Bexarotene capsules and gel for previously treated patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: results of the Australian patients treated on phase II trials

The Use of Retinoids for the Prevention and Treatment of Skin Cancers: An Updated Review

Retinoids are natural and synthetic vitamin A derivatives that are effective for the prevention and the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC). NMSCs constitute a heterogenous group of non-melanocyte-derived skin cancers that impose substantial burdens on patients and healthcare systems. They include entities such as basal cell carcinoma and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (collectively called keratinocyte carcinomas), cutaneous lymphomas and Kaposi’s sarcoma among others. The retinoid signaling pathway plays influential roles in skin physiology and pathology. These compounds regulate diverse biological processes within the skin, including proliferation, differentiation, angiogenesis and immune regulation. Collectively, retinoids can suppress skin carcinogenesis. Both topical and systemic retinoids have been investigated in clinical trials as NMSC prophylactics and treatments. Desirable efficacy and tolerability in clinical trials have prompted health regulatory bodies to approve the use of retinoids for NMSC management. Acceptable off-label uses of these compounds as drugs for skin cancers are also described. This review is a comprehensive outline on the biochemistry of retinoids, their activities in the skin, their effects on cancer cells and their adoption in clinical practice.

Interventions for mycosis fungoides

BACKGROUND

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, a malignant, chronic disease initially affecting the skin. Several therapies are available, which may induce clinical remission for a time. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2012: we wanted to assess new trials, some of which investigated new interventions.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of interventions for MF in all stages of the disease.

SEARCH METHODS

We updated our searches of the following databases to May 2019: the Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS. We searched 2 trials registries for additional references. For adverse event outcomes, we undertook separate searches in MEDLINE in April, July and November 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of local or systemic interventions for MF in adults with any stage of the disease compared with either another local or systemic intervention or with placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. The primary outcomes were improvement in health-related quality of life as defined by participants, and common adverse effects of the treatments. Key secondary outcomes were complete response (CR), defined as complete disappearance of all clinical evidence of disease, and objective response rate (ORR), defined as proportion of patients with a partial or complete response. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence and considered comparisons of psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) light treatment as most important because this is first-line treatment for MF in most guidelines.

MAIN RESULTS

This review includes 20 RCTs (1369 participants) covering a wide range of interventions. The following were assessed as either treatments or comparators: imiquimod, peldesine, hypericin, mechlorethamine, nitrogen mustard and intralesional injections of interferon-α (IFN-α) (topical applications); PUVA, extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP: photochemotherapy), and visible light (light applications); acitretin, bexarotene, lenalidomide, methotrexate and vorinostat (oral agents); brentuximab vedotin; denileukin diftitox; mogamulizumab; chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, and vincristine; a combination of chemotherapy with electron beam radiation; subcutaneous injection of IFN-α; and intramuscular injections of active transfer factor (parenteral systemics). Thirteen trials used an active comparator, five were placebo-controlled, and two compared an active operator to observation only. In 14 trials, participants had MF in clinical stages IA to IIB. All participants were treated in secondary and tertiary care settings, mainly in Europe, North America or Australia. Trials recruited both men and women, with more male participants overall. Trial duration varied from four weeks to 12 months, with one longer-term study lasting more than six years. We judged 16 trials as at high risk of bias in at least one domain, most commonly performance bias (blinding of participants and investigators), attrition bias and reporting bias. None of our key comparisons measured quality of life, and the two studies that did presented no usable data. Eighteen studies reported common adverse effects of the treatments. Adverse effects ranged from mild symptoms to lethal complications depending upon the treatment type. More aggressive treatments like systemic chemotherapy generally resulted in more severe adverse effects. In the included studies, CR rates ranged from 0% to 83% (median 31%), and ORR ranged from 0% to 88% (median 47%). Five trials assessed PUVA treatment, alone or combined, summarised below. There may be little to no difference between intralesional IFN-α and PUVA compared with PUVA alone for 24 to 52 weeks in CR (risk ratio (RR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 1.31; 2 trials; 122 participants; low-certainty evidence). Common adverse events and ORR were not measured. One small cross-over trial found once-monthly ECP for six months may be less effective than twice-weekly PUVA for three months, reporting CR in two of eight participants and ORR in six of eight participants after PUVA, compared with no CR or ORR after ECP (very low-certainty evidence). Some participants reported mild nausea after PUVA but no numerical data were given. One participant in the ECP group withdrew due to hypotension. However, we are unsure of the results due to very low-certainty evidence. One trial comparing bexarotene plus PUVA versus PUVA alone for up to 16 weeks reported one case of photosensitivity in the bexarotene plus PUVA group compared to none in the PUVA-alone group (87 participants; low-certainty evidence). There may be little to no difference between bexarotene plus PUVA and PUVA alone in CR (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.80) and ORR (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.44) (93 participants; low-certainty evidence). One trial comparing subcutaneous IFN-α injections combined with either acitretin or PUVA for up to 48 weeks or until CR indicated there may be little to no difference in the common IFN-α adverse effect of flu-like symptoms (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.88; 82 participants). There may be lower CR with IFN-α and acitretin compared with IFN-α and PUVA (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.84; 82 participants) (both outcomes: low-certainty evidence). This trial did not measure ORR. One trial comparing PUVA maintenance treatment to no maintenance treatment, in participants who had already had CR, did report common adverse effects. However, the distribution was not evaluable. CR and OR were not assessable. The range of treatment options meant that rare adverse effects consequently occurred in a variety of organs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

