Blood donors infected with the hepatitis B virus but persistently lacking antibodies to the hepatitis B core antigen

Transfusion-transmitted HBV infection with isolated anti-HBs-positive blood

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-positive individuals with isolated anti-HBs are found among HBV vaccine recipients and healthy blood donors with no vaccination history. HBV infectivity from blood transfusions derived from such individuals remains unclear.

CASE PRESENTATION

A male patient who received transfusion with blood negative for individual donation-NAT, HBsAg and anti-HBc but weakly positive for anti-HBs developed typical transfusion-transmitted (TT)-HBV with anti-HBc response. The responsible blood donor was a frequent repeat donor showing a marked increase in anti-HBs titer without anti-HBc response 84 days after index donation. Test results for his past donations showed transient viremia with very low viral load and fluctuating low-level anti-HBs. The HBV vaccination history of this donor was unknown.

DISCUSSION

Anti-HBs and anti-HBc kinetics of the donor suggest a second antibody response to new HBV challenge, representing a vaccine breakthrough case. On the other hand, transient low-level viremia and fluctuating anti-HBs in the test results of past donations suggested chronic occult HBV infection with isolated anti-HBs.

CONCLUSION

Whatever the basic infection state, blood donors with isolated weak anti-HBs may include a small population with a risk of causing TT-HBV. Identifying individuals harboring such TT-HBV risk among individuals positive only for anti-HBs is difficult under current screening strategies. Active surveillance for the occurrence of TT-HBV with blood positive only for anti-HBs is necessary.

Controversies in Treating Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection: Discordant Serologic Results

Despite effective vaccines and approved therapeutic agents, hepatitis B virus (HBV) remains a prevalent global health problem. Current guidelines rely on a combination of serologic, virological, and biochemical markers to identify the phase in the natural history of chronic HBV infection. Discordant serologic results can occur, which may lead to misclassification. Commonly encountered results that differ from the typical profiles seen in chronic HBV infection are described. For each scenario, the frequency of occurrence, possible explanations, and recommendations for clinical management are discussed. Recognition of discordant serologic findings is crucial for optimal clinical decision.

Hepatitis B Virus Blood Screening: Need for Reappraisal of Blood Safety Measures?

Over the past decades, the risk of HBV transfusion–transmission has been steadily reduced through the recruitment of volunteer donors, the selection of donors based on risk-behavior evaluation, the development of increasingly more sensitive hepatitis B antigen (HBsAg) assays, the use of hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) screening in some low-endemic countries, and the recent implementation of HBV nucleic acid testing (NAT). Despite this accumulation of blood safety measures, the desirable zero risk goal has yet to be achieved. The residual risk of HBV transfusion–transmission appears associated with the preseroconversion window period and occult HBV infection characterized by the absence of detectable HBsAg and extremely low levels of HBV DNA. Infected donations tested false-negative with serology and/or NAT still persist and derived blood components were shown to transmit the virus, although rarely. Questions regarding the apparent redundancy of some safety measures prompted debates on how to reduce the cost of HBV blood screening. In particular, accumulating data strongly suggests that HBsAg testing may add little, if any HBV risk reduction value when HBV NAT and anti-HBc screening also apply. Absence or minimal acceptable infectious risk needs to be assessed before considering discontinuing HBsAg. Nevertheless, HBsAg remains essential in high-endemic settings where anti-HBc testing cannot be implemented without compromising blood availability. HBV screening strategy should be decided according to local epidemiology, estimate of the infectious risk, and resources.

HBsAg-Negative, Anti-HBc-Negative Patients Still Have a Risk of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatitis after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma or Malignant Lymphoma

Purpose

Although hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)–negative, hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc)–negative patients are not considered to be at risk for hepatitis B virus (HBV)–related hepatitis, the actual risk remains to be elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of HBV-related hepatitis in HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc–negative patients receiving autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM) or malignant lymphoma.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data from 271 HBsAg-negative patients (161 anti-HBc–negative and 110 anti-HBc–positive at the time of ASCT) who received ASCT for MM or lymphoma. The risk of HBV-related hepatitis was analyzed according to the presence of anti-HBc. HBV serology results at the time of ASCT were compared with those at the time of diagnosis of MM or lymphoma.

Results

Three patients (two anti-HBc–negative MMs and one anti-HBc–positive MM) developed HBV-related hepatitis after ASCT. The rate of HBV-related hepatitis did not differ among patients with or without anti-HBc status (p=0.843). HBV-related hepatitis more frequently occurred in MM patients than in lymphoma patients (p=0.041). Overall, 9.1% of patients (16.7% with MM and 5.4% with lymphoma) who were HBsAg–negative and anti-HBc–positive at the time of diagnosis had lost anti-HBc positivity during chemotherapy prior to ASCT.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc–negative patients at the time of ASCT for MM or lymphoma still might be at a risk for HBV-related hepatitis.

