Comparative evaluation of Fungitest-, Neo-Sensitabs- and M27T-NCCLS broth microdilution methods for antifungal drug susceptibility testing of Candida species and Cryptococcus neoformans

Can We Improve Antifungal Susceptibility Testing?

Systemic antifungal agents are increasingly used for prevention or treatment of invasive fungal infections, whose prognosis remains poor. At the same time, emergence of resistant or even multi-resistant strains is of concern as the antifungal arsenal is limited. Antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) is therefore of key importance for patient management and antifungal stewardship. Current AFST methods, including reference and commercial types, are based on growth inhibition in the presence of an antifungal, in liquid or solid media. They usually enable Minimal Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) to be determined with direct clinical application. However, they are limited by a high turnaround time (TAT). Several innovative methods are currently under development to improve AFST. Techniques based on MALDI-TOF are promising with short TAT, but still need extensive clinical validation. Flow cytometry and computed imaging techniques detecting cellular responses to antifungal stress other than growth inhibition are also of interest. Finally, molecular detection of mutations associated with antifungal resistance is an intriguing alternative to standard AFST, already used in routine microbiology labs for detection of azole resistance in Aspergillus and even directly from samples. It is still restricted to known mutations. The development of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and whole-genome approaches may overcome this limitation in the near future. While promising approaches are under development, they are not perfect and the ideal AFST technique (user-friendly, reproducible, low-cost, fast and accurate) still needs to be set up routinely in clinical laboratories.

Evaluation of the Neo-Sensitabs diffusion method for determining the antifungal susceptibilities of Cryptococcus gattii isolates, using three different agar media

The Neo-Sensitabs diffusion method was evaluated for determining the antifungal susceptibilities of 30 Cryptococcus gattii isolates to amphotericin B (AMB), fluconazole (FLC), itraconazole (ITC) and voriconazole (VRC). Three different culture media, Müeller-Hinton (MH), RPMI 1640 (RPMI) and Antibiotic medium 3 (AM3), all supplemented with 2% of glucose and 0.5 microg/ml of methylene blue, were tested. The tests were repeated three times on different days at three incubation times (48, 72 and 96 h). Results were compared with those obtained with the CLSI M27-A2 broth microdilution method. The degree of reproducibility of the diffusion test was 100% for VRC and ITC, 98.3-100% for AMB and 43.3-73.3% for FLC. The best reproducibility was observed at 48 h of incubation and no important differences among media were observed at any of the incubation times assayed. Between Neo-Sensitabs and the reference method, VRC showed the best agreement and ITC the worst in all conditions tested (100% and 56.7%, respectively). AMB showed a high agreement between the two methods (93.3% to 96.7%) but Neo-Sensitabs assay failed to detect resistant isolates (discrepancy classified as "very major error") in all times of incubation assayed. Only agreement between both methods for FLC was clearly affected by incubation time and media used, the best results being achieved at 48 h of incubation when MH and RPMI (80.0%, in both media) were used.

Intrinsic in vitro susceptibility of primary clinical isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus terreus, Aspergillus nidulans, Candida albicans and Candida lusitaniae against amphotericin B

A total of 60 clinical fungal isolates from patients without prior amphotericin B treatment and three control strains were evaluated for their intrinsic susceptibility to amphotericin B (AmB) using microdilution, Etest and disc diffusion assays, on three media each, Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640, Antibiotic Medium 3 (AM3) and High Resolution Medium. The fungal strains included isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus (n = 10), Aspergillus terreus (n = 12), Aspergillus nidulans (n = 9), Candida albicans (n = 6) and Candida lusitaniae (n = 23). The A. terreus strains were significantly less susceptible to AmB than the A. fumigatus strains in all nine experimental settings (P-values ranging from 0.009 to <0.00001). The A. nidulans strains were equally susceptible to AmB as the A. fumigatus strains in seven of nine experimental settings and less susceptible in two (microdilution performed on RPMI and AM3, P = 0.01 and 0.007). The C. lusitaniae strains were equally susceptible to AmB as the C. albicans strains in seven of nine experimental settings and more susceptible in two (microdilution and Etest, both performed on AM3, P = 0.01 and 0.0002). Thus, we confirmed that A. terreus is intrinsically less susceptible to AmB than A. fumigatus. In contrast, nine German clinical isolates of Aspergillus nidulans were found equally susceptible to AmB as 10 isolates of A. fumigatus. Furthermore, we found 23 German clinical isolates of C. lusitaniae from patients without prior treatment with AmB equally susceptible to AmB as C. albicans.

