Involvement of differential efficiency of transcription by esigmas and esigma70 RNA polymerase holoenzymes in growth phase regulation of the Escherichia coli osmE promoter

Physiological and regulatory convergence between osmotic and nutrient stress responses in microbes

Bacterial cells are regularly confronted with simultaneous changes in environmental nutrient supply and osmolarity. Despite the importance of osmolarity and osmoregulation in bacterial physiology, the relationship between the cellular response to osmotic perturbations and other stresses has remained largely unexplored. Bacteria cultured in hyperosmotic conditions and bacteria experiencing nutrient stress exhibit similar physiological changes, including metabolic shutdown, increased protein instability, dehydration, and condensation of chromosomal DNA. In this review, we highlight overlapping molecular players between osmotic and nutrient stresses. These connections between two seemingly disparate stress response pathways reinforce the importance of central carbon metabolism as a control point for diverse aspects of homeostatic regulation. We identify important open questions for future research, emphasizing the pressing need to develop and exploit new methods for probing how osmolarity affects phylogenetically diverse species.

The exopolysaccharide gene cluster pea is transcriptionally controlled by RpoS and repressed by AmrZ in Pseudomonas putida KT2440

In Pseudomonas putida KT2440, the exopolysaccharide Pea is associated with biofilm stability and pellicle formation; however, little is known about its regulatory pathway. In this study, we identified that the gene cluster pea was transcribed from 25 bp upstream of the operon and the stationary phase alternative sigma factor RpoS regulated the transcription of pea. When RpoS was absent, another sigma factor, likely the housekeeping sigma factor RpoD, could also mediate pea transcription but at a low level. The function of Pea polysaccharide was further confirmed to be necessary for full production of biofilm, formation of pellicle and c-di-GMP-dependent wrinkly colony morphology. Additionally, evidences were provided to demonstrate that the transcriptional regulator AmrZ was a negative regulator for pea expression. DNase I footprinting studies verified that AmrZ bound directly to the site overlapping the pea promoter, which might interfere with the binding of RNA polymerase to the promoter and resulted in inhibition of transcription initiation.

sigmaS, a major player in the response to environmental stresses in Escherichia coli: role, regulation and mechanisms of promoter recognition

Bacterial cells often face hostile environmental conditions, to which they adapt by activation of stress responses. In Escherichia coli, environmental stresses resulting in significant reduction in growth rate stimulate the expression of the rpoS gene, encoding the alternative σ factor σ(S). The σ(S) protein associates with RNA polymerase, and through transcription of genes belonging to the rpoS regulon allows the activation of a 'general stress response', which protects the bacterial cell from harmful environmental conditions. Each step of this process is finely tuned in order to cater to the needs of the bacterial cell: in particular, selective promoter recognition by σ(S) is achieved through small deviations from a common consensus DNA sequence for both σ(S) and the housekeeping σ(70). Recognition of specific DNA elements by σ(S) is integrated with the effects of environmental signals and the interaction with regulatory proteins, in what represents a fascinating example of multifactorial regulation of gene expression. In this report, we discuss the function of the rpoS gene in the general stress response, and review the current knowledge on regulation of rpoS expression and on promoter recognition by σ(S).

RNA sequencing reveals differences between the global transcriptomes of Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis strains with high and low pathogenicities

Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis is one of the important causes of bacterial food-borne gastroenteritis worldwide. Field strains of S. Enteritidis are relatively genetically homogeneous; however, they show extensive phenotypic diversity and differences in virulence potential. RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) was used to characterize differences in the global transcriptome between several genetically similar but phenotypically diverse poultry-associated field strains of S. Enteritidis grown in laboratory medium at avian body temperature (42°C). These S. Enteritidis strains were previously characterized as high-pathogenicity (HP; n = 3) and low-pathogenicity (LP; n = 3) strains based on both in vitro and in vivo virulence assays. Using the negative binomial distribution-based statistical tools edgeR and DESeq, 252 genes were identified as differentially expressed in LP strains compared with their expression in the HP strains (P < 0.05). A majority of genes (235, or 93.2%) showed significantly reduced expression, whereas a few genes (17, or 6.8%) showed increased expression in all LP strains compared with HP strains. LP strains showed a unique transcriptional profile that is characterized by significantly reduced expression of several transcriptional regulators and reduced expression of genes involved in virulence (e.g., Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 [SPI-1], SPI-5, and fimbrial and motility genes) and protection against osmotic, oxidative, and other stresses, such as iron-limiting conditions commonly encountered within the host. Several functionally uncharacterized genes also showed reduced expression. This study provides a first concise view of the global transcriptional differences between field strains of S. Enteritidis with various levels of pathogenicity, providing the basis for future functional characterization of several genes with potential roles in virulence or stress regulation of S. Enteritidis.

Structural and mechanistic basis for the inhibition of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase by T7 Gp2

The T7 phage-encoded small protein Gp2 is a non-DNA-binding transcription factor that interacts with the jaw domain of the Escherichia coli (Ec) RNA polymerase (RNAp) β′ subunit and inhibits transcriptionally proficient promoter-complex (RPo) formation. Here, we describe the high-resolution solution structure of the Gp2-Ec β′ jaw domain complex and show that Gp2 and DNA compete for binding to the β′ jaw domain. We reveal that efficient inhibition of RPo formation by Gp2 requires the amino-terminal σ⁷⁰ domain region 1.1 (R1.1), and that Gp2 antagonizes the obligatory movement of R1.1 during RPo formation. We demonstrate that Gp2 inhibits RPo formation not just by steric occlusion of the RNAp-DNA interaction but also through long-range antagonistic effects on RNAp-promoter interactions around the RNAp active center that likely occur due to repositioning of R1.1 by Gp2. The inhibition of Ec RNAp by Gp2 thus defines a previously uncharacterized mechanism by which bacterial transcription is regulated by a viral factor.

