Manometry studies in children: minimum standards for procedures

Delayed Gastric Emptying Correlates With Decreased Post-prandial Motility in Children: A Single-center Retrospective Review

Background/Aims

Pediatric patients with suspected gastroparesis often undergo antroduodenal manometry (ADM) and gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) for diagnostic purposes. However, it is unknown if delayed gastric emptying (DGE) correlates with manometric findings. This study evaluates whether ADM parameters differ between normal and abnormal GES in pediatric patients.

Methods

Data from pediatric patients undergoing ADM and GES at Nationwide Children's Hospital from 2011-2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Manometry parameters including motility index (Ln [sum of amplitudes × number of contractions + 1]), number of antral contractions, and direction of the phase III migrating motor complex (MMC) were compared to GES results from age-matched patients with DGE (n = 32) and normal gastric emptying (NGE) (n = 32) of similar sex, body mass index, and weight.

Results

Children with DGE had a lower post-prandial antral motility index and antral contraction number than those with NGE (9.4 vs 11.2, P = 0.005; 21.8 vs 49.6, P < 0.001). The gastric emptying percentage at 4 hours was lower in patients with retrograde phase III (59.2% vs 83.9%, P = 0.022) and in those without an antral component in the fasting phase III of the migrating motor complex (70.3% vs 86.5%, P = 0.003). Post-prandial antral hypomotility occurred more frequently in the DGE group than in the NGE group (41% vs 9%, P = 0.008).

Conclusions

ADM findings differ between children with DGE and NGE. Children with DGE are more likely to have abnormal fasting phase III patterns and decreased post-prandial antral activity during ADM testing.

Accuracy of Anorectal Manometry to Detect the Rectoanal Inhibitory Reflex in Children: Awake Versus Under General Anesthesia

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to investigate if there is a difference in the detection of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) when an anorectal manometry (ARM) is performed awake or under general anesthesia.

METHODS

A retrospective review of ARM studies was performed to identify children who had undergone ARMs both while awake and under general anesthesia. We compared ARM outcomes including the detection of the RAIR and anal canal resting pressure.

RESULTS

Thirty-four children had received ARMs both while awake and under general anesthesia (53% female, median age at first ARM 7.5 years [range 3-18 years]). In 9 of 34 (26%) children the RAIR was solely identified during ARM under general anesthesia and not during ARM while awake. In 6 of 9 (66%) this was unrelated to the balloon volumes used during balloon inflations. In 4 of 34 (12%) children, assessment of the RAIR was inconclusive during ARM under general anesthesia due to too low, or loss of anal canal pressure. In 2 of those children, ARMs while awake showed presence of a RAIR. Anal canal resting pressures were higher during ARM while awake versus ARM under general anesthesia (median 70 [interquartile range, IQR 59-85] vs 46 mmHg [IQR 36-65] respectively, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

General anesthesia may affect the detection of a RAIR in 2 ways. On the one hand, it may facilitate better visualization in children in whom a RAIR could not be visualized while awake. On the other hand, it may cause a loss of anal canal pressure resulting in an inconclusive test result.

High amplitude propagated contractions with Glycerin versus Bisacodyl: A within-subject comparison in children undergoing colonic manometry

BACKGROUND

The presence of high amplitude propagated contractions (HAPCs) measured by colonic manometry (CM) reflect an intact neuromuscular function of the colon. Bisacodyl and Glycerin are colonic stimulants that induce HAPCs and are used for the treatment of constipation. HAPCs characteristics with each drug have not been compared before. We aimed to compare the HAPC characteristics with Bisacodyl and Glycerin in children undergoing CM for constipation.

METHODS

This is a prospective single-center cross-over study of children aged 2-18 years undergoing CM. All patients received both Glycerin and Bisacodyl during CM. They were randomized to group A with Bisacodyl first (n = 22) and group B with Glycerin first (n = 23), with 1.5 hours in between each dose. Differences in patient and HAPC characteristics between groups were summarized using descriptive statistics and compared using Chi-square test or Wilcoxon rank sum test as appropriate.

KEY RESULTS

A total of 45 patients were included. HAPCs post Bisacodyl had a longer duration of action (median of 40 vs 21.5 min, p < 0.0001), longer propagation (median of 70 vs 60 cm, p = 0.02), and more HAPCs (median of 10 vs 5, p < 0.0001) compared Glycerin. No differences were found in the HAPC amplitude and onset of action between both medications.

Pediatric Neurogastroenterology and Motility Disorders: What Role Does Endoscopy Play?

Although pediatric neurogastroenterology and motility (PNGM) disorders are prevalent, often debilitating, and remain challenging to diagnose and treat, this field has made remarkable progress in the last decade. Diagnostic and therapeutic gastrointestinal endoscopy emerged as a valuable tool in the management of PNGM disorders. Novel modalities such as functional lumen imaging probe, per-oral endoscopic myotomy, gastric-POEM, and electrocautery incisional therapy have changed the diagnostic and therapeutic landscape of PNGM. In this review, the authors highlight the emerging role of therapeutic and diagnostic endoscopy in esophageal, gastric, small bowel, colonic, and anorectal disorders and disorders of gut and brain axis interaction.

Intra- and Inter-observer Agreement of High Resolution Antroduodenal Manometry in Pediatric Patients Among Single Center Experts

OBJECTIVES

Studies in adults have suggested that high-resolution technology increases the diagnostic yield of antroduodenal manometry (ADM). However, there is no study comparing high-resolution with low-resolution ADM recordings as well as comparing the 2 types of high-resolution display [conventional line plot (CLP) and pressure topographic plots (PTP)]. We hypothesized that high-resolution ADM is a superior diagnostic modality with higher inter-observer and intra-observer agreement compared with low-resolution recordings.

METHODS

Twenty-four anonymized ADM studies were blindly analyzed by 3 experienced pediatric neurogastroenterologists. All studies had been performed using a low-compliance water-perfused system with a 20-channels catheter. Data were displayed as CLP, as both high-resolution and low-resolution, and PTP in different sessions with at least 6-week interval. Accuracy was evaluated using previous established diagnosis and specific pre-prandial and post-prandial manometric patterns. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreements were calculated.

RESULTS

Analysis with high-resolution CLP revealed a substantial inter-observer agreement among the 3 observers regarding the diagnosis (Krippendorff's alpha: 0.832; average pairwise percentage agreement: 88.9%). Conversely, PTP and low-resolution CLP showed poor agreement for diagnoses (Krippendorff's alpha: 0.600; average pairwise percentage agreement: 75.3%; Krippendorff's alpha: 0.390; average pairwise percentage agreement: 60.2%, respectively). For the intra-observer agreement, Krippendorff's alpha ranges were 0.891-1 for CLP and 0.19393-0.34621 for PTP.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy for high-resolution ADM compared to the low-resolution recordings. However, although it is well established for other motility investigations, PTP is not yet reliable in assessing foregut motor patterns. Advanced and more sophisticated software are clearly required for analyzing PTP display.