​​There is a lack of high-certainty evidence to support decision making in the treatment of MF. Because of substantial heterogeneity in design, missing data, small sample sizes, and low methodological quality, the comparative safety and efficacy of these interventions cannot be reliably established on the basis of the included RCTs. PUVA is commonly recommended as first-line treatment for MF, and we did not find evidence to challenge this recommendation. There was an absence of evidence to support the use of intralesional IFN-α or bexarotene in people receiving PUVA and an absence of evidence to support the use of acitretin or ECP for treating MF. Future trials should compare the safety and efficacy of treatments to PUVA, as the current standard of care, and should measure quality of life and common adverse effects.

Synthesis and anticancer cytotoxicity with structural context of an α-hydroxyphosphonate based compound library derived from substituted benzaldehydes

We synthesized substituted benzaldehyde derived α-hydroxyphosphonates (αOHP), α-hydroxyphosphonic acids (αOHPA) and α-phosphinoyloxyphosphonates (αOPP) and characterized their cytotoxicity against a panel of cancer cell lines.

Targeting Retinoid Receptors to Treat Schizophrenia: Rationale and Progress to Date

This review provides the rationale and reports on the progress to date regarding the targeting of retinoid receptors for the treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder and the role of retinoic acid in functions of the normal brain, and in psychotic states. After a brief introduction, we describe the normal function of retinoic acid in the brain. We then examine the evidence regarding retinoid dysregulation in schizophrenia. Finally, findings from two add-on clinical trials with a retinoid (bexarotene) are discussed. The authors of this review suggest that targeting retinoid receptors may be a novel approach to treat schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Further studies are warranted.

Tazarotene 0.1% Cream as Monotherapy for Early-Stage Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Numerous treatments are available for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), including systemic retinoids. Very few data are available on topical retinoids.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficiency of tazarotene as monotherapy for early-stage CTCL.

METHODS

An open-label, prospective study of tazarotene as monotherapy for stages IA to IIA CTCL was conducted. Index lesions on 10 patients were followed for 6 months on treatment, plus at least 6 months off treatment.

RESULTS

Six patients (60%) showed complete response (CR). Erythema, scaling, thickness, and lesion area decreased progressively throughout treatment. The mean time to CR was 3.8 months; CR was durable for at least 6 months in 83%. Of the 4 patients (40%) without CR, 2 (20%) had stable disease and 2 (20%) stopped the medication because of local side effects; none showed progression.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first Canadian trial providing evidence that topical tazarotene has excellent potential as a monotherapy agent for stages I to IIA CTCL.

Improvement of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) skin tumors during long-term treatment with oral sirolimus

BACKGROUND

Oral mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitors have been shown to reduce visceral tumor volume in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC).

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the cutaneous response to oral sirolimus in patients with TSC and an indication for systemic treatment, including long-term effects.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 14 adult patients with TSC prescribed sirolimus to treat lymphangioleiomyomatosis was performed. Serial photographs of angiofibromas, shagreen patches, and ungual fibromas taken before, during, and after the treatment period were blinded, then assessed using the Physician Global Assessment of Clinical Condition (PGA). Microscopic and molecular studies were performed on skin tumors harvested before and during treatment.

