Thrombocytopenia and Critical Care Medicine

Platelet transfusions play an important role in the treatment of critically ill patients. Like any blood component, however, there are various aspects of platelet transfusion therapy that need be considered by the intensivist. These include the proper dose and type of platelet component to infuse, as well as the route and method of administration. Methods to reduce the volume of the transfused platelets, for example, must ensure that the infused platelets will be functional and viable, posttransfusion. Treatment and diagnosis of the HLA alloimmunized recipient can pose a serious challenge to the clinician and an obstacle to adequate platelet therapy. An ICU patient for whom an adequate posttransfusion platelet increment cannot be achieved is at great risk of suffering a fatal hemorrhage. The ICU physician should be aware of the techniques used in modern transfusion practice to avoid having to deal with this complication. Adverse reactions to platelet transfusion include not only serologic ones, but those related to febrile and allergic complications, as well as infectious complications. The latter group includes diseases caused by infection with cytomegalovirus, bacteria, and a cadre of viruses including HIV and hepatitis. The clinical approach to thrombocytopenia in the ICU will be covered in some detail in an effort to review many of the conditions associated with recipient thrombocytopenia, including ITP, TTP, dilutional thrombocytopenia, DIC, surgery, HELLP syndrome, and drug-induced thrombocytopenia. Unfortunately the treatment approaches traditionally used are not always derived from evidence-based studies. This review covers many of these topics in an attempt to help physicians become better able to manage thrombocytopenia in the ICU and thus provide the best transfusion therapy for their patients.

Coagulopathy in critically ill patients: part 1: platelet disorders

Abnormalities of platelet number and function are the most common coagulation disorders seen among ICU patients. This article reviews the most frequent causes of thrombocytopenia by providing an overview of the following most common mechanisms: impaired production; sequestration; dilution; and destruction. Guidelines for treating thrombocytopenia and platelet dysfunction are also provided.

Increased plasma and platelet to red blood cell ratios improves outcome in 466 massively transfused civilian trauma patients

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of blood component ratios in massive transfusion (MT), we hypothesized that increased use of plasma and platelet to red blood cell (RBC) ratios would result in decreased early hemorrhagic death and this benefit would be sustained over the ensuing hospitalization.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Civilian guidelines for massive transfusion (MT > or =10 units of RBC in 24 hours) have typically recommend a 1:3 ratio of plasma:RBC, whereas optimal platelet:RBC ratios are unknown. Conversely, military data shows that a plasma:RBC ratio approaching 1:1 improves long term outcomes in MT combat casualties. There is little consensus on optimal platelet transfusions in either civilian or military practice. At present, the optimal combinations of plasma, platelet, and RBCs for MT in civilian patients is unclear.

METHODS

Records of 467 MT trauma patients transported from the scene to 16 level 1 trauma centers between July 2005 and June 2006 were reviewed. One patient who died within 30 minutes of admission was excluded. Based on high and low plasma and platelet to RBC ratios, 4 groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 466 MT patients, survival varied by center from 41% to 74%. Mean injury severity score varied by center from 22 to 40; the average of the center means was 33. The plasma:RBC ratio ranged from 0 to 2.89 (mean +/- SD: 0.56 +/- 0.35) and the platelets:RBC ratio ranged from 0 to 2.5 (0.55 +/- 0.50). Plasma and platelet to RBC ratios and injury severity score were predictors of death at 6 hours, 24 hours, and 30 days in multivariate logistic models. Thirty-day survival was increased in patients with high plasma:RBC ratio (> or =1:2) relative to those with low plasma:RBC ratio (<1:2) (low: 40.4% vs. high: 59.6%, P < 0.01). Similarly, 30-day survival was increased in patients with high platelet:RBC ratio (> or =1:2) relative to those with low platelet:RBC ratio (<1:2) (low: 40.1% vs. high: 59.9%, P < 0.01). The combination of high plasma and high platelet to RBC ratios were associated with decreased truncal hemorrhage, increased 6-hour, 24-hour, and 30-day survival, and increased intensive care unit, ventilator, and hospital-free days (P < 0.05), with no change in multiple organ failure deaths. Statistical modeling indicated that a clinical guideline with mean plasma:RBC ratio equal to 1:1 would encompass 98% of patients within the optimal 1:2 ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

Current transfusion practices and survival rates of MT patients vary widely among trauma centers. Conventional MT guidelines may underestimate the optimal plasma and platelet to RBC ratios. Survival in civilian MT patients is associated with increased plasma and platelet ratios. Massive transfusion practice guidelines should aim for a 1:1:1 ratio of plasma:platelets:RBCs.