Endoluminal Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Is Safe in Children Under Five Years Old

BACKGROUND

Endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP) is a minimally invasive, novel device that uses high-resolution impedance planimetry to measure important parameters of the gastrointestinal lumen that aid in the diagnosis of esophageal disorders. EndoFLiP is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for children 5 years and older. We sought to compare its safety and luminal characteristics between children under 5 years of age with children 5 years and older.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review was performed to identify all patients < 21 years of age who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with EndoFLIP between October 2017 and November 2020. Results: Sixty-seven EGDs with EndoFLIP were performed in 56 patients, including 14 that were done in children < 5 years and 53 in children ≥5years. The median age in the < 5-year group was 1.7years (interquartile range [IQR], 0.9-4.4) and the youngest patient was 1 month old. The median age in ≥5-year group was 14.3 years (IQR, 8.2-16.2). Median procedure times were similar (32 minutes [IQR, 25-48] for the < 5-year group; 28 minutes [IQR, 20-33] for ≥5-year group; P  = 0.08). There were no adverse events or unplanned hospitalizations in either group. At 30 mL inflation, the pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) was statistically different between the 2 groups (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

EndoFLIP appears to be safe for use in our small cohort of children < 5 years of age and may be an important tool in the management of esophageal disorders in this age group. There was no difference in procedure time between our 2 age groups and there were no procedure-related complications.

Colonic Function Investigations in Children: Review by the ESPGHAN Motility Working Group

Disorders of colonic motility, most often presenting as constipation, comprise one of the commonest causes of outpatient visits in pediatric gastroenterology. This review, discussed and created by the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) Motility Working Group, is a practical guide, which highlights the recent advances in pediatric colonic motility testing including indications, technical principles of the tests, patient preparation, performance and basis of the results' analysis of the tests. classical methods, such as colonic transit time (cTT) with radiopaque markers and colonic scintigraphy, as well as manometry and novel techniques, such as wireless motility capsule and electromagnetic capsule tracking systems are discussed.

Post-operative colonic manometry in children with Hirschsprung disease: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

A significant proportion of children experience bowel dysfunction (including constipation and fecal incontinence) following surgical repair of Hirschsprung disease (HD). Persistent symptoms are thought to relate to underlying colonic and/or anorectal dysmotility. Manometry may be used to investigate the gastrointestinal motility patterns of this population.

PURPOSE

To (1) evaluate the colonic manometry equipment and protocols used in the assessment of the post-operative HD population and (2) summarize the available evidence regarding colonic motility patterns in children with HD following surgical repair.

DATA SOURCES

We performed a systematic review of the Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases (January 1, 1980 and March 9, 2020). Data were extracted independently by two authors.

STUDY SELECTION

This systematic review was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Studies reporting the post-operative assessment of children with HD using colonic manometry were considered for inclusion.

RESULTS

Five studies satisfied selection criteria, providing a combined total of 496 children. Of these, 184 children with repaired HD underwent colonic manometry. Studies assessed heterogeneous populations, utilized variable manometry equipment and protocols, and reported limited baseline symptom characteristics, thus restricting comparability. All studies used low-resolution colonic manometry.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review highlighted the paucity of evidence informing the understanding of colonic dysmotility in the post-operative HD cohort. Current literature is limited by variable methodologies, heterogeneous cohorts, and the lack of high-resolution manometry.

Evaluation of constipation in children using high-resolution anorectal manometry

This prospective, cross-sectional study, conducted from July 2018 to March 2019, aimed to determine the causes of constipation using high-resolution anorectal manometry. Among 33 children enrolled in the study, 31 (94%) children presented with complaints of constipation with mean duration of 2.3 ± 2.5 years and 12 (36.4%) children also had associated complaints of faecal incontinence with mean duration of 3.5 ± 2.8 years. Seven children (21.2%) had normal high-resolution anorectal manometry parameters; anal sphincter hypotonia with decreased squeeze in one child, anal sphincter hypertonia with other abnormal parameters were noted in 25 and absent recto-anal inhibitory reflex in two. The causes of constipation determined were functional constipation in 30 (91%) children, suspected Hirschsprung's disease in two and suspected dyssynergic defecatory disorder in one. Almost 90% had functional constipation of which anal hypotension and anal hypertension may be a part of chronic functional constipation.

Bowel transit studies in children: evidence base, role and practicalities

Constipation is common in children and adults with varied worldwide prevalence. The majority of children have functional constipation as defined by Rome clinical criteria and respond favourably to standard medical therapy; up to one-third can develop difficult-to-treat constipation requiring investigation and specialist treatment. Colon function tests aim to assess the neuromuscular integrity, the movement of faeces across the colon and evaluate/predict response to the therapy. The 'ideal' test should be practical, non-invasive, widely available and cost-effective. None of the available diagnostic tools is designed to provide a comprehensive assessment of colon function and clinicians often have to combine more than one test to answer different questions. In this review, we aim to assess the strengths and limitations of the commonly available diagnostic investigations (radiopaque marker studies, scintigraphy, wireless motility capsule and colonic manometry) used to assess colon transit in children and to provide guidance on the most appropriate test for particular clinical settings.

The not-so-rare absent RAIR: Internal anal sphincter achalasia in a review of 1072 children with constipation undergoing high-resolution anorectal manometry

BACKGROUND

Our objective is to describe the prevalence of patients with internal anal sphincter achalasia (IASA) without Hirschsprung disease (HD) among children undergoing anorectal manometry (ARM) and their clinical characteristics.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of high-resolution ARM studies performed at our institution and identified patients with an absent rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR). Clinical presentation, medical history, treatment outcomes, and results of ARM and other diagnostic tests were collected. We compared data between IASA patients, HD patients, and a matched control group of patients with functional constipation (FC).

KEY RESULTS

We reviewed 1,072 ARMs and identified 109 patients with an absent RAIR, of whom 28 were diagnosed with IASA. Compared to patients with FC, patients with IASA had an earlier onset of symptoms and were more likely to have abnormal contrast enema studies. Compared to patients with HD, patients with IASA were more likely to have had a normal timing of meconium passage, a later onset of symptoms, and were diagnosed at an older age. At the latest follow-up, the majority of patients diagnosed with IASA (54%) were only using oral laxatives. Over half of patients with IASA had been treated with anal sphincter botulinum toxin injection, and 55% reported a positive response.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

Patients diagnosed with IASA may represent a more severe patient population compared to patients with FC, but have a later onset of symptoms compared to patients with HD. They may require different treatments for their constipation and deserve further study.

Anorectal manometry in pediatric settings: A systematic review of 227 studies

BACKGROUND

There is wide variation in the clinical use of diagnostic tools for children with chronic constipation and functional/structural fecal incontinence (CCFSFI). Anorectal manometry (ARM) is a well-recognized technique to assess the function of the anorectum.

PURPOSE

Our aim was to perform an up-to-date review on ARM in pediatric patients with CCFSFI, with specific focus on the indication of use and protocol. Variation of its use in pediatrics will be explored.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted for empirical studies utilizing ARM with a pediatric sample. A keyword search of literature published in English before July 2018 was conducted and updated to October 2019. Data on demographics, clinical information, study aims, ARM parameters and use of sedation/anesthesia were collected.

KEY RESULTS

A total of 227 studies were included in this systematic review. The age of study participants at the time of ARM ranged from birth to 18 years. ARM was most commonly used in patients with organic conditions (65%) compared to functional constipation (41%). In almost half [108/227 (48%)] of the studies, ARM was performed awake. The ARM parameters most frequently assessed were the rectoanal inhibitory reflex, which was evaluated in 198/227 studies (87%) and the anal resting pressure [166/227 studies (73%)].

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

This systematic review has highlighted the vast variation of ARM use within pediatrics and the need to strive toward standardization and use of consensus guidelines. We anticipate this will further advance our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in children with defecation disorders.