Stationary-Phase Gene Regulation in Escherichia coli §

In their stressful natural environments, bacteria often are in stationary phase and use their limited resources for maintenance and stress survival. Underlying this activity is the general stress response, which in Escherichia coli depends on the σS (RpoS) subunit of RNA polymerase. σS is closely related to the vegetative sigma factor σ70 (RpoD), and these two sigmas recognize similar but not identical promoter sequences. During the postexponential phase and entry into stationary phase, σS is induced by a fine-tuned combination of transcriptional, translational, and proteolytic control. In addition, regulatory "short-cuts" to high cellular σS levels, which mainly rely on the rapid inhibition of σS proteolysis, are triggered by sudden starvation for various nutrients and other stressful shift conditons. σS directly or indirectly activates more than 500 genes. Additional signal input is integrated by σS cooperating with various transcription factors in complex cascades and feedforward loops. Target gene products have stress-protective functions, redirect metabolism, affect cell envelope and cell shape, are involved in biofilm formation or pathogenesis, or can increased stationary phase and stress-induced mutagenesis. This review summarizes these diverse functions and the amazingly complex regulation of σS. At the molecular level, these processes are integrated with the partitioning of global transcription space by sigma factor competition for RNA polymerase core enzyme and signaling by nucleotide second messengers that include cAMP, (p)ppGpp, and c-di-GMP. Physiologically, σS is the key player in choosing between a lifestyle associated with postexponential growth based on nutrient scavenging and motility and a lifestyle focused on maintenance, strong stress resistance, and increased adhesiveness. Finally, research with other proteobacteria is beginning to reveal how evolution has further adapted function and regulation of σS to specific environmental niches.

The E. coli anti-sigma factor Rsd: studies on the specificity and regulation of its expression

Background

Among the seven different sigma factors in E. coli σ⁷⁰ has the highest concentration and affinity for the core RNA polymerase. The E. coli protein Rsd is regarded as an anti-sigma factor, inhibiting σ⁷⁰-dependent transcription at the onset of stationary growth. Although binding of Rsd to σ⁷⁰ has been shown and numerous structural studies on Rsd have been performed the detailed mechanism of action is still unknown.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We have performed studies to unravel the function and regulation of Rsd expression in vitro and in vivo. Cross-linking and affinity binding revealed that Rsd is able to interact with σ⁷⁰, with the core enzyme of RNA polymerase and is able to form dimers in solution. Unexpectedly, we find that Rsd does also interact with σ³⁸, the stationary phase-specific sigma factor. This interaction was further corroborated by gel retardation and footprinting studies with different promoter fragments and σ³⁸- or σ⁷⁰-containing RNA polymerase in presence of Rsd. Under competitive in vitro transcription conditions, in presence of both sigma factors, a selective inhibition of σ⁷⁰-dependent transcription was prevailing, however. Analysis of rsd expression revealed that the nucleoid-associated proteins H-NS and FIS, StpA and LRP bind to the regulatory region of the rsd promoters. Furthermore, the major promoter P2 was shown to be down-regulated in vivo by RpoS, the stationary phase-specific sigma factor and the transcription factor DksA, while induction of the stringent control enhanced rsd promoter activity. Most notably, the dam-dependent methylation of a cluster of GATC sites turned out to be important for efficient rsd transcription.

Conclusions/Significance

The results contribute to a better understanding of the intricate mechanism of Rsd-mediated sigma factor specificity changes during stationary phase.

In vitro transcription profiling of the σS subunit of bacterial RNA polymerase: re-definition of the σS regulon and identification of σS-specific promoter sequence elements

Specific promoter recognition by bacterial RNA polymerase is mediated by σ subunits, which assemble with RNA polymerase core enzyme (E) during transcription initiation. However, σ⁷⁰ (the housekeeping σ subunit) and σ^S (an alternative σ subunit mostly active during slow growth) recognize almost identical promoter sequences, thus raising the question of how promoter selectivity is achieved in the bacterial cell. To identify novel sequence determinants for selective promoter recognition, we performed run-off/microarray (ROMA) experiments with RNA polymerase saturated either with σ⁷⁰ (Eσ⁷⁰) or with σ^S (Eσ^S) using the whole Escherichia coli genome as DNA template. We found that Eσ⁷⁰, in the absence of any additional transcription factor, preferentially transcribes genes associated with fast growth (e.g. ribosomal operons). In contrast, Eσ^S efficiently transcribes genes involved in stress responses, secondary metabolism as well as RNAs from intergenic regions with yet-unknown function. Promoter sequence comparison suggests that, in addition to different conservation of the −35 sequence and of the UP element, selective promoter recognition by either form of RNA polymerase can be affected by the A/T content in the −10/+1 region. Indeed, site-directed mutagenesis experiments confirmed that an A/T bias in the −10/+1 region could improve promoter recognition by Eσ^S.

Escherichia coli mhpR gene expression is regulated by catabolite repression mediated by the cAMP-CRP complex

The expression of the mhp genes involved in the degradation of the aromatic compound 3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)propionic acid (3HPP) in Escherichia coli is dependent on the MhpR transcriptional activator at the Pa promoter. This catabolic promoter is also subject to catabolic repression in the presence of glucose mediated by the cAMP-CRP complex. The Pr promoter drives the MhpR-independent expression of the regulatory gene. In vivo and in vitro experiments have shown that transcription from the Pr promoter is downregulated by the addition of glucose and this catabolic repression is also mediated by the cAMP-CRP complex. The activation role of the cAMP-CRP regulatory system was further investigated by DNase I footprinting assays, which showed that the cAMP-CRP complex binds to the Pr promoter sequence, protecting a region centred at position -40.5, which allowed the classification of Pr as a class II CRP-dependent promoter. Open complex formation at the Pr promoter is observed only when RNA polymerase and cAMP-CRP are present. Finally, by in vitro transcription assays we have demonstrated the absolute requirement of the cAMP-CRP complex for the activation of the Pr promoter.

