Molecular characterization of weak D phenotypes by site-directed mutagenesis and expression of mutant Rh-green fluorescence protein fusions in K562 cells

How I manage donors and patients with a weak D phenotype

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Since the adoption of molecular blood-group typing, the considerable heterogeneity of the serologic entities weak D and DEL at the molecular level has come to light. I offer an approach to the management of donors and patients expressing D antigen weakly and carrying any of the various molecular types of weak D and DEL.

RECENT FINDINGS

More than 50 distinct weak D alleles have been described. An internet-based survey of anti-D immunizations occurring in D-positive transfusion recipients reveals that no allo-anti-D has been observed in patients carrying prevalent weak D types. Allo-immunizations are documented for weak D types 4.2 (also known as DAR), 11 and 15. Anti-D immunizations have been reported in D-negative persons transfused with weak D and DEL red blood cells.

SUMMARY

Patients carrying any of the prevalent weak D types 1, 2, 3 or 4.1 are not prone to allo-anti-D immunization and may safely be transfused with D-positive red blood cells. Pregnant women with these weak D types need not receive RhIg. We should pay attention to weak D- or DEL-positive blood units that are labelled D-negative. The clinical benefit of removing DEL blood units from our supply of D-negative red blood cell units should be determined.

Random survey for RHD alleles among D+ European persons

BACKGROUND

RHD alleles are considered more variable in African persons than in European persons. A systematic survey, however, was lacking among D+ European persons at the molecular level, precluding any definite frequency estimate.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A random survey was performed among 500 ccDee, 250 CcDee, and 250 ccDEe blood donors in southwestern Germany. They were tested by polymerase chain reaction with sequence-specific priming (PCR-SSP) for up to 12 single-nucleotide polymorphisms representative for the most frequent RHD alleles among European persons. The RHD exon 5 nucleotide sequence was also tested in all 1000 samples. The nucleotide sequence of the 10 RHD exons was checked in all samples with aberrant exon 5 or positive PCR-SSP procedures.

RESULTS

By PCR-SSP, 15 aberrant RHD alleles were found among the 500 ccDee, 2 among the 250 CcDee, and none among the ccDEe samples. One of these was the novel RHD(F223V, E233Q, T379M) allele dubbed DAU-5. Weak D type 4 was detected more frequently than expected, whereas the population frequencies of the other RHD alleles conformed to published estimates. Nucleotide sequencing of RHD exon 5 further revealed three novel alleles RHD(G212G), RHD(R234W), and RHD(V245L), dubbed DUC-1, DQC, and DUC-2.

CONCLUSION

In a limited screen at the molecular level among 1000 random D+ donors in southwestern Germany, 20 donors were found carrying aberrant RHD alleles. Four of these alleles were new and likely sporadic. An estimate was derived of the variety that may be encountered in genotyping approaches, and it was concluded that even within the European population the variety of RHD alleles may be larger than anticipated.

The evolution and formation of RH genes

The Rh system clinically is one of the important blood groups. The major Rh antigens, which are constituted by over 40 types, are RhD, RhC/c, and RhE/e. Furthermore, Rh blood group system is characterized by the existence of many variants. It was considered that Rh blood group system was encoded on two genes termed the RHCE and RHD, which are composed of ten exons, respectively. It is inferred that the RHD gene encodes the RhD antigen and that the RHCE gene encodes the Rh C/c and RhE/e antigens. There are RHce, RHCe, RHcE and RHCE alleles as polymorphisms of RHCE gene. In 2000, the entire nucleotide sequences in all introns of both the RHD and RHCE genes were determined. Due to the new findings on RH genes, it is thought that multiple recombination (and/or gene conversion), nucleotide substitutions, small nucleotide gaps, replication slippage of microsatellite, large nucleotide gaps (due to Alu sequence) and the high level of the homology (%) between both RH genes are the important factors in the formation and evolution of both RH genes and Rh variants. Based on the advance of human genome project, the new interpretations on the evolution and formation of RH genes and Rh variants will be performed. Human Rh family (superfamily) and its counterparts in primates, mammals, fish, amphibians, bacteria, lower eukaryotes, archaea and plants have been identified. A lot of findings have been accumulated in their evolution and function. As gene conversions or recombination events confuse the phylogenetic tree of human RH genes and their counterparts, careful attention is necessary for researchers to calculate the time of gene duplication and to discuss the evolution of Rh family and its counterparts.Rh genotyping methods will never be perfect and both the clinicians and researchers have to recognize the limitation of Rh genotyping, especially RhD genotyping, because new Rh variants must have formed continually. In applying the Rh genotyping to clinical medicine, especially transfusion medicine, it is necessary to compare and examine the serological (phenotypic) data in Rh blood group system with caution.