Breast radiotherapy: an Australasian survey of current treatment techniques

Patterns of Practice in Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer in Korea

Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) is a well-established treatment for breast cancer. However, there is a large degree of variation and controversy in practice patterns. A nationwide survey on the patterns of practice in breast RT was designed by the Division for Breast Cancer of the Korean Radiation Oncology Group. All board-certified members of the Korean Society for Radiation Oncology were sent a questionnaire comprising 39 questions on six domains: hypofractionated whole breast RT, accelerated partial breast RT, postmastectomy RT (PMRT), regional nodal RT, RT for ductal carcinoma in situ, and RT toxicity. Sixty-four radiation oncologists from 54 of 86 (62.8%) hospitals responded. Twenty-three respondents (35.9%) used hypofractionated whole breast RT, and the most common schedule was 43.2 Gy in 16 fractions. Only three (4.7%) used accelerated partial breast RT. Five (7.8%) used hypofractionated PMRT, and 40 (62.5%) had never used boost RT after chest wall irradiation. Indications for regional nodal RT varied; ≥pN2 (n=7) versus ≥pN1 (n=17) versus ≥pN1 with pathologic risk factors (n=40). Selection criteria for internal mammary lymph node (IMN) irradiation also varied; only four (6.3%) always treated IMN when regional nodal RT was administered and 30 (46.9%) treated IMN only if IMN involvement was identified through imaging. Thirty-one (48.4%) considered omission of whole breast RT after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ based on clinical and pathologic risk factors. Fifty-two (81.3%) used heart-sparing techniques. Overall, there were wide variations in the patterns of practice in breast RT in Korea. Standard guidelines are needed, especially for regional nodal RT and omission of RT for ductal carcinoma in situ.

Breast interest group faculty of radiation oncology: Australian and New Zealand patterns of practice survey on breast radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

This patterns of practice study was conducted on behalf of the RANZCR Breast Interest Group in order to document current radiotherapy practices for breast cancer in Australia and New Zealand. The survey identifies variations and highlights potential contentious aspects of radiotherapy management of breast cancer.

METHODS

A fifty-eight question survey was disseminated via the Survey Monkey digital platform to 388 Radiation Oncologists in Australia and New Zealand.

RESULTS

In total, 156 responses were received and collated. Areas of notable consensus among respondents included hypofractionation (77.3% of respondents would 'always' or 'sometimes' consider hypofractionation in the management of ductal carcinoma in-situ and 99.3% in early invasive breast cancer); margin status in early breast cancer (73.8% believe a clear inked margin is sufficient and does not require further surgery) and use of bolus in post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) (91.1% of participants use bolus in PMRT). Areas with a wider degree of variability amongst respondents included regional nodal irradiation and components of radiotherapy planning and delivery (examples include the technique used for delivery of boost and frequency of bolus application for PMRT).

CONCLUSION

The results of these patterns of practice survey informs radiation oncologists in Australia and New Zealand of the current clinical practices being implemented by their peers. The survey identifies areas of consensus and contention, the latter of which may lead to a development of research trials and/or educational activities to address these areas of uncertainty.

Australian survey on current practices for breast radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Detailed, published surveys specific to Australian breast radiotherapy practice were last conducted in 2002. More recent international surveys specific to breast radiotherapy practice include a European survey conducted in 2008/2009 and a Spanish survey conducted in 2009. Radiotherapy techniques continue to evolve, and the utilisation of new techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), is increasing. This survey aimed to determine current breast radiotherapy practices across Australia.

METHOD

An online survey was completed by 50 of the 69 Australian radiation therapy treatment centres.

RESULTS

Supine tangential beam whole breast irradiation remains the standard of care for breast radiotherapy in Australia. A growing number of institutions are exploring prone positioning and IMRT utilisation. This survey demonstrated a wide variation in the benchmarks used to limit and report organ at risk doses, prescribed dose regimen, and post-mastectomy bolus practices. This survey also indicated, when compared with international literature, that there may be less interest in or uptake of external beam partial breast irradiation, prone positioning, simultaneous integrated boost and breath hold techniques. These are areas where further review and research may be warranted to ensure Australian patients are receiving the best care possible based on the best evidence available.

