A predictive model for estimating the number of erythrocytapheresis or phlebotomy treatments for patients with naïve hereditary hemochromatosis

Background and Aims

Standard treatment for naïve hereditary hemochromatosis patients consists of phlebotomy or a personalized erythrocytapheresis. Erythrocytapheresis is more efficient, but infrequently used because of perceived costs and specialized equipment being needed. The main aim of our study was to develop a model that predicts the number of initial treatment procedures for both treatment methods. This information may help the clinician to select the optimal treatment modality for the individual patient.

Methods

We analyzed retrospective data of 125 newly diagnosed patients (C282Y homozygous), treated either with phlebotomy (n = 54) or erythrocytapheresis (n = 71) until serum ferritin (SF) reached levels ≤100 μg/L. To estimate the required number of treatment procedures multiple linear regression analysis was used for each treatment method separately.

Results

The linear regression model with the best predictive quality (R² = 0.74 and 0.73 for erythrocytapheresis and phlebotomy respectively) included initial SF, initial hemoglobin (Hb) level, age, and BMI, where initial SF was independently related to the total number of treatment procedures for both treatment methods. The prediction error expressed in RMSPE and RMSDR was lower for erythrocytapheresis than for phlebotomy (3.8 and 4.1 vs 7.0 and 8.0 respectively),

Conclusions

Although the prediction error of the developed model was relatively large, the model may help the clinician to choose the most optimal treatment method for an individual patient. Generally erythrocytapheresis halves the number of treatment procedures for all patients, where the largest reduction (between 55% and 64%) is reached in patients with an initial Hb level ≥ 9 mmol/L (14.5 g/dL).

ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00202436.

Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice - Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Eighth Special Issue

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis (TA) in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor in order to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Eighth Edition, like its predecessor, continues to apply the category and grading system definitions in fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was introduced in the Fourth Edition, has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of TA in a specific disease entity or medical condition. The Eighth Edition comprises 84 fact sheets for relevant diseases and medical conditions, with 157 graded and categorized indications and/or TA modalities. The Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue seeks to continue to serve as a key resource that guides the utilization of TA in the treatment of human disease.

Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice-Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Seventh Special Issue

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating, and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the Committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Seventh Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Seventh Edition, like its predecessor, has consistently applied the category and grading system definitions in the fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was used since the fourth edition has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of therapeutic apheresis in a specific disease entity. The Seventh Edition discusses 87 fact sheets (14 new fact sheets since the Sixth Edition) for therapeutic apheresis diseases and medical conditions, with 179 indications, which are separately graded and categorized within the listed fact sheets. Several diseases that are Category IV which have been described in detail in previous editions and do not have significant new evidence since the last publication are summarized in a separate table. The Seventh Edition of the JCA Special Issue serves as a key resource that guides the utilization of therapeutic apheresis in the treatment of human disease. J. Clin. Apheresis 31:149-162, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

How we manage patients with hereditary haemochromatosis

A number of disorders cause iron overload: some are of genetic origin, such as hereditary haemochromatosis, while others are acquired, for instance due to repeated transfusions. This article reviews the treatment options for hereditary haemochromatosis, with special attention to the use of erythrocytapheresis. In general, therapy is based on the removal of excess body iron, for which ferritin levels are used to monitor the effectiveness of treatment. For many decades phlebotomy has been widely accepted as the standard treatment. Recent publications suggest that erythrocytapheresis, as a more individualized treatment, can provide a good balance between effectiveness, tolerability and costs. Other treatments like oral chelators and proton pomp inhibitors, which are used in selected patients, create the possibility to further individualize treatment of hereditary haemochromatosis. In the future, hepcidin-targeted therapy could provide a more fundamental approach to treatment.

Course of iron parameters in HFE-hemochromatosis patients during initial treatment with erythrocytapheresis compared to phlebotomy

