Different remodelling against left ventricular overload between diabetic and non-diabetic haemodialysis patients

Computational analysis of the hemodynamic characteristics under interaction influence of β-blocker and LVAD

Background

Hemodynamic characteristics of the interaction influence among support level and model of LVAD, and coupling β-blocker has not been reported.

Methods

In this study, the effect of support level and model of LVAD on cardiovascular hemodynamic characteristics is investigated. In addition, the effect of β-blocker on unloading with LVAD is analyzed to elucidate the mechanism of LVAD coupling β-blocker. A multi-scale model from cell level to system level is proposed. Moreover, LVAD coupling β-blocker has been researching to explain the hemodynamics of cardiovascular system.

Results

Myocardial force was decreased along with the increase of support level of LVAD, and co-pulse mode was the lowest among the three support modes. Additionally, the β-blocker combined with LVAD significantly reduced the left ventricular volume compared with LVAD support without β-blocker. However, the left ventricular pressure under both cases has no significant difference. External work of right ventricular was increased along with the growth of support level of only LVAD. The LVAD under co-pulse mode achieved the lowest right-ventricular EW among the three support modes.

Conclusions

Co-pulse mode with β-blocker could be an optimal strategy for promoting cardiac structure and function recovery.

Altered proximal aortic stiffness and endothelin plasma levels in diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease

Peripheral artery stiffness is altered in diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), whereas few data exist to confirm this trend for proximal aortic stiffness. The pulse wave velocity of the proximal aorta (PWVr) and of the carotid-to-femoral aortic segment (PWVcf) were determined by ultrasound imaging in 160 patients with ESRD (70 diabetic) and in 160 matched control subjects. Also, plasma levels of endothelin, homocysteine, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were determined in both groups. Patients with ESRD had increased pulse pressure, left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic diameter, LV mass index, PWVr, and PWVcf compared with control subjects (p < 0.05). Diabetic patients had increased LV mass index, PWVr, and PWVcf compared with nondiabetic patients with ESRD (p < 0.05). Endothelin levels exhibited a strong relation with PWVr (r = 0.32, p < 0.001) and PWVcf (r = 0.33, p < 0.001) measurements in ESRD patients. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that age, diabetes, and plasma levels of endothelin were major determinants of increased PWVr measurements in the total ESRD population. After adjustment for age, body surface area, time on dialysis, systolic blood pressure, history of hypertension, and plasma endothelin levels, diabetes was an independent factor associated with PWVr in ESRD subjects. Diabetic patients with ESRD had significantly increased proximal aortic stiffness and significantly altered plasma levels of endothelin as compared with the nondiabetic.

Brain Natriuretic Peptide and N-Terminal proBNP in Chronic Haemodialysis Patients

BACKGROUND

Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) are released into circulation as a result of congestive heart failure (HF). As HF and water overload are frequent complications in haemodialysis (HD) patients, we decided to study the levels of BNP and NT-proBNP and their changes during HD.

METHODS

BNP and NT-proBNP levels were determined in 94 HD patients before and after a regular 4-h HD. We followed changes in these peptides during HD depending on age, sex, HF (NYHA classification and left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF]), duration on HD, presence of hypertension, coronary artery disease, type of membrane used for HD [low-flux (LFx) or high-flux (HFx)] and body mass change during HD. Furthermore, patients basic medication and creatinine levels and presence of diabetes mellitus were monitored.

RESULTS

Respectively,94% and 100% of the patients had pre-dialysis concentrations of BNP and NT-proBNP above the cut-off values for HF. The marker levels correlated significantly both before and after HD (r = 0.903 and 0.888, respectively, p < 0.001). BNP levels significantly decreased (p < 0.0001), whereas NT-proBNP significantly increased (p < 0.0001) during HD on LFx membranes. HD on HFx membranes caused greater decrease of BNP (compared to LFx membranes, p < 0.001), but also a decrease of NT-proBNP (p < 0.001).We did not find any significant differences in marker levels for HF and non-HF patients (NYHA classification). However, both peptides reached higher levels in the group with LVEF < or = 50% (p < 0.001 for both peptides). Body mass change during HD negatively correlated only with the change of NT-proBNP (r = -0.27, p < 0.05). In the multiple regression model, the change of both peptides during HD was significantly influenced by membrane type (p = 0.003 for BNP and p = 0.001 for NT-proBNP). NT-proBNP change during HD was further significantly influenced by LVEF (p = 0.012), sex (p = 0.002) and duration on HD (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Both BNP and NT-proBNP levels were significantly increased in HD patients prior to dialysis. The change in concentrations of both peptides during HD is influenced by membrane type. HD probably triggers increased production of both peptides and this increase is emphasized by impaired LVEF. This fact can be clinically observed only on NT-proBNP levels, because BNP levels are biased by significant removal of this protein during HD.