Growth-phase-dependent expression of the operon coding for the glycosylated autotransporter adhesin AIDA-I of pathogenic Escherichia coli

The adhesin involved in diffuse adherence (AIDA-I) is an autotransporter found in pathogenic strains of Escherichia coli causing diarrhea in humans and pigs. The AIDA-I protein is glycosylated by a specific enzyme, the AIDA-associated heptosyltransferase (Aah). The aah gene is immediately upstream of the aidA gene, suggesting that they form an operon. However, the mechanisms of regulation of the aah and aidA genes are unknown. Using a clinical E. coli isolate expressing AIDA-I, we identified two putative promoters 149 and 128 nucleotides upstream of aah. Using qRT-PCR, we observed that aah and aidA are transcribed in a growth-dependent fashion, mainly at the start of the stationary phase. Western blotting confirmed that protein expression follows the same pattern. Using a fusion to a reporter gene, we observed that the regulation of the isolated aah promoter matched this transcription and expression pattern. Lastly, we found glucose to be a repressor and nutrient starvation to be an inducer. Taken together, our results suggest that, in the strain and the conditions we studied, aah-aidA is transcribed as a bicistronic message from a promoter upstream of aah, with maximal expression under conditions of nutrient limitation such as high cell density.

Transcription analysis of central metabolism genes in Escherichia coli. Possible roles of sigma38 in their expression, as a response to carbon limitation

The phosphoenolpyruvate: carbohydrate transferase system (PTS) transports glucose in Escherichia coli. Previous work demonstrated that strains lacking PTS, such as PB11, grow slow on glucose. PB11 has a reduced expression of glycolytic, and upregulates poxB and acs genes as compared to the parental strain JM101, when growing on glucose. The products of the latter genes are involved in the production of AcetylCoA. Inactivation of rpoS that codes for the RNA polymerase σ³⁸ subunit, reduces further (50%) growth of PB11, indicating that σ³⁸ plays a central role in the expression of central metabolism genes in slowly growing cells. In fact, transcription levels of glycolytic genes is reduced in strain PB11rpoS⁻ as compared to PB11. In this report we studied the role of σ⁷⁰ and σ³⁸ in the expression of the complete glycolytic pathway and poxB and acs genes in certain PTS⁻ strains and their rpoS⁻ derivatives. We determined the transcription start sites (TSSs) and the corresponding promoters, in strains JM101, PB11, its derivative PB12 that recovered its growth capacity, and in their rpoS⁻ derivatives, by 5′RACE and pyrosequencing. In all these genes the presence of sequences resembling σ³⁸ recognition sites allowed the proposition that they could be transcribed by both sigma factors, from overlapping putative promoters that initiate transcription at the same site. Fourteen new TSSs were identified in seventeen genes. Besides, more than 30 putative promoters were proposed and we confirmed ten previously reported. In vitro transcription experiments support the functionality of putative dual promoters. Alternatives that could also explain lower transcription levels of the rpoS⁻ derivatives are discussed. We propose that the presence if real, of both σ⁷⁰ and σ³⁸ dependent promoters in all glycolytic genes and operons could allow a differential transcription of these central metabolism genes by both sigma subunits as an adaptation response to carbon limitation.

Physiology and genetic traits of reverse osmosis membrane biofilms: a case study with Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa on the surface of a reverse osmosis (RO) membrane was studied using a synthetic wastewater medium to simulate conditions relevant to reclamation of secondary wastewater effluent. P. aeruginosa biofilm physiology and spatial activity were analyzed following growth on the membrane using a short-life green fluorescent protein derivative expressed in a growth-dependent manner. As a consequence of the limiting carbon source prevailing in the suspended culture of the RO unit, a higher distribution of active cells was observed in the biofilm close to the membrane surface, likely due to the higher nutrient levels induced by concentration polarization effects. The faster growth of the RO-sessile cells compared to the planktonic cells in the RO unit was reflected by the transcriptome of the two cultures analyzed with DNA microarrays. In contrast to the findings recently reported in gene expression studies of P. aeruginosa biofilms, in the RO system, genes related to stress, adaptation, chemotaxis and resistance to antibacterial agents were induced in the planktonic cells. In agreement with the findings of previous P. aeruginosa biofilm studies, motility- and attachment-related genes were repressed in the RO P. aeruginosa biofilm. Supported by the microarray data, an increase in both motility and chemotaxis phenotypes was observed in the suspended cells. The increase in nutrient concentration in close proximity to the membrane is suggested to enhance biofouling by chemotaxis response of the suspended cells and their swimming toward the membrane surface.

The molecular basis of selective promoter activation by the ?Ssubunit of RNA polymerase

Different environmental stimuli cause bacteria to exchange the sigma subunit in the RNA polymerase (RNAP) and, thereby, tune their gene expression according to the newly emerging needs. Sigma factors are usually thought to recognize clearly distinguishable promoter DNA determinants, and thereby activate distinct gene sets, known as their regulons. In this review, we illustrate how the principle sigma factor in stationary phase and in stressful conditions in Escherichia coli, sigmaS (RpoS), can specifically target its large regulon in vivo, although it is known to recognize the same core promoter elements in vitro as the housekeeping sigma factor, sigma70 (RpoD). Variable combinations of cis-acting promoter features and trans-acting protein factors determine whether a promoter is recognized by RNAP containing sigmaS or sigma70, or by both holoenzymes. How these promoter features impose sigmaS selectivity is further discussed. Moreover, additional pathways allow sigmaS to compete more efficiently than sigma70 for limiting amounts of core RNAP (E) and thereby enhance EsigmaS formation and effectiveness. Finally, these topics are discussed in the context of sigma factor evolution and the benefits a cell gains from retaining competing and closely related sigma factors with overlapping sets of target genes.