RESULTS

Sirolimus significantly improved angiofibromas (median treatment duration 12 months; median PGA score 4.5 [range 1.5-5]; Wilcoxon signed rank test, P = .018) and shagreen patches (median treatment duration 10 months; median PGA score 4.5 [range 3.5-5]; Wilcoxon signed rank test, P = .039), whereas ungual fibromas improved in some patients (median treatment duration 6.5 months; median PGA score 4.66 [range 2.75-5]; Wilcoxon signed rank test, P = .109). Clinical, immunohistochemical, or molecular evidence of resistance was not observed (range 5-64 months of treatment).

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective analysis limited to adult women with lymphangioleiomyomatosis.

CONCLUSION

Oral sirolimus is an effective long-term therapy for TSC skin tumors, particularly angiofibromas, in patients for whom systemic treatment is indicated.

Oral retinoids and rexinoids in cutaneous T-cell lymphomas

Retinoids are biologically active derivatives of vitamin A modulating cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis and altering the immune response. They have been used for years in therapy of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) but the exact mechanism of retinoids' action is unclear. It is based on the presence of specific receptors' families, mediating the biological effects of retinoids on the tumor cells: retinoic acid receptor (RAR) and retinoic X receptor (RXR). Orally administrated bexarotene, the first synthetic selective RXR retinoid, was revealed to be active against the cutaneous manifestation of CTCL. The toxicity profile caused by bexarotene seems to be more limited to laboratory values and better tolerated than classical retinoids, but generally associated with more severe grades of toxicity. Both selective retinoic acid receptor- and retinoic X receptor-mediated retinoids have modest objective response rates and, therefore, most likely will have limited impact as monotherapeutic agents. However, the immunomodulatory effects of RAR and RXR retinoids provide a rational basis for using retinoids in combination with other biologic immune response modifiers, phototherapy and radiotherapy. The authors reviewed the literature on the results of the use of retinoids and rexinoids in patients with mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome.

Interventions for mycosis fungoides

BACKGROUND

Mycosis fungoides is the most common type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, a malignant, chronic disease initially affecting the skin. Several therapies are available, which may induce clinical remission for a time.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of interventions for mycosis fungoides in all stages of the disease.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases up to January 2011: the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (from 2005), EMBASE (from 2010), and LILACS (from 1982). We also checked reference lists of included studies for further references to relevant RCTs. We searched online trials registries for further references to unpublished trials and undertook a separate search for adverse effects of interventions for mycosis fungoides in non-RCTs in MEDLINE in May 2011.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions for mycosis fungoides in people with any stage of the disease. At least 90% of participants in the trials must have been diagnosed with mycosis fungoides (Alibert-Bazin-type).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed eligibility and methodological quality for each study and carried out data extraction. We resolved any disagreement by discussion. Primary outcomes were the impact on quality of life and the safety of interventions. When available, we reported on our secondary outcomes, which were the improvement or clearance of skin lesions, disease-free intervals, survival rates, relapse rates, and rare adverse effects. When possible, we combined homogeneous studies for meta-analysis. We used The Cochrane Collaboration's 'Risk of bias' tool to assess the internal validity of all included studies in six different domains.

MAIN RESULTS

The review included 14 RCTs involving 675 participants, covering a wide range of interventions. Eleven of the included trials assessed participants in clinical stages IA to IIB only (please see Table 1 for definitions of these stages).Internal validity was considerably low in studies with a high or unclear risk of bias. The main reasons for this were low methodological quality or missing data, even after we contacted the study authors, and a mean dropout rate of 26% (0% to 72%). Study size was generally small with a minimum of 4 and a maximum of 103 participants. Only one study provided a long enough follow-up for reliable survival analysis.Included studies assessed topical treatments, such as imiquimod, peldesine, hypericin, nitrogen mustard, as well as intralesional injections of interferon-α (IFN-α). The light therapies investigated included psoralen plus ultraviolet A light (PUVA), extracorporeal photopheresis (photochemotherapy), and visible light. Oral treatments included acitretin, bexarotene, and methotrexate. Treatment with parenteral systemic agents consisted of denileukin diftitox; a combination of chemotherapy and electron beam radiation; and intramuscular injections of active transfer factor. Nine studies evaluated therapies by using an active comparator; five were placebo-controlled RCTs.Twelve studies reported on common adverse effects, while only two assessed quality of life. None of these studies compared the health-related quality of life of participants undergoing different treatments. Most of the reported adverse effects were attributed to the interventions. Systemic treatments, and here in particular a combined therapeutic regimen of chemotherapy and electron beam, bexarotene, or denileukin diftitox, showed more adverse effects than topical or skin-directed treatments.In the included studies, clearance rates ranged from 0% to 83%, and improvement ranged from 0% to 88%. The meta-analysis combining the results of 2 trials comparing the effect of IFN-α and PUVA versus PUVA alone showed no significant difference in the relative risk of clearance: 1.07 (95% confidence interval 0.87 to 1.31). None of the included studies demonstrated a significant increase in disease-free intervals, relapse, or overall survival.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review identified trial evidence for a range of different topical and systemic interventions for mycosis fungoides. Because of substantial heterogeneity in design, small sample sizes, and low methodological quality, the comparative safety and efficacy of these interventions cannot be established on the basis of the included RCTs. Taking into account the possible serious adverse effects and the limited availability of efficacy data, topical and skin-directed treatments are recommended first, especially in the early stages of disease. More aggressive therapeutic regimens may show improvement or clearance of lesions, but they also result in more adverse effects; therefore, they are to be considered with caution. Larger studies with comparable, clearly-defined end points for all stages of mycosis fungoides, and a focus on safety, quality of life, and duration of remission as part of the outcome measures, are necessary.