Evaluation of commercialized rapid diagnostic testing for some Hepatitis B biomarkers in an area of intermediate endemicity

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a major public health threat. Enzyme immune assay (EIA) of HBsAg is the screening method used in most settings, including in blood banks. Other markers are used to evaluate the HBV replication, immunity and the infectious level of the patient. Testing negative for HBsAg, however, does not always mean the absence of infection, and testing other markers using EIA is costly. This study evaluated the diagnostic reliability of commercially available non-HBsAg HBV biomarkers to detect their usefulness to screen for HBV infection. INTEC rapid tests for HBV markers were evaluated in 508 HBsAg negative blood donors and were compared to EIA as a reference method. Only anti-HBs, anti-HBc and anti-HBe could be evaluated. Sensitivities of all tests (64.2, 85.48, and 82.78 respectively) were much lower than those claimed by the manufacturer. The specificities and negative predictive values for all tests exceeded 95% and 93% respectively and were lowest for anti-HBs. Anti-HBe had the highest accuracy (99.02%), while anti-HBs had the lowest (90.16%). It was concluded that the rapid test performance was lower than the manufacturer's reports. They are reliable tools to prove negativity, but less efficient to confirm reactivity. The best performance was for anti-HBe. The positive results of anti-HBs was significantly associated with higher ELISA titer levels, which is therefore recommended to be used for screening of immunity.

Atypical serological profiles in hepatitis B virus infection

During hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, at least four antigen-antibody systems are observed: HBsAg and anti-HBs; preS antigen and anti-preS antibody; HBcAg and anti-HBc; and HBeAg and anti-HBe. Through the examination of these antigen-antibody systems, hepatitis B infection is diagnosed and the course of the disorder may be observed. Although the serologic findings that allow both the diagnosis of HBV infection as well as assessing of its clinical course are already well established, the dynamics of viral proteins expression and of the antibodies production may vary during the infection natural course. This causes the HBV infection to be occasionally associated with the presence of uncommon serological profiles, which could lead to doubts in the interpretation of results or suspicion of a serological result being incorrect. This paper is dedicated to the discussion of some of these profiles and their significance.

New Strategies for Blood Donor Screening for Hepatitis B Virus

Serologic testing for hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibody to HBV core antigen (anti-HBc) has historically been the foundation of blood screening, while HBV nucleic acid testing (NAT) was recently developed to detect HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-negative blood units donated during early acute infection. Comparison data on seroconversion panels using HBsAg assays of varying sensitivities and pooled- or single-sample NAT, along with viral load estimates corresponding to HBsAg assay detection limits, have provided information on the theoretical benefits of NAT relative to HBsAg. Model-derived estimates have generally been predictive of the yields of DNA-positive, HBsAg-negative window period blood units detected in a number of studies from Europe, Japan, and the US. Studies indicate that the added benefit of pooled-sample NAT is relatively small in areas of low endemicity, with greater yields in areas highly endemic for HBV. Single-sample NAT would offer more significant early window period closure and could prevent a moderate number of residual HBV transmissions not detected by HBsAg assays; however, no fully automated single-sample HBV NAT systems are currently available.Even single-sample HBV NAT may not substitute for anti-HBc screening, as indicated by studies of donors with isolated anti-HBc who have extremely low DNA levels undetectable by standard single-sample NAT and who have been associated with transfusion-transmitted HBV. Moreover, HBsAg testing may still be needed even in the setting of combined anti-HBc and NAT screening. HBsAg-positive units from donors in the chronic stage of infection may contain very low or intermittently detectable DNA levels that single-sample NAT would miss. Although such donors are usually anti-HBc reactive and would be interdicted by anti-HBc screening, some lack anti-HBc. Extensive parallel testing will be needed to determine whether single-sample NAT in combination with anti-HBc might be sufficient to detect all the infectious donors currently interdicted by HBsAg testing. In countries that do not screen for anti-HBc, HBsAg testing would be the only means of detecting donations from chronically infected individuals with low/intermittently detectable DNA, since even single-donor NAT would not identify these potentially infectious blood units. In the future, the current fully automated HBsAg assays may incorporate significant sensitivity improvements, and automated single-sample HBV NAT may become a reality. Each country will need to develop its blood screening strategy based on HBV endemicity, yields of infectious units detected by different serologic/NAT screening methods, and cost effectiveness of test methods in ensuring blood safety.