Susceptibility to antifungal agents of Candida species isolated from paediatric and adult patients with haematological diseases

Summary The susceptibility to six antifungals: amphotericin B (AMF), 5-fluorocytosine (5-F), miconazole (MIK), ketoconazole (KET), fluconazole (FLU) and itraconazole (ITR) was tested among 206 Candida spp. isolated from paediatric and adult patients with haematological malignancies. To determinate the susceptibility the commercial microdilution method Fungitest (Bio-Rad, France) was used. The strains were classified as susceptible, intermediate susceptible, or resistant on the base of the growth in following breakpoint concentrations of particular drugs: 2 and 8 microg ml(-1) for AMF, 2 and 32 microg ml(-1) for 5-F, 0.5 and 8 microg ml(-1) for MIK, 0.5 and 4 microg ml(-1) for KET and ITR, and 8 and 64 microg ml(-1) for FLU. The highest activity to overall species showed AMF (only one resistant strain) and 5-F (85% susceptible strains). Most of C. albicans isolates were susceptible to tested azoles. The percentages of C. albicans resistant to FLU, ITR, KET and MIK were 4, 11, 8, and 0.8%, respectively. The less susceptible to azoles were C. glabrata and C. krusei (14% and 44% isolates resistant to FLU). A non-albicans Candida isolated from adult patients receiving KET prophylaxis was more frequently resistant to FLU than isolates from patients without previous exposure to azoles (P < 0.05). We did not observe differences in the susceptibility of Candida strains isolated from children compared with those from adults.

Correlation between the procedure for antifungal susceptibility testing for Candida spp. of the European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and four commercial techniques

The correlation between results obtained with the European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) antifungal susceptibility testing procedure (document 7.1) and four commercial systems was evaluated for a collection of 93 clinical isolates of Candida spp. Overall, agreement between the EUCAST procedure and the Sensititre YeastOne and Etest methods was 75% and 90.4%, respectively. The correlation indices (p < 0.01) between the EUCAST and commercial methods were 0.92 for Sensititre YeastOne, 0.89 for Etest, - 0.90 for Neo-Sensitabs, and 0.95 for Fungitest. Amphotericin B MICs obtained by Sensititre YeastOne were consistently higher than with the EUCAST method and, although very major errors were not observed, 91% of MICs were misclassified. Amphotericin B- and fluconazole-resistant isolates were identified correctly with Sensititre YeastOne, Etest and Fungitest. Neo-Sensitabs identified amphotericin B-resistant isolates, but misclassified > 5% of fluconazole-resistant isolates as susceptible. The commercial methods, particularly Etest and Fungitest, appeared to be suitable alternatives to the EUCAST procedure for antifungal susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Candida.

Epidemiology of clinical isolates of Candida albicans and their susceptibility to triazoles

The study comprised strains of Candida albicans isolated from patients hospitalised in a tertiary care hospital during a 2-year period. In total 851 strains were cultured, including 379 (44.5%) strains from internal medicine patients, 243 (28.6%) from surgical patients and 229 (26.9%) from patients in the surgical intensive care unit. The strains were tested for susceptibility to the triazoles: fluconazole and itraconazole. There were 523 (61.5%) strains susceptible, 11 strains (1.3%) showed intermediate susceptibility and 317 (37.2%) were resistant to fluconazole, while 403 (47.3%) strains were susceptible, 43 (5.1%) intermediately susceptible and 405 (47.6%) resistant to itraconazole. Regular surveillance of fungal resistance patterns should be carried out and there should be prudent use of hospital triazole usage.

Multicenter comparison of Fungitest for susceptibility testing of Candida species

In four laboratories the reproducibility of Fungitest, a colorimetric breakpoint method for antifungal susceptibility testing, was examined. The interlaboratory agreement of test results from 50 Candida strains was dependent on the antifungal agents and ranged from 56% to 100%. Itraconazole showed the poorest, amphotericin B and flucytosine (100% and 96%, respectively) the highest concordance. When minor discrepancies were disregarded the agreement increased to 94% to 100% for all agents. In total, major discrepancies were only seen in 2.7%. The overall agreement between concordant results and the NCCLS standard method was high, ranging between 96.4% and 100%. Generally, sensitive strains showed a better agreement with Fungitest. Since the concordance in multisite studies with Fungitest will always depend on the isolates chosen, further studies with this test are necessary.

Antifungal susceptibility testing: practical aspects and current challenges

Development of standardized antifungal susceptibility testing methods has been the focus of intensive research for the last 15 years. Reference methods for yeasts (NCCLS M27-A) and molds (M38-P) are now available. The development of these methods provides researchers not only with standardized methods for testing but also with an understanding of the variables that affect interlaboratory reproducibility. With this knowledge, we have now moved into the phase of (i) demonstrating the clinical value (or lack thereof) of standardized methods, (ii) developing modifications to these reference methods that address specific problems, and (iii) developing reliable commercial test kits. Clinically relevant testing is now available for selected fungi and drugs: Candida spp. against fluconazole, itraconazole, flucytosine, and (perhaps) amphotericin B; Cryptococcus neoformans against (perhaps) fluconazole and amphotericin B; and Aspergillus spp. against (perhaps) itraconazole. Expanding the range of useful testing procedures is the current focus of research in this area.