Concert of regulators to switch on LEE expression in enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7: Interplay between Ler, GrlA, HNS and RpoS

Enterohemorrhagic (EHEC) and enteropathogenic (EPEC) Escherichia coli strains carry a pathogenicity island termed locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) responsible for attaching and effacing lesions on epithelial cells. The expression of LEE varies among isolates and is dependent on environmental cues. In the EHEC O157:H7 Sakaï isolate (RIMD-0509952 strain), we found that the non-coding RNA, DsrA, activates the expression of the LEE. This activation requires RpoS, the stress sigma factor. The DsrA/RpoS regulatory pathway mediates its positive effect by stimulating the transcription of ler, a positive regulatory gene encoded by the LEE. A second regulatory pathway, repressed by HNS, is also able to activate the transcription of ler and requires GrlA, another LEE-encoded regulator. Both regulatory pathways, DsrA/RpoS and HNS/GrlA, affect the activity of the ler distal promoter and require the Ler protein to be functional. Our data demonstrate that the LEE expression can be turned on by at least two separate pathways acting on the transcription of ler.

Role of the spacer between the -35 and -10 regions in sigmas promoter selectivity in Escherichia coli

In vitro, the sigma(s) subunit of RNA polymerase (RNAP), RpoS, recognizes nearly identical -35 and -10 promoter consensus sequences as the vegetative sigma70. In vivo, promoter selectivity of RNAP holoenzyme containing either sigma(s) (Esigma(s)) or sigma70 (Esigma70) seems to be achieved by the differential ability of the two holoenzymes to tolerate deviations from the promoter consensus sequence. In this study, we suggest that many natural sigma(s)-dependent promoters possess a -35 element, a feature that has been considered as not conserved among sigma(s)-dependent promoters. These -35 hexamers are mostly non-optimally spaced from the -10 region, but nevertheless functional. A +/- 2 bp deviation from the optimal spacer length of 17 bp or the complete absence of a -35 consensus sequence decreases overall promoter activity, but at the same time favours Esigma(s) in its competition with Esigma70 for promoter recognition. On the other hand, the reduction of promoter activity due to shifting of the -35 element can be counterbalanced by an activity-stimulating feature such as A/T-richness of the spacer region without compromising Esigma(s) selectivity. Based on mutational analysis of sigma(s), we suggest a role of regions 2.5 and 4 of sigma(s) in sensing sub-optimally located -35 elements.

DNA looping-mediated repression by histone-like protein H-NS: specific requirement of Esigma70 as a cofactor for looping

Transcription initiation by RNA polymerase (RNP) carrying the house-keeping sigma subunit, sigma70 (Esigma70), is repressed by H-NS at a number of promoters including hdeABp in Escherichia coli, while initiation with RNP carrying the stationary phase sigma, sigma38 (Esigma38), is not. We investigated the molecular mechanism of selective repression by H-NS to identify the differences in transcription initiation by the two forms of RNPs, which show indistinguishable promoter selectivities in vitro. Using hdeABp as a model promoter, we observed with purified components that H-NS, acting at a sequence centered at -118, selectively repressed transcription by Esigma70. This selective repression is attributed to the differences in the interactions between hdeABp and the two forms of RNPs, since no other factor is required for the repression. We observed that the two forms of RNPs could form an open initiation complex (RP(O)) at hdeABp, but that Esigma70 failed to initiate transcription in the presence of H-NS. Interestingly, KMnO4 assays and high-resolution atomic force microscopy (AFM) revealed that hdeABp DNA wrapped around Esigma70 more tightly than around Esigma38, resulting in the potential crossing over of the DNA arms that project out of Esigma70 . RP(O) but not out of Esigma38 . RP(O). Based on these observations, we postulated that H-NS bound at -118 laterally extends by the cooperative recruitment of H-NS molecules to the promoter-downstream sequence joined by wrapping of the DNA around Esigma70 . RP(O), resulting in effective sealing of the DNA loop and trapping of Esigma70. Such a ternary complex of H-NS . Esigma70 hdeABp was demonstrated by AFM. In this case, therefore, Esigma70 acts as a cofactor for DNA looping. Expression of this class of genes by Esigma38 in the stationary phase is not due to its promoter specificity but to the architecture of the promoter . Esigma38 complex.

The sequence upstream of the -10 consensus sequence modulates the strength and induction time of stationary-phase promoters in Escherichia coli

We constructed a library of synthetic stationary-phase promoters for Escherichia coli. For designing the promoters, the known -10 consensus sequence, as well as the extended -10 region, and an A/T-rich region downstream of the -10 region were kept constant, whereas sequences from -37 to -14 were partially or completely randomised. For detection and selection of stationary-phase promoters, green fluorescent protein (GFP) with enhanced fluorescence was used. To establish the library, 33 promoters were selected, which differ in strength from 670 to more than 13,000 specific fluorescence units, indicating that the strength of promoters can be modulated by the sequence upstream of the -10 region. DNA sequencing revealed a preferential insertion of nucleotides depending on the position. By expressing the promoters in an rpoS-deficient strain, a special group of stationary-phase promoters was identified, which were expressed exclusively or preferentially by RNA polymerase holoenzyme Esigma(s). The DNA sequence of these promoters differed significantly in the region from -25 to -16. Furthermore, it was shown that the DNA curvature of the promoter region had no effect on promoter strength. The broad range of promoter activities make these promoters very suitable for fine-tuning of gene expression and for cost-effective large-scale applications in industrial bioprocesses.