CONCLUSION

This survey provides insight into the current radiotherapy practice for breast cancer in Australia.

Radiation techniques used in patients with breast cancer: Results of a survey in Spain

AIM

To evaluate the resources and techniques used in the irradiation of patients with breast cancer after lumpectomy or mastectomy and the status of implementation of new techniques and therapeutic schedules in our country.

BACKGROUND

The demand for cancer care has increased among the Spanish population, as long as cancer treatment innovations have proliferated. Radiation therapy in breast cancer has evolved exponentially in recent years with the implementation of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity modulated radiotherapy, image guided radiotherapy and hypofractionation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An original survey questionnaire was sent to institutions participating in the SEOR-Mama group (GEORM). In total, the standards of practice in 969 patients with breast cancer after surgery were evaluated.

RESULTS

The response rate was 70% (28/40 centers). In 98.5% of cases 3D conformal treatment was used. All the institutions employed CT-based planning treatment. Boost was performed in 56.4% of patients: electrons in 59.8%, photons in 23.7% and HDR brachytherapy in 8.8%. Fractionation was standard in 93.1% of patients. Supine position was the most frequent. Only 3 centers used prone position. The common organs of risk delimited were: homolateral lung (80.8%) and heart (80.8%). In 84% histograms were used. An 80.8% of the centers used isocentric technique. In 62.5% asymmetric fields were employed. CTV was delimited in 46.2%, PTV in 65% and both in 38.5%. A 65% of the centers checked with portal films. IMRT and hypofractionation were used in 1% and in 5.5% respectively.

CONCLUSION

In most of centers, 3D conformal treatment and CT-based planning treatment were used. IMRT and hypofractionation are currently poorly implemented in Spain.

Radiotherapy breast boost with reduced whole-breast dose is associated with improved cosmesis: the results of a comprehensive assessment from the St. George and Wollongong randomized breast boost trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate comprehensively the effect of a radiotherapy boost on breast cosmetic outcomes after 5 years in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery.

METHODS

The St. George and Wollongong trial (NCT00138814) randomized 688 patients with histologically proven Tis-2, N 0-1, M0 carcinoma to the control arm of 50 Gy in 25 fractions (342 patients) and the boost arm of 45 Gy in 25 fractions to the whole breast followed by a 16 Gy in 8 fraction electron boost (346 patients). Five-year cosmetic outcomes were assessed by a panel subjectively in 385 patients and objectively using pBRA (relative breast retraction assessment). A subset of patients also had absolute BRA measurements. Clinician assessment and patient self-assessment of overall cosmetic and specific items as well as computer BCCT.core analysis were also performed.

RESULTS

The boost arm had improved cosmetic overall outcomes as scored by the panel and BCCT.core software with 79% (p = 0.016) and 81% (p = 0.004) excellent/good cosmesis respectively compared with 68% in no-boost arm. The boost arm also had lower pBRA and BRA values with a mean difference of 0.60 and 1.82 mm, respectively, but was not statistically significant. There was a very high proportion of overall excellent/good cosmetic outcome in 95% and 93% in the boost and no-boost arms using patient self-assessment. However, no difference in overall and specific items scored by clinician assessment and patient self-assessment was found.

CONCLUSION

The results show the negative cosmetic effect of a 16-Gy boost is offset by a lower whole-breast dose of 45 Gy.