Current treatment for newly diagnosed patients with hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) and iron overload consist of weekly phlebotomy or less frequent and more personalized erythrocytapheresis. Previous observations during phlebotomy suggest an increase in intestinal iron uptake caused by lowering of hepcidin as a result of intensive bloodletting. It is not known whether such an effect is present or even more pronounced using erythrocytapheresis since a larger amount of iron is extracted per procedure. In this study we aimed to assess the effect of erythrocytapheresis on the course of iron parameters, with special focus on serum hepcidin. We performed a retrospective proof-of-principle observational study, comparing serum iron parameters in 12 males during the depletion phase using either phlebotomy (n = 6) or erythrocytapheresis (n = 6). Decreases in serum ferritin over time were similar for both treatments but more pronounced using erythrocytapheresis when expressed per treatment procedure. Hemoglobin did not change during erythrocytapheresis, whereas during phlebotomy decreased with 10%. Increase of erythropoietin and soluble transferrin receptor and decrease in transferrin saturation were similar for both treatments. Reduction in serum hepcidin was higher (50% versus 25% of initial value) and occurred more early using phlebotomy (10 versus 20 weeks after start). In aggregate, compared to phlebotomy, the less frequent and more personalized erythrocytapheresis leads to a more pronounced decrease in serum ferritin per treatment procedure, without a larger decrease in serum hepcidin. This may be clinically relevant and may prevent an increase in intestinal iron uptake and an ensuing vicious circle of more frequent treatment procedures. J. Clin. Apheresis 31:564-570, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[Predictive factors of response to erytrhocytapheresis in patients with biochemical iron overload with or without hereditary hemochromatosis type 1]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Progressive increase of iron stores leads to the development of varied diseases, some of them irreversible. Until now, phlebotomy has been the cornerstone in the treatment of iron overload. Nevertheless, each erytrhocytapheresis procedure removes more than twice the volume of red cells and iron than phlebotomy, allowing to achieve iron depletion in shorter time. Our aim was to describe clinical features and analytical tests parameters of patients with iron overload, to analyze global and subsets results, to suggest predictive factors of response and to evaluate security of the procedure.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Descriptive, longitudinal and prospective study of 663 procedures corresponding to 35 patients (December 2002 to October 2011). Response was defined as a serum ferritine value lower than 50 ng/mL during two months. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS(®) v 17.0 and the minimum level of statistical significance was defined as p-value < 0,05.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven percent of patients reached response with 11 (interquartile range 1-42) erytrhocytapheresis procedures and at 11 (1-108) months. Eighty-seven point five percent of patients who did not achieve response had their ferritine values reduced in more than 50%. The decrease of all iron metabolism parameters was statistically significant. Statistically significant predictive factors of response to erytrhocytapheresis were: patients younger than 60 years-old, hereditary hemochromatosis cases, and patients who had received treatment with phlebotomies prior to erytrhocytapheresis.

CONCLUSIONS

Erytrhocytapheresis is a secure and effective procedure for iron depletion in patients with iron overload, especially in high risk hereditary hemochromatosis cases that do not respond to phlebotomies.

Red cell concentrates of hemochromatosis patients comply with the storage guidelines for transfusion purposes

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic phlebotomy is the preferred treatment for iron overload associated with hemochromatosis. In the Netherlands, red blood cell concentrates (RCCs) from hemochromatosis patients are not used for transfusion purposes. In this study, their storage performance was compared with that of control donors as a first step in the evaluation of their potential usefulness for transfusion.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

RCCs were obtained from hemochromatosis patients and regular donors, either by apheresis or by whole-blood collection, and stored up to 50 days under routine Dutch blood bank conditions. Weekly samples were taken for determination of hematologic, biophysical, and biochemical variables.

RESULTS

Most variables displayed the same storage-related changes in RCCs originating from hemochromatosis patients as in those from regular donors. In all RCCs, hemolysis remained well below the guideline limit of 0.8 percent for up to 6 weeks of storage, and the glucose concentration remained above the required 5 mmol per L up to 5 weeks of storage. After 4 weeks of storage, the mean ATP level remained above the required limit of 75 percent of the starting value in all RCCs as well. The major difference was a larger mean cell volume in hereditary hemochromatosis RBCs up to 50 days of storage.

CONCLUSIONS

RCCs from hemochromatosis patients comply with the in vitro quality requirements for transfusion. This paves the way for the final step, namely, the establishment of the 24-hour RBC posttransfusion recovery.

Optimal management strategies for chronic iron overload

Iron overload is characterised by excessive iron deposition and consequent injury and dysfunction of target organs, especially the heart, liver, anterior pituitary, pancreas and joints. Iron overload disorders are common worldwide and occur in most major race/ethnicity groups. Physiological mechanisms to excrete iron are very limited. Thus, all patients with iron overload need safe and effective treatment that is compatible with their co-existing medical conditions. Treatments for iron overload include phlebotomy and erythrocytapheresis that remove iron predominantly as haemoglobin, and chelation therapy with drugs that bind excess iron selectively and increase its excretion. The most important potential benefits of therapy are preventing deaths due to cardiac siderosis and hepatic cirrhosis. Preventing iron-related injury to endocrine organs is critical in children. Successful treatment or prevention of iron overload increases quality of life and survival in many patients. This article characterises the major categories of iron overload disorders, tabulates methods to evaluate and treat iron overload, and describes treatment options for iron overload disorders. Research needed to advance knowledge about treatment of iron overload is proposed.