Increased seroprevalence of HBV DNA with mutations in the s gene among individuals greater than 18 years old after complete vaccination

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Despite the success of a universal vaccination program against hepatitis B virus (HBV) in Taiwan, a small but substantial proportion of individuals remain infected by mutant viruses that escape the vaccine. We investigated the seroepidemiology and genotypic characteristic of HBV for long periods after neonatal vaccination.

METHODS

We measured hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), and antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) in 1214 serum samples collected throughout Taiwan from individuals 0.6-87.8 years old in 2007. HBV DNA was detected using polymerase chain reaction and sequence analysis in vaccine recipients who tested positive for anti-HBc and/or HBsAg.

RESULTS

The overall seroprevalence of HBsAg and anti-HBc was significantly lower among individuals born after the initiation of the nationwide vaccination program (P < .001). However, we observed increasing seroprevalence of anti-HBc and isolated anti-HBs when subjects were grouped by age: at 10-14, 14-18, to 18-21 years of age, values were 0.4%, 1.9%, and 8.1% (P = .0135) and 43.7%, 55.4%, and 59.6% (P = .0093), respectively (χ(2) test for trend). A large increase was observed in the percentage of patients who tested positive for HBV DNA at 18-21 years of age (3.0% vs 0.2% [P = .002] for all eligible subjects and 5.7% vs 0.3% [P < .001] for subjects vaccinated with ≥3 doses). Five of 8 completely vaccinated individuals who were seropositive for HBV DNA carried variants with mutations in the S gene.

CONCLUSIONS

Universal vaccination effectively controls HBV infection in children and adolescents. However, after adolescence, there is a significant increase in the seroprevalence of anti-HBs, anti-HBc, and HBV DNA, indicating that new preventative strategies are needed for adults.

Low rates of hepatitis B virus screening at the onset of chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection are at risk for reactivation after chemotherapy. Effective prophylaxis is available but depends on detection of prior infection. Previous studies have shown low screening rates, but no large-scale US studies have been conducted. We sought to determine predictors of screening and positive HBV test results in patients receiving chemotherapy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed cancer who received chemotherapy between January 2004 and September 2007 at a comprehensive cancer center. We determined rates and predictors of screening for HBV infection with HB surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) tests as well as the prevalence and predictors of positive results. We explored rates of acutely elevated liver function tests and liver decompensation after chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Of 10,729 new patients who received chemotherapy, 1,787 (16.7%) underwent HBsAg or anti-HBc screening. Less than 20% of patients with HBV risk factors were screened, even though their odds of HBV infection were increased four-fold compared with those without risk factors. The prevalence of chronic HBV infection was 1.5%. whereas 7.4% had positive anti-HBc only. The strongest predictors of HBV screening were having a history of HBV infection, hematologic malignancy, and rituximab treatment (P < .001). Asian ethnicity was not a significant predictor of screening, despite being a strong and highly significant predictor of positive test results (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

HBV screening among patients with cancer is low, especially among those known to be at high risk for HBV infection. Future research directed toward identifying best screening methods and HBV risk tools will be necessary to reduce the risk of reactivation of HBV infection after chemotherapy.

The underlying mechanisms for the "isolated positivity for the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)" serological profile

During HBV infection, four structural antigen/antibody systems are observed: hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and its antibody (anti-HBs); the pre-S antigens associated with HBsAg particles and their antibodies; the particulate nucleocapsid antigen (HBcAg) and anti-HBc; and an antigen structurally related to HBcAg, namely HBeAg and its antibody (anti-HBe). Through the examination of this antigen-antibodies system, hepatitis B infection is diagnosed and the course of the disorder may be observed. Isolated HBsAg seropositivity is a peculiar serological pattern in HBV infection observed some times in routine laboratory. In most cases is not clear how this profile should be interpreted neither its significance. This pattern, however, may be associated with some clinical and laboratorial situations of great relevance, some of which will be addressed in this article.

The underlying mechanisms for the 'anti-HBc alone' serological profile

The serological pattern, "anti-HBc alone", characterized by the presence of antibodies against the core antigen of hepatitis B virus (anti-HBc) as the only marker of hepatitis B, is not rare in a diagnostic setting. Depending on the prevalence of HBV infection and the patient group investigated, 1-31% of positive anti-HBc results are isolated positive findings. Anti-HBc alone is frequently observed in intravenous drug addicts, HIV-infected individuals, patients who are coinfected with HBV and hepatitis C virus, and pregnant women. However, it is not clear how this profile should be interpreted. Several studies have shown that anti-HBc alone is not only compatible with acute and resolved HBV infection but also with chronic infection. The reasons for the lack of HBsAg and anti-HBs in anti-HBc-alone individuals are not clear, but several mechanisms and possibilities have been suggested that could explain this phenomenon, some of which are delineated in this article.