Understanding gastrointestinal motility studies in pediatrics

Motility of the gut is affected by the nervous system, the endocrine system, smooth muscle cells, interstitial cells of Cajal, secretory mucosal cells, the immune system, and gut flora. Abnormal gastrointestinal motility can generate nonspecific symptom complaints that are refractory to standard treatment approaches. It is important to exclude anatomical obstruction or other causes for patients' symptoms prior to proceeding with motility evaluation. Motility studies that help to evaluate children with suspected motility problems include combined multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) and pH recording, esophageal manometry, gastric emptying scinitigraphy, antroduodenal manometry, colonic manometry, and anorectal manometry. Many pediatric gastrointestinal motility evaluations should be completed in a pediatric motility center where specialized training is completed by physicians in this field. Indications for pediatric gastrointestinal motility studies and how the procedures are performed are addressed in this paper.

Anorectal manometry in children with defecation disorders BSPGHAN Motility Working Group consensus statement

Defecatory disorders in children, including chronic constipation (CC) and fecal incontinence (FI), are common conditions worldwide and have a significant impact on children, their families, and the healthcare system. Anorectal manometry (ARM) and high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) are relatively novel tools for the assessment of anal sphincter function and rectal sensation and have contributed significantly to improving the understanding of the anorectum as a functional unit. ARM has been recognized as the investigation of choice for adults with symptoms of defecation disorders, including fecal incontinence (FI), evacuation difficulties, and constipation. Although it is the gold standard tool in adults, it has yet to be formally accepted as a standardized diagnostic tool in the pediatric age, with limited knowledge regarding indications, protocol, and normal values. ARM/HRAM is slowly becoming recognized among pediatricians, but given that there are currently no agreed guidelines there is a risk that will lead to diversity in practice. The British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (BSPGHAN)-Motility Working Group (MWG) therefore has taken the opportunity to provide guidance on the use of ARM/HRAM in children with CC and/or FI.

Scientific solution to a complex problem: physiology and multidisciplinary team improve understanding and outcome in chronic constipation and faecal incontinence

PURPOSE

There is a lack of diagnostic credibility to direct focused management for children with chronic constipation (CC) and faecal incontinence (FI). The aim is to assess the impact of an innovative Children's Anorectal Physiology Service (CAPS) focusing on improving outcomes in children with CC/FI.

METHODS

Prospective data: demographics, bowel and quality of life (QoL)/risk of distress questionnaires. Diagnostics: awake high-resolution anorectal manometry (AHRAM), endoanal ultrasound and transit marker studies (TMS).

RESULTS

Total patients: 112; 66 males (59%); median 9 years (17 months to 16 years). Patient groups included: 89 (79%) had functional CC/FI; 9 (8%), Hirschsprung's disease; 12 (11%), anorectal malformations and 2 (2%), trauma. St Marks Incontinence score (SMIS) abnormal in 91 (81%) and Cleveland Constipation Score (CCS) in 101 (90%) patients. Anorectal manometry: 94 (84%) awake and 18 (17%) under anaesthesia. Play specialist input 37 (33%) patients. AHRAM abnormal 65 (58%): sphincter dysfunction 36 (32%) and altered rectal sensation: hyposensitive 22% (20/91); 21% (19/91) hypersensitive. TMS normal in 64 (57%), 17 (15%) slow transit and 27 (24%) rectal evacuatory disorder. Risk of distress in 38% and poor QoL in 55% patients which correlated with abnormal SMIS (p = 0.02). Patient/parent satisfaction improved significantly (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Scientific investigations combined with multidisciplinary team improve patient satisfaction and reduces patient self-report illness severity. A complex problem requires a scientific solution.

Postoperative Pullthrough Obstruction in Hirschsprung Disease: Etiologies and Diagnosis

Some patients continue to have obstructive symptoms and/or incontinence after pullthrough surgery for Hirschsprung disease. Incontinence can be due to injury to the anal sphincter and/or dentate line, abnormal colonic motility (nonretentive), or a chronic large stool burden (retentive). A diagnostic algorithm based on clinical and pathological evaluations can be applied to distinguish potential etiologies for obstructive symptoms, which segregate into anatomic (mechanical or histopathological) or physiologic subgroups. Valuable clinical information may be obtained by anorectal examination under anesthesia, radiographic studies, and anorectal or colonic manometry. In addition, histopathological review of a patient's original resection specimen(s) as well as postoperative biopsies of the neorectum usually are an important component of the diagnostic workup. Goals for the surgical pathologist are to exclude incomplete resection of the aganglionic segment or transition zone and to identify other neuromuscular pathology that might explain the patient's dysmotility. Diagnoses established from a combination of clinical and pathological data dramatically alter management strategies. In rare instances, reoperative pullthrough surgery is required, in which case the pathologist must be aware of histopathological features specific to redo pullthrough resection specimens.

Diagnosis of Hirschsprung Disease

Diagnosis or exclusion of Hirschsprung disease (HSCR) is a frequent exercise in any pediatric hospital. Although HSCR may present at different ages and with varied clinical findings, the most common presentation is a neonate with severe constipation or signs of intestinal obstruction. A variety of diagnostic tests including contrast enema and anorectal manometry may be used as diagnostic screens, but diagnosis ultimately rests upon histopathological evaluation of a rectal biopsy. For the experienced pathologist, conventional hematoxylin-and-eosin-stained sections often suffice to exclude HSCR or establish the diagnosis. However, ancillary diagnostic tests such as acetylcholinesterase histochemistry or calretinin immunohistochemistry are complementary and extremely helpful in some cases. In this Perspectives article, we review the clinical and pathological features of HSCR, highlight those that are found in most patients, and discuss how to address particularly challenging aspects of the diagnostic workup.

First translational consensus on terminology and definitions of colonic motility in animals and humans studied by manometric and other techniques

Alterations in colonic motility are implicated in the pathophysiology of bowel disorders, but high-resolution manometry of human colonic motor function has revealed that our knowledge of normal motor patterns is limited. Furthermore, various terminologies and definitions have been used to describe colonic motor patterns in children, adults and animals. An example is the distinction between the high-amplitude propagating contractions in humans and giant contractions in animals. Harmonized terminology and definitions are required that are applicable to the study of colonic motility performed by basic scientists and clinicians, as well as adult and paediatric gastroenterologists. As clinical studies increasingly require adequate animal models to develop and test new therapies, there is a need for rational use of terminology to describe those motor patterns that are equivalent between animals and humans. This Consensus Statement provides the first harmonized interpretation of commonly used terminology to describe colonic motor function and delineates possible similarities between motor patterns observed in animal models and humans in vitro (ex vivo) and in vivo. The consolidated terminology can be an impetus for new research that will considerably improve our understanding of colonic motor function and will facilitate the development and testing of new therapies for colonic motility disorders.

Same day versus next day antroduodenal manometry results in children with upper gastrointestinal symptoms: A prospective study

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the changes in antroduodenal manometry (ADM) parameters and interpretation when the test is performed the day of catheter placement and the following day.

METHODS

Catheter was placed endoscopically under anesthesia and recorded on day 1 and repeated on day 2. Study parameters including antrum and small bowel motility index (MI) during fasting, meal, postprandial, erythromycin (EES), and octreotide (OCT) challenge phases, the presence of the phase III of the migrating motor complex (MMC), visual postprandial response, and study interpretation were compared between both days.