Current technological clinical practice in breast radiotherapy; results of a survey in EORTC-Radiation Oncology Group affiliated institutions

PURPOSE

To evaluate the current technological clinical practice of radiation therapy of the breast in institutions participating in the EORTC-Radiation Oncology Group (EORTC-ROG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A survey was conducted between August 2008 and January 2009 on behalf of the Breast Working Party within the EORTC-ROG. The questionnaire comprised 32 questions on 4 main topics: fractionation schedules, treatment planning methods, volume definitions and position verification procedures.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight institutions out of 16 countries responded (a response rate of 47%). The standard fraction dose was generally 2Gy for both breast and boost treatment, although a 2.67 Gy boost fraction dose is routinely given in British institutions. The main boost modality was electrons in 55%, photons in 47% and brachytherapy in 3% of the institutions (equal use of photon and electron irradiation in 5% of the institutions). All institutions used CT-based treatment planning. Wide variations are seen in the definition of the breast and boost target volumes, with margins around the resection cavity, ranging from 0 to 30 mm. Inverse planned IMRT is available in 27% and breath-hold techniques in 19% of the institutions. The number of patients treated with IMRT and breath-hold varied per institution. Electronic portal imaging for patient set-up is used by 92% of the institutions.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey provides insight in the current practice of radiation technology used in the treatment of breast cancer among institutions participating in EORTC-ROG clinical trials.

Fractionated doses of ionizing radiation confer protection to mesenchymal stem cell pluripotency

BACKGROUND

Although it is clear that radiation therapy can cause tissue injury, the degree of injury that is observed clinically can be highly variable. It is possible that variability in the methods by which ionizing radiation is delivered can contribute to some of the observed variability. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess the effects of various fractionation schedules on the growth and differentiation potential of isolated mesenchymal stem cells in vitro.

METHODS

Isolated mesenchymal stem cells (triplicate studies) were exposed to a dose of 12 Gy of ionizing radiation as a single dose, in two doses of 6 Gy, or in six doses of 2 Gy. Cellular proliferation and the potential for differentiation along the bone and fat lineage were assessed. Potential mechanisms for injury and protection were evaluated by analyzing the expression of p21 and manganese superoxide dismutase.

RESULTS

Delivery of radiation in multiple doses confers significant radioprotection to mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and potential for differentiation. In contrast, delivery of 12 Gy of radiation as a single dose or as two equal doses of 6 Gy results in marked deficiencies in cellular proliferation and potential for multilineage cellular differentiation.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors have demonstrated that even minor alterations in fractionation of radiation dose can result in significant effects on the potential of mesenchymal stem cells to differentiate. These findings imply that at least some of the variability in tissue damage after radiation therapy observed clinically may be attributable to differences in the delivery of ionizing radiation.

Radiation therapy treatment verification imaging in Australia and New Zealand

An original questionnaire was used to investigate the available types of reference and treatment image verification equipment and specific practices related to image analysis. A section on treatment site-specific imaging was included. The questionnaire was distributed to all radiation oncology facilities in Australia and New Zealand. A response rate of 87% (40/46) was achieved. Most facilities (90%) in Australia and New Zealand reported the availability of electronic portal imaging devices. Use of computer software to assist with image interpretation was indicated by 92% of centres. Frequency of image acquisition and tolerance levels used for radical treatment sites were variable, but palliative treatment site protocols were more consistent between treatment facilities. In conclusion, departments should strive to use evidence-based protocols and guidelines to ensure acceptable accuracy in treatment delivery.

CT planning for breast cancer

Radiotherapy to the affected breast or chest wall is well established as an integral part of postoperative management of breast cancer. However, it is known to be associated with increased cardiac and pulmonary morbidities and mortalities. Modern technologies, such as CT planning, have shown to improve treatment planning by accurately delivering optimal doses to the target volumes, while minimizing doses to sensitive structures, thus reducing potential treatment-related adverse effects. The purpose of this study is to report on our experiences with CT planning of adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer.

Engaging Australian physicians in evidence-based medicine: a representative national survey

AIM

To assess Australian adult physicians' views about evidence-based medicine (EBM) and quality improvement (QI).

BACKGROUND

Cross-sectional postal survey of two hundred and forty-four randomly selected Australian physicians (78.5% response rate).

