, and exposure periods were 20, 30, 60, and 90 s. Curing depth of the materials was determined according to the method described by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO 4049). The results were analysed by factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparison intervals. Two-factor ANOVA revealed that the depth of cure was influenced both by the material-unit combination and by the exposure period (P = 0.0001). Among the eight combinations, a hybrid composite material (Prywood color) polymerized with a metal halide curing unit (Hyper LII) exhibited the greatest depth of cure after 90-s exposure. For all combinations, longer exposure increased the depth of cure.

Properties of four composite veneering materials polymerized with different laboratory photo-curing units

This study examined properties of four composite veneering materials polymerized with two different photo-curing units for the purpose of evaluating curing performance of the combination of composite material and curing unit. Two microfilled (Dentacolor and Thermoresin LC II) and two hybrid (Cesead II and Solidex) composite materials designed for prosthetic veneer were selected. The respective light sources of the units were a xenon (Dentacolor XS) and a metal halide (Hyper L II) lamp. The composite materials were exposed with the photo-curing unit for 60 s on each side (i.e. from top and bottom). Knoop hardness, compressive strength, flexural strength, flexural modulus, water absorption and water solubility were determined according to standardized testing methods. The specimens exposed with the metal halide unit generally exhibited greater Knoop hardness number, and compressive strength and lower solubility than those exposed with the xenon unit. A microfilled material (Thermoresin LC II) cured with the metal halide unit exhibited significantly improved results for all tests as compared with the same material cured with the xenon unit.