KEY RESULTS

Twenty patients were studied. Antrum and small bowel MI during fasting, postprandial, and EES challenge phases were significantly higher on day 2 than on day 1 (P < 0.05). The proportion of patients having a phase III of the MMC was significantly higher on day 2 compared to day 1 (65% vs 15%; P = 0.006). Study interpretation changed from day 1 to day 2. On day 1, 70% of the patients had a normal study and 30% had an abnormal study. On day 2, 67% of the patients with an abnormal study on day 1 changed to normal and 33% remained abnormal. All patients with a normal study on day 1 remained normal on day 2.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

ADM parameters are affected the day of catheter placement. The MI and presence of the phase III of the MMC were significantly higher on day 2 compared to day 1. Overall, ADM study interpretation changed from day 1 to day 2 in 20% of the patients.

Characterization of Simultaneous Pressure Waves as Biomarkers for Colonic Motility Assessed by High-Resolution Colonic Manometry

Simultaneous pressure waves (SPWs) in manometry recordings of the human colon have been associated with gas expulsion. Our hypothesis was that the SPW might be a critical component of most colonic motor functions, and hence might act as a biomarker for healthy colon motility. To that end, we performed high-resolution colonic manometry (HRCM), for the first time using an 84-sensor (1 cm spaced) water-perfused catheter, in 17 healthy volunteers. Intraluminal pressure patterns were recorded during baseline, proximal and rectal balloon distention, after a meal and following proximal and rectal luminal bisacodyl administration. Quantification was performed using software, based on Image J, developed during this study. Gas expulsion was always associated with SPWs, furthermore, SPWs were associated with water or balloon expulsion. SPWs were prominently emerging at the termination of proximal high amplitude propagating pressure waves (HAPWs); we termed this motor pattern HAPW-SPWs; hence, SPWs were often not a pan-colonic event. SPWs and HAPW-SPWs were observed at baseline with SPW amplitudes of 12.0 ± 8.5 mmHg and 20.2 ± 7.2 mmHg respectively. The SPW occurrence and amplitude significantly increased in response to meal, balloon distention and luminal bisacodyl, associated with 50.3% anal sphincter relaxation at baseline, which significantly increased to 59.0% after a meal, and 69.1% after bisacodyl. Often, full relaxation was achieved. The SPWs associated with gas expulsion had a significantly higher amplitude compared to SPWs without gas expulsion. SPWs could be seen to consist of clusters of high frequency pressure waves, likely associated with a cluster of fast propagating, circular muscle contractions. SPWs were occasionally observed in a highly rhythmic pattern at 1.8 ± 1.2 cycles/min. Unlike HAPWs, the SPWs did not obliterate haustral boundaries thereby explaining how gas can be expelled while solid content can remain restrained by the haustral boundaries. In conclusion, the SPW may become a biomarker for normal gas transit, the gastrocolonic reflex and extrinsic neural reflexes. The SPW assessment reveals coordination of activities in the colon, rectum and anal sphincters. SPWs may become of diagnostic value in patients with colonic dysmotility.

Quantifying Patterns of Smooth Muscle Motility in the Gut and Other Organs With New Techniques of Video Spatiotemporal Mapping

The uses and limitations of the various techniques of video spatiotemporal mapping based on change in diameter (D-type ST maps), change in longitudinal strain rate (L-type ST maps), change in area strain rate (A-type ST maps), and change in luminous intensity of reflected light (I-maps) are described, along with their use in quantifying motility of the wall of hollow structures of smooth muscle such as the gut. Hence ST-methods for determining the size, speed of propagation and frequency of contraction in the wall of gut compartments of differing geometric configurations are discussed. We also discuss the shortcomings and problems that are inherent in the various methods and the use of techniques to avoid or minimize them. This discussion includes, the inability of D-type ST maps to indicate the site of a contraction that does not reduce the diameter of a gut segment, the manipulation of axis [the line of interest (LOI)] of L-maps to determine the true axis of propagation of a contraction, problems with anterior curvature of gut segments and the use of adjunct image analysis techniques that enhance particular features of the maps.

An ANMS-NASPGHAN consensus document on esophageal and antroduodenal manometry in children

BACKGROUND

Upper gastrointestinal symptoms in children are common and motility disorders are considered in the differential diagnosis. High resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) has revolutionized the study of esophageal physiology, and the addition of impedance has provided new insights into esophageal function. Antroduodenal motility has provided insight into gastric and small bowel function.

PURPOSE

This review highlights some of the recent advances in pediatric esophageal and antroduodenal motility testing including indications, preparation, performance, and interpretation of the tests. This update is the second part of a two part series on manometry studies in children (first part was on anorectal and colonic manometry [Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;29:e12944]), and has been endorsed by the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS).

Motility Disorders in Children

Gastrointestinal motility disorders in the pediatric population are common and can range from benign processes to more serious disorders. Performing and interpreting motility evaluations in children present unique challenges. There are primary motility disorders but abnormal motility may be secondary due to other disease processes. Diagnostic studies include radiographic scintigraphic and manometry studies. Although recent advances in the genetics, biology, and technical aspects are having an important impact and have allowed for a better understanding of the pathophysiology and therapy for gastrointestinal motility disorders in children, further research is needed to be done to have better understanding of the pathophysiology and for better therapies.

Pediatric rumination subtypes: A study using high-resolution esophageal manometry with impedance

BACKGROUND

The differential diagnosis of intractable reflux in children includes rumination syndrome, but confirming the diagnosis using antroduodenal manometry is invasive, is costly, and requires anesthesia. High-resolution esophageal manometry with impedance (HRM-MII) overcomes these limitations, and the goal of this study is to validate the use of HRM-MII as a diagnostic tool for rumination and to describe the subtypes of pediatric rumination.

METHODS

We reviewed the HRM-MII tracings of 21 children presenting with symptoms of intractable reflux in whom rumination was being considered. Patients underwent a standard and post-prandial HRM-MII. Peak intraluminal esophageal pressures, baseline gastric and thoracic pressures, and the timing of the R wave relative to LES relaxations and bolus flow were recorded. Chi-square analyses were used for comparison of proportions and means were compared using t-tests or non-parametric equivalent.

KEY RESULTS

Forty-one (55.5%) primary and 33 (44.5%) secondary rumination episodes were seen. Three types of primary rumination were identified: i) LES relaxation without retrograde flow preceding the R wave (51% of episodes); ii) LES relaxation after the R wave (20% of episodes); and iii) R waves with no LES relaxation (29% of episodes). Eleven patients had rumination episodes with a peak gastric pressure <30 mm Hg. A total of 44 (60%) rumination episodes occurred during the standard HRM-MII, and 30 (40%) occurred during or after the meal.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

HRM-MII can accurately diagnose rumination in children. We identify three types of primary rumination which may provide insight into therapeutic response.

An ANMS-NASPGHAN consensus document on anorectal and colonic manometry in children

BACKGROUND

Over the last few years, the study of the colon and anorectal function has experienced great technical advances that have facilitated the performance of the tests and have allowed a more detailed characterization of reflexes and motor patterns. As a result, we have achieved a much better understanding of the pathophysiology of children with defecation problems. Anorectal and colonic manometry are now commonly used in all major pediatric referral centers as diagnostic tools and to guide the management of children with intractable constipation and fecal incontinence, particularly when a surgical intervention is being considered.