A phase I pharmacokinetic study of bexarotene with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

PURPOSE

Preclinical data suggest that the synthetic retinoid bexarotene may be an effective chemopreventive agent and that it may act synergistically in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether repeated doses of bexarotene capsules affect pharmacokinetic parameters of paclitaxel or carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Patients received treatment with paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin to provide a target AUC of 6 mg min/mL (day 1) every 3 weeks. Continuous oral bexarotene therapy (400 mg/m(2)/day) was initiated on Day 4, and patients started lipid-lowering therapy prior to beginning chemotherapy. Blood sampling to characterize the pharmacokinetic profiles of the chemotherapeutic agents with or without bexarotene was performed during cycle 1 (without concomitant bexarotene) and during cycle 2 (with concomitant bexarotene).

RESULTS

An analysis of drug concentration data from 16 patients indicated that bexarotene did not affect the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel, free carboplatin, or total carboplatin concentrations. However, both maximal plasma concentrations and total exposure of bexarotene increased by 80% in the presence of paclitaxel-carboplatin by an, as of yet, unexplained mechanism. The toxicities observed resembled those of either the chemotherapy regimen or bexarotene alone, and there was no evidence for an enhancement of any drug-related toxicity with the combined treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of bexarotene, paclitaxel, and carboplatin is feasible and safe; however, the increased bexarotene plasma concentrations and exposure warrant further investigation if this combination is to be utilized clinically.

Absence of modulation of CD4+CD25 regulatory T cells in CTCL patients treated with bexarotene

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) are a heterogeneous group of lymphoproliferative disorders, characterized by the infiltration of the epidermis by mature and activated malignant CD4+ T-lymphocytes. Retinoids such as retinoic acid and synthetic analogues have long been used alone or in combination with other therapies for CTCL. Bexarotene, the first synthetic highly selective RXR retinoid, was approved for the treatment of all stages of CTCL in patients refractory to at least one systemic therapy. Recently, six cases in which the initiation of bexarotene therapy for CTCL was associated with the progression of internal disease despite improvement of cutaneous signs and symptoms were reported. Moreover, it has been established that retinoids promote the generation of CD4+ Foxp3+ regulatory T cells, raising the question of an induction of regulatory T-cells by bexarotene. The aim of this work was to determine if bexarotene induces an increase of functional regulatory T cells which could play a role in the development of secondary extra-cutaneous lymphomas. Regulatory T cells were studied both in cutaneous biopsy specimens using an immunohistochemical analysis of CD4, CD25 and Foxp3 and in blood where proportion and functionality of circulating CD4+CD25(high) T-cells were determined. The study was performed in 10 patients [five patients with Sézary syndrome (SS) and five mycosis fungoïdes (MF)], treated for 6 months with bexarotene. Four healthy donors were used as controls for phenotypic and functional analysis on PBL. We found that the frequency of CD4+CD25(high) Treg cells was not significantly different before starting bexarotene and after 6 months of treatment in CTCL patients. However, we observed that the frequency of CD4+CD25(high) Treg cells before the beginning of the treatment was significantly increased compared to healthy donors. In addition, functional assays demonstrated that Foxp3 expressing CD4+CD25(high) T-cells were capable of suppressing autologous CD4 + CD25- T-cell proliferation. In the present work, we detected the presence of functional circulating CD4+CD25(high) Foxp3+ regulatory T-cells in CTCL patients, with an increased frequency compared to healthy donors. The treatment with bexarotene does not seem to affect the regulatory T-cell compartment.