RNA polymerase holoenzymes can share a single transcription start site for the Pm promoter. Critical nucleotides in the -7 to -18 region are needed to select between RNA polymerase with sigma38 or sigma32

The Pm promoter of the benzoate meta-cleavage pathway is transcribed with E sigma32 or E sigma38 according to the growth phase, with an identical transcriptional start site. To investigate sequence determinants in the interaction between either of the two RNA polymerases and Pm, all possible single mutants between positions -7 and -18 were generated, and the activity in the exponential and stationary phases of the resulting mutant promoters was compared. The results precisely delimited a -10 element between positions -7 and -12 (TAGGCT), which defined a promoter sharing nucleotides with both sigma38 and sigma32 consensus. The first two and the last positions of this hexamer were crucial for recognition by both polymerases. Position -10 was the only one specifically recognized by E sigma38, whereas positions -8, -9, and the C-track between positions -14 and -17 were important for specific E sigma32 recognition. Western blots showed that sigma32 was only detectable in the exponential phase, and sigma38 appeared in the early stationary phase. In the rpoH mutant KY1429, sigma38 was already present in the exponential growth phase both free and bound to the RNA polymerase core, in good correlation with the transcription levels found. Pm seems to be optimized for recognition by sigma32 as an initial response to the addition of effector to the medium and allows binding of the adaptable sigma38-dependent RNA polymerase in the stationary phase. XylS is always required for Pm transcription. Therefore, the mechanism that controls Pm expression involves specific nucleotide sequences, the abundance of free and core-bound sigma32 and sigma38 factors during growth, and the presence of the regulator activated by an effector.

Global gene expression responses to cadmium toxicity in Escherichia coli

Genome-wide analysis of temporal gene expression profiles in Escherichia coli following exposure to cadmium revealed a shift to anaerobic metabolism and induction of several stress response systems. Disruption in the transcription of genes encoding ribosomal proteins and zinc-binding proteins may partially explain the molecular mechanisms of cadmium toxicity.

Genome-wide analysis of the general stress response network in Escherichia coli: sigmaS-dependent genes, promoters, and sigma factor selectivity

The sigmaS (or RpoS) subunit of RNA polymerase is the master regulator of the general stress response in Escherichia coli. While nearly absent in rapidly growing cells, sigmaS is strongly induced during entry into stationary phase and/or many other stress conditions and is essential for the expression of multiple stress resistances. Genome-wide expression profiling data presented here indicate that up to 10% of the E. coli genes are under direct or indirect control of sigmaS and that sigmaS should be considered a second vegetative sigma factor with a major impact not only on stress tolerance but on the entire cell physiology under nonoptimal growth conditions. This large data set allowed us to unequivocally identify a sigmaS consensus promoter in silico. Moreover, our results suggest that sigmaS-dependent genes represent a regulatory network with complex internal control (as exemplified by the acid resistance genes). This network also exhibits extensive regulatory overlaps with other global regulons (e.g., the cyclic AMP receptor protein regulon). In addition, the global regulatory protein Lrp was found to affect sigmaS and/or sigma70 selectivity of many promoters. These observations indicate that certain modules of the sigmaS-dependent general stress response can be temporarily recruited by stress-specific regulons, which are controlled by other stress-responsive regulators that act together with sigma70 RNA polymerase. Thus, not only the expression of genes within a regulatory network but also the architecture of the network itself can be subject to regulation.

A differential effect of sigmaS on the expression of the PHO regulon genes of Escherichia coli

The RNA polymerase core associated with sigma(S) transcribes many genes related to stress or to the stationary phase. When cells enter a phase of phosphate starvation, the transcription of several genes and operons, collectively known as the PHO regulon, is strongly induced. The promoters of the PHO genes hitherto analysed are recognized by sigma(D)-associated RNA polymerase. A mutation in the gene that encodes sigma(S), rpoS, significantly increases the level of alkaline phosphatase activity and the overproduction of sigma(S) inhibits it. Other PHO genes such as phoE and ugpB are likewise affected by sigma(S). In contrast, pstS, which encodes a periplasmic phosphate-binding protein and is a negative regulator of PHO, is stimulated by sigma(S). The effect of sigma(S) on the PHO genes is at the transcriptional level. It is shown that a cytosine residue at position -13 is important for the positive effect of sigma(S) on pst. The interpretation of these observations is based on the competition between sigma(S) and sigma(D) for the binding to the core RNA polymerase.

Substitutions in Region 2.4 of σ70 Allow Recognition of the σS-Dependent aidB Promoter

The strict dependence of transcription from the aidB promoter (PaidB) on the Esigma(S) form of RNA polymerase is because of the presence of a C nucleotide as the first residue of the -10 promoter sequence (-12C), which does not allow an open complex formation by Esigma(70). In this report, sigma(70) mutants carrying either the Q437H or the T440I single amino acid substitutions, which allow -12C recognition by sigma(70), were tested for their ability to carry out transcription from PaidB. The Gln-437 and Thr-440 residues are located in region 2.4 of sigma(70) and correspond to Gln-152 and Glu-155 in sigma(S). Interestingly, the Q437H mutant of sigma(70), but not T440I, was able to promote an open complex formation and to initiate transcription at PaidB. In contrast to T440I, a T440E mutant was proficient in carrying out transcription from PaidB. No sigma(70) mutant displayed significantly increased interaction with a PaidB mutant in which the -12C was substituted by a T (PaidB((C12T))), which is also efficiently recognized by wild type sigma(70). The effect of the T440E mutation suggests that the corresponding Glu-155 residue in sigma(S) might be involved in -12C recognition. However, substitution to alanine of the Glu-155 residue, as well as of Gln-152, in the sigma(S) protein did not significantly affect Esigma(S) interaction with PaidB. Our results reiterate the importance of the -12C residue for sigma(S)-specific promoter recognition and strongly suggest that interaction with the -10 sequence and open complex formation are carried out by different determinants in the two sigma factors.