PURPOSE

This review highlights some of the recent advances in pediatric colon and anorectal motility testing including indications and preparation for the studies, and how to perform and interpret the tests. This update has been endorsed by the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN).

Sequential incremental doses of bisacodyl increase the diagnostic accuracy of colonic manometry

BACKGROUND

Colonic manometry is the standard diagnostic modality for evaluating colonic motility in children. Intraluminal bisacodyl is routinely used to trigger high-amplitude propagating contractions (HAPCs), a feature of normal colonic motility. Usually, only a single dose (0.2 mg/kg) is suggested. We retrospectively explored whether the use of an additional higher (0.4 mg/kg) dose of bisacodyl increases the yield of colonic manometry.

METHODS

In 103 children (median age: 8.8 years, range 3.2-15.7 years) with a diagnosis of slow transit constipation, colonic motility was recorded for 1 h before and 1 h after each of two incremental doses of bisacodyl (low, L, dose: 0.2 mg/kg, max 10 mg; high, H, dose: 0.4 mg/kg, max 20 mg) and the characteristics of HAPCs analyzed.

KEY RESULTS

High-amplitude propagating contractions were seen in 85 children. H dose significantly increased the proportion of patients with fully propagated HAPCs (H dose: 57/103 [55%], L dose: 27/103 [26%], p < 0.001), paralleling the significant decrease in the proportion with partially propagated HAPCs (H dose: 29/103 [28%], L dose: 47/103 [46%], p < 0.01). Mean HAPC number significantly increased throughout the colon at H compared to L dose (7.2 ± 5.05 vs 5.6 ± 5.1, p < 0.05). Finally, the proportion of patients with normal pressure wave morphology of HAPCs significantly increased with higher dose (H dose: 55/85 [65%], L dose: 27/85 [32%], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS & INTERFERENCES

An additional higher dose of bisacodyl during colonic manometry improves colonic neuromuscular function suggesting its use might improve interpretation and decision making in children with slow transit constipation.

Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Applications and Limits in Adults and Pediatric Patients with Esophageal Symptoms

The Chicago classification (CC) is most valued for its systematic approach to esophageal disorders and great impact in unifying practice for esophageal manometric studies. In view of the ever-growing wealth of knowledge and experience gained by the expanding use of high-resolution manometry (HRM) in various clinical scenarios, the CC is regularly updated. Its clinical impact and ability to predict clinical outcome, both in adults and pediatrics, will be further promoted by recognizing its current limitations, incorporating new metrics in its diagnostic algorithms and adjusting the HRM protocols based on the clinical question posed. Herein, we discuss the current limitations of the CC and highlight some areas of improvement for the future.

Values From Three-dimensional High-resolution Anorectal Manometry Analysis of Children Without Lower Gastrointestinal Symptoms

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry (3DHRAM) provides a topographic image of pressure along the anal canal. We aimed to determine normal 3DHRAM values in children.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study of 61 children (34 male; mean age, 8.28 years) without any symptoms arising from the lower gastrointestinal tract who were evaluated at the Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland. Manometry procedures were performed by using a rigid probe without medication. Pressure within the anal canal and 3D images of sphincters were measured. If possible, squeeze pressure and thresholds of sensation were evaluated. The population was divided into age groups of <5 years, 5-8 years, 9-12 years, and older than 12 years.

RESULTS

The mean resting and squeeze sphincter pressures were 83 ± 23 mm Hg and 191 ± 64 mm Hg, respectively. The mean length of the anal canal was 2.62 ± 0.68 cm and correlated with age (r = 0.49, P < .0001). The mean rectal balloon volume to elicit rectoanal inhibitory reflex was 15.7 ± 10.9 cm(3). The first sensation, urge, and discomfort were observed at balloon volumes of 24.4 ± 23.98 cm(3), 45.9 ± 34.55 cm(3), and 91.6 ± 50.17 cm(3), respectively. The mean resting pressure of the puborectalis muscle was 69 ± 14 mm Hg, whereas the mean squeeze pressure was 124 ± 33 mm Hg. There was no statistically significant difference in pressure parameters between age groups. We observed a positive correlation between age and balloon volume needed to elicit discomfort (r = 0.49, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a prospective study, we determined normal values from 3DHRAM analysis of children without symptoms arising from the lower gastrointestinal tract. There were no significant differences in pressure results between children of different sexes or ages. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02236507.

Effect of Octreotide on Colonic Motility in Pediatric Patients With Chronic Recalcitrant Constipation

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to study the effect of octreotide on colonic motility in pediatric patients with recalcitrant chronic constipation/encopresis and other suspected colonic motility disorders.

METHODS

This was a nonrandomized, single-center, open-label, prospective study evaluating the effect of a single subcutaneous dose of octreotide on colonic motility.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (5 boys) were enrolled in the study. The age range was 4.6 to 16.2 years. Eleven patients (84%) had normal colonic manometry and 2 patients (16%) had colonic neuropathy. Motility Index (MI) (mmHg) for the 15 minutes before and after octreotide infusion was 6.03 ± 1.26 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.35-6.72) and 5.32 ± 1.66 (95% CI 4.42-6.23), respectively, with P value of 0.08. MI for the 30 minutes before and after octreotide infusion was 6.89 ± 1.37 (95% CI 6.14-7.64) and 6.71 ± 1.47 (95% CI 5.91-7.52), respectively, with P value of 0.55. MI for the 45 minutes before and after octreotide infusion was 7.73 ± 1.32 (95% CI 7.01-8.45) and 7.53 ± 1.38 (95% CI 6.78-8.28), respectively, with P value of 0.8.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that the administration of octreotide resulted in no significant changes in colonic MI in pediatric patients with chronic recalcitrant constipation.

Effect of colon transection on spontaneous and meal-induced high-amplitude--propagating contractions in children

BACKGROUND

After Hirschsprung disease (HD) surgery, many children experience fecal incontinence caused by increased number of high-amplitude-propagating contractions (HAPCs) through the neorectum to the anal verge. The aim of this study was to determine whether children with HD have more HAPCs than children with colon transections for reasons other than HD.

METHODS

We reviewed 500 colon manometries. Children (age 7.6 ± 5.1 years, 275 boys) with functional constipation (n = 237, age 7.4 ± 5.0 years, 126 boys) and chronic abdominal pain (n = 48, age 9.8 ± 5.8 years, 25 boys) served as controls compared with subjects with HD (n = 56, age 6.9 ± 4.1 years, 44 boys) and colon transection for other reasons (n = 24, age 6.1 ± 5.8 years, 12 boys). We excluded 139 subjects without HAPCs. We documented HAPCs during 1-hour fasting and 1-hour postprandial. Results are in mean ± SD.