About the cutaneous targets of bexarotene in CTCL patients

There are several approved therapies for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). The retinoids are one of the major biologic response modifiers used in CTCL, producing good response rates but few complete responses. Bexarotene has been demonstrated to act on malignant T-cells by inducing their apoptosis, but nothing is known about its role on keratinocytes and Langerhans cells. Immunohistochemical analysis using CD1a, HLA-DR, ICAM-1 (activation markers), CD95 and CD40 (apoptosis markers) was conducted on frozen sections of bexarotene-exposed cutaneous explants and skin biopsy specimens from patients treated with bexarotene. None of the studied markers was significantly modulated both on cutaneous explants and on skin biopsy specimens after treatment with bexarotene, compared to controls. Langerhans cells and keratinocytes do not appear to play a central role in the therapeutic control of CTCL by bexarotene therapy. The main bexarotene's target thus remains T-cells by inducing their apoptosis, a mechanism that is different from the other retinoids used in CTCL.

Bexarotene as add-on to antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenia patients: a pilot open-label trial

OBJECTIVES

Bexarotene is a synthetic retinoid used for treatment of neoplastic or dermatologic disorders. Based on the retinoid dysregulation hypothesis, it was hypothesized that bexarotene augmentation would have a beneficial effect in the antipsychotic treatment of schizophrenia patients. This study is the first to investigate the safety and efficacy of add-on oral bexarotene to ongoing antipsychotic treatment in chronic schizophrenia patients who were stabilized on regular antipsychotic treatment.

METHODS

A 6-week open label trial was conducted in 2 mental health centers from October 2005 to October 2006. Twenty-five patients with chronic schizophrenia received a low dose of bexarotene (75 mg/d) augmentation. Mental condition and laboratory tests were assessed at baseline and after weeks 2, 4, and 6 of the study. The primary outcome measure was change from baseline in 4 symptom scales: the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale, Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale, Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale, and Barnes Akathisia Scale. Blood cell count, liver and thyroid functions, cholesterol, and triglyceride rates were followed.

RESULTS

Significant improvement from baseline to endpoint was observed on total Positive and Negative Symptom Scale score (P = 0.022), general psychopathology (P = 0.024), positive (P = 0.012), and the dysphoric mood (P = 0.028) factor scores. Furthermore, a trend to a diminishing Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale score (P = 0.053) was found. Bexarotene was found to be a safe medication as measured by all laboratory parameters with the exception of increased total cholesterol serum level.

CONCLUSIONS

This short-term pilot study supports bexarotene as a potential valuable adjunct in management of schizophrenia. Low doses of bexarotene were well tolerated. A double-blind controlled study should be performed to replicate these preliminary positive results.

Bexarotene in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

Primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas encompass a spectrum of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas that are characterised by clonal proliferation of skin-homing malignant T lymphocytes. Mycosis fungoides and the leukaemic variant Sézary syndrome, collectively referred to as cutaneous T-cell lymphomas, are the most common entities. No curative therapy exists and patients ultimately develop advanced or relapsed disease that is refractory to standard treatment options. Therefore, there is a great need for the development of novel emerging therapies. Bexarotene is the first synthetic nuclear retinoid X receptor-selective retinoid approved by the FDA for the treatment of refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma in all stages, as both an oral capsule and a topical gel formulation. Bexarotene was found to induce apoptosis in a variety of preclinical in vitro and in vivo models including cutaneous T-cell lymphoma cells, and has shown efficacy in two multi-centre, open-label Phase II - III clinical trials for early and advanced stages of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma in patients who have failed or were refractory to standard therapies. New insights into the immunomodulatory function of bexarotene have indicated opportunities for combined treatment with IFN-alpha, denileukin diftitox or phototherapy. This article reviews the biological properties, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, safety and role of bexarotene in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.

Lack of apoptosis of Sezary cells in the circulation following oral bexarotene therapy

BACKGROUND

Apoptosis of malignant cells has been suggested as an important mechanism of the action of bexarotene in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL).

OBJECTIVES

Our purpose was to examine the in vivo and in vitro responses of patients with Sézary syndrome treated with oral bexarotene and assess them for apoptosis of the Sézary cells.

