Perioperative treatment with octreotide minimizes technical complications after enteric conversion of bladder-drained pancreas transplants

Enteric conversion after pancreatic transplantation: resolution of symptoms and long-term results

PURPOSE

Bladder drainage (BD) of pancreatic transplants is associated with a unique set of complications. We intended to analyze the incidence, indications, complications and long-term results of enteric conversion procedures (EC).

METHODS

Using a prospective database, 32 EC patients out of 433 simultaneous pancreas-kidney-transplant (SPK) recipients were identified. Graft and patient survival rates were compared with those after primary enteric drainage (ED).

RESULTS

The mean SPK-EC interval was 5.0 yr, and the mean patient follow-up was 13.8 yr. Indications for EC were genitourinary symptoms (62.5%), duodenal complications (15.6%), graft pancreatitis (12.5%), pyelonephritis (6.3%), and metabolic acidosis (3.1%). All patients reported significant long-term resolution of symptoms. Surgical complications, reoperations, early graft loss, and 30-d mortality occurred in 31.3%, 25.0%, 6.3%, and 3.1% of cases, respectively. Pancreatic graft and patient survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 yr after SPK were comparable between EC patients and ED patients at the same institution.

CONCLUSION

For the treatment of symptoms associated with BD, EC results in excellent long-term graft function and significant resolution of symptoms even years after SPK. Postoperative morbidity after EC including early reoperation and graft loss, however, has to be considered.

Compative study of bladder versus enteric drainage in pancreas transplantation

INTRODUCTION

There is some controversy concerning the choice of best technique for drainage of exocrine secretions in pancreas transplantation. We compared patients with bladder drainage (BD) versus those with enteric drainage (ED).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From March 1995 to September 2008, 118 patients (68 men and 50 women) of overall mean age of 37.8 +/- 7.8 years underwent pancreas transplantation. There were 109 simultaneous pancreas-kidney, and 9 pancreas after kidney procedures. Recipients were divided in a BD (n = 66 patients) and an ED group (n = 52).

RESULTS

Donor characteristics were similar in both groups. Thirty-two patients (48.5%) of the BD group versus none in the ED group experienced urinary tract infections (UTI; P < .001), and 16 patients (24.2%) BD versus 15 (29.4%) ED developed intraabdominal infections (P = NS). The overall rate of relaparotomies was 33.9% (n = 40): 34.8% (n = 23) in the BD versus 32.7% (n = 17) in the ED group (P = NS). Thirty patients (25.4%) lost their pancreas grafts: 21 (31.8%) in the BD group versus 9 (17.3%) in the ED group (P = .055). The acute rejection rates were 12.7%; namely, 15.2% in the BD versus 9.8% in the ED (P = NS). Three-year patient and graft survivals were equivalent in both groups: 96.1% and 65.3% in the BD versus 89.0% and 74.0% in the ED group, respectively (P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

ED is a good alternative to BD for drainage of pancreatic graft exocrine secretions because both techniques have the same patient and graft survival, but BD is associated with a significantly higher rate of UTI and urologic complications.