Replication timing and cell differentiation

Possible role of H1 histone in replication timing

AT-rich repetitive DNA sequences become late replicating during cell differentiation. Replication timing is not correlated with LINE density in human cells (Ryba et al. 2010). However, short and properly spaced runs of oligo dA or dT present in nuclear matrix attachment regions (MARs) of the genome are good candidates for elements of AT-rich repetitive late replicating DNA. MAR attachment to the nuclear matrix is negatively regulated by chromatin binding of H1 histone, but this is counteracted by H1 phosphorylation, high mobility group proteins or, indirectly, core histone acetylation. Fewer MAR attachments correlates positively with longer average DNA loop size, longer replicons and an increase of late replicating DNA.

Clusters, factories and domains: The complex structure of S-phase comes into focus

During S-phase of the cell cycle, chromosomal DNA is replicated according to a complex replication timing program, with megabase-sized domains replicating at different times. DNA fibre analysis reveals that clusters of adjacent replication origins fire near-synchronously. Analysis of replicating cells by light microscopy shows that DNA synthesis occurs in discrete foci or factories. The relationship between timing domains, origin clusters and replication foci is currently unclear. Recent work, using a hybrid Xenopus/hamster replication system, has shown that when CDK levels are manipulated during S-phase the activation of replication factories can be uncoupled from progression through the replication timing program. Here, we use data from this hybrid system to investigate potential relationships between timing domains, origin clusters and replication foci. We suggest that each timing domain typically comprises several replicon clusters, which are usually processed sequentially by replication factories. We discuss how replication might be regulated at different levels to create this complex organisation and the potential involvement of CDKs in this process.

Domain-wide regulation of DNA replication timing during mammalian development

Studies of replication timing provide a handle into previously impenetrable higher-order levels of chromosome organization and their plasticity during development. Although mechanisms regulating replication timing are not clear, novel genome-wide studies provide a thorough survey of the extent to which replication timing is regulated during most of the early cell fate transitions in mammals, revealing coordinated changes of a defined set of 400-800 kb chromosomal segments that involve at least half the genome. Furthermore, changes in replication time are linked to changes in sub-nuclear organization and domain-wide transcriptional potential, and tissue-specific replication timing profiles are conserved from mouse to human, suggesting that the program has developmental significance. Hence, these studies have provided a solid foundation for linking megabase level chromosome structure to function, and suggest a central role for replication in domain-level genome organization.

Many players, one goal: how chromatin states are inherited during cell division

Replication of genomic material is a process that requires not only high fidelity in the duplication of DNA sequences but also inheritance of the chromatin states. In the last few years enormous effort has been put into elucidating the mechanisms involved in the correct propagation of chromatin states. From all these studies it emerges that an epigenetic network is at the base of this process. A coordinated interplay between histone modifications and histone variants, DNA methylation, RNA components, ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling, and histone-specific assembly factors regulates establishment of the replication timing program, initiation of replication, and propagation of chromatin domains. The aim of this review is to examine, in light of recent findings, how so many players can be coordinated with each other to achieve the same goal, a correct inheritance of the chromatin state.

The Function of Nuclear Architecture: A Genetic Approach

Eukaryotic genomes are distributed on linear chromosomes that are grouped together in the nucleus, an organelle separated from the cytoplasm by a characteristic double membrane studded with large proteinaceous pores. The chromatin within chromosomes has an as yet poorly characterized higher-order structure, but in addition to this, chromosomes and specific subchromosomal domains are nonrandomly positioned in nuclei. This review examines functional implications of the long-range organization of the genome in interphase nuclei. A rigorous test of the physiological importance of nuclear architecture is achieved by introducing mutations that compromise both structure and function. Focussing on such genetic approaches, we address general concepts of interphase nuclear order, the role of the nuclear envelope (NE) and lamins, and finally the importance of spatial organization for DNA replication and heritable gene expression.

Barring gene expression after XIST: maintaining facultative heterochromatin on the inactive X

X chromosome inactivation refers to the developmentally regulated process of silencing gene expression from all but one X chromosome per cell in female mammals in order to equalize the levels of X chromosome derived gene expression between the sexes. While much attention has focused on the genetic and epigenetic events early in development that initiate the inactivation process, it is also important to understand the events that ensure maintenance of the inactive state through subsequent cell divisions. Gene silencing at the inactive X chromosome is irreversible in somatic cells and is achieved through the formation of facultative heterochromatin (visible as the Barr body) that is remarkably stable and faithfully preserved. Here we review the many features of inactive X chromatin in terminally differentiated cells and address the highly redundant mechanisms of maintaining the inactive X chromatin.

Type III intermediate filament proteins interact with four-way junction DNA and facilitate its cleavage by the junction-resolving enzyme T7 endonuclease I

The isolation from proliferating mouse and human embryo fibroblasts of SDS-stable crosslinkage products of vimentin with DNA fragments containing inverted repeats capable of cruciform formation under superhelical stress and the competitive effect of a synthetic Holliday junction on the binding of cytoplasmic intermediate filament (cIF) proteins to supercoiled DNA prompted a detailed investigation of the proteins' capacity to associate with four-way junction DNA and to influence its processing by junction-resolving endonucleases. Electrophoretic mobility shift analysis of reaction products obtained from vimentin and Holliday junctions under varying ionic conditions revealed efficient complex formation of the filament protein not only with the unstacked, square-planar configuration of the junctions but also with their coaxially stacked X-conformation. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) was less efficient and desmin virtually inactive in complex formation. Electron microscopy showed binding of vimentin tetramers or octamers almost exclusively to the branchpoint of the Holliday junctions under physiological ionic conditions. Even at several hundredfold molar excess, sequence-related single- and double-stranded DNAs were unable to chase Holliday junctions from their complexes with vimentin. Vimentin also stimulated bacteriophage T7 endonuclease I in introducing single-strand cuts diametrically across the branchpoint and thus in the resolution of the Holliday junctions. This effect is very likely due to vimentin-induced structural distortion of the branchpoint, as suggested by the results of hydroxyl radical footprinting of Holliday junctions in the absence and the presence of vimentin. Moreover, vimentin, and to a lesser extent GFAP and desmin, interacted with the cruciform structures of inverted repeats inserted into a supercoiled vector plasmid, thereby changing their configuration via branch migration and sensibilizing them to processing by T7 endonuclease I. This refers to both plasmid relaxation caused by unilateral scission and, particularly, linearization via bilateral scission at primary and cIF protein-induced secondary cruciform branchpoints that were identified by T7 endonuclease I footprinting. cIF proteins share these activities with a variety of other architectural proteins interacting with and structurally modulating four-way DNA junctions. In view of the known and hypothetical functions of four-way DNA junctions and associated protein factors in DNA metabolism, cIF proteins as complementary nuclear matrix proteins may play important roles in such nuclear matrix-associated processes as DNA replication, recombination, repair, and transcription, with special emphasis on both the preservation and evolution of the genome.