METHODS

Six patients with CTCL with circulating Sézary cells, participating in a clinical trial of oral bexarotene (300 mg m(-2) daily) were included in the study. Peripheral blood from the patients was analysed for in vivo and in vitro apoptosis.

RESULTS

None of the six patients demonstrated in vivo apoptosis. In vitro apoptosis of Sézary cells was demonstrated in one patient following exogenous bexarotene.

CONCLUSIONS

Apoptosis is not detectable in the circulation of patients with Sézary syndrome treated with bexarotene.

A phase II multicenter clinical trial of systemic bexarotene in psoriasis

BACKGROUND

Bexarotene, a novel and unique synthetic P, RXR-selective retinoid, is available as a treatment for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. In psoriasis, a common retinoid-sensitive disease, no data are available on bexarotene treatment.

OBJECTIVE

In this phase II study we investigated the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of bexarotene in psoriasis at doses of 0.5 to 3.0 mg/kg/day.

METHODS

Fifty patients with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis were treated with bexarotene in 4 sequential dose-defined panels of 12-13 patients at doses of 1.0, 2.0, 0.5, and 3.0 mg/kg/day for 12-24 weeks. Patients were monitored for safety and clinical efficacy.

RESULTS

No serious adverse events related to the drug occurred. Bexarotene was well tolerated in most patients. Most frequently observed adverse events related to bexarotene were hypertriglyceridaemia (56%) and a decrease in free T4 serum levels (54%). Significant improvement of psoriasis after bexarotene at all doses was confirmed by a modified psoriasis area and severity index (mPASI), plaque elevation (PEL), and physician's global assessment (PGA). Overall response rates (> or =50% improvement) for mPASI, PEL, and PGA were 22%, 52%, and 36%, respectively. No significant dose-response effect was established for these parameters.

CONCLUSION

The present study indicates an anti-psoriatic effect of bexarotene. Further studies are necessary to assess the optimal dose and the potential for bexarotene as a new therapy for psoriasis.

Bexarotene: a clinical review

Bexarotene (Targretin, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Inc.) is a synthetic retinoid analog with specific affinity for the retinoid X receptor and belongs to a group of compounds called rexinoids. Early clinical trials of this drug demonstrated activity in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Subsequent Phase II/III trials have demonstrated a greater than 50% response rate in patients with all stages of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma who were refractory or intolerant to the previous therapy. The principal toxicities of bexarotene include central hypothyroidism, xeroderma and elevation of cholesterol and triglycerides. These toxicities can be managed with dose attenuation or addition of atorvastatin (Lipitor, Pfizer) or fenofibrate (TriCor, Abbott Laboratories). Since bexarotene has little bone marrow toxicity, it is an excellent candidate for combination therapy with other modalities useful in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. These include ultraviolet B irradiation, psoralen and ultraviolet A photochemotherapy, interferons, denileukin diftitox (Ontak, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Inc.) and cytotoxic chemotherapy. Bexarotene has also been investigated in the treatment of breast cancer and non-small cell carcinoma of the lung with promising early results.

Management of the primary cutaneous lymphomas

Cutaneous lymphomas are rare and, although some are a manifestation of systemic lymphoma, the majority arise primarily from the skin. These primary cutaneous lymphomas comprise both T- and B-cell subtypes and represent a wide spectrum of disorders, which at times can be difficult to diagnose and classify. Classical therapeutic strategies include topical corticosteroids, phototherapy, radiotherapy, retinoids, extracorporeal photopheresis, topical chemotherapy, systemic chemotherapy and biological response modifiers. Newer therapies include the synthetic retinoid bexarotene, the immunotoxin conjugate denileukin diftitox, interleukin-12 and monoclonal antibodies such as alemtuzumab and rituximab.