RESULTS

During fasting, HD subjects had more HAPCs (2.2 ± 3.4/hour) versus functional constipation (0.8 ± 2.2/hour, P = 0.0004) and chronic pain (0.5 ± 1.1/hour, P = 0.001), but not more than colon transection (1.9 ± 3.2/hour, P = 1.0). HD showed more postprandial HAPCs (4.0 ± 5.4/hour) than functional constipation (1.5 ± 2.5/hour, P < 0.0001) and chronic pain (0.9 ± 1.6/hour, P < 0.0001), but not more than colon transection (2.4 ± 3.0/hour, P = 0.6). There were more HAPCs fasting and postprandial after colon transection (1.9 ± 3.2/hour and 2.4 ± 3.0/hour) than functional constipation (0.8 ± 2.2/hour, P = 0.3 and 1.5 ± 2.5/hour, P = 1.0) and chronic pain (0.5 ± 1.1/hour, P = 1.0 and 0.9 ± 1.6, P = 1.0). HD subjects were divided by chief complaint: fecal incontinence or constipation. HD subjects with incontinence (n = 23) only had more HAPCs fasting (P = 0.01) and postprandial (P = 0.01) than HD subjects with constipation (n = 28) only.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased HAPCs followed colon transection, regardless of a cause. HD subjects with incontinence had more HAPCs than subjects with colon transection for other reasons.

Prolonged colonic manometry in children with defecatory disorders

OBJECTIVES

Colonic manometry is a test used in the evaluation of children with defecation disorders unresponsive to conventional treatment. The most commonly reported protocol in pediatrics consists of a study that lasts approximately 4 hours. Given the wide physiological variations in colonic motility throughout the day, longer observation may detect clinically relevant information. The aim of the present study was to compare prolonged colonic manometry studies in children referred for colonic manometry with the more traditional short water-perfused technology.

METHODS

Colonic manometry studies of 19 children (8 boys, mean age 9.4 ± 0.9, range 3.9-16.3) with severe defecation disorders were analyzed. First, a "standard test" was performed with at least 1-hour fasting, 1-hour postprandial, and 1-hour postbisacodyl provocation recording. Afterwards, recordings continued until the next day.

RESULTS

In 2 of the 19 children, prolonged recording gave us extra information. In 1 patient with functional nonretentive fecal incontinence who demonstrated no abnormalities in the short recording, 2 long clusters of high-amplitude contractions were noted in the prolonged study, possibly contributing to the fecal incontinence. In another patient evaluated after failing use of antegrade enemas through a cecostomy, short recordings showed colonic activity only in the most proximal part of the colon, whereas the prolonged study showed normal motility over a larger portion of the colon.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged colonic measurement provides more information regarding colonic motor function and allows detection of motor events missed by the standard shorter manometry study.

Management of chronic intractable constipation in children

BACKGROUND

Chronic intractable constipation (CIC) is a debilitating disease that is challenging to manage. Treatment options in children include medications, enemas, and surgical management in selected cases.

METHOD

We reviewed medical records of pediatric patients diagnosed as having CIC at Tufts Medical Center from 2005 to 2012. Demographic variables, diagnostic procedures, and medical and surgical outcomes were collected. Clinical outcome was defined using the Rome III criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 14 patients were included in the study (10 boys). The age range was 10 to 21 years. All of the patients had the diagnosis of CIC. Eleven patients had cecostomy placement. During the follow-up period, 10 patients underwent total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis, 1 had total colectomy with ileostomy, and 1 had partial colectomy with colorectal anastomosis. Successful clinical outcome was reported in 7 patients with 3 patients reporting persistent fecal incontinence. Colonic motility studies were performed on 12 patients (colonic neuropathy in 11 patients and normal study in 1 patient). Defecography was consistent with isolated pelvic floor dysfunction in 1 patient, abnormal motility and anatomy in 1 patient, pelvic floor dysfunction and abnormal motility in 2 patients, and found abnormal motility only in 5. Defecography study was normal in 5 patients. All of the patients with abnormal colonic manometry underwent a surgical procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Anorectal manometry, colonic manometry, and defecography help in understanding the pathophysiology of defecation disorders in children. The majority of patients with abnormal colonic manometry underwent TAC-IRA. There was no statistical correlation between individual investigations (anorectal manometry, colonic manometry, and defecography) with surgical intervention (P > 0.35). TAC-IRA may be safe and useful intervention in a subset of patients when other treatment options have failed.

Clinical applications of gastrointestinal manometry in children

Manometry is a noninvasive diagnostic tool for identifying motility dysfunction of the gastrointestinal tract. Despite the great technical advances in monitoring motility, performance of the study in pediatric patients has several limitations that should be considered during the procedure and interpretation of the test results. This article reviews the clinical applications of conventional esophageal and anorectal manometries in children by describing a technique for performing the test. This review will develop the uniformity required for the methods of performance, the parameters for measurement, and interpretation of test results that could be applied in pediatric clinical practice.

Colonic manometry and colonic scintigraphy as a diagnostic tool for children with severe constipation

OBJECTIVE

In adults, colonic manometry and colonic scintigraphy are both valuable studies in discriminating normal and abnormal colonic motility. The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic yield and tolerability of colonic manometry and colonic scintigraphy in children with severe constipation.

METHODS

Twenty-six children (mean age 11.4 years, 77% boys) who had received colonic manometry and colonic scintigraphy as part of a colonic motility evaluation were included. Manometry was performed as per department protocol. After swallowing a methacrylate-coated capsule containing indium-111, images were taken at 4, 24, and 48 hours, and geometric centers were calculated. Results of both tests were categorized in 3 groups: normal, abnormal function in the distal part of the colon, and colonic inertia. Cohen κ was used for the level of agreement. Patients and parents completed a questionnaire regarding their experience.

RESULTS

Colonic scintigraphy showed normal transit time in 20%, delay in the distal colon in 48%, and colonic inertia in 32% of patients. Colonic manometry was normal in 40%, abnormal in the distal colon in 40%, and colonic inertia was diagnosed in 20%. The κ score was 0.34. All 5 patients with colonic inertia during manometry had a similar result by scintigraphy. Eighty-eight percent of patients preferred scintigraphy over manometry and 28% of parents preferred colonic manometry over scintigraphy.

CONCLUSIONS

Colonic manometry and colonic scintigraphy have a fair agreement regarding the categorization of constipation. Scintigraphy is well tolerated in pediatric patients and may be a useful tool in the evaluation of children with severe constipation.

Novel techniques to study colonic motor function in children

Colonic motility is an essential component of normal colonic physiology and it controls essential bodily functions such as stool propulsion, storage, and expulsion. Disordered colonic motility may present with constipation or diarrhea as well as associated symptoms such as bloating, gas, pain, incontinence, and others. In order to assess colonic motor function, practitioners may use studies that either investigate transit time or that evaluate peristaltic activity. Transit time is the result of both the effectiveness of propulsive pressures and the physical characteristics of the stools. Its measurement allows one to quantify the extent and severity of the colonic dysfunction and permits the assessment of response to therapy. Various methods exist to investigate colon transit time and motility. In this review, we will focus on newer techniques for these investigations, including: scintigraphic transit studies, anorectal manometry, colonic manometry, and studies using a wireless motility capsule.

Diffuse esophageal spasm in children referred for manometry

Diffuse esophageal spasm (DES) causes chest pain and/or dysphagia in adults. We reviewed charts of 278 subjects 0 to 18 years of age after esophageal manometry to describe the frequency and characteristics of DES in children. Patient diagnoses included normal motility (61%), nonspecific esophageal motility disorder (20%), DES (13%, n=36), and achalasia (4%). Of patients with DES, the most common chief complaint was food refusal in subjects younger than 5 years (14/24, 58%) and chest pain in subjects older than 5 years (4/12, 33%). Comorbid medical conditions, often multiple, existed in 33 subjects. DES should be considered when young children present with food refusal.