METHOD

Physicians' views about the promotion of EBM and QI and their impact on patient care, strategies to support better clinical practice and self-reported understanding of EBM terms.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight per cent (95% confidence interval (CI): 62-74%) of physicians had a positive view of the current promotion of EBM in Australia. Significantly fewer (45%; 95% CI: 38-51%) were so positive about QI (P <0.001). Although 74% (95% CI: 68-79%) indicated that EBM improves patient care, significantly fewer (46%; 95% CI: 40-53%) held this view with respect to QI (P <0.001). Although 70% (95% CI: 64-76%) of physicians agreed they had adequate skills to search for evidence, significantly fewer (21%; 95% CI: 17-27%) agreed they had sufficient time to do so (P <0.001). EBM skills were positively associated with involvement in teaching. Physicians were significantly more positive about approaches exclusive to themselves compared with those involving other disciplines.

CONCLUSIONS

Although Australian physicians have positive views of EBM, QI appears less well regarded. Initiatives to improve quality and safety that incorporate principles and language of EBM will likely be received better by physicians than isolated QI. Further enhancement of EBM requires concomitant attention to physician training, workplace infrastructure and supportive professional development.

Changes in practice of breast cancer radiotherapy 1998-2002: An Australasian survey

In order to assess the impact on radiation oncology practice of the publication of evidence-based guidelines for technical aspects of therapeutic radiation for breast cancer, the Radiation Oncology Expert Advisory Group of the National Breast Cancer Centre conducted two postal surveys of radiation oncologists practising in Australia and New Zealand. Results from a survey conducted in 1998, prior to distribution of the guidelines, have been published previously. This article reports on results from a survey undertaken in 2002 and contains data from 102 respondents who manage women with breast cancer. The results show several important changes in practice since 1998, including increased use of CT scanning in breast cancer treatment planning and increased use of immobilization devices for patient treatment. There is also evidence of increased attention to technical aspects of treatment planning that reduce the potential risk of treatment toxicity. The influence of the guidelines, the wider availability of modern equipment and results from landmark clinical trials on change in radiation therapy practice is discussed.

Randomized, paired comparison of No-Sting Barrier Film versus sorbolene cream (10% glycerine) skin care during postmastectomy irradiation

PURPOSE

Postmastectomy irradiation provides an excellent model for irradiated skin care practices because of the relatively uniform surface and radiation compared with other situations in which radiation-induced moist desquamation is common. We designed a study to test the effect of prophylactic 3M Cavilon No-Sting Barrier Film (No-Sting) on the rates of moist desquamation compared with sorbolene cream (with 10% glycerin).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The irradiated chest wall was divided into medial and lateral halves. Sixty-one women were randomized to have No-Sting applied to either the medial or lateral half, with the alternate half treated with sorbolene.

RESULTS

For all patients, the skin toxicity, calculated as the area under the curve, mean No-Sting and sorbolene score was 8.1 vs. 9.2, respectively (p = 0.005, Wilcoxon signed rank test). The total number of weeks of moist desquamation for the 61 patients was 40 vs. 45, equating to a mean of 0.65 week vs. 0.74 week per patient in the No-Sting and sorbolene-treated areas, respectively. The rates of moist desquamation were 33% vs. 46% (p = 0.096, McNemar's Exact test). For 58 fully assessable patients (minimum of 7 weekly observations), the area under the curve and rates of moist desquamation were significantly different statistically (p = 0.002 and 0.049, respectively). No statistically significant differences were noted in the pain scores. The pruritus scores were significantly reduced in the No-Sting area (area under the curve, p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

No-Sting reduces the duration and frequency of radiation-induced moist desquamation.

Why a breast boost should remain a controversial aspect of routine breast conservation management in Australia and New Zealand in 2002

Two randomized trials have recently shown a statistically significant improvement in local control when a boost is employed in the conservative treatment of early breast cancer. However, unresolved issues of cost effectiveness, potentially increased toxicity and the inability to automatically generalize these results to Australian and New Zealand practice remain. In view of these unresolved controversies, the St George and Wollongong hospitals breast boost trial (SGW trial) will continue to recruit.