Modern radiotherapy for modern surgeons: an update on radiation oncology

Interventional oncology in multidisciplinary cancer treatment in the 21(st) century

Interventional oncology is an evolving branch of interventional radiology, which relies on rapidly evolving, highly sophisticated treatment tools and precise imaging guidance to target and destroy malignant tumours. The development of this field has important potential benefits for patients and the health-care system, but as a new discipline, interventional oncology has not yet fully established its place in the wider field of oncology; its application does not have a comprehensive evidence base, or a clinical or quality-assurance framework within which to operate. In this regard, radiation oncology, a cornerstone of modern cancer care, has a lot of important information to offer to interventional oncologists. A strong collaboration between radiation oncology and interventional oncology, both of which aim to cure or control tumours or to relieve symptoms with as little collateral damage to normal tissue as possible, will have substantial advantages for both disciplines. A close relationship with radiation oncology will help facilitate the development of a robust quality-assurance framework and accumulation of evidence to support the integration of interventional oncology into multidisciplinary care. Furthermore, collaboration between interventional oncology and radiation oncology fields will have great benefits to practitioners, people affected by cancer, and to the wider field of oncology.

Current evidence does not support routine adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

There is widespread support in the published literature for routine adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer.

METHODS

In the present paper, the current evidence regarding adjuvant radiotherapy is reviewed, particularly the most recent studies of preoperative radiotherapy (usually including patients with Stage I, II and III disease) and postoperative radiotherapy (usually for Stage II and III disease), and meta-analyses. Two questions in particular are addressed: Does radiotherapy improve survival when surgeons are able to achieve low local recurrence rates with surgery alone? Does radiotherapy improve patients' quality of life?

RESULTS

Radiotherapy has only been demonstrated to significantly improve survival in one individual study and one recent meta-analysis. The local recurrence rates in the no-radiotherapy arm of these studies were 27% and 21-36.5%, respectively. In more recent studies, with lower local recurrence rates reflecting modern surgical standards, no survival advantage has been found. It is currently unknown whether radiotherapy improves patients' quality of life. Studies have demonstrated that radiotherapy has acute and long-term detrimental effects on quality of life. While local recurrence can be very debilitating, it can also be asymptomatic, and the overall effect of the local recurrence statistics found in adjuvant therapy studies on quality of life has not been systematically investigated. The most recent studies demonstrate that 17-20 patients need to undergo adjuvant radiotherapy to prevent one local recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence does not support the widespread advocacy for routine adjuvant radiotherapy as used in the treatment arms of recent trials.