SigmaS-dependent gene expression at the onset of stationary phase in Escherichia coli: function of sigmaS-dependent genes and identification of their promoter sequences

The sigma(S) subunit of RNA polymerase, the product of the rpoS gene, controls the expression of genes responding to starvation and cellular stresses. Using gene array technology, we investigated rpoS-dependent expression at the onset of stationary phase in Escherichia coli grown in rich medium. Forty-one genes were expressed at significantly lower levels in an rpoS mutant derived from the MG1655 strain; for 10 of these, we also confirmed rpoS and stationary-phase dependence by reverse transcription-PCR. Only seven genes (dps, osmE, osmY, sodC, rpsV, wrbA, and yahO) had previously been recognized as rpoS dependent. Several newly identified rpoS-dependent genes are involved in the uptake and metabolism of amino acids, sugars, and iron. Indeed, the rpoS mutant strain shows severely impaired growth on some sugars such as fructose and N-acetylglucosamine. The rpoS gene controls the production of indole, which acts as a signal molecule in stationary-phase cells, via regulation of the tnaA-encoded tryptophanase enzyme. Genes involved in protein biosynthesis, encoding the ribosome-associated protein RpsV (sra) and the initiation factor IF-1 (infA), were also induced in an rpoS-dependent fashion. Using primer extension, we determined the promoter sequences of a selection of rpoS-regulated genes representative of different functional classes. Significant fractions of these promoters carry sequence features specific for Esigma(S) recognition of the -10 region, such as cytosines at positions -13 (70%) and -12 (30%) as well as a TG motif located upstream of the -10 region (50%), thus supporting the TGN(0-2)C(C/T)ATA(C/A)T consensus sequence recently proposed for sigma(S).

Osmo-regulation of bacterial transcription via poised RNA polymerase

Adaptation to high-salt environments is critical for the survival of a wide range of cells, especially for pathogenic bacteria that colonize the animal gut and urinary tract. The adaptation strategy involves production of the salt potassium glutamate, which induces a specific gene expression program that produces electro-neutral osmolytes while inhibiting general sigma(70) transcription. These data show that in Escherichia coli potassium glutamate stimulates transcription by disengaging inhibitory polymerase interactions at a sigma(38) promoter. These occur in an upstream region that is marked by an osmotic shock promoter DNA consensus sequence. The disruption activates a poised RNA polymerase to transcribe. This transcription program leads to the production of osmolytes that are shown to have only minor effects on transcription and therefore help to restore normal cell function. An osmotic shock gene expression cycle is discussed.

Interactions between the 2.4 and 4.2 regions of sigmaS, the stress-specific sigma factor of Escherichia coli, and the -10 and -35 promoter elements

The sigmas subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase holoenzyme (EsigmaS) is a key factor of gene expression upon entry into stationary phase and in stressful conditions. The selectivity of promoter recognition by EsigmaS and the housekeeping Esigma70 is as yet not clearly understood. We used a genetic approach to investigate the interaction of sigmaS with its target promoters. Starting with down-promoter variants of a sigmaS promoter target, osmEp, altered in the -10 or -35 elements, we isolated mutant forms of sigmaS suppressing the promoter defects. The activity of these suppressors on variants of osmEp and ficp, another target of sigmaS, indicated that sigmaS is able to interact with the same key features within a promoter sequence as sigma70. Indeed, (i) sigmaS can recognize the -35 element of some but not all its target promoters, through interactions with its 4.2 region; and (ii) amino acids within the 2.4 region participate in the recognition of the -10 element. More specifically, residues Q152 and E155 contribute to the strong preference of sigmaS for a C in position -13 and residue R299 can interact with the -31 nucleotide in the -35 element of the target promoters.

Nucleotides from -16 to -12 determine specific promoter recognition by bacterial sigmaS-RNA polymerase

The alternative sigma factor sigmaS, mainly active in stationary phase of growth, recognizes in vitro a -10 promoter sequence almost identical to the one for the main sigma factor, sigma70, thus raising the problem of how specific promoter recognition by sigmaS-RNA polymerase (EsigmaS) is achieved in vivo. We investigated the promoter features involved in selective recognition by EsigmaS at the strictly sigmaS-dependent aidB promoter. We show that the presence of a C nucleotide as first residue of the aidB -10 sequence (-12C), instead of the T nucleotide canonical for sigma70-dependent promoters, is the major determinant for selective recognition by EsigmaS. The presence of the -12C does not allow formation of an open complex fully proficient in transcription initiation by Esigma70. The role of -12C as specific determinant for promoter recognition by EsigmaS was confirmed by sequence analysis of known EsigmaS-dependent promoters as well as site-directed mutagenesis at the promoters of the csgB and sprE genes. We propose that EsigmaS, unlike Esigma70, can recognize both C and T as the first nucleotide in the -10 sequence. Additional promoter features such as the presence of a C nucleotide at position -13, contributing to open complex formation by EsigmaS, and a TG motif found at the unusual -16/-15 location, possibly contributing to initial binding to the promoter, also represent important factors for sigmaS-dependent transcription. We propose a new sequence, TG(N)0-2CCATA(c/a)T, as consensus -10 sequence for promoters exclusively recognized by EsigmaS.