Colon manometry proves that perception of the urge to defecate is present in children with functional constipation who deny sensation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Children with functional constipation often state an inability to sense an urge to defecate and/or inability to feel incontinence. We used colon manometry to assess whether there was a sensory abnormality in patients who denied sensation.

METHODS

A physician observed all of the colon manometries in the preceding 20 years, and included behavioral observations in the procedure reports. We reviewed the charts of these patients.

RESULTS

Of 150 subjects with normal manometry and a diagnosis of functional constipation, 56 volunteered that they had no urge to defecate or complained of abdominal pain. For all who denied sensation, the first high-amplitude propagating colonic contraction (HAPC) was associated with retentive posturing and facial grimaces. When queried, all reported they felt nothing. The examiner explained the HAPC was causing pain, and informed the child that the pain would resolve if they defecated. With subsequent HAPCs, every patient acknowledged an urge to defecate and successfully defecated. Most agreed that a similar pain sensation was present daily, but was misinterpreted to be abdominal pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Colon manometry may be useful not only for objective findings to discriminate neuromuscular disease from functional symptoms but also to understand psychological issues and aid in helping the child and family understand the maladaptive behaviors in functional constipation.

Interobserver variability in the interpretation of colon manometry studies in children

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the variability in interpretation of colon manometry (CM) in children.

METHODS

Fifty-seven colon motility studies were independently reviewed by 5 observers. Each observer was required to report on the colonic motility during fasting, after administration of a meal, and after bisacodyl stimulation. They were also asked to comment whether CM study was normal or abnormal and whether in their opinion the postprandial recording provided clinically useful information.

RESULTS

The median (range) agreement regarding the presence of high-amplitude propagating contractions (HAPC) was 83% (80%-92%). The interpretation of gastrocolonic response produced the most inconsistent results with median (range) agreemnet of 64% (53%-95%). The postprandial period was reported to be useful in only 3% to 24% of the studies. The median (range) agreement regarding the overall interpretation of the study being either normal or abnormal was 87% (83%-90%).

CONCLUSIONS

The most easily recognizable contraction pattern during CM is the high-amplitude propagating contractions. Visual interpretation of the gastrocolonic response produces the most inconsistent results and maximum variability. Abbreviated CM studies without the postprandial period or routine calculation of the motility index to evaluate gastrocolonic response can help make colon manometries more objective and reliable.

Solid-state vs water-perfused catheters to measure colonic high-amplitude propagating contractions

BACKGROUND

  Solid-state (SS) manometry catheters with portable data loggers offer many potential advantages over traditional water-perfused (WP) systems, such as prolonged recordings in a more physiologic ambulatory setting and the lack of risk for water overload. The use of SS catheters has not been evaluated in comparison with perfused catheters in children. This study aims to compare data provided by SS and WP catheters in children undergoing colonic manometry studies.

METHODS

  A SS catheter and a WP catheter were taped together such that their corresponding sensors were at the same location. Simultaneous recordings were obtained using the SS and WP catheters (both 8 channels, 10 cm apart) in 15 children with severe defecation disorders referred for colonic manometry. Signals were recorded for a minimum of 1 h during fasting, 1 h after ingestion of a meal, and 1 h after the administration of bisacodyl. Solid-state signals from the data logger were analyzed against the perfused signals. All high-amplitude propagated contractions (HAPCs), the most recognizable and interpreted colonic motor event, were evaluated for spatial and temporal features including their durations, amplitudes, and propagation velocities.

KEY RESULTS

  A total of 107 HAPCs were detected with SS and 91 with WP catheters. All WP-HAPC were also observed with SS. Linear regression analysis showed that SS catheters tended to give higher readings in the presence of amplitudes <102 mmHg and lower reading with amplitudes >102 mmHg. An opposite trend was found for the duration of contractions. No significant difference was found for HAPC velocity.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

  SS catheters are more sensitive in recording HAPCs in children with defecation disorders compared with the more traditional WP assembly. There is a difference in measurements of amplitude between the two systems. Solid-state catheters offer potential advantages over WP catheters in children, being portable, safer to use, and may provide data over a more prolonged period.

Heterogeneity of lower esophageal sphincter function in children with achalasia

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Achalasia is a rare esophageal motor disorder in children. The manometric hallmarks are esophageal body aperistalsis, lack of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation, and high LES pressure. However, LES relaxation and function may be heterogeneous, making the diagnosis difficult at times. The aim of the study was to describe LES function in children with achalasia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The present study is a retrospective review of manometric tracings of pediatric patients with achalasia and controls. LES response after each swallow was evaluated. LES parameters were defined as homogeneous (normal or abnormal) if the same response was observed in >75% of swallows. Otherwise, the LES parameters were considered heterogeneous.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients with achalasia and 16 control patients were included. All of the controls had normal LES pressure and relaxation in all of the wet swallows. In the achalasia group, some LES relaxation was present in 74% of swallows and 25% of swallows had normal relaxation. Depending on the parameter, a heterogeneous LES (resting pressure, relaxation, residual pressure, and duration of relaxation) was observed in 27.6% to 34.5% of patients with achalasia versus 0% of the controls (P < 0.001). The rest of the patients with achalasia had homogeneous abnormal responses versus homogeneous normal responses in 100% of control patients (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The LES function in pediatric patients with achalasia is heterogeneous. The classic description of a nonrelaxing high-pressure LES in patients with achalasia is rarely found in children. Partial relaxations are common, and normal relaxations may be present.

Colonic hyperactivity results in frequent fecal soiling in a subset of children after surgery for Hirschsprung disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Fecal soiling is a challenging problem in some children after pull-through surgery for Hirschsprung disease (HSCR). The prevailing perception is that soiling results from overflow incontinence; however, its treatment with laxatives yields mixed results. Colonic manometry studies are reported to be normal in most patients in this population. The interpretation of these findings does not support the physiology of fecal overflow incontinence in these children. The aim of the present study was to define the physiology underlying daily, frequent fecal soiling in children after surgery for HSCR using manometric techniques.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four pediatric motility centers in the United States participated in the study; medical records and manometric tracings (anorectal and colonic) of children (n = 59; 6.5 years; 48 boys) who had pull-through surgery for HSCR and presented with daily, frequent fecal soiling were examined. Children referred for evaluation of constipation who had normal colonic manometry served as controls (n = 25; 6.7 years; 12 boys). The patients with HSCR were divided into 2 groups (Hirschsprung disease groups 1 and 2 [HD1, HD2]) based on the absence or presence of high-amplitude propagated contractions (HAPCs). A control group that included children with chronic constipation was also studied. We compared the mean HAPC frequency between the HD2 and control groups.

RESULTS

HD1 included 21 patients who had no HAPCs in fasting or postprandial periods. HD2 included 38 patients who had an average of 0.07 HPACs/min while fasting and 0.13/min in the postprandial state. In this subset the number of HAPCs in the fasting state (P = 0.04) and the postprandial state (P < 0.001) was greater when compared with controls. Additionally, there was a significant increase in HAPCs/min from the fasting to the postprandial state (P = 0.01). In the HD2 group 40% had colonic hyperactivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Daily, frequent fecal soiling after pull-through surgery for HSCR may be due to colonic hyperactivity in some children. It is imperative that this unique subset be identified because the management strategy would include avoidance of laxatives, contrary to standard current practice.