Re-evaluation of anti-HBc non-reactive serum samples from patients with persistent hepatitis B infection by immune precipitation with labelled HBV core antigen

BACKGROUND

Core antigen (HBcAg) is the most immunogenic component of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and is believed to induce virtually always antibodies (anti-HBc) in immunocompetent infected persons. However, some chronically infected persons do not develop detectable anti-HBc.

OBJECTIVE

A more sensitive assay for anti-HBc was to be developed and used to re-evaluate a cohort of chronically HBV infected persons without detectable anti-HBc.

STUDY DESIGN

Among 3309 serum samples which had been tested by commercially available (microparticle) enzyme immune assay (M/EIA) 34 samples from 22 patients were identified having reacted positive for HBsAg and negative for anti-HBc. Nine of these patients had immunosuppression or HIV coinfection, 13 patients were immunocompetent, 5 of them were perinatally infected. Anti-HBc was re-tested for in an immune precipitation (IP) assay using (32)P-labelled recombinant HBcAg as reagent and anti-human-IgG-coated magnetic beads as separation system for immunecomplexes containing HBcAg. Specificity was controlled for by competition with unlabelled HBcAg.

RESULTS

27 serum samples from the 22 patients could be retested. IP was positive in 7 MEIA negative sera, unspecific positive in 4 and negative in 16. Using 5 anti-HBe positive control sera, we found IP to be 1.8-fold (1.3-2.9) more sensitive than MEIA, but IP was 6.5-fold (5.8-7.4) more sensitive with 4 anti-HBe negative, anti-HBc positive sera.

CONCLUSION

IP allowed specific detection of anti-HBc in about 25% of MEIA negative chronic HBV patients. The majority of these seem to produce no or very little anti-HBc, however.

Detection of a premature stop codon in the surface gene of hepatitis B virus from an HBsAg and antiHBc negative blood donor

BACKGROUND

In blood donors, HBV infection is detected by the presence of serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). However, some mutations in the surface gene region may result in altered or truncated HBsAg that can escape from immunoassay-based diagnosis. Such diagnostic escape mutants pose a potential risk for blood transfusion services.

RESULTS

In the present study, we report a blood donor seronegative for HBsAg and antiHBc, but positive for antiHBs who was HBV DNA positive by PCR. Sequencing of the HBsAg gene revealed presence of a point mutation (T-A) at 207th nucleotide of the HBsAg ORF, which resulted in a premature stop codon at position 69. This results in a truncated HBsAg gene lacking the entire 'a' determinant region. However, follow-up of the donor after 2 years revealed clearance of HBV DNA from the serum.

CONCLUSION

The case illustrates an unusual mutation, which causes HBsAg negativity. The finding emphasizes the importance of molecular assays in reducing the possibility of HBV transmission through blood transfusion. However, developing more sensitive serological assays, capable of detecting HBV mutants, is an alternative to expensive and complex amplification-based assays for developing countries.

Hepatitis B virus genotype E surface antigen detection with different immunoassays and diagnostic impact of mutations in the preS/S gene

The major neutralizing epitope, the "a" determinant of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype E surface antigen (HBsAg) is most divergent from that of genotype A, which is used for preparing monoclonal antibodies used in commercially available HBV reagents. To evaluate the performance of the latest generation of HBsAg detection assays with respect to genotype E HBsAg. Three commercial assays were evaluated using sera from 200 Nigerian patients compared to the preS/S sequence of DNA positive samples. Out of 200 samples, 61 and 103 gave concordant positive and negative results between the three HBsAg assays. Of 36 samples with discordant results, 35 were confirmed negative by neutralisation. One of the three assays showed significantly high rate of false positives (29 of 35). DNA positive samples with no detectable HBsAg or reduced HBsAg detection signals (<75% of mean signal obtained with HBsAg positive samples) revealed several mutations (V14A, F46S, N48T, L49R, I49T, D51G, A53V, P54L, Q82P, F83C, L127P, A184V, T189I, S204N, V224A), mostly outside the a-determinant. Several of these mutations are found as wild type nucleotides normally in genotype A and only exceptionally in genotype E. All three assays showed comparable sensitivities for genotype E HBsAg detection (98.4-100%) but differed considerably in specificity (84-99%). Failure to detect HBsAg antigen and differences in signal intensity were mainly associated with mutations in the preS/S gene outside the "a" determinant.