Open complex formation in vitro by sigma38 (rpoS) RNA polymerase: roles for region 2 amino acids

Non-functional mutants of sigma(38)(sigma(S)) were studied in vitro to identify the nature of their defects. Mutations in four amino acids led to severe defects in DNA binding and enzyme isomerization with promoter fork junction probes containing single-stranded non-template DNA. The same properties were previously seen with DNA mutations at the fork junction, implying that sigma:DNA interactions at the fork junction are used both for DNA binding and enzyme isomerization. An overlapping set of four mutants had defects that appear to be associated with DNA melting to create the fork junction. When mapped onto the sigma(70) structure, these groups of mutants suggest motifs used by sigma factors to melt DNA and isomerize RNA polymerase to form functional open promoter complexes.

DNA supercoiling contributes to disconnect sigmaS accumulation from sigmaS-dependent transcription in Escherichia coli

The sigmaS subunit of RNA polymerase is a key regulator of Escherichia coli transcription in stress conditions. sigmaS accumulates in cells subjected to stresses such as an osmotic upshift or the entry into stationary phase. We show here that, at elevated osmolarity, sigmaS accumulates long before the beginning of the sigmaS-dependent induction of osmEp, one of its target promoters. A combination of in vivo and in vitro evidence indicates that a high level of DNA negative supercoiling inhibits transcription by EsigmaS. The variations in superhelical densities occurring as a function of growth conditions can modulate transcription of a subset of sigmaS targets and thereby contribute to the temporal disconnection between the accumulation of sigmaS and sigmaS-driven transcription. We propose that, in stress conditions leading to the accumulation of sigmaS without lowering the growth rate, the level of DNA supercoiling acts as a checkpoint that delays the shift from the major (Esigma70) to the general stress (EsigmaS) transcriptional machinery, retarding the induction of a subset of the sigmaS regulon until the conditions become unfavourable enough to cause entry into stationary phase.

Stationary phase gene regulation: what makes an Escherichia coli promoter sigmaS-selective?

The general stress sigma factor sigma(S) and the vegetative sigma(70) are highly related and recognise the same core promoter elements. Nevertheless, they clearly control different sets of genes in vivo. Recent studies have demonstrated that Esigma(S) selectivity is based on modular combinations of several sequence and structural features of a promoter, to which also trans-acting factors can strongly contribute. These results throw novel light on the details of transcription initiation, as well as on the co-evolution of sigma factors and their cognate promoter sequences.

The interaction between sigmaS, the stationary phase sigma factor, and the core enzyme of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase

BACKGROUND

The RNA polymerase holoenzyme of Escherichia coli is composed of a core enzyme (subunit structure alpha2betabeta') associated with one of the sigma subunits, required for promoter recognition. Different sigma factors compete for core binding. Among the seven sigma factors present in E. coli, sigma70 controls gene transcription during the exponential phase, whereas sigmaS regulates the transcription of genes in the stationary phase or in response to different stresses. Using labelled sigmaS and sigma70, we compared the affinities of both sigma factors for core binding and investigated the structural changes in the different subunits involved in the formation of the holoenzymes.

RESULTS

Using native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, we demonstrate that sigmaS binds to the core enzyme with fivefold reduced affinity compared to sigma70. Using iron chelate protein footprinting, we show that the core enzyme significantly reduces polypeptide backbone solvent accessibility in regions 1.1, 2.5, 3.1 and 3.2 of sigmaS, while increasing the accessibility in region 4.1 of sigmaS. We have also analysed the positioning of sigmaS on the holoenzyme by the proximity-dependent protein cleavage method using sigmaS derivatives in which FeBABE was tethered to single cysteine residues at nine different positions. Protein cutting patterns are observed on the beta and beta' subunits, but not alpha. Regions 2.5, 3.1 and 3.2 of sigmaS are close to both beta and beta' subunits, in agreement with iron chelate protein footprinting data.

CONCLUSIONS

A comparison between these results using sigmaS and previous data from sigma70 indicates similar contact patterns on the core subunits and similar characteristic changes associated with holoenzyme formation, despite striking differences in the accessibility of regions 4.1 and 4.2.

Promoter recognition and discrimination by EsigmaS RNA polymerase

Although more than 30 Escherichia coli promoters utilize the RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing sigmaS (EsigmaS), and it is known that there is some overlap between the promoters recognized by EsigmaS and by the major E. coli holoenzyme (Esigma70), the sequence elements responsible for promoter recognition by EsigmaS are not well understood. To define the DNA sequences recognized best by EsigmaS in vitro, we started with random DNA and enriched for EsigmaS promoter sequences by multiple cycles of binding and selection. Surprisingly, the sequences selected by EsigmaS contained the known consensus elements (-10 and -35 hexamers) for recognition by Esigma70. Using genetic and biochemical approaches, we show that EsigmaS and Esigma70 do not achieve specificity through 'best fit' to different consensus promoter hexamers, the way that other forms of holoenzyme limit transcription to discrete sets of promoters. Rather, we suggest that EsigmaS-specific promoters have sequences that differ significantly from the consensus in at least one of the recognition hexamers, and that promoter discrimination against Esigma70 is achieved, at least in part, by the two enzymes tolerating different deviations from consensus. DNA recognition by EsigmaS versus Esigma70 thus presents an alternative solution to the problem of promoter selectivity.