Colonic dysmotility in constipation

Constipation is a common and distressing condition with major morbidity, health care burden, and impact on quality of life. Colonic motor dysfunction remains the leading hypothesis to explain symptom generation in the most severe cases of chronic constipation and physiological testing plays a role in identifying the colonic dysmotility and the subsequent patient management. Measurement of colonic motor patterns and transit has enhanced our knowledge of normal and abnormal colonic motor physiology. The scope of this review encompasses the latest findings that improve our understanding of the motility disorders associated with colonic dysfunction in both the paediatric and adult population suffering from constipation.

Constipation in children: novel insight into epidemiology, pathophysiology and management

Constipation in children is a common health problem affecting 0.7% to 29.6% children across the world. Exact etiology for developing symptoms is not clear in children and the majority is considered to have functional constipation. Alteration of rectal and pelvic floor function through the brain-gut axis seems to play a crucial role in the etiology. The diagnosis is often a symptom-based clinical process. Recently developed Rome III diagnostic criteria looks promising, both in clinical and research fields. Laboratory investigations such as barium enema, colonoscopy, anorectal manometry and colonic transit studies are rarely indicated except in those who do not respond to standard management. Treatment of childhood constipation involves several facets including education and demystification, toilet training, rational use of laxatives for disimpaction and maintenance and regular follow-up. Surgical options should be considered only when medical therapy fails in long standing constipation. Since most of the management strategies of childhood constipation are not evidence-based, high-quality randomized controlled trials are required to assess the efficacy of currently available or newly emerging therapeutic options. Contrary to the common belief that children outgrow constipation as they grow up, a sizable percentage continue to have symptoms beyond puberty.

Paediatric and adult colonic manometry: A tool to help unravel the pathophysiology of constipation

Colonic motility subserves large bowel functions, including absorption, storage, propulsion and defaecation. Colonic motor dysfunction remains the leading hypothesis to explain symptom generation in chronic constipation, a heterogeneous condition which is extremely prevalent in the general population, and has huge socioeconomic impact and individual suffering. Physiological testing plays a crucial role in patient management, as it is now accepted that symptom-based assessment, although important, is unsatisfactory as the sole means of directing therapy. Colonic manometry provides a direct method for studying motor activities of the large bowel, and this review provides a contemporary understanding of how this technique has enhanced our knowledge of normal colonic motor physiology, as well as helping to elucidate pathophysiological mechanisms underlying constipation. Methodological approaches, including available catheter types, placement technique and recording protocols, are covered, along with a detailed description of recorded colonic motor activities. This review also critically examines the role of colonic manometry in current clinical practice, and how manometric assessment may aid diagnosis, classification and guide therapeutic intervention in the constipated individual. Most importantly, this review considers both adult and paediatric patients. Limitations of the procedure and a look to the future are also addressed.

Clinical utility of colonic and anorectal manometry in chronic constipation

Constipation is one of the most common digestive problems in North America with significant psychosocioeconomic implications. It is caused by either a primary disorder of colonic and anorectal function or by many secondary conditions such as constipating drugs, metabolic disorders and other colorectal problems. Given the heterogeneity of problems that cause constipation, defining the underlying pathophysiology is increasingly being recognized as a key step toward optimal management. Colonic manometry with sensation and tone assessment (barostat) and anorectal manometry with rectal sensation and compliance assessment and balloon expulsion test can provide a comprehensive evaluation of colonic and anorectal sensorimotor function and facilitate a diagnosis of slow transit constipation, dyssynergic defecation or irritable bowel syndrome, or an overlap of these disorders. This review provides a critical appraisal of the role of manometric techniques toward augmenting our understanding of colonic and anorectal physiology, both in health and constipation and discussing their clinical utility in the diagnosis and management of chronic constipation.

Bowel preparation affects the amplitude and spatiotemporal organization of colonic propagating sequences

BACKGROUND

Colonic manometry is performed using either colonoscopically assisted catheter placement, after bowel preparation, or nasocolonic intubation of the unprepared bowel. There has been little systematic evaluation of the effects of bowel cleansing upon colonic propagating pressure wave sequences.

METHODS

Eight healthy volunteers underwent nasocolonic placement of a water-perfused silicone catheter which recorded pressures at 16 recording sites each spaced 7.5 cm apart in the unprepared colon for 24 h. These measures were compared with those obtained in another eight healthy volunteers in whom the catheter was placed to the caecum at colonoscopy in the prepared colon.

KEY RESULTS

The colonic motor responses to meals and morning waking, and the normal nocturnal suppression did not differ between the two groups, nor were the overall frequency, regional dependence nor extent of propagating sequences (PS) influenced by bowel preparation. Bowel preparation did result in a significant increase in the frequency of high amplitude PS (22 +/- 7 vs 8 +/- 4 HAPS/24 h; P = 0.003). Additionally, a number of the measures of spatiotemporal organization among consecutive PS (linkage among sequences and predefecatory stereotypical patterning) were significantly altered by bowel preparation.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

The overall frequency of PSs, the colonic responses to physiological stimuli such a meal and morning waking and nocturnal suppression, are not influenced by prior bowel preparation. However, investigators wishing to study HAPS frequency, or the more complex spatiotemporal relationships among consecutive PSs, should control for bowel preparation when making comparisons among study groups.

Effect of intravenous erythromycin on the colonic motility of children and young adults during colonic manometry

PURPOSE

Erythromycin is successfully used as a gastroduodenal prokinetic agent. Given the limited available treatments for colonic dysmotility, further investigation into erythromycin's effect on colonic motility is warranted. We aimed to study the effect of erythromycin on colonic motility in pediatric patients with recalcitrant chronic constipation/encopresis and other suspected colonic motility disorders.

METHODS

Patients referred for colonic manometry were eligible for enrollment. Fasting motility was recorded for 1 to 2 hours, then erythromycin lactobionate (EL), 3 mg/kg, was administered intravenously, and colonic motility was monitored for 1 to 2 hours after erythromycin. Manometry was then continued per routine. The motility index (MI) of pressure tracings at each pressure transducer was calculated for each patient for a period of 15 and 60 minutes before and after EL infusion. Change in MI was compared by Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were enrolled. The most common indication was constipation with encopresis. Seventy percent of patients had normal colonic manometry, and 30% of patients demonstrated a neuropathy. Average MI for the 60-minute period before and after EL infusion were 254 +/- 74 mm Hg/h and 253 +/- 94 mm Hg/h, respectively (P = .55). Average MI for the 15-minute period before and after EL infusion were 64 +/- 23 mm Hg/15 min and 69 +/- 32 mm Hg/15 min, respectively (P = .45).

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of intravenous EL resulted in no changes in colonic MI in pediatric patients referred for colonic manometry. Further studies on potential colokinetic agents are warranted in this population of patients.

Diagnosis and management of intestinal motility disorders

Gastrointestinal motility disorders in their most severe forms may directly lead to intestinal failure. Abnormal motor function may also contribute to the overall gut dysfunction of children who have other underlying gastrointestinal diseases, such as Hirschsprung disease or gastroschisis. Understanding the extent and the severity of the dysmotile segments has direct therapeutic and prognostic implications. Our ability to study gastrointestinal motility has greatly improved in the past few years, with the development of less-invasive diagnostic tests. Optimal treatment of children with intestinal motility disorders relies on a multidisciplinary approach, which focuses on optimizing nutrition, improving gastrointestinal motility, and reducing psychosocial disability. Patient education is important to avoid aggravations of symptoms caused by dietary indiscretions.