Commercial systems for fluconazole susceptibility testing of yeasts: comparison with the broth microdilution method

Fluconazole susceptibility was tested in 100 clinical yeast isolates (65 Candida albicans, 13 C. glabrata, 8 C. tropicalis, 7 C. parapsilosis, 3 Saccharomyces cerevisiae, 1 each of C. krusei, C. lusitaniae, Cryptococcus neoformans, Rhodotorula glutinis) and two control strains (Candida krusei ATCC 6258, C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019) using broth microdilution (reference method), disk diffusion, Etest strips, Sensititre YeastOne, Candifast, Integral System Yeasts. Using M27-A breakpoints, isolates were classified as susceptible (81%), susceptible-dose dependent or Resistant with broth dilution. Rates of concordance with the reference method were good for Sensititre YeastOne, Etest and disc-diffusion (81.2%-94.7%) but very low for the Candifast (3.1%) and Integral System (16.6%), which classified most susceptible isolates as resistant. Lack of standardisation (inoculum, medium composition) and non-objective interpretation schemes may be the cause of their poor performance. Sensititre YeastOne, Etest and disc-diffusion are potentially useful for fluconazole antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts in clinical laboratories.

Susceptibility testing of Candida species: comparison of NCCLS microdilution method with Fungitest

Fungitest is a new commercially available and easy-to-perform breakpoint test system using six antifungal agents. We compared this test with a modified standard method described by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS). One hundred isolates of Candida species were tested with both methods. Based on the same breakpoints, the correlation of qualitative results between the reference method and Fungitest was high. Best results were obtained after incubation of Fungitest for 48 h. Overall agreement was high, an excellent correlation was given with amphotericin B and flucytosine (100% and 99%, respectively), whereas itraconazole showed only 86% concordance. When Fungitest was read after 24 h the agreement was lower ranging from 100% to 75%. Some of the breakpoints used with Fungitest differ from the breakpoints recommended by NCCLS, whereas others have not been elaborated by the NCCLS. The adaptation of Fungitest breakpoints to NCCLS and determination of further breakpoints have to be discussed before Fungitest can be recommended for routine use.

Comparative evaluation of PASCO and national committee for clinical laboratory standards M27-A broth microdilution methods for antifungal drug susceptibility testing of yeasts

The PASCO antifungal susceptibility test system, developed in collaboration with a commercial company, is a broth microdilution assay which is faster and easier to use than the reference broth microdilution test performed according to the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) document M27-A guidelines. Advantages of the PASCO system include the system's inclusion of quality-controlled, premade antifungal panels containing 10, twofold serial dilutions of drugs and a one-step inoculation system whereby all wells are simultaneously inoculated in a single step. For the prototype panel, we chose eight antifungal agents for in vitro testing (amphotericin B, flucytosine, fluconazole, ketoconazole, itraconazole, clotrimazole, miconazole, and terconazole) and compared the results with those of the NCCLS method for testing 74 yeast isolates (14 Candida albicans, 10 Candida glabrata, 10 Candida tropicalis, 10 Candida krusei, 10 Candida dubliniensis, 10 Candida parapsilosis, and 10 Cryptococcus neoformans isolates). The overall agreements between the methods were 91% for fluconazole, 89% for amphotericin B and ketoconazole, 85% for itraconazole, 80% for flucytosine, 77% for terconazole, 66% for miconazole, and 53% for clotrimazole. In contrast to the M27-A reference method, the PASCO method classified as resistant seven itraconazole-susceptible isolates (9%), two fluconazole-susceptible isolates (3%), and three flucytosine-susceptible isolates (4%), representing 12 major errors. In addition, it classified two fluconazole-resistant isolates (3%) and one flucytosine-resistant isolate (1%) as susceptible, representing three very major errors. Overall, the agreement between the methods was greater than or equal to 80% for four of the seven species tested (C. dubliniensis, C. glabrata, C. krusei, and C. neoformans). The lowest agreement between methods was observed for miconazole and clotrimazole and for C. krusei isolates tested against terconazole. When the data for miconazole and clotrimazole were removed from the analysis, agreement was >/=80% for all seven species tested. Therefore, the PASCO method is a suitable alternative procedure for the testing of the antifungal susceptibilities of the medically important Candida spp. and C. neoformans against a range of antifungal agents with the exceptions only of miconazole and clotrimazole and of terconazole against C. krusei isolates.