Permanent loss of anti-HBc after reactivation of hepatitis B virus infection in an anti-HBs and anti-HBc-positive patient after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Reactivation of a hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after transplantation is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. HBV infections generally result in anti-HBc persisting lifelong.

CASE REPORT

A 44-year-old female presented 10 years after allogeneic stem cell transplantation with a chronic hepatitis B. The infection was reactivated from a resolved (anti-HBs and anti-HBc positive) HBV infection acquired some years prior to transplantation. Interestingly, she lost all antibodies to HBV including anti-HBc and is upto now anti-HBc negative. The sequence of the surface and the core gene did not reveal any escape mutations. Thus, the loss of anti-HBc might suggest an immunotolerance of the donor's immune system against HBcAg.

CONCLUSION

This data illustrate that an HBV infection might be reactivated despite high anti-HBs levels prior to transplantation. Furthermore, this is the first patient in which a complete loss of anti-HBc could be documented. Moreover, since anti-HBc is often used as a screening marker for HBV it should be kept in mind that anti-HBc negative patients with high viremic HBV infection may occur.

Immune suppression as the etiology of failure to detect anti-HBc antibodies in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection

A lack of anti-HBc antibodies during chronic hepatitis B virus infection is a serological pattern that is rarely observed. In our series of 39 patients with such a confirmed profile, mutations within the precore/core gene were rarely found and the lack of antibody detection was mostly explained by concurrent immunosuppression and the low sensitivities of the serological assays.

Detection of HBV DNA by nested-PCR in a HBsAg and anti-HBc negative blood bank donor

BACKGROUND

The criteria and protocol adopted in serological screening of blood bank donors have significantly reduced the possibility of HBV transmission. However, it is possible that, in a very recent phase of HBV infection, HBsAg seronegative donors be able to transmit the virus. This study reports a case of a donor with this serological profile who was involved in the viral transmission to a seronegative receptor.

CASE REPORT

A blood donor had her sample tested for HBsAg and anti-HBc, which resulted negative. At the second donation the sample demonstrated to be seropositive for anti-HBc, anti-HBs and seronegative for HBsAg. The first stored sample was tested for the presence of HBV DNA. Two fragments could be identified in the genomic region corresponding to HBV core and precore. Only one individual was involved in the transfusion of hemo-derivatives originating from the processing of this bag, and was seropositive for HBsAg, HBeAg and anti-HBc markers and seronegative for the anti-HBe and anti-HBs markers.

CONCLUSION

This case illustrates the possibility of the occurrence of HBV transmission from blood bank donors seronegative for HBsAg and anti-HBc. This fact could be associated with the possibility of the donor to be in the pre-seroconversion phase of a recent infection, when the levels of HBsAg present in the circulation are below the limits of detection. The implementation of molecular tests or higher sensitivity HBsAg assays could further reduce the risk of HBV transmission via blood transfusion.

Hepatitis B de novo con anticuerpo frente al HBcAg negativo en un trasplantado hepático

De novo hepatitis B was diagnosed in a 47-year-old man 15 months after liver transplantation for end-stage alcoholic cirrhosis. Serum antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) were negative, and remained undetectable over 20 months of follow-up. The possible causes of negative serum anti-HBc despite of active hepatitis B virus infection are reviewed. Immunosuppression may underlie this phenomenon in similar cases.

Analysis of complement-bound hepatitis B virus complexes by an immuno-capture polymerase chain reaction method

Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) can be present in the circulating blood either as a free virus or as a virion-immunoglobulin (Ig) complex with or without complement. However, information regarding the complement-bound HBV circulating immune complexes (CIC) in HBV-infected patients is currently not available. In the present study, we have combined immuno-capture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and developed a quick method of high specificity for the detection of complement-bound HBV CIC. We found that the frequency of HBV-factor B was associated with clinical types of hepatitis B (HB) but not with that of HBV-C1q. Moreover, increased frequency at P < 0.05 were found for HBV/C1q-CIC in the group with normal total bilirubin (TBIL) and for HBV/factor B-CIC in the group with positive hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg). These findings suggest that the immuno-capture PCR (iPCR) for the detection of HBV-bound CIC is a valuable method for analysis of the composition of the immune complexes and for the understanding of host immune response and immune pathogenesis in HBV-infected individuals. In summary, iPCR is a valuable method for analysis of the composition of the immune complexes, which may provide new and valuable insights into HBV pathogenesis.