Superimposed levels of regulation of the 4-hydroxyphenylacetate catabolic pathway in Escherichia coli

The regulation of the Pg promoter, which controls the expression of the meta operon of the 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid (4-HPA) catabolic pathway of Escherichia coli W, has been examined through in vivo and in vitro experiments. By using Pg-lacZ fusions we have demonstrated that Pg is a promoter only inducible in the stationary phase when cells are grown on glucose as the sole carbon and energy source. This strict catabolite repression control is mediated by the cAMP receptor protein (CRP). This event does not require the presence of the specific HpaR repressor or the 4-HPA permease (HpaX), excluding the involvement of a typical inducer exclusion mechanism. However, the acetic acid excreted in the stationary phase by the cells growing in glucose acts as an overflow metabolite, which can provide the energy to produce cAMP and to adapt the cells rapidly to the utilization of a new less preferred carbon source such as the aromatic compounds. Although Pg is not a final sigma(38)-dependent promoter, it is activated by the global regulator integration host factor (IHF) in the stationary phase of growth. Gel retardation assays have demonstrated that both CRP and IHF simultaneously bind to the Pg upstream region. DNase I footprint experiments showed that cAMP-CRP and IHF binding sites are centered at -61.5 and -103, respectively, with respect to the transcription start site +1 of the Pg promoter.

Regulation of microcin C51 operon expression: the role of global regulators of transcription

Expression of the microcin C51 operon in Escherichia coli cells is regulated as a function of the phase of growth; it is stimulated during the decelerating phase of growth. Using single-copy P(mcc)-lac transcriptional fusion (the promoter region of the microcin C51 operon fused to a promoterless lac operon in lambda phage), we showed that transcription from the microcin operon promoter is dependent on sigma(s) (RpoS) factor. However, some level of P(mcc)-lac expression is possible in rpoS null mutants, indicating that another sigma factor might be involved in transcription of the microcin C51 operon. Overproduction of sigma70 decreased Pmcc-directed transcription, presumably as a result of competition of sigma factors for the limited amount of core RNA polymerase. The cyclic AMP-CRP complex was shown to stimulate transcription from Pmcc: the absence of CRP or cAMP in crp or cya mutant cells strongly decreased the level of P(mcc)-lac expression. The production of C51 microcin decreased or was absent in rpoS, crp and cya mutant cells. Leucine-responsive protein Lrp and histone-like protein H-NS repressed P(mcc)-lac expression in the exponential and decelerating phases of growth. In studies of P(mcc)-lac expression in double mutant cells, we showed that proteins CRP, Lrp and H-NS acted in rpoS-dependent and rpoS-independent ways in transcription of the microcin C51 operon. Mutation hns(-) resulted in an increase in P(mcc)-lac expression in crp, rpoS and lrp mutant cells, as in wild-type cells.

Sigma38 (rpoS) RNA polymerase promoter engagement via -10 region nucleotides

Band shift assays using DNA probes that mimic closed and open complexes were used to explore the determinants of promoter recognition by sigma38 (rpoS) RNA polymerase. Duplex recognition was found to be much weaker than that observed in sigma70 promoter usage. However, binding to fork junction probes, which attempt to mimic melted DNA, was very strong. This binding occurs via the non-template strand with the identity of the two conserved junction nucleotides (-12T and -11A) being of paramount importance. A modified promoter consensus sequence identified these two nucleotides as among only four (underlined) that are highly conserved, and all four were in the -10 region (CTAcacT from -13 to -7). The remaining two nucleotides were shown to have different roles, -13C in preventing recognition by the heterologous sigma70 polymerase and -7T in directing enzyme isomerization. These -10 region nucleotides appear to have their primary function prior to full melting because probes that had a melted start site were relatively insensitive to substitution at these positions. These results suggest the sigma38 mechanism differs from the sigma70 mechanism, and this difference likely contributes to selective use of sigma38 under conditions that exist during stationery phase.

What makes an Escherichia coli promoter sigma(S) dependent? Role of the -13/-14 nucleotide promoter positions and region 2.5 of sigma(S)

The sigmaS and sigma70 subunits of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase recognize very similar promoter sequences. Therefore, many promoters can be activated by both holoenzymes in vitro. The same promoters, however, often exhibit distinct sigma factor selectivity in vivo. It has been shown that high salt conditions, reduced negative supercoiling and the formation of complex nucleoprotein structures in a promoter region can contribute to or even generate sigmaS selectivity. Here, we characterize the first positively acting sigmaS-selective feature in the promoter sequence itself. Using the sigmaS-dependent csiD promoter as a model system, we demonstrate that C and T at the -13 and -14 positions, respectively, result in strongest expression. We provide allele-specific suppression data indicating that these nucleotides are contacted by K173 in region 2.5 of sigmaS. In contrast, sigma70, which features a glutamate at the corresponding position (E458), as well as the sigmaS(K173E) variant, exhibit a preference for a G(-13). C(-13) is highly conserved in sigmaS-dependent promoters, and additional data with the osmY promoter demonstrate that the K173/C(-13) interaction is of general importance. In conclusion, our data demonstrate an important role for region 2.5 in sigmaS in transcription initiation. Moreover, we propose a consensus sequence for a sigmaS-selective promoter and discuss its emergence and functional properties from an evolutionary point of view.

sigma factor selectivity of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: role for CRP, IHF and lrp transcription factors

osmY is a stationary phase-induced and osmotically regulated gene in Escherichia coli that requires the stationary phase RNA polymerase (Esigma(S)) for in vivo expression. We show here that the major RNA polymerase, Esigma(70), also transcribes osmY in vitro and, depending on genetic background, even in vivo. The cAMP receptor protein (CRP) bound to cAMP, the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) and the integration host factor (IHF) inhibit transcription initiation at the osmY promoter. The binding site for CRP is centred at -12.5 from the transcription start site, whereas Lrp covers the whole promoter region. The site for IHF maps in the -90 region. By mobility shift assay, permanganate reactivity and in vitro transcription experiments, we show that repression is much stronger with Esigma(70) than with Esigma(S) holoenzyme. We conclude that CRP, Lrp and IHF inhibit open complex formation more efficiently with Esigma(70) than with Esigma(S). This different ability of the two holoenzymes to interact productively with promoters once assembled in complex nucleoprotein structures may be a crucial factor in generating sigma(S) selectivity in vivo.