Topical and systemic retinoid therapy for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

Because curative therapies for CTCL are not yet available, short of TSEB in patients who have early-stage disease and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in patients who have more advanced disease, the goal of current therapies is to prevent progression of MF and to preserve quality of life. The overall conclusion drawn from the studies reported in the literature, is that retinoids as monotherapy, or in combination with other nonaggressive treatment modalities, represent a low-risk treatment alternative that is especially suitable for controlling early stages of MF and other CTCL. A combination of therapies may be more effective in controlling CTCL as shown with IFN-alpha plus retinoids, and, recently, IFN-alpha with bexarotene and other modalities. For example, isotretinoin, followed by TSEB (for stage I to II disease) or preceded by chemotherapy (for stage II and IV disease) and bexarotene plus PUVA or photopheresis plus IFN, gave overall response rates of 82% and 69% in patients who had MF and SS, respectively. Retinoids as monotherapy may induce complete remissions, but usually these responses are of short duration and relapses are common. Clinical response is not identical to histologic clearance. Even in cases with clinically complete clearance of skin lesions, lymphoid infiltrates persisted, which are most likely the source of recurrences. The new generation of retinoids, the RXR selective agonists like bexarotene, represent a promising approach for refractory or persistent MF that is unresponsive to first-line therapies. Individual differences in response to retinoids may be due to different expression of retinoid receptors, functional polymorphisms in metabolizing retinoids, or resistance to some retinoids. In the future, pharmacogenomic studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms that underlie the differing response rates of patients who have CTCL to retinoids. In addition, new agonists of RAR and RXR, either selective or pan agonists, will become available and will enlarge the spectrum of vitamin A analogs that have antitumoral properties.

Bexarotene - an alternative therapy for progressive cutaneous T-cell lymphoma? First experiences

BACKGROUND

A standard therapy for advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphomas has not yet been defined. Bexarotene is a new retinoid x receptor-specific retinoid that has been approved for systemic second-line therapy for cutaneous T-cell lymphomas in the USA and Europe. In order to evaluate the efficacy of bexarotene in cutaneous T-cell lymphomas, a pilot trial was initiated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a pilot project 10 patients with advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphomas, who had received a variety of previous treatments, were treated with bexarotene at the departments of dermatology in Münster, Minden and Charité Berlin, Germany. The patients received bexarotene at a dose of 300 mg/m2 body surface daily. According to the percentage of tumour reduction and affected body surface, the response rates were divided in complete and partial remission, stable disease and progressive disease. Laboratory parameters i.e. cholesterol, triglycerides transaminases, T3, T4, and TSH were screened regularly.

RESULTS

In 2 patients a short partial remission was achieved; however, after a few weeks progression followed. In 4 patients a lasting stabilisation was obtained. The other 4 patients showed a progressive disease during therapy. 6 patients developed hypertriglyceridemia with levels up to 2000 mg/dl; therapy had to be suspended in 3 patients because of these adverse drug events.

CONCLUSION

Weighing benefits and risks, bexarotene can at present not be recommended as standard therapy in the treatment of patients with progressive cutaneous lymphomas.

Long-term control of mycosis fungoides of the hands with topical bexarotene

BACKGROUND

Limited Stage IA mycosis fungoides (MF) is often treated with topical steroids, which can cause atrophy, or with nitrogen mustard, which imposes several limitations on the patient's lifestyle. Topical bexarotene is a novel synthetic rexinoid with few side-effects that has shown efficacy for treatment of mycosis fungoides skin lesions in recent Phase II-III clinical trials. The Phase I-II trial involving 67 stage IA-IIA MF patients demonstrated complete response (CR) in 21% and partial response (PR) in 42% of the patients. The median time to response was approximately 20 weeks. In the phase III trial of refractory stage IA, IB and IIA MF, the patients demonstrated a 44% response rate (8% CR). Patients with no prior therapy for mycosis fungoides responded at a higher rate (75%) than those with prior topical therapies.

METHODS

Case report of a patient with MF limited to the hands treated with topical bexarotene 0.1% gel in a open label phase II clinical trial.

RESULTS

Partial response occurred after 2 weeks of topical bexarotene therapy and the lesions were well controlled for 5 years using bexarotene monotherapy, with only occasional mild local irritation.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical bexarotene is effective as long-term treatment monotherapy for limited MF lesions. To our knowledge this is the longest use of the drug by any individual.

Cutaneous lymphomas: which pathological classification?

Cutaneous lymphomas are rare and although some are a manifestation of systemic lymphoma, the majority arise primarily from the skin. These primary cutaneous lymphomas comprise predominantly T cell subtypes and represent a wide spectrum of disorders. Pathologists can currently choose to label these conditions according to three classifications (REAL, EORTC or WHO) but each has shortcomings. Nonetheless, in an attempt to unify the field, we would recommend that pathologists make every attempt to categorise these conditions according to the WHO classification. This classification can encompass all the conditions and aligns the cutaneous lymphomas with the broader systemic lymphoproliferative conditions.