Therapeutic erythrocytapheresis versus phlebotomy in the initial treatment of hereditary hemochromatosis – A pilot study

Hereditary Hemochromatosis (HH) is a genetic disorder of iron metabolism, resulting in excessive iron overload. Currently, phlebotomy is the standard effective treatment that prevents progression of tissue damage. Aim of the therapy is to reach ferritin levels between 20 and 50mugl(-1). In patients with total iron stores of more than 30g, intensive treatment by means of weekly phlebotomies during 2-3 years is required to reach this aim. More recently mechanical removal of erythrocytes through therapeutic erythrocytapheresis (TE) has become a new therapeutic modality. By means of TE, up to 1000ml erythrocytes per session can be removed, depending on patient characteristics, compared to 250ml erythrocytes per phlebotomy. Thus, TE potentially offers a more efficient method of removing iron overload with less procedures in a shorter treatment period. In a pilot study between 2002 and 2005, results from a group of HH patients treated with TE (N=6) were compared to the results of a historical control group of HH patients (N=6) treated with phlebotomy. The results showed a reduction of almost 70% in both the total number and the duration of treatments in the TE group. Although, the procedure costs compared on the basis of a single TE session were higher, the total costs for the whole treatment were comparable or cheaper with the use of TE. Future prospective studies are needed to compare both therapies in a randomized setting.

Comparación de la flebotomía con eritrocitaféresis en la sobrecarga de hierro en portadores de mutaciones del gen HFE

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Large-volume erythrocytapheresis (EA) is an useful and speedy method to treat iron overload (IO). We assesed the efficacy of EA in patients with HFE gene mutations and IO compared to the classical phlebotomies.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Data from 9 patients with IO treated with EA, using a discontinuous flow cell separator as a single needle procedure, for a period of 2 years, were compared to 9 matched patients who underwent conventional phlebotomies.

RESULTS

The mean volume of red blood cells removed in each EA was 275 ml, with a median reduction of 23 g/l for haemoglobin and 55 microg/l for serum ferritin levels (vs. 17 microg/l between phlebotomies). The liver function test returned to normal values in 4 out of 5 patients undergoing EA, but none of the phlebotomies. The time required to achieve iron depletion was 3 times shorter in EA group.

CONCLUSIONS

EA is an effective and safe procedure that achieves iron depletion more quickly than manual phlebotomies. Nevertheless, to determine its cost-effectiveness, economical, prospective, randomized studies are warranted.

Quo vadis haemapheresis. Current developments in haemapheresis

The techniques of haemapheresis originated in the development of centrifugal devices separating cells from plasma and later on plasma from cells. Subsequently membrane filtration was developed allowing for plasma-cell separation. The unspecificity of therapeutic plasma exchange led to the development of secondary plasma separation technologies being specific, semi-selective or selective such as adsorption, filtration or precipitation. In contrast on-line differential separation of cells is still under development. Whereas erythrocytapheresis, granulocytapheresis, lymphocytapheresis and stem cell apheresis are technically advanced, monocytapheresis may need further improvement. Also, indications such as erythrocytapheresis for the treatment of polycythaemia vera or photopheresis though being clinically effective and of considerable importance for an appropriate disease control are to some extent under debate as being either too costly or without sufficient understanding of the mechanism. Other forms of cell therapy are under development. Rheohaemapheresis as the most advanced technology of extracorporeal haemorheotherapy is a rapidly developing approach contributing to the treatment of microcirculatory diseases and tissue repair. Whereas the control of a considerable number of (auto-) antibody mediated diseases is beyond discussion, the indication of apheresis therapy for immune complex mediated diseases is quite often still under debate. Detoxification for artificial liver support advanced considerably during the last years, whereas conclusions on the efficacy of septicaemia treatment are debatable indeed. LDL-apheresis initiated in 1981 as immune apheresis is well established since 24 years, other semi-selective or unspecific procedures, allowing for the elimination of LDL-cholesterol among other plasma components are also being used. Correspondingly Lp(a) apheresis is available as a specific, highly efficient elimination procedure superior to techniques which also eliminate Lp(a). Quality control systems, more economical technologies as for instance by increasing automation, influencing the over-interpretation of evidence based medicine especially in patients with rare diseases without treatment alternative, more insight into the need of controlled clinical trials or alternatively improved diagnostic procedures are among others tools ways to expand the application of haemapheresis so far applied in cardiology, dermatology, haematology, immunology, nephrology, neurology, ophthalmology, otology, paediatrics, rheumatology, surgery and transfusion medicine.